ライフサイエンスコーパス: GMO

1 he screening PSP was developed to detect all GMOs authorized in the EU in one single PCR experiment,

2 ssess DNA degradation, DNA amplification and GMO quantification along breadmaking process of broa.

3 hips between g(H) and [H] in diphytanoyl and GMO bilayers are essentially the same (approximately 0.7

4 ence reporter and the endogene with another (GMO concentration = transgene/endogene ratio).

5 al products of recombinant DNA technology as GMOs lacks biological coherence, but has proved to be a

6 ucts containing more than 0.9% of authorized GMOs per ingredient.

7 tive gA channels are nearly the same in both GMO and DiPhPC bilayers.

8 In both GMO and DPhPC bilayers, fluorination decreased conductan

9 (11)C-GMO also had a long neuronal retention time (>200 h).

10 strongly suggest that PET studies with (11)C-GMO can provide robust and sensitive quantitative measur

11 y was to determine whether analyses of (11)C-GMO kinetics could provide robust and sensitive measures

12 mental modeling and Patlak analysis of (11)C-GMO kinetics each provided quantitative parameters that

13 (11)C-GMO kinetics in isolated rat hearts were also measured f

14 Compartmental modeling of (11)C-GMO kinetics in the monkey heart proved stable under all

15 Compartmental modeling of (11)C-GMO kinetics yielded estimates of the rate constants K1

16 addition, Patlak graphical analyses of (11)C-GMO kinetics yielded Patlak slopes K(p) (mL/min/g), whic

17 at hearts, the neuronal uptake rate of (11)C-GMO was 8 times slower than (11)C-HED and 12 times slowe

18 N-(11)C-guanyl-(-)-meta-octopamine ((11)C-GMO) has a much slower NET transport rate and is trapped

19 n of Agrobacterium sp. in samples containing GMO or non GMO samples.

20 Moreover, for samples containing GMOs, the throughput and cost-effectiveness is significa

21 were measured in glycerylmonooleate/decane (GMO) and diphytanoylphosphatidylcholine/decane (DiPhPC)

22 n 10/12 cases was sensitive enough to detect GMO DNA at concentrations of 1%.

23 Newly developed GMO detection methods, also multiplex methods, are mostl

24 Comparing actual and estimated GMO content between two extraction methods, root mean sq

25 Finally, GMO mixtures and a real-life sample were analyzed to ill

26 ndicate that the method could be applied for GMO quantification below the European labeling threshold

27 n developed to this aim, mainly intended for GMO screening.

28 opment of reliable and sensitive methods for GMO detection.

29 the development of genosensing platforms for GMO quantification, which should be expressed as the num

30 omply with international recommendations for GMO quantification methods.

31 During routine monitoring for GMOs in food in the Netherlands, papaya-containing food

32 tect and quantify DNA sequences specific for GMOs.

33 ilayers were formed from glycerylmonooleate (GMO) in various solvents.

34 hatidylcholine (DPhPC) or glycerylmonoolein (GMO) bilayers.

35 eads to degradation of DNA, which may impair GMO detection and quantification.

36 In GMO bilayers, however, proton affinities of gA and the d

37 In GMO/decane (thick) bilayers, the largest flicker frequen

38 These frequencies were attenuated in GMO/squalene (thin) bilayers by 100-, 30-, and 70-fold i

39 types of bilayers, and for the SS channel in GMO bilayers only.

40 ton conductances in gramicidin A channels in GMO and PEPC cannot be explained by surface charge effec

41 rrier was reduced, and decreased currents in GMO bilayers, where ion exit or entry is rate limiting b

42 trasts with what was previously described in GMO (glycerylmonooleate) bilayers.

43 olution interface is strikingly different in GMO and diphytanoyl bilayers, the reduced slope in g(H)-

44 R dioxolane-linked gA dimer "inactivated" in GMO/decane but not in squalene-containing bilayers.

45 nels are within the range of 27-29 kJ/mol in GMO bilayers and of 20-22 kJ/mol in DiPhPC bilayers.

46 he monoglyceride bilayer was not reversed in GMO-ether bilayers, solvent-inflated or -deflated bilaye

47 ssing of raw maize play also a major role in GMO quantification.

48 crop and food samples is the primary step in GMO monitoring and regulation, with the increasing numbe

49 nces increased upon fluorination, whereas in GMO they decreased.

50 assessment of novel food proteins, including GMOs.

51 cation capability on grains with high or low GMO content.

52 fraction to investigate the effects of MMPC, GMO, OA, and AA on the bending and stability of lipid bi

53 ated to biotechnology--genetic modification, GMOs, genetic engineering, transgenic, and all the rest-

54 s on the undulation pressure; 10 and 50 mol% GMO increase the fluid spacing of EPC in excess water by

55 membrane fusion, whereas glycerol monoleate (GMO), oleic acid (OA), and arachidonic acid (AA) promote

56 0-fold) than in neutral glyceryl monooleate (GMO) membranes.

