ライフサイエンスコーパス: FRAP

1 FRAP (fluorescence recovery after photobleaching) assays

2 FRAP and DPPH showed a high correlation with ascorbic ac

3 FRAP and photo-conversion experiments demonstrate that t

4 FRAP and TEAC assays showed high correlations with total

5 FRAP studies revealed that, unlike at nuclear pores, the

6 FRAP studies show that caveolae domains increase the imm

7 FRAP values increased correspondingly by 62%, 387%, 747%

8 olox) and the reduction of Fe(3+)to Fe(2+) - FRAP (microM Fe(2+)).

9 d losses of 29%, 8%, 12%, 12% (DPPH) and 9% (FRAP), respectively for CHE samples at the end of storag

10 ing potent cellular inhibition activity in a FRAP model of CREBBP and chromatin association.

11 This study proposes a FRAP assay adapted to FIA system with a merging zones co

12 um salt (ABTS(+)), Fe(III) reducing ability (FRAP) and linoleic acid co-oxidation initiated by soybea

13 mg gallic acid equivalents/g, RSC (ABTS(+)), FRAP and ORAC values were 31.9-109.8, 32.3-61.8 and 141.

14 ic compounds and antioxidant activity (ABTS, FRAP and ORAC methods)) of 30 grape cultivars of white,

15 e than 24, 12 and 53mmol TE/100gdm, by ABTS, FRAP and ORAC, respectively).

16 ant and antimicrobial effects by DPPH, ABTS, FRAP, ORAC and agar disc diffusion methods, respectively

17 gallic acid equiv/g, respectively for ABTS, FRAP and TP).

18 y by different in vitro methodologies (ABTS, FRAP, DPPH, ORAC, HOSC).

19 ic content (TPC) and antioxidant activities (FRAP, ABTS(+), DPPH) in free and bound phenolics were de

20 acid, polyphenols and antioxidant activity (FRAP and DPPH) of a smoothie were compared to thermal pr

21 Serum antioxidant activity (FRAP, ABTS), as well as lipid peroxidation (TBARS) were

22 osic acid content) and antioxidant activity (FRAP, ABTS).

23 olSA/g and 6.9-92.1mumolSA/g for AuNP, AgNP, FRAP, DPPH and FC methods, respectively.

24 -9937 mumol sinapic acid (SA)/100g for AgNP, FRAP, DPPH and FC methods, respectively.

25 Knockout of TOCA-1 does not alter FRAP kinetics of GFP ZO-1 or occludin, but longer term (

26 tioxidant activities (i.e., ABTS (42.2%) and FRAP (0.81 mM)) and alpha-amylase inhibitory activity (6

27 (i.e., ABTS scavenging activity (53.3%) and FRAP value (3.71 mM)), whereas pH 6.5 with the same extr

28 DPPH, ABTS and FRAP assays showed the highest activity for raw garlic s

29 for antioxidant potential by DPPH, ABTS and FRAP assays, and for antimicrobial activity by the agar

30 es, based on a combination of DPPH, ABTS and FRAP assays.

31 LC and antioxidant capacity by TEAC ABTS and FRAP methods) properties of plum powders.

32 d vitamin C), antioxidant capacity (ABTS and FRAP), and sensory attributes (e.g. hardness, jujube-ID,

33 ated for antioxidant capacity (AC) (ABTS and FRAP), total soluble phenolics (TP), browning index (BI)

34 The AC (ABTS and FRAP), TPs and HMF ranged between 124-722, 95-802mumoles

35 DPPH, ABTS radical scavenging activity, and FRAP.

36 observed between total phenolic content and FRAP (R(2) = 0.98) and DPPH (R(2) = 0.66) assays.

37 significantly (P<0.05) reduced TPC, DPPH and FRAP activity of the fruit beverages.

38 DPPH and FRAP antioxidant assays showed marked increases in antio

39 be used to get rough estimates for DPPH and FRAP antioxidant capacities.

40 ical and reducing activities in the DPPH and FRAP assay, although in the liposome model, the guaiacyl

41 apacities were determined using the DPPH and FRAP assay, respectively.

42 The antioxidant DPPH and FRAP assays and chemical profile were determined by colo

43 ctivity using conventional methods (DPPH and FRAP assays) and correlated the results with the total p

44 contents and antioxidant capacity (DPPH and FRAP assays) in Moscatel dessert wines (n=56).

