ライフサイエンスコーパス: GPP

1 GPP and its ortholog, the peroxisomal DEG protease from

2 GPP averaged 4.1+/-2.3 g O2 m(-3) d(-1) with minimal dif

3 GPP binds to an allylic site (S1) and aligns well with k

4 atment induced sustained remissions in all 4 GPP patients.

5 Overall, we estimate a GPP increase of 37 +/- 9 per cent for high-latitude ecos

6 Notably, the absolute GPP bias was highest at the tropical evergreen tree site

7 ic constraints and by three trade-offs among GPP components: wood production (NPPwood ) vs fine-root

8 roduct in North America during 2000-2014 and GPP data from 24 AmeriFlux sites.

9 d and halved precipitation suppressed ER and GPP equivalently, with the net outcome being unchanged i

10 tering (the most data-driven hypothesis) and GPP suggested that greater effort is needed understand V

11 eranyl diphosphate (GPP) and between IPP and GPP to give farnesyl diphosphate (FPP).

12 he Z-methyl group at C3 in DMAPP (3-OPP) and GPP (4-OPP), respectively.

13 However Reco and GPP remained high in areas with large Eriophorum vaginat

14 emporal correspondence between OCO-2 SIF and GPP globally.

15 t our simulated relationship between SIF and GPP values are reasonable when compared with satellite (

16 ogy of GPP is only partially understood, and GPP lacks approved treatments.

17 y (precipitation)-induced ET variability and GPP-ET coupling strength.

18 ergreen tree sites, the corresponding annual GPP biases were up to 20%.

19 n phenology, plays a dominant role in annual GPP variability, indicating more attention should be pai

20 of plant phenology and physiology on annual GPP variation is not clear.

21 growing season (GSstart and GSend) to annual GPP variability, using a regional GPP product in North A

22 defined as the ratio of carbon assimilation (GPP) to evapotranspiration (ET).

23 of uncertainty in most remote sensing based GPP models.

24 Here, we report VPM-based GPP (GPPvpm) estimates for the world's ten most populous

25 e 2010 dry season drought, but links between GPP and NBE changes are not conclusive.

26 iosynthesis, we characterized a bifunctional GPP/FPP synthase and a GGPP synthase in the mountain pin

27 ed eddy covariance flux towers, we find both GPP and ER to be larger at the landscape compared to the

28 m ecosystem-scale field observations of both GPP and Ra.

29 ut in contrast to the traditional view, both GPP and Ra decline in aging boreal and temperate forests

30 d areas during summer months was balanced by GPP.

31 NEP was jointly determined by GPP and Re for both inland and coastal wetlands.

32 l diphosphate and isopentenyl diphosphate by GPP synthases (GPPSs).

33 NPP in aging forests is primarily driven by GPP, which decreases more rapidly with increasing age th

34 Here, we synthesize data on component GPP fluxes from a worldwide forest database to determine

35 The recombinant Li3CARS converted GPP into 3-carene as the major product, with K m and k c

36 Our SIF-based crop GPP estimates are 50-75% higher than results from state-

37 Finally, posterior estimates of cumulative GPP under control and eCO2 treatments were tested as a b

38 -predicted increase in springtime cumulative GPP was 0.035 Pg/decade [15.5 gCm(-2) (6.8%)/decade] for

39 the relative contributions of maximum daily GPP (GPPmax) and the start and end of growing season (GS

40 Vegetated basins showed declining GPP and CO2 sink with age (R(2) = 67% and 57%, respectiv

41 d a weakened carbon sink from both decreased GPP and increased RE.

42 valuated 6 years (2007-2012) of flux-derived GPP data from the Prairie Heating and CO2 Enrichment (PH

43 e also found that canopy SIF and SIF-derived GPP (GPPSIF ) were strongly correlated to leaf-level bio

44 Uncertainties in the derived GPP and physiological within-canopy gradients and their

45 osphate (DMAPP) to form geranyl diphosphate (GPP) and between IPP and GPP to give farnesyl diphosphat

46 eversible conversion of geranyl diphosphate (GPP) to geraniol.

47 talyzes the reaction of geranyl diphosphate (GPP) with the cis-farnesyl group in phosphoglycolipid 5

48 Geranyl diphosphate (GPP), the precursor of most monoterpenes, is synthesized

49 ate (DMAPP) and then to geranyl diphosphate (GPP).

