ライフサイエンスコーパス: FLAIR image

1 We visualized the BF using T2-weighted FLAIR images.

2 weighted spin-echo images and in 20 cases on FLAIR images.

3 ngeal metastases were detected by using only FLAIR images.

4 T1-weighted images than on postcontrast fast FLAIR images.

5 images and can be seen only on 2-mm sagittal FLAIR images.

6 nd other areas better with postcontrast fast FLAIR imaging.

7 typically better seen with postcontrast fast FLAIR imaging.

8 ft and right hippocampi was smallest at fast FLAIR imaging.

9 tropic-resolution (0.55 x 0.55 x 0.55 mm(3)) FLAIR* images.

10 ased on fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery (FLAIR) imaging.

11 nd fast fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery (FLAIR) imaging.

12 ratentorially (P = .05) but were similar for FLAIR imaging (0.90 +/- 0.06) and T2-weighted MR imaging

13 ed A(1) scores were significantly better for FLAIR imaging (0.96 +/- 0.01 [standard error]) than for

14 and location were equally represented on the FLAIR images (11 000/100-200/2600 [repetition time msec/

15 ysis of the DEFUSE 2 study, 35 patients with FLAIR images acquired both after endovascular therapy (m

16 - 0.02, and 0.89 +/- 0.04, respectively, for FLAIR imaging and 0.77 +/- 0.06, 0.99 +/- 0.01, and 0.89

17 of chronic seizures warrants T2-weighted or FLAIR imaging and gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted imagin

18 rmance in the detection of MS lesions on the FLAIR images, as estimated by using areas under the alte

19 eighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) images at disease onset and during follow-up.

20 apy have significantly less lesion growth on FLAIR images between after therapy and day 5 compared wi

21 ce (MR) fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) images between the images after endovascular ther

22 only produced higher SNR for T1-weighted and FLAIR images but also higher CNRs for all three sequence

23 te SAH cases were interpreted as abnormal on FLAIR images by both readers.

24 An artificially hyperintense signal on FLAIR images can result from magnetic susceptibility art

25 -enhanced T1-weighted images are better than FLAIR images for detecting leptomeningeal metastases.

26 and signal intensity were assessed by using FLAIR imaging for the initial lesion (ie, visible after

27 FLAIR imaging has a sensitivity of 34% for cytologically

28 Fast FLAIR images have noticeable T1 contrast making gadolini

29 Observers did better with FLAIR imaging in the detection of cortical lesions, and

30 Findings on FLAIR* images included intralesional veins for lesions l

31 However, postcontrast fast FLAIR images may be useful for detecting superficial abn

32 T2 measurements obtained at dual-echo fast FLAIR imaging may help detect subtle hippocampal abnorma

33 High-isotropic-resolution FLAIR* images obtained at 3.0 T yield high contrast for

34 High-quality FLAIR* images of the brain were produced at 3.0 T, yield

35 igher for FLAIR* images than for T2-weighted FLAIR images (P < .0001).

36 Fast FLAIR imaging provided the smallest normal range and SD

37 ent in 14 studies, whereas postcontrast fast FLAIR images showed superior enhancement in 15 studies.

38 lesions that are hyperintense on precontrast FLAIR images, such as intraparenchymal tumors, may be be

39 upratentorially, performance was better with FLAIR imaging than with T2-weighted MR imaging.

40 ein CNR values were significantly higher for FLAIR* images than for T2-weighted FLAIR images (P < .00

41 er, the T2-weighted, FIESTA, and T2-weighted FLAIR images that used the CSF cleft sign to predict adh

42 ed with fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) imaging; the use of intravenously administered co

43 ttributing increased CSF signal intensity on FLAIR images to abnormal CSF properties such as hemorrha

44 The accuracy of FLAIR images was 97% versus 91% for SE images (P<.02).

45 mm fast fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery (FLAIR) imaging was added to the routine MR studies of th

46 hree-dimensional (3D) magnetization prepared FLAIR images were acquired in 12 volunteers (0.8 3 0.8 3

47 FLAIR images were evaluated for the severity of the dise

48 FLAIR images were interpreted blindly and independently

49 he sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of FLAIR imaging were 86%, 91%, and 89%; the sensitivity, s

50 eighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) imaging were reviewed to identify the presence of

51 ts, a healthy volunteer underwent sequential FLAIR imaging while breathing high-flow 100% O2.

52 Measurements were performed on axial FLAIR images with section thickness of less than 5 mm.