45 enging activity, determined by both DPPH and FRAP assays, and the high resveratrol content confer hig

46 and antioxidant activity, using the DPPH and FRAP assays, was obtained for kisra prepared from both c

47 s well as AA, evaluated using ABTS, DPPH and FRAP assays.

48 ned the antioxidant capacity (ABTS, DPPH and FRAP methods), total phenolic content and color analysis

49 Baking improves the DPPH and FRAP of the kisra prepared from two cultivars.

50 DPPH and FRAP showed low antioxidant activity for the extract.

51 5326.7 mg/100 g DM) and the highest DPPH and FRAP values (2027.9 and 3539.6 mumol TE/100 g DM, respec

52 ificant correlation with results of DPPH and FRAP.

53 The results of ABTS, DPPH, and FRAP assays showed that above ground parts generally dis

54 nt, antioxidant capacity (ABTS(+), DPPH, and FRAP), quality (CIELAB colour parameters), and microbiol

55 hen samples assessed employing the DPPH- and FRAP-based antioxidant assays.

56 c spines, as revealed by free-barbed end and FRAP assays, consistent with a role for Eps8 as an actin

57 We thus performed simultaneous FCS and FRAP measurements on supported lipid bilayers and live c

58 iscrepancy arises from the fact that FCS and FRAP report on different effective (concentration depend

59 antitative immunofluorescence, RNA FISH, and FRAP measurements revealed atypical promoter recognition

60 heterodimerization was confirmed by FRET and FRAP (fluorescence recovery after photobleach).

61 r both the DPPH (35.338+/-0.908 mg TE/g) and FRAP (77.352+/-0.627 mg TE/g) assays.

62 capacity (426.72 mg ascorbic acid eq./g) and FRAP value (53.04 mumol FeSO4/g) than bran milled to the

63 lts of the DPPH (EC50=0.6-1105.3 mug/ml) and FRAP (0.1-8.5 mmol/g) assays.

64 PF2 with 16 was demonstrated in nanoBRET and FRAP assays.

65 allic acid, and had relatively high ORAC and FRAP activities.

66 was determined by ABTS(+), DPPH radical, and FRAP assays.

67 berries showed much higher TSP, TMA, RSA and FRAP values than V. uliginosum subsp. gaultherioides fru

68 dant capacities were established by TEAC and FRAP methods.

69 r antioxidant activity than acai in TEAC and FRAP tests.

70 The AC was measured by TEAC and FRAP.

71 Highest TPC, TEAC- and FRAP values were observed in systems containing citrus p

72 antly (p<0.05) higher recovery of TP, TF and FRAP antioxidant activity.

73 sented significantly (p<0.05) higher TPC and FRAP (0.083mgGAE/mgdw; 0.101mgTE/mgdw, respectively) tha

74 35 degrees C) determined the highest TPI and FRAP values and the highest temperature (145 degrees C)

75 DPPH and ABTS radical scavenging as well as FRAP assays, the extracts showed a consistent dose-depen

76 ed except the ferric reducing ability assay (FRAP) and Trolox-equivalent antioxidant capacity assay (

77 ferric ion reducing antioxidant power assay (FRAP) and anti-glycation activity by a bovine serum albu

78 n (Fe(3+)) reducing antioxidant power assay (FRAP), ferrous ion (Fe(2+)) metal chelating activity, an

79 by ferric-reducing/antioxidant power assay (FRAP), free radical-scavenging activity (DPPH), nitric o

80 ing ferric-reducing/antioxidant power assay (FRAP), free radical-scavenging activity (DPPH), nitric o

81 In addition, other antioxidant assays (FRAP, ABTS and ORAC) were carried out.

82 tracts were measured using different assays: FRAP, nitric oxide radical scavenging and DPPH.

83 actin incorporation and partially attenuates FRAP recovery, indicating functional interaction between

84 However, microplate-based FRAP (mFRAP) assays are affected by sample volume and co

85 while Afrostyrax lepidophyllus had the best FRAP.

86 important assumption of existing biophysical FRAP and binding models, namely that the pseudo-on bindi

87 fluorescence recovery after photo-bleaching (FRAP) and a p53 reporter assay.

88 ively) than those observed in the blueberry (FRAP: 10 +/- 2 and 19 +/- 3 muM FeSO4/gFW; TEAC: 10 +/-

89 By FRAP and imaging we monitored mobility of calsequestrin

90 ctors of antioxidant capacity as assessed by FRAP (R(2)=0.832) and flavonoids, neochlorogenic acid an

91 ible to measure the diffusion coefficient by FRAP and FCS in the exact same images.