50 ptomic changes in 3 pustular skin disorders, GPP, PPP, and AGEP, converged on neutrophil chemotaxis a

51 he narrow uncertainties of these data-driven GPP estimates suggest that they could be useful semi-ind

52 ow that at most sites, the reanalysis-driven GPP bias was significantly positive with respect to the

53 Temporal water-driven GPP and TER variations compensate locally, dampening wat

54 es incorporated 20 +/- 9% of total ecosystem GPP into biomass.

55 ern forests (~3.6 Pg C yr(-1) ) and enhanced GPP in tropical forests (~3.7 Pg C yr(-1) ).

56 air temperature: warmer conditions enhanced GPP and RE.

57 Moreover, negative correlations of the ER/GPP ratio with soil temperature and moisture did not dif

58 is difficult however, to accurately estimate GPP in urban areas, mostly due to the complexity of impe

59 We developed a model to estimate GPP from the tower-based measurement of SIF and leaf-lev

60 MAESTRA-estimated GPP did not statistically differ from GPP estimated usin

61 d respiration measurements, and we estimated GPP in two ways: using (1) the canopy process model MAES

62 s reduced magnitude of growing season FCH4 , GPP and NEE, thus reducing or reversing their C sink fun

63 direct global observational constraints for GPP.

64 A in temperate forests after controlling for GPP and MAT, suggesting other additional factors contrib

65 roduce 3-carene was over ten fold higher for GPP (k cat /K m = 0.56 microM(-1)s(-1)) than NPP (k cat

66 Here, we focus on a key quantity for GPP, the ratio of leaf internal to external CO2 (chi).

67 imated GPP did not statistically differ from GPP estimated using approach 2, but was 28% greater than

68 does not directly constrain models of future GPP growth, it does provide a global-scale benchmark for

69 s of DMAPP, and couples IPP to DMAPP to give GPP.

70 Global GPP varied from 108.1 to 128.2 PgC yr(-1) , 65% of the r

71 Without this correction, the CFE for global GPP is underestimated by 0.05 PgC/y/ppm.

72 ribute to 57% of the detrended IAV of global GPP.

73 of a recent model intercomparison of global GPP.

74 (r = 0.85-0.91) with three proxies of global GPP.

75 max distributions and their impact on global GPP in the Sheffield Dynamic Global Vegetation Model (SD

76 vides a unique opportunity to produce global GPP operationally using the Southampton CARbon Flux (SCA

77 All hypotheses produced global GPP that was highly correlated (r = 0.85-0.91) with thre

78 ng soil carbon, adequately reproduced global GPP distributions.

79 biogeochemical processes can suppress global GPP growth.

80 ites along with persistent net heterotrophy (GPP<ER), indicating significant bacterial metabolism of

81 Overall, the SCARF model predicted high GPP in regions dominated by forests and croplands, and l

82 This higher GPP IAV in semi-arid regions is co-limited by supply (pr

83 Moreover, in regions with higher GPP variability, GPP fluctuations are mostly controlled

84 However, current ESMs disagree on how GPP responds to environmental variations (1,2) , suggest

85 expansion and vegetation collectively impact GPP variations in these megacities.

86 with its C6-C11 group poised to attack C1 in GPP to form the moenocinyl sidechain, with the more dist

87 - defined here as drought-induced decline in GPP without a change in greenness.

88 (Jaru RJA) exhibited dry-season declines in GPP and Re consistent with most DGVMs simulations.

89 simulated consistent dry-season declines in GPP in the equatorial Amazon (Manaus K34, Santarem K67,

90 m a 20 per cent to a 60 per cent increase in GPP for a doubling of atmospheric CO2 concentrations in

91 sed soil respiration) and a 10% reduction in GPP contributed equally to the difference in NEP between

92 suggest that T cells play a crucial role in GPP pathogenesis based on the documented role that IL-12

93 The validity of these trends in GPP and Ra is, however, very difficult to test because o

94 ficant predictors of temporal variability in GPP among most treatments.

95 iver of the local interannual variability in GPP and TER.

96 The variation in GPP propagated through to a 27% coefficient of variation

97 it, but that (ii) site-to-site variations in GPP have little power in explaining site-to-site spatial

98 hich SIF tracks spatiotemporal variations in GPP remains unresolved.

99 ained 71%, 54%, and 57% of the variations in GPP, Re , and NEP, respectively.

