ライフサイエンスコーパス: Firmicutes

1 sociated with body mass index (Bacteroidetes/Firmicutes).

2 lineage within the order Bacillales (phylum Firmicutes).

3 d Gram-positive bacteria (actinobacteria and firmicutes).

4 tion and obligate anaerobe enrichment (e.g., Firmicutes).

5 a large number of cell wall proteins in the Firmicutes.

6 re peptide pheromone receptors ubiquitous in Firmicutes.

7 ile vancomycin promoted the expansion of the Firmicutes.

8 d associated with CD-specific alterations in Firmicutes.

9 and belongs to the Ruminococcaceae family of Firmicutes.

10 tive set of active microorganisms, primarily Firmicutes.

11 hly conserved from the Proteobacteria to the Firmicutes.

12 in particular, the selection for the phylum Firmicutes.

13 and syntrophic, acetogenic, and fermentative Firmicutes.

14 ric bacteria and a few species in the phylum Firmicutes.

15 plicated in interbacterial competition among Firmicutes.

16 quences belonged to Bacteroidetes and 41% to Firmicutes.

17 t bacterial species differed, especially the Firmicutes.

18 tinal enrichment of bacteria from the phylum Firmicutes.

19 nal bacterium that is a member of the phylum Firmicutes.

20 n anaerobic, endospore-forming member of the Firmicutes.

21 cillus subtilis, the model microorganism for Firmicutes.

22 gulatory strategies in B. subtilis and other Firmicutes.

23 pression that they may be less important for Firmicutes.

24 n Bacteroidetes and significant increases in Firmicutes.

25 t be fundamentally different to that in most Firmicutes.

26 s in DNA replication termination between the Firmicutes.

27 found primarily, but not exclusively, in the Firmicutes.

28 n the terminus region of some members of the Firmicutes.

29 mice, primarily among families of the phylum Firmicutes.

30 uncultured, endospore-forming member of the Firmicutes.

31 , Proteobacteria, Chlorobi, Chloroflexi, and Firmicutes.

32 cterial divisions, the Bacteroidetes and the Firmicutes.

33 thermophilum belongs with Actinobacteria or Firmicutes.

34 h thermophilic sulfate reducers belonging to Firmicutes.

35 lude a newly identified functionality in the Firmicutes.

36 in the human gut, the Bacteroidetes and the Firmicutes.

37 sions of Bacteria, the Bacteroidetes and the Firmicutes.

38 Bacteroidetes and a proportional increase in Firmicutes.

39 iome, a polymicrobial community dominated by Firmicutes.

40 be produced by a thermophilic member of the Firmicutes.

41 mercially important members of the low G + C Firmicutes.

42 canonical type domains are widespread among Firmicutes.

43 ed by the bacterial phyla Proteobacteria and Firmicutes.

44 eral families belonging to Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes.

45 se mechanisms control spore formation in the Firmicutes.

46 followed by Bactroidetes (13.99% +/- 0.29), Firmicutes (11.45% +/- 0.51), Actinobacteria (10.21% +/-

47 ting 74.8% of the 16S sequences, followed by Firmicutes (12.0%), Proteobacteria (10.4%), Verrucomicro

48 eas in digesta both Proteobacteria (47%) and Firmicutes (38%) showed high abundance.

49 7) was associated with higher proportions of Firmicutes (43.8% x 38.5%, P = 0.05).

50 In contrast, Firmicutes (47% vs 63%, P = .17) and Actinobacteria (10%

51 t microbiotas were dominated by three phyla: Firmicutes (62.9%), Proteobacteria (29.9%) and Fusobacte

52 d the predominance in swine facility dust of Firmicutes (70%) at the phylum level, Clostridia (44%) a

53 units (OTUs, 97% similarity), primarily from Firmicutes (92.6%) and Proteobacteria (6.9%), via 16S rR

54 ncultivated clades related to Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, Actinobacteria and Chloroflexi were ubiquito

55 epresentatives from the phyla Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, Actinobacteria and Proteobacteria.

56 ltered abundances in the phyla Fusobacteria, Firmicutes, Actinobacteria and Proteobacteria.

57 p-GMK interaction is conserved in members of Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, and Deinococcus-Thermus, but

58 quences were assigned to the Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, and Fusobacte

59 lysis suggests that this may be common among Firmicutes and 30% of all bacteria.

60 detected, 18 of which belonged to the phylum Firmicutes and 8 to Bacteroidetes.