92 VFG motifs, displayed measurable cohesion by FRAP.

93 extract, at the concentration determined by FRAP method, had higher oxidative stability, evidenced b

94 LC-PDA-MS/MS, while the AC was determined by FRAP, ABTS and DPPH assays.

95 Antioxidant capacity, as determined by FRAP, ABTS and ORAC assays, followed the same pattern as

96 n vitro antioxidant capacity was measured by FRAP and DPPH assays.

97 PLS, beer's antioxidant capacity measured by FRAP assay could be predicted with acceptable precision

98 Antioxidant capacity measured by FRAP assay of concentrated apple, blueberry and cranberr

99 s (22%) for antioxidant capacity measured by FRAP.

100 samples were found to be rather moderate by FRAP (ferric reducing antioxidant power), DPPH (1,1-diph

101 Ciocalteu assay) and antioxidant capacities (FRAP and TEAC assay) of strawberry phenolics over time.

102 DW), with pronounced antioxidant capacities (FRAP: 5030.5 to 4244.9 mumol Fe(2+)/g DW; ORAC: 3861.5 t

103 , total flavonoids and antioxidant capacity (FRAP and DPPH).

104 noids, ferric reducing antioxidant capacity (FRAP) and 2,2-diphenyl-1-picryhydrazyl (DPPH) free radic

105 lation with markers of antioxidant capacity (FRAP, ABTS, Folin-Ciocalteu).

106 action with AlCl3) and antioxidant capacity (FRAP, ORAC, DPPH).

107 venging activity, ferric reduction capacity (FRAP) and total phenolic content (TPC).

108 spectrophotometric studies (Folin-Ciocalteu, FRAP, ABTS) to infusions and decoctions of ten plant spe

109 Phenolic content, FRAP/DPPH assays and the colour coordinates were determi

110 860+/-116mg of Trolox as measured by CUPRAC, FRAP, DPPH and ABTS, respectively.

111 elial barrier function, exhibit differential FRAP dynamics, and compete for residency within the TJ.

112 ectable concentration, and the dimensionless FRAP-value.

113 uated through different methods (ABTS, DPPH, FRAP and ORAC).

114 rent regardless of antioxidant assays (DPPH, FRAP, and TEAC) used.

115 and three in vitro antioxidant assays: DPPH, FRAP, and ORAC.

116 d the antioxidant capacity measured by DPPH, FRAP and ABTS.

117 Pure organosulphur compounds tested by DPPH, FRAP and beta-carotene bleaching assays showed that alli

118 antioxidant activities, as measured by DPPH, FRAP and ORAC assays.

119 cant decrease in antioxidant capacity (DPPH, FRAP and ABTS), total phenolic (TP) and ascorbic acid (A

120 oxidant activity than R. idaeus in the DPPH, FRAP and TEAC assays.

121 ol content, antioxidant capacity using DPPH, FRAP and TEAC assays, and specific anthocyanins were det

122 oxidant activities were evaluated with DPPH, FRAP and ABTS assays and the in vitro vasodilatory effec

123 our results indicate that myocardial NADH ED-FRAP is a useful optical non-destructive approach for as

124 NADH ED-FRAP parameters were optimized to deliver 23.8 mJ of pho

125 myocardium of perfused hearts using NADH ED-FRAP.

126 uorescence recovery after photobleaching (ED-FRAP) of NADH has been shown to be an effective approach

127 The entire FRAP experiment preparation, data acquisition and analys

128 le peel extract had significantly higher FC, FRAP and DPPH(.) scavenging values than those of dried a

129 Previous interpretations of FDAP/FRAP data have revealed dwell times of tau on MTs in the

130 sed phenomenological interpretations of FDAP/FRAP data, we have generalized the standard two-state re

131 ies, ferric ion-chelation capacity, ferric- (FRAP), and phosphomolybdenum-reducing antioxidant power

132 Finally, FRAP was used to determine cell population specific coup

133 assessed by complementary methods (ORAC-Fl, FRAP and DPPH assay), phenolic composition of each extra

134 2 to 26667.45micromol Fe(+2) 100g(-1) DW for FRAP; and 957.72 to 2061.35mg GAE 100g(-1) DW for Folin-

135 elenium, chlorogenic acid and flavonoids for FRAP (R(2)=0.711).