100 es, needs to be mapped and incorporated into GPP estimates in order to adequately assess the role of

101 els (DGVMs) provide mechanistic insight into GPP variability but diverge in predicting the response t

102 bed photosynthetically active radiation into GPP.

103 covery would have increased the January-June GPP sum by 29 gCm(-2) [8.4 gCm(-2) (3.7%)/decade].

104 imate and the carbon cycle that assume large GPP growth during the twentieth century (31% +/- 5% grow

105 on cycle and posit that there will be larger GPP and ET variations in the future with changes in prec

106 ) yr(-1) across sites (ca. 15% of site level GPP).

107 dominated by forests and croplands, and low GPP in shrublands and dry-grasslands across USA and Euro

108 f increased carbon uptake in 2011, and lower GPP during a period of increased NBE in the 2010 dry sea

109 In contrast, the Luminex GPP assay was FDA cleared for the detection of 11 pathog

110 es is consistent with increasing annual mean GPP, driven in part by climate warming, but with differe

111 s USA was comparable to those from the MOD17 GPP product except in regions dominated by croplands.

112 At the end of the 21st century, modeled GPP mainly increases in spring and fall due to reduced t

113 onstrating the potential of SIF for modeling GPP.

114 e was a negative correlation between monthly GPP and lake level (r = 0.45) and positive correlation w

115 The results suggest that a mu : GPP value of c. 0.13 is a homeostatic steady state for e

116 These trends constrain the ratio mu : GPP (= (CUEa x CUEh )/(1 - CUEe )) with respect to MAT b

117 However, the NEP/Re and NEP/GPP ratios exhibited little variability for inland wetla

118 was controlled predominantly by RE, and not GPP.

119 asing age than Ra does, but the ratio of NPP/GPP remains approximately constant within a biome.

120 The model fits the observed GPP well (R(2) = 0.79), which was confirmed by other mod

121 7, and Caxiuana CAX); a contrast to observed GPP increases.

122 is negligible relative to the total observed GPP trend of 0.41 mumol C m(-2) s(-1) yr(-1) .

123 measurement campaign, while exceeding 5% of GPP and 10% of NEE just before the strongest drought pha

124 (Ra) consumed a larger proportion (~67%) of GPP, and their woody stem growth (ANPPstem) represented

125 Our results reveal that allocation of GPP is governed in an integrated way by allometric const

126 iving novel seven-membered ring analogues of GPP and FPP.

127 sis for the reformulation of the controls of GPP in next-generation ESMs.

128 The temperature dependence of GPP is directly linked to photosynthetic physiology, but

129 ains the long-term temperature dependence of GPP, and highlights the importance of considering physio

130 approach to infer the global distribution of GPP from an ensemble of eight DGVMs constrained by globa

131 The spatial distribution of GPP from the SCARF model over Europe and conterminous US

132 sent a global, measurement-based estimate of GPP growth during the twentieth century that is based on

133 esults suggest that large-scale estimates of GPP that capture variation in SSWS among ecosystems coul

134 Model estimates of GPP that used VPD scalars were poorly correlated with ob

135 Current satellite-derived estimates of GPP use a vapor pressure deficit (VPD) scalar to account

136 then compared satellite-derived estimates of GPP with eddy-covariance observations of GPP in two deci

137 sis-driven biases on the global estimates of GPP.

138 The estimation of GPP from this model agreed well with flux tower observat

139 The etiology of GPP is only partially understood, and GPP lacks approved

140 le and the magnitude of CO2 fertilization of GPP is almost linear across the entire ensemble of model

141 gent constraints on the CO2 fertilization of GPP.

142 They increase CUE, and the fraction of GPP partitioned aboveground.

143 and autotrophic respiration, the fraction of GPP respired by trees is predicted to increase with warm

144 nlinear relationship between the fraction of GPP that was respired above ground (Ra /GPP) and the mea

145 te root respiration as a primary function of GPP and which respond to environmental variables by modi

146 ests limited high-frequency O3 inhibition of GPP at this site.

147 agreed well with flux tower observations of GPP (R(2 ) = 0.68; P < 0.0001), demonstrating the potent

148 were poorly correlated with observations of GPP at MO (r(2) = 0.09) and MMSF (r(2) = 0.38).