61 lean individuals such that a 20% increase in Firmicutes and a corresponding decrease in Bacteroidetes

62 However, examination of Firmicutes and Actinobacteria reveals that PspA ortholog

63 In addition, Firmicutes and Actinobacteria were also the abundant phy

64 thogens and opportunistic pathogens from the Firmicutes and Actinobacteria, which exhibit a Gram-posi

65 ear, especially reduced exposure to specific Firmicutes and Bacteriodetes, was associated with atopy

66 t Gram-positive bacteria affiliated with the Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes dominated in the post-reduc

67 r at the division (superkingdom) level, with Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes dominating.

68 l model for polysaccharide hydrolysis by the Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes in the thermophilic cellulo

69 Comparison of these and 25 other gut Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes indicated that the Firmicut

70 s are dominated by bacteria belonging to the Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes phyla.

71 f strict anaerobic bacteria belonging to the Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes phyla.

72 nera were identified from all fecal samples; Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes were the most dominant phyl

73 ensal bacteria, notably members of the phyla Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes.

74 al communities in kogiid whales dominated by Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes.

75 lesterol, intestinal and plasma LPC18:1, and Firmicutes and Cyanobacteria with plasma LPC 18:1.

76 to eoslipin in prokaryotic genomes except in Firmicutes and Deinococci, where yqfA replaces eoslipin.

77 Firmicutes and Enterobacteriaceae abundances were associ

78 e Romanian adolescents had more sequences in Firmicutes and fewer in Actinobacteria phyla and more se

79 es unique to clades, such as Actinobacteria, Firmicutes and gamma-Proteobacteria, and shed light on s

80 ous in genomes from the Gram-positive phylum Firmicutes and in some Gram-negative bacteria.

81 vel diversity comparisons revealed decreased Firmicutes and increased Proteobacteria in ulcerated sit

82 FXR KO also had reduced Firmicutes and increased Proteobacteria, which could be

83 ic Proteobacteria and decreases in anaerobic Firmicutes and Melainabacteria in the murine foregut and

84 possibility of lateral gene transfer between Firmicutes and Methanosarcinales, the similarity between

85 filiated with Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes and Proteobacteria (especially Roseobacter of

86 On day 4 the proportion of the phylum Firmicutes and Proteobacteria in stool was significantly

87 Abundances of dominant phyla (Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes and Proteobacteria) were similar.

88 ed with members of the dominant rumen phyla (Firmicutes and Proteobacteria).

89 ated with either enrichment or reductions of Firmicutes and Proteobacteria, respectively, at a false

90 24-7 and Bacteroidaceae was reduced, whereas Firmicutes and Proteobacteria, such as Ruminococcaceae,

91 hree phyla common in the gut--Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes and Proteobacteria--as well as one aerobic pa

92 onging to the Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes and Proteobacteria.

93 ated with the dust was low, but dominated by Firmicutes and Proteobacteria.

94 ase in Bacteroidetes and an increase in both Firmicutes and Proteobacteria.

95 striction in the progression phase increased Firmicutes and reduced Bacteroidetes compared to a high-

96 In Firmicutes and related bacteria, ribosomal large subunit

97 ponents and their homologs in homoacetogenic Firmicutes and Spirochaetes suggests that the deltaprote

98 We found that Firmicutes and Spirochaetes were the most abundant phyla

99 inated by 2 bacterial phyla (divisions), the Firmicutes and the Bacteroidetes.

100 Diet-enriched Firmicutes and their products were sufficient to increas

101 te NiaR-binding sites, characteristic of the Firmicutes and Thermotogales, were verified by an electr

102 pha-, beta-, gamma- or delta-Proteobacteria, Firmicutes and uncharacterized clones in other types of

103 the low-G+C group of Gram-positive bacteria (Firmicutes) and requires signature sporulation genes tha

104 Gs were mostly found in Clostridia, Bacilli (Firmicutes), and in alpha and beta Proteobacteria.

105 s, with phyla Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, and Actinobacteria being most abundant.

106 characterized fusobacteria, proteobacteria, firmicutes, and bacteroidetes.

107 the phyla of Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Firmicutes, and Cyanobacteria in bacteria and the phylum

108 vels of total bacterial load, Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, and Enterobacteriaceae were mostly similar,

109 sals from the Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, and Proteobacteria phyla, we found that pote

110 Three phyla (Actinobacteria, Firmicutes, and Proteobacteria) accounted for 94.6% of t

111 ria (including an aquificale, cyanobacteria, firmicutes, and proteobacteria), yet are missing from ot

112 in phyla in all samples were Actinobacteria, Firmicutes, and Proteobacteria.