136 d by the polyphenolic and aqueous fractions, FRAP, ORAC and DPPH, in that order.

137 that model initial conditions extracted from FRAP postbleach intensities prevent underestimation of d

138 icients was close to the value obtained from FRAP in the identical area.

139 to extract binding and diffusion rates from FRAP recovery curves, active transport of molecules is t

140 tages, showing greater values in ripe fruit (FRAP: 24 +/- 2 and 28 +/- 3 muM FeSO4/gFW; TEAC: 18 +/-

141 Furthermore, FRAP analysis provides the possibility of a relatively h

142 Furthermore, FRAP studies demonstrate that phosphorylation at this si

143 activity (ABTS - 2765.3micromol TE/100g FW, FRAP - 1663.67micromol TE/100g FW), with the lowest cont

144 2g/g DPPH; and 3027.31-3216.27mumol Fe2SO4/g FRAP) were found to be exceptionally higher than those o

145 d equivalent antioxidant capacity (AEAC)/g), FRAP (1022.05mumol FeSO4/g), TPC (915.7mg gallic acid eq

146 GCF FRAP level was lower in CsA GO- than in H (P = 0.04).

147 EAC/gDW (DPPH assay), 35.35 mmol Fe(II)/gDW (FRAP assay), and 46.37 mmol TE/gDW (ABTS(+) assay).

148 ics (1251-2115mg GAE kg(-1) FW) and greatest FRAP values (25.9-43.2mM TE kg(-1) FW).

149 %), whereas aqueous extracts showed a higher FRAP value compared to ethanol extracts (0.98 and 0.61mm

150 lour), while the Monty variety showed higher FRAP values, vitamin C (189.06 mg/100g flour), flavonoid

151 HB showed the highest FRAP activity.

152 e with the observed PCNA recruitment data if FRAP is not used.

153 ree independent measures-calibrated imaging, FRAP, and photoconversion-we find that the Dam1 submodul

154 for taking measures to significantly improve FRAP data interpretation and analysis.

155 Combining modelling, an improved FRAP methodology and direct semi-quantitative analysis o

156 r of SRB in the microdomains was assessed in FRAP studies of circular photobleached regions ( approxi

157 35% increase in TFC; and 18-35% increases in FRAP activity.

158 , in particular the high bleach intensity in FRAP, the bleach corrections, and the fitting procedures

159 analysis, there was a resurging interest in FRAP applications.

160 and fitting introduce large uncertainties in FRAP.

161 tionation, immunoprecipitation, and inversal FRAP experiments show that the actin depolymerization pr

162 OH and ABTS(+) radicals, and to reduce iron (FRAP).

163 our highly accepted assays and confirmed its FRAP, ORAC, beta-CLAMS and PCL values to be 79.95 mumol

164 anthocyanin levels correlated with measured FRAP antioxidant capacities, for some cultivars the indi

165 AgNP method (RSD=1.4-4.4%) and the modified FRAP, DPPH and FC methods (RSD=1.0-4.4%, 0.7-2.1% and 0.

166 e demonstrate a single-point single-molecule FRAP microscopy technique that enables determination of

167 Moreover, FRAP assay was more sensitive to measure this parameter

168 uorescence recovery after photobleaching (MP-FRAP) of injected FITC-BSA, a 32.6% decrease in lymph sp

169 Multiphoton FRAP provided the specific binding constants for alpha-s

170 The implementation of FRAP and SMT measurements in identical areas provides co

171 tioxidant activities in terms of rankings of FRAP, DPPH activities, TPC, TFC and vitamin C content.

172 evelopment of a novel approach, a variant of FRAP (fluorescent recovery after photo-bleaching) modifi

173 ds by using three different analytical ORAC, FRAP, and ABTS; the effects of treatments were very posi

174 ifferent antioxidant assays, including ORAC, FRAP and DPPH, were monitored on crude jujube extract (C

175 Our FRAP (fluorescence recovery after photobleaching) measur

176 We performed FRAP experiments on XTC cells to compare SiMS to FRAP on

177 fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) analyses revealed that expression of STIM1 DQ muta

178 fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) analysis demonstrated that exposure to bile salts

179 fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) analysis of actin filament mobility in intact RBCs

180 fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) and binding, which is widely used in biophysics.