149 of GPP with eddy-covariance observations of GPP in two deciduous broadleaf forests with low SSWS: th

150 base to determine the allocation patterns of GPP across global gradients in climate and nitrogen depo

151 lastids also increases the cytosolic pool of GPP available for monoterpene synthesis in this compartm

152 This portion of GPP remains unaffected by [O3 ], thus helping to buffer

153 ss, we substantially improved predictions of GPP at MO (r(2) = 0.83) and for a severe drought year at

154 transpiration-based WUE (WUEt , the ratio of GPP and transpiration), is analyzed from 0.5 degrees gri

155 The ratio of GPP to FPP produced by the GPP/FPP synthase was highly d

156 ESMs require accurate representation of GPP.

157 d NEE due to a stronger positive response of GPP compared to ER, indicating that clipping could poten

158 otosynthetic physiology, but the response of GPP to warming over longer timescales could also be shap

159 in the northern hemisphere is the result of GPP increasing faster than ET because of the higher temp

160 w insight into the relative sensitivities of GPP and ET to climate, CO2, and NDEP.

161 use of the higher temperature sensitivity of GPP relative to ET.

162 otosynthesis model for diagnostic studies of GPP and the terrestrial carbon cycle in urban areas.

163 This change in the springtime sum of GPP related to the timing of spring snowmelt is quantifi

164 g-term trend and inter-annual variability of GPP are dominated by GPPmax both at the ecosystem and re

165 n explain 98% of inter-annual variability of GPP over mid- and high latitudes in North America.

166 easonal patterns of meteorological biases on GPP.

167 can benefit from advancing beyond a focus on GPP.

168 or predicting the impacts of water stress on GPP in forests with low SSWS.

169 s taxa dampens the effects of temperature on GPP across a catchment of geothermally heated streams.

170 n of net primary productivity (NPP, ~32%) or GPP (~9%).

171 Overall GPP duration ranged from 50 to 146 months.

172 uminex xTAG gastrointestinal pathogen panel (GPP) assay for the detection of common enteric bacterial

173 uminex xTag gastrointestinal pathogen panel [GPP] [Luminex Corporation, Toronto, Canada]) using Cary-

174 This updated Good Publication Practice (GPP) guideline, known as GPP3, builds on earlier version

175 PARps ) rather than total canopy, to predict GPP.

176 Uncertainty in predicted GPP (estimated from the spread of DGVMs) is reduced by 4

177 rement period resulted in moderate predicted GPP trends of 0.02-0.04 mumol C m(-2) s(-1) yr(-1) , whi

178 ospheric drought is important for predicting GPP under current and future climate; we highlight the n

179 otosynthesis (8) , and successfully predicts GPP measured at eddy-covariance flux sites.

180 ental GES line, indicating that the produced GPP can be used by plastidic monoterpene synthases.

181 ure dependences of gross primary production (GPP) and autotrophic respiration, the fraction of GPP re

182 the allocation of gross primary production (GPP) and its response to climate is essential for improv

183 ponding changes in gross primary production (GPP) by applying in situ carbon flux observations.

184 ses in terrestrial gross primary production (GPP) due to the use of meteorological reanalysis dataset

185 ive an ensemble of gross primary production (GPP) estimates using the average of three data-driven mo

186 exchange (NEE) and gross primary production (GPP) fluxes from a 9-years water table manipulation expe

187 y NO3- uptake and growth primary production (GPP) for the forest (r2 = 0.72) and agricultural (r2 = 0

188 t (CFE) for global gross primary production (GPP) from 915 to 1,057 PgC for the period of 1901-2010.

189 ve helped increase gross primary production (GPP) in recent decades.

190 ion of terrestrial gross primary production (GPP) is a critical step in closing the Earth's carbon bu

191 Gross primary production (GPP) is the largest flux in the carbon cycle, yet its re

192 spiration (ER) and gross primary production (GPP) negatively responded to warming, net ecosystem exch

193 The gross primary production (GPP) of vegetation in urban areas plays an important rol

194 lysis we show that gross primary production (GPP) partitioning belowground is inversely related to so

195 Quantifying gross primary production (GPP) remains a major challenge in global carbon cycle re

196 Models of gross primary production (GPP) responses to water stress are commonly based on rem

197 in the response of gross primary production (GPP) to rainfall change (intrinsic response).

198 spiration (RE) and gross primary production (GPP) to this weakened carbon sink.

199 nd LAI, as well as gross primary production (GPP), net primary production (NPP), wood NPP, soil CO2 e

200 sed for estimating gross primary production (GPP), often includes contributions from both mosses and

201 quantification of gross primary production (GPP), the largest flux of C in the global C cycle.