57 lcholine (DPhPC) bilayers than in monoolein (GMO) bilayers (coupled for the four combinations of pept

58 all tested samples, the presence of multiple GMOs was unambiguously proven by the characterization of

59 cterium sp. in samples containing GMO or non GMO samples.

60 lasmic male sterile lines for release as non-GMO or transgenic materials.

61 In contrast, the addition of GMO has minor effects on the undulation pressure; 10 and

62 Detection of GMO material in crop and food samples is the primary ste

63 soybean seed with a different percentage of GMO seed two extraction methods were used, CTAB and DNea

64 would increase harmonization and quality of GMO testing in the EU.

65 eal-time PCR revealed that quantification of GMO was feasible in the three different breads and that

66 e of the detection and the quantification of GMO.

67 st-effective, and high-fidelity screening of GMO.

68 y control ratio, substrate control ratios of GMOd/GMd and GMOSd/GMd were approximately 30-40% lower i

69 osed systems and enable safe applications of GMOs in open systems, which include bioremediation and p

70 atform for direct, quantitative detection of GMOs found in the Turkish feed market.

71 t, and reliable methods for the detection of GMOs is crucial for proper food labeling.

72 to 10(6)-fold, allowing Yes/No detection of GMOs with a limit of detection of approximately 30 copie

73 well as the overall environmental impact of GMOs.

74 As the number of GMOs has increased over time, standard-curve based simpl

75 With the growing number of GMOs introduced to the market, testing laboratories have

76 eeded to prevent unintended proliferation of GMOs in natural ecosystems.

77 edures commonly involved in the screening of GMOs.

78 and characterization of a broad spectrum of GMOs in routine analysis of food/feed matrices.

79 res to ensure authenticity and validation of GMOs.

80 , and De Jaeger to engage with the public on GMOs and genetic engineering broadly.

81 resistance to genetically modified organism (GMO) technologies.

82 the needs for genetically modified organism (GMO) traceability in highly processed foods, the aim of

83 ification of genetically modified organisms (GMO's) using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR).

84 Presence of genetically modified organisms (GMO) in food and feed products is regulated in many coun

85 aquaculture, genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and even pharmaceuticals are raising public concer

86 ification of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and implementation of labeling regulations.

87 ltivation of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and their use in food and feed is constantly expan

88 the field of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) are characterized using real-time polymerase chain

89 Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) are commonly used to produce valuable compounds in

90 Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) are increasingly deployed at large scales and in o

91 Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) are increasingly used in research and industrial s

92 constructed genetically modified organisms (GMOs) are introduced into the environment, the method is

93 unauthorised genetically modified organisms (GMOs) being present in the European food and feed chain

94 presence of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in crops, foods and ingredients, necessitated the

95 labeling of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) with a minimum content of 0.9% would benefit from

96 existing and genetically modified organisms (GMOs), as well as the overall environmental impact of GM

97 umbrella of genetically modified organisms (GMOs), their commercialization is by no means certain at

98 detection of genetically modified organisms (GMOs).

99 ide around 'genetically modified organisms' (GMOs) has limited the diffusion and scope of this techno

100 The present GMO-HPL, which has an unique three-dimensional periodic

101 The resulting GMOs cannot metabolically bypass their biocontainment me

102 cability of the proposed strategy in routine GMO analysis.

103 This work provides a foundation for safer GMOs that are isolated from natural ecosystems by a reli

104 tes that, at small interbilayer separations, GMO, OA, or AA converts the bilayer to a structure conta

105 ach for the rapid quantification of specific GMO events in foods.

106 centage of RR, it is possible to monitor the GMO content at the first stage of processing crude oil.

107 Disaggregating the concept of the 'GMO' is a necessary condition for confronting misconcept

108 These GMOs could also be quantified using the microarray, as t

109 is longer and more restrictive than in thin GMO bilayers.

110 Thus GMO, OA, or AA destabilizes bilayer structure as apposin

111 scribes the development and applicability to GMO testing of a screening strategy involving a PSP and

112 onduction through gA channels in relation to GMO bilayers.

113 eveloped a strategy to identify unauthorised GMOs containing a pCAMBIA family vector, frequently pres

114 To identify unauthorised GMOs in food and feed matrices, an integrated approach h

115 irst, the potential presence of unauthorised GMOs is assessed by the qPCR SYBR(R)Green technology tar

116 e used to securely authenticate and validate GMOs without disclosing the actual signature.

117 fluorescence signals increased linearly with GMO concentration.