181 fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) and fluorescence anisotropy measurements, that for

182 Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) and fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (FCS) ar

183 Fluorescence Recovery After Photobleaching (FRAP) and Fluorescence Correlation Spectroscopy (FCS), o

184 fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) and single-molecule tracking (SMT).

185 fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) and single-molecule tracking in human cells, we sh

186 Fluorescence Recovery after Photobleaching (FRAP) and Total Internal Reflection Fluorescence (TIRF)

187 fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) are well established approaches for studying the i

188 fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) are widely used methods to determine diffusion coe

189 fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) as a technique to accurately and robustly measure

190 fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) dynamics in response to inflammatory cytokines.

191 Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) experiments confirmed the differential kinetics of

192 fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) experiments employing overexpression of fluorescen

193 fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) experiments.

194 fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) for determining how many reaction processes partic

195 fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) in transgenic zebrafish with GFP-tagged Ribeye.

196 Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) is a well-established experimental technique to st

197 Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) is a widespread technique used to determine intrac

198 Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) is an excellent tool to measure the chemical rate

199 Fluorescence Recovery After Photobleaching (FRAP) measurements assumes bleaching with a circular las

200 Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) microscopy is used to probe the diffusion properti

201 fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) microscopy.

202 g fluorescent recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) monitoring displacement of GFP-BAZ2A from acetylat

203 fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) of GFP-Galphas.

204 Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) of labeled protein demonstrated that somatic alpha

205 fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) of SC junctions in utricles from mice that express

206 fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) results indicated that NKKY101 mutant cells exhibi

207 fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) revealed that the population of Gag proteins local

208 fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) shows that YscQ exchanges between the injectisome

209 Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) studies indicate that like H1, binding of HP1BP3 t

210 fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) to demonstrate that endoglin forms stable homodime

211 fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) to probe chain mobility in reversible hydrogels as

212 fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) we found that the integrin adhesome is extensively

213 d fluorescent recovery after photobleaching (FRAP), quantitative RT-PCR, and whole cell patch clamp r

214 fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP), we demonstrate that adherens junction proteins ar

215 fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP), we find that Src significantly reduces NEDD9 exch

216 fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP), we have established that the C-terminal LIM domai

217 fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP), we quantitatively assessed the clustering and dyn

218 fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP).

219 orm was made by TEAC assay at different pHs, FRAP assay, and ORAC assay.

220 Plasma FRAP level was higher in H and CsA GO- than in CsA GO+ (

221 y and ferric reducing antioxidant potential (FRAP).

222 teu (FC), ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) and 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl radical (DPPH) s

223 l (DPPH), ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) and 2,2'-azinobis 3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphon

224 l (DPPH), ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) and 2,2'-azinobis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfoni

225 l (DPPH), ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) assays.

226 avenging, ferric-reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) and metal chelation of VH were comparable to those

227 dant upon ferric-reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) and oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC) assa

228 ed higher ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) and oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC) comp

229 pacities [Ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) and Oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC)] and

230 ex (TPI), ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) and total radical trapping antioxidant parameter (

231 The ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) assay was recently adapted to a microplate format.

232 activity, ferric reducing/antioxidant power (FRAP) assay, oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC),

233 nging and ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) assays found methanol extract (ME) to be the most

234 DPPH) and ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) assays).

235 (RSA) and ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) in the HMW fractions of 3.5-100 kDa and/or >100 kD

236 DPPH) and ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) methods, respectively.

237 tion, and ferric reducing/antioxidant power (FRAP) methods.

238 ) and Ferric Ion Reducing Antioxidant Power (FRAP) of hydrolysates and fractions <10kDa and <3kDa wer

239 nging and ferric reducing/antioxidant power (FRAP) than that of the Wad Ahmed cultivar.

240 ORAC) and ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) than those generated with plant proteases for all

241 d assays: ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP), 2,2'-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) and Folin-C

242 d (AgNP), ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP), 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) and Folin-Ci

243 vities in ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP), ABTS, superoxide anion and hydroxyl radical scave

244 DPPH) and ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP), after in vitro digestion decreased 51-78% when co

245 ty (RSA), ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP), and a number of anthocyanins, phenolic acids, cou

246 tivities, ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP), and total phenolic content (TPC) than did hot-air

247 ty (RSC), ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP), oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC) and Fol

248 ty (RSC), ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP), oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC), total

249 ical, the ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP), the superoxide anion scavenging activity assay (S

250 ctivity, ferrous reducing antioxidant power (FRAP), total phenolic content (TPC), total flavonoid con

251 ) and the ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP).