202 wth in terrestrial gross primary production (GPP)-the amount of carbon dioxide that is 'fixed' into o

203 Gross primary production (GPP)-the uptake of carbon dioxide (CO2) by leaves, and i

204 standing of global gross primary production (GPP).

205 ) as a fraction of gross primary production (GPP).

206 photosynthesis or gross primary production (GPP).

207 based estimates of gross primary production (GPP, output from photosynthesis) are highly uncertain, i

208 asured was 2% of gross primary productivity (GPP) and 4.9% of net ecosystem exchange (NEE) on average

209 ue to stabilized gross primary productivity (GPP) and continuously increased autotrophic respiration

210 rst estimates of gross primary productivity (GPP) and ecosystem respiration (ER) for the Tonle Sap.

211 ng from changing gross primary productivity (GPP) and ecosystem respiration (ER), remains unknown.

212 ariations in the gross primary productivity (GPP) and ecosystem respiration (RE) were associated prim

213 Gross primary productivity (GPP) and ecosystem respiration (Re) were greater at GM t

214 tantially higher gross primary productivity (GPP) and ecosystem respiration (Reco), their autotropic

215 oot respiration, gross primary productivity (GPP) can explain most patterns of ecosystem root respira

216 conductance and gross primary productivity (GPP) derived from EC data to calculate a measure of iWUE

217 dence for higher gross primary productivity (GPP) during a pulse of increased carbon uptake in 2011,

218 we find that (i) gross primary productivity (GPP) has a simple relationship with seasonal water defic

219 he proportion of gross primary productivity (GPP) incorporated into growth - and aboveground versus b

220 d with catchment gross primary productivity (GPP) indicating a strong potential terrestrial aquatic l

221 n of terrestrial gross primary productivity (GPP) remains a challenge despite its importance in the g

222 Annual gross primary productivity (GPP) varies considerably due to climate-induced changes

223 ng for 10-25% of gross primary productivity (GPP), 15-32% of terrestrial ecosystem respiration (TER)

224 iration (Reco ), gross primary productivity (GPP), and net summer CO2 storage (NEE).

225 ential tracer of gross primary productivity (GPP), assuming a unidirectional COS flux into the vegeta

226 ad higher annual gross primary productivity (GPP), ecosystem respiration (Re ), and net ecosystem pro

227 annual cycle of gross primary productivity (GPP), of photosynthetic capacity (Pc), and of other flux

228 availability on gross primary productivity (GPP), terrestrial ecosystem respiration (TER) and net ec

229 ly driven by low gross primary productivity (GPP), with little shift in either carbon use efficiency

230 ance terrestrial gross primary productivity (GPP).

231 o its control on gross primary productivity (GPP).

232 estimating daily gross primary productivity (GPP).

233 ermelon the glyoxysomal processing protease (GPP) was shown to catalyse PTS2 processing.

234 viduals with generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) identified a low-frequency variant (p.Asp176His) th

235 n disorders: generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP), palmoplantar pustulosis (PPP), and acute generaliz

236 e a cause of generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP), three recent investigations attempted to correlate

237 proach 2, but was 28% greater than published GPP estimates for the same site and years using eddy cov

238 the fluxes of aboveground respiration (Ra ), GPP and their ratio (Ra /GPP) in large, field-grown Euca

239 n of GPP that was respired above ground (Ra /GPP) and the mean daily temperature.

240 Thus, warming significantly increased Ra /GPP by moving plants to higher positions on the shared R

241 respiration (Ra ), GPP and their ratio (Ra /GPP) in large, field-grown Eucalyptus tereticornis trees

242 plants to higher positions on the shared Ra /GPP vs daily temperature relationship, but this effect w

243 of heat waves may modestly increase tree Ra /GPP, contributing to a positive feedback between climate

244 d saturated microsites and suppressed Reco , GPP, and NEE.

