ライフサイエンスコーパス: FLAIR

1 FLAIR abnormality correlates moderately with the activat

2 FLAIR also appears to be highly sensitive but nonspecifi

3 FLAIR exemplifies a generally applicable approach for ex

4 FLAIR images were evaluated for the severity of the dise

5 FLAIR images were interpreted blindly and independently

6 FLAIR imaging has a sensitivity of 34% for cytologically

7 FLAIR is highly sensitive and specific for the diagnosis

8 FLAIR MR imaging was performed in 62 patients (21 with p

9 FLAIR provides images with T2-weighted contrast and comp

10 FLAIR revealed precise spatial control of growth factor-

11 FLAIR scores were significantly higher than T2-weighted

12 tropic-resolution (0.55 x 0.55 x 0.55 mm(3)) FLAIR* images.

13 ical regions with high-spatial-resolution 3D FLAIR MR imaging at 7.0 T.

14 n with a single-slab, three-dimensional (3D) FLAIR sequence.

15 luated for the severity of the disease and a FLAIR/DWI score was used.

16 Incorporation of a FLAIR sequence into the routine MR evaluation of patient

17 presents with hyperintense signals on T2 and FLAIR sequences.

18 -white junction, increased signal on T2- and FLAIR-weighted images in the gray and subcortical white

19 only produced higher SNR for T1-weighted and FLAIR images but also higher CNRs for all three sequence

20 Measurements were performed on axial FLAIR images with section thickness of less than 5 mm.

21 se data have important implications, because FLAIR is performed without the costs and inherent risks

22 In the 24 patients who underwent both FLAIR and gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted MR imaging, th

23 There were 58 studies in which both FLAIR and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted spin-echo MR ima

24 ncreased CSF signal intensity noted on brain FLAIR MR images.

25 e protein was identified in 70 (75%) ears by FLAIR MR-imaging and was strongly associated with the pr

26 A method called FLAIR (fluorescence activation indicator for Rho protein

27 rops was identified on delayed post-contrast FLAIR sequences.

28 Fast FLAIR and fast SE imaging provided the smallest coeffici

29 Fast FLAIR images have noticeable T1 contrast making gadolini

30 Fast FLAIR imaging provided the smallest normal range and SD

31 ft and right hippocampi was smallest at fast FLAIR imaging.

32 T2 measurements obtained at dual-echo fast FLAIR imaging may help detect subtle hippocampal abnorma

33 However, postcontrast fast FLAIR images may be useful for detecting superficial abn

34 ent in 14 studies, whereas postcontrast fast FLAIR images showed superior enhancement in 15 studies.

35 T1-weighted images than on postcontrast fast FLAIR images.

36 nd other areas better with postcontrast fast FLAIR imaging.

37 typically better seen with postcontrast fast FLAIR imaging.

38 The first FLAIR sequence was performed with the child breathing 10

39 cted contralateral tissue, and 98 +/- 12 for FLAIR hyperintense regions surrounding tumors.

40 ed A(1) scores were significantly better for FLAIR imaging (0.96 +/- 0.01 [standard error]) than for

41 ein CNR values were significantly higher for FLAIR* images than for T2-weighted FLAIR images (P < .00

42 - 0.02, and 0.89 +/- 0.04, respectively, for FLAIR imaging and 0.77 +/- 0.06, 0.99 +/- 0.01, and 0.89

43 ratentorially (P = .05) but were similar for FLAIR imaging (0.90 +/- 0.06) and T2-weighted MR imaging

44 the second echo of the SE sequence than for FLAIR (P<.002).

45 Results All 35 patients had FLAIR lesion growth between the after-revascularization

46 only partially overlapped with areas of high FLAIR lesion probability, confirming the contribution of

47 and brain MRI in T1- and T2-weighted images, FLAIR and DWI sequences are the method of choice in pati

48 erred for gadolinium-enhanced brain imaging, FLAIR and T1-weighted MR imaging with MT saturation were

49 seizures are best evaluated with nonenhanced FLAIR or T2-weighted imaging for low-grade tumors, vascu

50 he sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of FLAIR for both readers were 82%, 93%, and 90%.

51 ll sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of FLAIR for both readers were 85%, 93%, and 90%.

52 The accuracy of FLAIR images was 97% versus 91% for SE images (P<.02).

53 he sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of FLAIR imaging were 86%, 91%, and 89%; the sensitivity, s

54 logists preferred the contrast properties of FLAIR to those of SE images by a significant margin (P<.

