コーパス検索結果 (left1)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 lculated creatinine clearance (Cockcroft and Gault formula) at 1 year was also better (MMF 74+/-32 mL
2 an subjects in the original cohort Cockcroft Gault, which led to biased and highly variable estimates
3 mated iothalamate GFR, whereas the Cockcroft Gault formula underestimated it when it was <120 ml/min
5 16.5, CRMSE = 16.5, r2 = 0.69; (2) Cockcroft-Gault, delta GFR = 9.56 +/- 14.9, CRMSE = 17.7, r2 = 0.6
6 nship between hemoglobin level and Cockcroft-Gault creatinine clearance (CrCl) and to estimate the li
9 , age, sex, creatinine levels, and Cockcroft-Gault estimated creatinine clearance, current immunosupp
11 tion adjusted for BSA, followed by Cockcroft-Gault equation, and CKD-EPI equation, while the worst wa
12 D equation), Cockcroft-Gault (CG), Cockcroft-Gault corrected for GFR (CG-GFR), and other equations we
13 Estimated creatinine clearance (Cockcroft-Gault) from baseline out to 6 additional years (8 years
14 inary creatinine clearance (CrCl), Cockcroft-Gault (CG), and previously reported creatinine- and/or c
15 our methods: 100/serum creatinine, Cockcroft-Gault equation, creatinine clearance from 24-h urine col
16 enal disease estimated GFR (eGFR), Cockcroft-Gault estimated creatinine clearance, and endogenous 24-
17 MDRD 2 (simplified MDRD equation), Cockcroft-Gault (CG), Cockcroft-Gault corrected for GFR (CG-GFR),
18 by using two prediction equations [Cockcroft-Gault and that from the Modification of Diet in Renal Di
20 ream urine sample; and reduced GFR-Cockcroft-Gault estimated GFR (abnormal: <60 ml/min per 1.73 m(2))
21 oalbuminuria) or renal impairment (Cockcroft-Gault estimated creatinine clearance <60 ml/min or doubl
22 98+/-19 and 63+/-12 mL/min/1.73 m; Cockcroft-Gault estimated creatinine clearance, 125+/-33 and 85+/-
23 ative Cardiovascular Project, mean Cockcroft-Gault creatinine clearance was 55 +/- 24 ml/min and esti
24 changes in baseline-adjusted mean Cockcroft-Gault GFR at month 12 (primary efficacy end point) were
25 alues, whereas only 40% and 60% of Cockcroft-Gault- and MDRD-based GFRs, respectively, were within th
27 RD] 2.0 [95% CI 1.0 to 4.2] or OR [Cockcroft-Gault] 1.9 [95% CI 0.9 to 3.9]), and creatinine clearanc
29 ed using the recently recalculated Cockcroft-Gault (GFR-CGc) and the simplified Modification of Diet
30 ce (CrCl) were estimated using the Cockcroft-Gault (C-G) and Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (M
31 et in Renal Disease (MDRD) and the Cockcroft-Gault (CG) equations as compared with measured (125)I-io
32 h standardized creatinine, and the Cockcroft-Gault (CG) formula as compared with (125)I-iothalamate G
34 o group during follow-up using the Cockcroft-Gault (P < .001) and CKD-EPI (P = .007) equations, but n
35 creatinine, GFR (estimated by the Cockcroft-Gault [GFRCG] and Modification of Diet in Renal Disease
36 over time estimated with both the Cockcroft-Gault and Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaborat
38 atinine clearance according to the Cockcroft-Gault and Jelliffe formulas were available from 10,236 p
39 MR imaging, which outperformed the Cockcroft-Gault and MDRD formulas, adds less than 10 minutes of ta
40 creatinine levels according to the Cockcroft-Gault and modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) f
41 ation algorithms: the best was the Cockcroft-Gault equation adjusted for BSA, followed by Cockcroft-G
42 le equation and better than in the Cockcroft-Gault equation, even when the latter was corrected for b
47 2) from baseline estimated [by the Cockcroft-Gault equation] glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] in tho
48 study formula for the GFR and the Cockcroft-Gault estimate of creatinine clearance, were examined ag
49 isease (62 [69%] studies), but the Cockcroft-Gault formula (22 [24%] studies) and Modification of Die
50 atinine clearance (CrCl) using the Cockcroft-Gault formula (CrCl < 45, 45 to 59, and > or = 60 ml/min
51 clearance (CrCl) derived from the Cockcroft-Gault formula (normal, > or = 90 ml/min; mild, 60 to 89
56 lant and also calculated using the Cockcroft-Gault method at the transplant evaluation; at the day of
58 ration rate was estimated with the Cockcroft-Gault, Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration
59 ion of trial participants with the Cockcroft-Gault, Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD), and
60 GFR (eGFR) was calculated with the Cockcroft-Gault, Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study (MDRD
61 nd estimated kidney function using Cockcroft-Gault creatinine clearance (CCl), Modification of Diet i
62 erular filtration rate (eGFR) with Cockcroft-Gault (C-G) and Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (M
63 1.5 +/- 0.6; 1.5 +/- 0.7 mg/dL), or Cockroft Gault calculated creatinine clearance (58.6 +/- 19.7; 59
64 hloretin (P), tetrahydrocurcuminoid Cockroft Gault (T), and resveratrol (R) were tested in single, do
65 glomerular filtration rate was 38 (Cockroft-Gault) and 24 mL/min (modification of diet in renal dise
67 ion rates (AER) and renal function (Cockroft-Gault formula) were determined, and clinical and hematol
68 stly used to assess renal function: Cockroft-Gault formula, MDRD-4 (Modification of Diet in Renal Dis
70 on derived from donor and recipient Cockroft-Gault GFRs and adjusted for the single kidney adaptive r
71 ntration and arithmetic mean +/- SE Cockroft-Gault creatinine clearance calculations, respectively, w
74 diction was most accurate using the Cockroft-Gault formula as evaluated by Cox proportional hazards m
75 eal-life cohort of HF patients, the Cockroft-Gault formula was the most accurate of the 3 used eGFR f
76 iscrimination improvement using the Cockroft-Gault formula were 21% and 5.04, respectively, versus th
77 nce of <60 mL/min determined by the Cockroft-Gault formula), undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass cardia
WebLSDに未収録の専門用語（用法）は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。