113 species within the phyla of Actinobacteria, Firmicutes, and Proteobacteria.

114 lope that was present in the ancestor of the Firmicutes, and that the monoderm phenotype in this phyl

115 Spx-family proteins are highly conserved in Firmicutes, and the L. monocytogenes genome contains two

116 mouth, including members of the Bacteroides, Firmicutes, and TM7 phyla, while airway microbiota were

117 a profile characterized by the expansion of Firmicutes (appearance of Erysipelotrichi), Proteobacter

118 The Firmicutes are a phylum of bacteria that dominate numero

119 at Gram-positive bacteria, in particular the Firmicutes, are likely to utilize cis-acting regulatory

120 nserved in other amidases from Gram-positive Firmicutes, are pivotal for enzymatic activity.

121 where GlgC and GlgD proteins found in other Firmicutes arrange in distinctive clusters.

122 decreased Actinobacteria, Cyanobacteria, and Firmicutes as well as a reduced diversity in microbiome.

123 a, a reduced ratio between Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes, as well as a dramatic increase of Gram-negat

124 iety of Gram-positive bacteria in the phylum Firmicutes, as well as Escherichia coli with a compromis

125 e classes of low-G+C Gram-positive bacteria (Firmicutes), Bacilli, Clostridia and Negativicutes, incl

126 hol compared with a relative predominance of Firmicutes bacteria in control mice.

127 tance against antimicrobial peptides in many Firmicutes bacteria is mediated by detoxification system

128 Many of the Firmicutes bacteria responsible for plant polysaccharide

129 rium acetylicum, a representative intestinal Firmicutes bacterium that is intractable to molecular ge

130 Members of six phyla, Firmicutes, Bacteroides, Actinobacteria, Proteobacteria,

131 Persistent bacterial groups belonging to Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes and Actinobacteria were presen

132 tation selected for three dominant taxa--the Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes and Thermus.

133 revealed that the dominant phyla related to Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, and Proteobacteria accelerate

134 lm material produced by members of the phyla Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, and Proteobacteria.

135 heless, both shared a dominance of the phyla Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, and Proteobacteria.

136 uding the Cyanobacteria, Desulfuromonadales, Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Chlamydiae, Spirochaeta, and

137 Results showed that relative abundances of Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Enterococcus, Enterobacteriac

138 ction (CDI) are both related to an increased Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio in the intestinal microbi

139 community of LCR rats, resulting in a lower Firmicutes:Bacteroidetes ratio.

140 ld for syntrophic propionate oxidation, with Firmicutes being replaced by Bacteroidetes.

141 Some Firmicutes (belonging to the genus Bacillus and Sporosar

142 ur predominantly in bifidobacteria and a few Firmicutes but lack in other HGMs.

143 ulosiruptorand among other biomass-degrading Firmicutes but missing from Caldicellulosiruptor bescii

144 correlated with increased Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes but reduced Clostridium.

145 erobiales belong to the classically monoderm Firmicutes, but possess outer membranes with lipopolysac

146 EP class inhibit the growth of Gram-positive firmicutes by activating ClpP and causing unregulated pr

147 and the relative abundances were higher for Firmicutes, Chloroflexi and Crenarchaeota, but lower for

148 e halotolerant bacterial genus in the phylum Firmicutes, commonly found in various habitats in Antarc

149 Bacterial taxa within Clostridia and Firmicutes could be studied as probiotic candidates for

150 erial taxa in ileal effluents and especially Firmicutes, could be used to discriminate between nonrej

151 m 1% to 46% with monensin, but gram-positive Firmicutes decreased from 93% to 46%.

152 In Firmicutes, degradative capacity is largely restricted t

153 We propose that in some Firmicutes DMB is activated to alpha-RP via alpha-R usin

154 control mucosally associated microbiota were Firmicutes-dominant, whereas WT TPN mice were Proteobact

155 obacteria dominated in immature stages while Firmicutes dominated in adult stages.

156 age, body mass index, and diet; genera from Firmicutes (Faecalibacterium, Lactococcus, and Roseburia

157 The class Clostridia in the phylum Firmicutes (formerly low-G+C Gram-positive bacteria) inc

158 eviously known, with examples throughout the Firmicutes, Fusobacteria and Proteobacteria.

159 tes, Chlamydiae, Chloroflexi, Euryarchaeota, Firmicutes, Fusobacteria, Proteobacteria, Spirochaetes,

160 w-onset patients had different levels of the Firmicutes genera Lactobacillus and Staphylococcus compa

161 phic representatives of the bacterial phylum Firmicutes, genomic analyses of these organisms have yet

162 her 3',5'-cAMP is universally present in the Firmicutes group of bacteria.

