戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。

今後説明を表示しない

[OK]

コーパス検索結果 (left1)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1                                              FSHD expression profiles generated by oligonucleotide mi
2                                              FSHD has recently been hypothesized to involve abnormal
3                                              FSHD is a common muscular dystrophy that has been linked
4                                              FSHD is a gain-of-function disease characterized by the
5                                              FSHD is an autosomal dominant disease linked to chromoso
6                                              FSHD is now known to be associated with large deletions
7                                              FSHD patients have too few copies of a tandem 3.3-kb rep
8                                              FSHD region gene 1 (FRG1) is a dynamic nuclear and cytop
9                                              FSHD results from a unique combination of genetic and ep
10                                              FSHD typically results from contraction of a critical nu
11 ncluding several genetically diagnosed adult FSHD subjects yet to show clinical manifestations of the
12                          Instead, almost all FSHD patients carry deletions of an integral number of t
13                                   Almost all FSHD patients carry deletions of an integral number of t
14  phenotypic similarities between FSHD and an FSHD-like condition caused by FAT1 mutations.
15 ges in DUX4 target gene expression are as an FSHD biomarker.
16                    Among genes altered in an FSHD-specific and highly significant manner, many are in
17 nted here provides the first insight into an FSHD-specific defect in myogenic differentiation.
18 essed in the testis and causes apoptosis and FSHD when misexpressed in skeletal muscle.
19                      Also, these control and FSHD cells displayed similar H4 hyperacetylation (like t
20              Unfixed biopsies of control and FSHD deltoid and biceps muscles, snap-frozen at resting
21 n muscle cells and biopsies from control and FSHD individuals.
22 ch model(s) faithfully recapitulate DUX4 and FSHD biology.
23 ified modifier locus for DUX4 expression and FSHD.
24 d experiments and validates the fidelity and FSHD relevance of multiple distinct models of DUX4 expre
25 d that in muscle of FRG1 transgenic mice and FSHD patients, specific pre-mRNAs undergo aberrant alter
26  unique shared cytoplasm of the myotube, and FSHD cell death that depends on its activation.
27 the 4q35 and 10q26 D4Z4 arrays in normal and FSHD lymphoid cells were like those in unexpressed euchr
28 ting from the 4q D4Z4 units in wild-type and FSHD muscle cells.
29 additional 26 subjects and predicted them as FSHD or control with 90% accuracy based on biceps and 80
30 found to be differentially expressed between FSHD and normal myoblasts.
31 criptions of phenotypic similarities between FSHD and an FSHD-like condition caused by FAT1 mutations
32                   Upon differentiation, both FSHD and healthy myotubes express SORBS2, suggesting tha
33 n between DME2 and the DUX4 promoter in both FSHD and unaffected primary myocytes was greatly reduced
34  array, these deletions are thought to cause FSHD by a position effect on other genes.
35 del for how the 4q35 array-shortening causes FSHD is that it results in a loss of postulated D4Z4 het
36 have been examined as candidates for causing FSHD, including the DUX4 homeobox gene in the D4Z4 repea
37 in a clinically and genetically well-defined FSHD population.
38 ystrophies (DMD, aSGD) in order to determine FSHD-specific changes.
39 re, we choose facioscapulohumeral dystrophy (FSHD) as a model to determine whether or not targeting k
40               Facioscapulohumeral dystrophy (FSHD) is associated with somatic chromatin relaxation of
41               Facioscapulohumeral dystrophy (FSHD) is caused by decreased epigenetic repression of th
42               Facioscapulohumeral dystrophy (FSHD) is caused by the mis-expression of the double-home
43               Facioscapulohumeral dystrophy (FSHD) is one of the most common inherited muscular dystr
44 re mutated in facioscapulohumeral dystrophy (FSHD).