245 In the initial stages of thaw, Reco , GPP, and NEE increased linearly with thaw across all tre

246 Over 7 years Reco , GPP, and NEE also increased in Control (i.e., ambient pl

247 Pg C yr(-1) from 2010 to 2012, with reduced GPP in northern forests (~3.6 Pg C yr(-1) ) and enhanced

248 to annual GPP variability, using a regional GPP product in North America during 2000-2014 and GPP da

249 explicitly included when estimating regional GPP in the boreal region, resulting in a substantial ove

250 seasonal cycle, including earlier dry season GPP loss and enhanced peak-to-trough GPP in tropical for

251 Model simulated dry-season GPP reductions were driven by an external environmental

252 frastructure (Pc), while observed dry-season GPP resulted from a combination of internal biological (

253 reducing magnitude of maximum growing season GPP in subsequent flood years by 15% compared to contro

254 A linear SIF-GPP relationship is also obtained at eddy-flux sites cov

255 by the SCARF model was comparable to in situ GPP measurements (R(2) > 0.7) in most of the evaluated b

256 ces in biomass among sites, biomass-specific GPP was independent of temperature in spite of a 20 degr

257 this sensitivity of the measured springtime GPP to the spring recovery to be in accordance with the

258 product profiles from different substrates (GPP versus NPP) by Li3CARS indicates that monoterpene me

259 hawed soils exceeded the increases in summer GPP, and thawed tundra was a net annual CO2 source.

260 enous part is denatured, but the C-terminal (GPP)7-NC2 remains intact.

261 molecular origin, can assist in terrestrial GPP monitoring.

262 t to be the result of increasing terrestrial GPP.

263 r component of net ecosystem production than GPP.

264 The GPP data were used to calibrate a light response model w

265 The GPP predicted by the SCARF model was comparable to in si

266 The ratio of GPP to FPP produced by the GPP/FPP synthase was highly dependent on the ratio of th

267 e data, and satellite images to estimate the GPP of terrestrial ecosystems including urban areas.

268 diation and humidity strongly influenced the GPP biases, while the nontree sites were more affected b

269 his weighted GPP ensemble to investigate the GPP variability for different aridity regimes.

270 Implementation of the GPP ASRs enables our public health laboratory to offer h

271 thods as standards, the sensitivities of the GPP ASRs were 100% for adenovirus 40/41, norovirus, rota

272 The overall comparative performance of the GPP ASRs with conventional methods in clinical samples w

273 F retrievals provide a direct measure of the GPP of cropland and grassland ecosystems.

274 oss can generate only about one-third of the GPP that vascular plants can because of its much lower p

275 nce augurs a new opportunity to quantify the GPP response to climate drivers and the potential to con

276 lostridium difficile, were detected with the GPP.

277 selectivity gradually switching from FPP to GPP, until replacement of the final alpha-helix, whereup

278 we quantified the contribution of mosses to GPP, CUE and partitioning.

279 e ratio of net ecosystem production (NEP) to GPP, was estimated for each site using published models.

280 ks-including a large sink that is related to GPP.

281 t re-direction of the metabolic flux towards GPP in plastids also increases the cytosolic pool of GPP

282 bolic flux from carotenoid formation towards GPP and monoterpene biosynthesis.

283 season GPP loss and enhanced peak-to-trough GPP in tropical forests within the Amazon Basin and redu

284 alized pustular psoriasis von Zumbusch type (GPP) is the most severe manifestation of psoriasis.

285 ver, in regions with higher GPP variability, GPP fluctuations are mostly controlled by precipitation

286 onoterpene synthesis in this compartment via GPP export from plastids.

287 We then use this weighted GPP ensemble to investigate the GPP variability for diff

288 ion and shows a significant association with GPP in Asian populations (P=8.4x10(-5); odds ratio=6.4).

289 empted to correlate the IL36RN genotype with GPP clinical presentations.

290 fficient treatment modality interfering with GPP pathomechanisms.

291 f IL-1 blockade in a subset of patients with GPP are viewed as evidence for an autoinflammatory patho

292 We treated a series of 4 patients with GPP with ustekinumab, which was applied on an outpatient

293 erged as common alterations in patients with GPP, PPP, and AGEP, which is consistent with the pustula

294 biopsy specimens obtained from patients with GPP, PPP, or AGEP and healthy control subjects.

295 OS flux into the vegetation that scales with GPP.

296 variants of EWUE, water-use efficiency (WUE, GPP/ET), and transpiration-based WUE (WUEt , the ratio o

297 The use of the Luminex xTAG GPP for the detection of enteric pathogens in settings,

298 and specificity were calculated for the xTAG GPP for the seven principal diarrheal etiologies.

299 The sensitivity and specificity for the xTAG GPP were >88% for Shigellaspp.,Campylobacterspp., rotavi

300 Stimulation of cumulative 6-year GPP by warming (29%, P = 0.02) and eCO2 (26%, P = 0.07)