55 s a moderate correlation with the volumes of FLAIR abnormality in metastases (rho = -0.50) and mening

56 te SAH cases were interpreted as abnormal on FLAIR images by both readers.

57 weighted spin-echo images and in 20 cases on FLAIR images.

58 Findings on FLAIR* images included intralesional veins for lesions l

59 apy have significantly less lesion growth on FLAIR images between after therapy and day 5 compared wi

60 ttributing increased CSF signal intensity on FLAIR images to abnormal CSF properties such as hemorrha

61 An artificially hyperintense signal on FLAIR images can result from magnetic susceptibility art

62 ngeal metastases were detected by using only FLAIR images.

63 of chronic seizures warrants T2-weighted or FLAIR imaging and gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted imagin

64 lesions that are hyperintense on precontrast FLAIR images, such as intraparenchymal tumors, may be be

65 hree-dimensional (3D) magnetization prepared FLAIR images were acquired in 12 volunteers (0.8 3 0.8 3

66 High-quality FLAIR* images of the brain were produced at 3.0 T, yield

67 ense on fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) 1H images (edema).

68 ting or fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) contrast.

69 en fast fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) data and enhancement volume with activation (Spea

70 eighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) images at disease onset and during follow-up.

71 ce (MR) fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) images between the images after endovascular ther

72 eighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) imaging were reviewed to identify the presence of

73 ed with fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) imaging; the use of intravenously administered co

74 ex with fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging at 7.0 T, whole-b

75 ed 2572 fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) MRI scans from 262 participants in two phase 2 st

76 al (2D) fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequence with those seen with a single-slab, thre

77 ocal T2 fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) signal hyperintensities, ventricular size increas

78 cluding fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and perfusion

79 mm fast fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery (FLAIR) imaging was added to the routine MR studies of th

80 ased on fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery (FLAIR) imaging.

81 nd fast fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery (FLAIR) imaging.

82 mulated fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery (FLAIR) magnetic resonance (MR) images obtained at differ

83 SE) and fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery (FLAIR) T2-weighted sequences and an ultra-low-SAR 3D spo

84 ng plus fluid-attenuated inversion recovery [FLAIR] at 3-mm section thickness) were compared with old

85 nt were determined utilizing high resolution FLAIR, the presence of cochlear aperture obstruction was

86 High-isotropic-resolution FLAIR* images obtained at 3.0 T yield high contrast for

87 images and can be seen only on 2-mm sagittal FLAIR images.

88 ts, a healthy volunteer underwent sequential FLAIR imaging while breathing high-flow 100% O2.

89 ing a t test for both tumors and surrounding FLAIR hyperintense tissues versus GM, WM, CSF, and contr

90 l intensity of the affected areas on T1, T2, FLAIR and DW sequences were recorded.

91 On T2-FLAIR and T1-weighted black-blood imaging, lymphatic ves

92 hted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (T2/FLAIR) signal in cortical white matter.

93 -enhanced T1-weighted images are better than FLAIR images for detecting leptomeningeal metastases.

94 The total number of regions involved and the FLAIR/DWI score did not vary significantly between both

95 e blinded reviewers independently graded the FLAIR and SE images in 36 patients with intractable comp

96 and location were equally represented on the FLAIR images (11 000/100-200/2600 [repetition time msec/

97 rmance in the detection of MS lesions on the FLAIR images, as estimated by using areas under the alte

98 er enhancement was more conspicuous with the FLAIR or T1-weighted sequences.

99 during general anesthesia with propofol, two FLAIR sequences were performed in 20 children with Ameri

100 Unenhanced FLAIR is superior to gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted MR

101 and signal intensity were assessed by using FLAIR imaging for the initial lesion (ie, visible after

102 igher for FLAIR* images than for T2-weighted FLAIR images (P < .0001).

103 er, the T2-weighted, FIESTA, and T2-weighted FLAIR images that used the CSF cleft sign to predict adh

104 We visualized the BF using T2-weighted FLAIR images.

105 Images from a T2-weighted FLAIR sequence were combined with images from a T2*-weig

106 MRI at 3T with FLAIR and multiple channel coils identifies and clarifie

107 Observers did better with FLAIR imaging in the detection of cortical lesions, and

108 upratentorially, performance was better with FLAIR imaging than with T2-weighted MR imaging.

109 ysis of the DEFUSE 2 study, 35 patients with FLAIR images acquired both after endovascular therapy (m

110 s-to-background tissue C/N was superior with FLAIR (P<.0001).

111 hods (T1- and T2-weighted MR imaging without FLAIR at 5-mm section thickness).