163 lostridiaceae and Sporomusa subgroups of the Firmicutes grouping are also shown.

164 mmunity skewed towards a higher abundance of Firmicutes (> 59.2%) and Bacteroidetes (4.2-31.4%) withi

165 ism of interbacterial antagonism utilized by Firmicutes has not been elucidated.

166 However, Firmicutes have a fundamentally different set of ribonuc

167 Herein, we show that the Actinobacteria and Firmicutes (high-GC and low-GC Gram-positive bacteria) a

168 acteria in healthy piglets, were replaced by Firmicutes in asymptomatic and diarrheal piglets.

169 the presence of oral Actinobacteria and oral Firmicutes in stool was positively correlated with subse

170 ture, decreased Bacteroidetes, and increased Firmicutes in the feces.

171 P = .047), with enrichment of Clostridia and Firmicutes in the infant gut microbiome of subjects whos

172 Spore-forming firmicutes include many environmentally important organi

173 -cell communication system is present across firmicutes, including the human pathogen Clostridium per

174 the presence of sporulation genes in various firmicutes, including those with smaller genomes than B.

175 Firmicutes increased sharply, whereas Proteobacteria, Ac

176 s in bacterial abundance including decreased Firmicutes, increased Bacteroidetes, and decreased Bifid

177 m in Lake Miers, and two distinct classes of Firmicutes inhabited East and West Lobe Bonney at depths

178 that L27 in Staphylococcus aureus and other Firmicutes is encoded with an N-terminal extension that

179 orulation in low-G+C gram-positive bacteria (Firmicutes) is an important survival mechanism that invo

180 loroflexi, Cyanobacteria, Proteobacteria and Firmicutes) is limited and uneven, genome sequences are

181 ssential for sialic acid scavenging in other Firmicutes, is evidence that variation in specific activ

182 sensitive target for ADEP-activated ClpP in firmicutes, is not degraded in mycobacteria.

183 l coabundance groups; the first dominated by Firmicutes (Lachnospiraceae/Clostridiales), the second b

184 Some Firmicutes lack CobT-type enzymes but have a two-protein

185 The most abundant phyla were Firmicutes [mean relative abundance (SD), 42.1% (10.1%)]

186 he diol dehydratase gene cluster (pduCDE) in Firmicutes metagenomes predicted from the 16S rRNA gene.

187 Firmicutes multidrug resistance inc18 plasmids encode pa

188 h different faecal inocula, while nine other Firmicutes OTUs showed > 5-fold enrichment in at least o

189 odes of rejection, the proportions of phylum Firmicutes (p < 0.001) and the order Lactobacillales (p

190 Firmicutes (P < 0.001) was the dominant phylum in MF pup

191 21 there was an increase in HOMIM scores of firmicutes (P </=0.001), fusobacteria (P = 0.003), prote

192 Proteobacteria and Firmicutes penetrated small intestinal villi, and flagel

193 ormal DNA pairs, while the Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes phyla were depleted in tumors.

194 e in the abundance of both Bacteriodetes and Firmicutes phyla, with a proportional increase in the gr

195 es belonging mainly to the Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes phyla.

196 TMF(-/-) mice leading to predominance of the Firmicutes phylum and a significantly higher abundance o

197 rial sequences and showed an increase in the Firmicutes phylum in GOLD 4 patients versus all other gr

198 acid scavenging that seems widespread in the Firmicutes phylum of bacteria.

199 rved microbial developmental strategy in the Firmicutes phylum wherein a progenitor cell that faces s

200 Bacillus subtilis and most species from the Firmicutes phylum, ThiI lacks the rhodanese domain that

201 marily by a paucity of phylotypes within the Firmicutes phylum.

202 o membranes on multiple occasions within the Firmicutes phylum.

203 a from the phyla Chloroflexi, Acidobacteria, Firmicutes, Planctomycetes, and Spirochaetes.

204 micutes and Bacteroidetes indicated that the Firmicutes possess smaller genomes and a disproportionat

205 In contrast to adults, we find that Firmicutes predominate on infant skin.

206 Clostridia are anaerobic Firmicutes producing a large array of metabolites by uti

207 m samples contained 5 major bacterial phyla: Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Fusobacteriu

208 d predominance of Bacteroidetes, followed by Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, and Actinobacteria phyla.