45               Facioscapulohumeral dystrophy (FSHD; MIM158900, MIM158901) is caused by misexpression o
46      Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) involves sporadic expression of DUX4, which inhibi
47      Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) is a common form of muscular dystrophy characteriz
48      Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) is a muscular dystrophy caused by inefficient epig
49      Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) is a neuromuscular disorder characterized by an in
50      Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) is a prevalent, incurable myopathy, linked to hypo
51      Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) is a progressive neuromuscular disorder caused by
52      Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) is a unique dominant disorder involving shortening
53      Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) is an autosomal dominant disorder linked to contra
54      Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) is an autosomal dominant hereditary neuromuscular
55      Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) is an autosomal dominant neuromuscular disease tha
56      Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) is an autosomal dominant neuromuscular disorder th
57      Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) is an autosomal dominant neuromuscular disorder th
58      Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) is associated with D4Z4 repeat contraction on huma
59      Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) is caused by an unusual deletion with neomorphic a
60      Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) is caused by chromatin relaxation that results in
61 ases facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) is caused by contraction of the D4Z4 repeat in the
62      Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) is caused by deletions within the polymorphic DNA
63      Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) is caused by the aberrant expression of the DUX4 t
64      Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) is characterized by marked inter- and intrafamilia
65      Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) is linked to either contraction of D4Z4 repeats on
66      Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) is linked to epigenetic dysregulation of the chrom
67      Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) is one of the most common inherited diseases of mu
68      Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) may be a new member of the class of neuromuscular
69 ying facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) much closer to the telomere in human 4q than in th
70 rder facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) results from integral deletions of the subtelomeri
71 with facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) type 2.
72 uses facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) when occurring on a specific haplotype of 4qter (4
73      Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD), a common myopathy, is an autosomal dominant disea
74 d in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD), a dominant disease thought to involve local patho
75      Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD), the most prevalent myopathy afflicting both child
76  for facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD), whereby de-repression of the D4Z4 macrosatellite
77 s in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD).
78  to fascioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD).
79  for facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD).
80 s of Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD).
81 uses facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD).
82      Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD: MIM#158900) is a common myopathy with marked but l
83 ray (facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy, FSHD) despite sequence conservation in repeat units thro
84 ffects of expressing variable levels of each FSHD candidate gene on myoblasts.
85 t mice with disrupted Fat1 functions exhibit FSHD-like phenotypes, we have investigated the expressio
86  gene expression is the underlying basis for FSHD, distinguishing it from other forms of muscular dys
87 misexpression of DUX4 is a causal factor for FSHD.
88 ription factor, a leading candidate gene for FSHD.
89                  We propose a hypothesis for FSHD in which DUX4 expression interferes with Pax7 in sa
90 ion in FSHD muscle, and has implications for FSHD pathogenesis.
91 ter is discussed as an alternative model for FSHD gene regulation and pathogenesis.
92               We propose a revised model for FSHD in which FAT1 levels might play a role in determini
93 ear lamina protein lamin A/C is required for FSHD region chromatin localization to the nuclear envelo
94         To identify the gene responsible for FSHD pathogenesis, we generated transgenic mice selectiv
95 s siRNAs could be a therapeutic strategy for FSHD.
96 4-fl expression per se is not sufficient for FSHD muscle pathology and indicate that quantitative mod
97 ral other mechanisms have been suggested for FSHD pathophysiology and it remains unknown whether DUX4
98 xploited for development of therapeutics for FSHD.
99 ogenic cells and muscle tissues derived from FSHD affected subjects, including several genetically di
100 re, we have utilized myoblasts isolated from FSHD patients (FSHD myoblasts) to investigate the effect
101                Investigation of heterozygous FSHD myoblasts demonstrated no significant displacement
102 fects in nuclear envelope proteins, however, FSHD may result from inappropriate chromatin interaction
103  DUX4 in myoblasts, and differentiated human FSHD myocytes expressing endogenous DUX4-and show that t
104 t recapitulates the phenotypes seen in human FSHD patients.