252 (TBARS); ferric-reducing antioxidant power (FRAP); total oxidant status (TOS); and total antioxidant

253 using the following assays: reducing power (FRAP), DPPH and ABTS radical scavenging activity and pro

254 city (ferric ion reducing antioxidant power, FRAP) and anti-glycation activity by a bovine serum albu

255 J plugin, and should facilitate quantitative FRAP measurements for users equipped with standard fluor

256 of 0.85-2.81 mg gallic acid equiv./mL, RSC, FRAP and ORAC values were 6.38-20.9, 3.07-17.8 and 4.21-

257 ial was assessed by DPPH radical scavenging, FRAP and beta-carotene bleaching assays.

258 The results of this study show FRAP to be a robust technique which provides the cellula

259 good correlation with the spectrophotometric FRAP (Ferric Reducing Ability of Plasma) and DPPH (2,2-D

260 offered smaller diffusion coefficients than FRAP, possibly due to contributions from SRB molecules c

261 Using this approach, we show that FRAP data are highly susceptible to misinterpretation.

262 d 18+ Unique Manuka Factor; UMF) showed that FRAP values (0.54-0.76 mmol Fe(2+) per 100g honey) were

263 The FRAP and DPPH assays were more suitable than the TEAC as

264 The FRAP assay adapted to the FIA system under the optimised

265 The FRAP data showed anisotropic fluorescence recovery, yiel

266 The FRAP recovery rate and the mobile fraction of gamma-acti

267 In addition, the FRAP of plant lignans (secoisolariciresinol, lariciresin

268 cts with binding sites to show that both the FRAP and the FCS estimates may be correct and compatible

269 s, by the Folin Ciocalteau method and by the FRAP assay, respectively.

270 method and the antioxidant properties by the FRAP assay.

271 activity of cranberry juice, measured by the FRAP assay.

272 ere analysed for antioxidant activity by the FRAP, ORAC, ABTS and beta-carotene-linoleate methods.

273 ghly conserved extreme C-terminus called the FRAP-ATM-TRRAP-C-terminal (FATC) domain.

274 assay at all pHs, with similar values in the FRAP and ORAC assays.

275 est stoichiometry of Fe(3+) reduction in the FRAP assay and belonged to the most efficient compounds

276 oxyl radicals, and as electron donors in the FRAP assay.

277 regardless of bleaching geometry used in the FRAP experiment.

278 e confirmed from the results obtained in the FRAP, DPPH and ORAC assays.

279 However, only the FRAP assay gave the relative antioxidant activity for th

280 lue is an order of magnitude larger than the FRAP one.

281 Overall, we find that the FRAP bleach intensity does not measurably influence the

282 cal scavenging activities measured under the FRAP, ABTS and ORAC assays in grain extracts of 29 Peruv

283 ivity of these extracts was tested using the FRAP and DPPH assays, and two biological models of lipid

284 ntire film thickness, as consistent with the FRAP results.

285 ting ability was significantly correlated to FRAP, DPPH, and TPC, while sparse (p<0.05) correlations

286 experiments on XTC cells to compare SiMS to FRAP on the same cell type.

287 We used FRAP, super-resolution microscopy, functional tests in m

288 Using FRAP, F1 mainly composed of lipids, exhibited the lowest

289 By using FRAP at different time points during protein accumulatio

290 vity of the inhibitor was demonstrated using FRAP assays as well as cell viability data.

291 y thus demonstrates the feasibility of using FRAP during protein recruitment and its application in t

292 presented here to estimate parameters using FRAP recovery data is a broadly applicable tool for syst

293 rates, and active transport velocities using FRAP data that captures intracellular dynamics through p

294 Usually FRAP experiments are conducted with the protein concentr

295 dicators were established to clarify whether FRAP data should be analyzed using a binding-diffusion m

296 this study, we present an approach in which FRAP is used shortly after DNA damage introducing laser

297 While FRAP activity ranged from 8.64-104.21mgTEg(-1)DW (about

298 fuse actin species is in good agreement with FRAP experiments.

299 relation between vitamin C, TPC and TFC with FRAP and DPPH showed their contribution to antioxidant c

300 The cationic dye Rhodamine 123 was used with FRAP to quantify dye diffusion between islet beta cells