209 cterial phylotypes across the Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, and Actinobacteria, the four

210 In the IBD group, Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, Verrucomicrobia, and Fusobac

211 the major low-molecular-weight thiol in the Firmicutes raises the possibility that BSH is involved i

212 sitive correlation between the Bacteroidetes:Firmicutes ratio and total dietary fiber intake but not

213 fiber consumption shifted the Bacteroidetes:Firmicutes ratio, increasing the relative abundance of B

214 corresponding to uncultured Lachnospiraceae (Firmicutes) related to Eubacterium xylanophilum and Buty

215 piring microbes of the phyla Chloroflexi and Firmicutes, respectively.

216 undant in Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria and Firmicutes, respectively.

217 Taxa from the Firmicutes responded positively to AMF, while taxa from

218 Firmicutes scores were higher for infants born by C-sect

219 zebrafish larvae, elevating the abundance of Firmicutes sequences and reducing the abundance of Actin

220 bacteria revealed that Methanosarcinales and Firmicutes shared a similar structure, also common to mo

221 groups XZ and JD than in group SPF, whereas Firmicutes showed the inverse pattern.

222 Similar genes occur in many Firmicutes, sometimes next to folate or thiamine salvage

223 of putative GusR orthologs from GUS-encoding Firmicutes species also reveal functionally unique featu

224 h the replicative helicase for gram-positive Firmicutes (Staphylococcus, Bacillus and Geobacillus) an

225 bulk pH in the media allowed us to isolate a Firmicutes strain (Paenibacillus sp.).

226 ione is absent from the low-GC Gram-positive Firmicutes, such as Bacillus subtilis.

227 ia, particularly among facultative anaerobic Firmicutes, such as streptococci.

228 ntly identified motile representative of the Firmicutes that contributes to butyrate formation from a

229 and Bacteroides) and decreased the levels of Firmicutes that metabolize dietary plant polysaccharides

230 Gram-positive bacteria, and particularly the Firmicutes, the DNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RNAP) comp

231 Among the Firmicutes, the interactions were all competitive.

232 icted proteins is most similar to those from Firmicutes, the presence of key genes suggests a diderm

233 cteroides, and potentially Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes-the predominant BXD gut phyla.

234 The Firmicutes Thermoanaerobacter sulfurigignens and Thermoa

235 e bacterial lineages, Methanosarcinales with Firmicutes, Thermoplasmatales and M. thermoautotrophicus

236 ved in Rex orthologs identified in the phyla Firmicutes, Thermotogales, Actinobacteria, Chloroflexi,

237 ent demonstrated a community transition from Firmicutes to a novel Bacteroidetes population that clus

238 ht loss, there is a decrease in the ratio of Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes phyla.

239 r, aged mice had a significant change in the Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes ratio with vancomycin treatm

240 ased gut dysbiosis, measured by the ratio of Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes, and increased the prevalenc

241 muciniphila and decreased the proportion of Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes, consistent with prior repor

242 ition, characterized by a decreased ratio of Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes, reduced Allobaculum bacteri

243 the gut microbiota by shifting the ratio of Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes.

244 ts fed the same high-fat diet, with a higher Firmicutes-to-Bacteroidetes ratio and significant genera

245 gut dysbiosis-as indicated by the decreased Firmicutes-to-Bacteroidetes ratios and endotoxin-bearing

246 om a predominance of Gammaproteobacteria and Firmicutes towards Bacteroidetes.

247 Firmicutes was the most abundant phylum, and Corynebacte

248 Gammaproteobacteria and Firmicutes were consistently enriched from lab electroch

249 Specifically, Firmicutes were dominant in normal-weight and obese indi

250 Overall, Firmicutes were found to account for 96% of amplified gu

251 ypes belonging to the Ruminococcaceae in the Firmicutes were predominant in the methanogenic cultures

252 bacterial species, including members of the Firmicutes were significantly different in abundance bet

253 Based on microbiome sequencing, Firmicutes were the predominant bacterial group at the p

254 obacteria, Bacteroidetes, Cyanobacteria, and Firmicutes were the top five phyla identified from all s

255 and can be used in all related gram positive firmicutes which employ drastically different DNA replic

256 they were considered to be restricted to the Firmicutes, which include important pathogens such as St

257 opmental phenotypes (including virulence) in Firmicutes, which includes common human pathogens, e.g.,

258 f steady state communities was enriched with Firmicutes, while the other was enriched with Bacteroide

259 unity was relatively simple and dominated by Firmicutes with 79% and 65% relative abundance for Meish

260 oromusa branch, which unifies members of the Firmicutes with Gram-negative-type cell envelopes, was r

261 of ABR genes and increased Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes with reduced Proteobacteria.