105 al model that mirrors the pathology in human FSHD.
106  facilitate pairwise comparisons to identify FSHD-specific differences and are expected to create new
107 rs at low frequency but in high abundance in FSHD myotube nuclei.
108 us studies showing p53 pathway activation in FSHD muscles.
109  Indeed, many of the transcripts affected in FSHD represent direct targets of the transcription facto
110 both DUX4-expressing murine myoblasts and in FSHD patient-derived myoblasts.
111 ect suggests the presence of anticipation in FSHD and raises the possibility of an underlying dynamic
112 e majority of the gene expression changes in FSHD skeletal muscle together with an immune cell infilt
113 stress sensitivity and epigenetic changes in FSHD.
114 rity of the sarcolemma may be compromised in FSHD.
115 se-specific, further implicating a defect in FSHD muscle satellite cells.
116  buffer oxidative stress, as demonstrated in FSHD myoblasts.
117 scription when epigenetically derepressed in FSHD, resulting in the pathological misexpression of DUX
118      However, DUX4 is difficult to detect in FSHD muscle biopsies and it is debatable how robust chan
119 ith short telomeres, while not detectable in FSHD myoblasts with long telomeres or in healthy myoblas
120 s regulated by DUX4 are reliably detected in FSHD muscle but not in controls, providing direct suppor
121 protein, DUX4-FL, which has been detected in FSHD, but not in unaffected control myogenic cells and m
122 ier that underlie sex-related differences in FSHD by protecting against myoblast differentiation impa
123                               Disruptions in FSHD myogenesis and oxidative capacity may therefore not
124 ly based on endogenous expression of DUX4 in FSHD cells or by mis-expression of DUX4 in control human
125 the current hypothesis for a role of DUX4 in FSHD pathogenesis.
126 al therapeutic approach to silencing DUX4 in FSHD.
127 previous studies showed DUX4 was elevated in FSHD patient muscles, our data support the hypothesis th
128                       SORBS2 is expressed in FSHD myoblasts with short telomeres, while not detectabl
129 R-133b, and miR-206 were highly expressed in FSHD myoblasts, which nonetheless did not prematurely en
130         We first analyzed FAT1 expression in FSHD adult muscles and determined whether FAT1 expressio
131 nsistent with 'bursts' of DUX4 expression in FSHD muscle, and has implications for FSHD pathogenesis.
132 gnificantly altered pattern of expression in FSHD muscle.
133 rts a role for the D4Z4-encoded DUX4 gene in FSHD.
134 ted the expression of the human FAT1 gene in FSHD.
135 ase in transcript levels from these genes in FSHD skeletal muscle samples compared with controls.
136 e aberrant expression has been implicated in FSHD pathogenesis.
137 A through a double-negative feedback loop in FSHD muscle cells.
138 However, DUX4 expression is extremely low in FSHD muscle, and there is no DUX4 animal model that mirr
139 muscle biopsies, FAT1 expression is lower in FSHD muscles compared to control muscles.
140 m in controls to values as high as 550 nm in FSHD.
141 , can recapitulate the phenotype observed in FSHD patients in a vertebrate model.
142 entified in this region are overexpressed in FSHD myoblasts, including the double homeobox genes DUX4
143 ion leads to inappropriate overexpression in FSHD skeletal muscle of 4q35 genes located upstream of D
144 investigation of DUX4 and the p53 pathway in FSHD pathogenesis.
145 that up-regulation of both DUX4 and PITX1 in FSHD muscles may play critical roles in the molecular me
146          One site was seen preferentially in FSHD myoblasts.
147 ne two models for the role of this repeat in FSHD.
148                   Loss of D4Z4 repression in FSHD is observed as hypomethylation of the array accompa
149   Clinical and molecular genetic research in FSHD has since helped define it as a distinct clinical e
150 ificantly up-regulated, suggesting a role in FSHD.
151  some of the structures at the sarcolemma in FSHD samples were misaligned with respect to the underly
152 nt for most of the molecular changes seen in FSHD.
153 The relative chromatin DNaseI sensitivity in FSHD and control myoblasts and lymphoblasts was as follo
154 pression is the major molecular signature in FSHD muscle together with a gene expression signature co
155 e mapped DNaseI-hypersensitive (DH) sites in FSHD and control myoblasts.
156                        Here, we find that in FSHD muscle, 4q35 genes located upstream of D4Z4 are ina
157 s could be accounted for by the fact that in FSHD myoblasts, functionally important target genes, inc
158 egulated by TPE-OLD-dependent variegation in FSHD myoblasts.
159 n, one unaffected individual without a known FSHD-causing mutation showed the expression of DUX4 targ
160 a sibling with FSHD and also without a known FSHD-causing mutation, suggesting the presence of an uni
161                                   In leading FSHD pathogenesis models, D4Z4 contractions are proposed
162  effective therapeutic strategy for at least FSHD.
163                                   GHD and LH/FSHD were not treated in 99.7% and 78.5% of affected ind
164 evelopment over time is noted for GHD and LH/FSHD with possible associations between nontreatment of
165 t prevalence was 46.5% for GHD, 10.8% for LH/FSHD, 7.5% for TSHD, and 4% for ACTHD, and the cumulativ
166 le mass and exercise tolerance; untreated LH/FSHD was associated with hypertension, dyslipidemia, low
167 hite race was significant associated with LH/FSHD and TSHD.
168 GHD; doses >/= 22 Gy were associated with LH/FSHD; and doses >/= 30 Gy were associated with TSHD and
169 besity were significantly associated with LH/FSHD; white race was significant associated with LH/FSHD
170 e sequencing analysis indicated that in most FSHD myocytes, both enhancers are associated with nucleo
171 icism for D4Z4 repeat contraction in de novo FSHD, we have established a clonal myogenic cell model f
172 multaneous miRNome/transcriptome analysis of FSHD and control primary myoblasts.
173 g was corroborated by expression analysis of FSHD muscle using a custom cDNA microarray containing 51
174  is a leading candidate gene as causative of FSHD.
175 amily genetic background are determinants of FSHD muscle disease progression.
176 nucleolar localization in the development of FSHD.
177 increased engraftment and differentiation of FSHD myoblasts in regenerating mouse muscle.
178  model for the molecular genetic etiology of FSHD, such as, differential long-distance cis looping th
179 PAX7 target gene repression is a hallmark of FSHD that should be considered in the investigation of F
180 ession of PAX7 target genes is a hallmark of FSHD, and that it is as major a signature of FSHD muscle
181 on that is considered a clinical hallmark of FSHD.
182 counteract the differentiation impairment of FSHD myoblasts without affecting cell proliferation or s
183 should be considered in the investigation of FSHD pathology and therapy.
184 ignited with the demonstration of linkage of FSHD to chromosome 4q35 in 1990.
185 hese findings suggest specific mechanisms of FSHD pathology and identify candidate biomarkers for dis
186                             Animal models of FSHD are hindered by incomplete knowledge regarding the
187 ata generated from three different models of FSHD-lentiviral-based DUX4 expression in myoblasts, doxy
188 s derived from biceps and deltoid muscles of FSHD affected subjects and their unaffected first-degree
189 inct muscles obtained from a large number of FSHD subjects and their unaffected first-degree relative
190 ads proximally, leading to overexpression of FSHD genes in cis.
191 lopment is important for the pathogenesis of FSHD.
192  To better understand the pathophysiology of FSHD and develop mRNA-based biomarkers of affected muscl
193 Our results show that the pathophysiology of FSHD includes novel changes in the organization of the s
194                       The pathophysiology of FSHD is unknown and, as a result, there is currently no
195 en developed to study the pathophysiology of FSHD, frequently based on endogenous expression of DUX4
196 re new candidates for the pathophysiology of FSHD.
197  for understanding the reduced penetrance of FSHD within families.
198  the D4Z4 repeat and increased penetrance of FSHD.
199 report, we have compared mRNA populations of FSHD and normal muscle.
200 FSHD, and that it is as major a signature of FSHD muscle as DUX4 target gene expression.
201 es not account for the tissue specificity of FSHD pathology, which requires stable expression of an a
202 muscles that are affected at early stages of FSHD progression than in muscles that are affected later
203 itate mechanistic and therapeutic studies of FSHD.
204 DUX4 protein is present in a small subset of FSHD muscle cells, making its detection and analysis of
205 r the complexity and age-related symptoms of FSHD.
206  tyrosine kinase inhibitors for treatment of FSHD.
207  studies, and validated by RNA-sequencing on FSHD patient-derived myoblasts.
208 he D4Z4 repeat array, being either normal or FSHD sized.
209 lized myoblasts isolated from FSHD patients (FSHD myoblasts) to investigate the effect of estrogens o
210 eat D4Z4) localize to the nuclear periphery, FSHD likely arises instead from improper interactions wi
211                              Until recently, FSHD had received little attention because of its relati
212 his is shown using meta-analysis of over six FSHD muscle biopsy gene expression studies, and validate
213            Recent studies have proposed that FSHD pathology is caused by the misexpression of the DUX
214       Collectively, our results suggest that FSHD results from inappropriate overexpression of FRG1 i
215                                          The FSHD mutation is a deletion within an array of 3.3-kb ta
216 cis; however which candidate gene causes the FSHD phenotype, and through what mechanism, is unknown.
217 e observations complicate the search for the FSHD gene but also imply the presence of a potentially n
218 great apes and lower primates identified the FSHD-associated repeat on chromosome 4q as the likely an
219 ates re-examination of current models of the FSHD disease mechanism.
220 loped to examine nuclear organization of the FSHD genomic region.
221 expression recapitulates key features of the FSHD molecular phenotype, including repression of MyoD a
222  There is evidence of multiple copies of the FSHD Region Candidate Gene 1 (FRG1) in humans.
223 from genetically unaffected relatives of the FSHD subjects, although at a significantly lower frequen
224 est a functional role for a component of the FSHD-associated repeat.
225 ish a basis for animal models recreating the FSHD transcriptome.
226     In contrast to most other telomeres, the FSHD region at 4q35.2 localizes to the nuclear periphery
227 rtantly, none of the genes localizing to the FSHD region at 4q35 were found to exhibit a significantl
228 ric chromosomes, we investigated whether the FSHD region on 4q is involved in sub-nuclear localizatio
229 ve functional significance, possibly also to FSHD, despite their paucity of known genes.
230 onstraints that link short 4q D4Z4 arrays to FSHD and make long ones phenotypically neutral.
231 enic differentiation and could contribute to FSHD pathology by preventing satellite cell-mediated rep
232 esis that DUX4 overexpression contributes to FSHD development.
233 expression of DUX4 in somatic cells leads to FSHD.
234 ough no gene has been conclusively linked to FSHD development, recent evidence supports a role for th
235 one to 10 copies of the repeat are linked to FSHD.
236 tions on the pathogenic mechanism underlying FSHD.
237 uently, the pathogenic mechanisms underlying FSHD have been difficult to discern.
238 (D4Z4) on chromosome 4q35 is associated with FSHD but otherwise the molecular basis of the disease an
239 and unaffected muscle) from individuals with FSHD served to monitor expression changes during the pro
240 n data from muscle biopsies of patients with FSHD to those of 11 other neuromuscular disorders, paire
241 d specifically up-regulated in patients with FSHD.
242           This individual has a sibling with FSHD and also without a known FSHD-causing mutation, sug

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。
 
Page Top