コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 y urinary (29.2%), gastrointestinal (20.4%), Gram negative (29.9%), Gram positive (16.8%), and cultur
7 et, the difference in mechanism of action on gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria may be less pro
8 ed on four bacterial strains, including both Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria, showing great
12 arbapenemase-producing glucose-nonfermenting Gram-negative bacilli (CPNFs), including Pseudomonas aer
14 tion being significantly shorter for enteric Gram-negative bacilli and enterococci (means, 3.6 h and
16 ce characteristics for the identification of Gram-negative bacilli commonly isolated from blood cultu
18 uter membrane, C10OOc12O was able to enhance gram-negative bacilli susceptibility to antibacterial co
19 peptides may therefore be useful in fighting gram-negative bacilli threats through sensitization to e
20 es to antibiotics, we attempted to sensitize gram-negative bacilli to innate antibacterial protagonis
21 A total of 210 Bactec bottles demonstrating Gram-negative bacilli were prospectively enrolled for th
22 (54 Enterobacteriaceae and 26 nonfermenting Gram-negative bacilli) obtained from multiple institutio
27 rains 0.3-8 mug/mL) than for the majority of Gram negative bacteria (Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 16-32 mu
28 um chemotaxis towards live gram positive and gram negative bacteria and demonstrate high sensitivity
31 e active against Gram positive bacteria than Gram negative bacteria; however zerumbone showed highest
35 es for the prevention of multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria (MDR-GNB) in adult intensive care
36 occus aureus and Streptococcus pyogenes) and gram-negative bacteria (Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Esche
37 togenes, Geobacillus stearothermophilus) and gram-negative bacteria (Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Pseudomo
38 ated molecular patterns in gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria activate IL-1beta release from im
39 urpose, we chose the pilus protein FimG from Gram-negative bacteria and a disulfide-bonded variant of
40 le to rapidly traverse the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria and accumulate inside these cells
41 acteria that are obligate predators of other Gram-negative bacteria and are considered potential alte
42 he periplasmic side of the inner membrane of Gram-negative bacteria and are then extracted by the Lpt
43 biofilm resistance to both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria and fungi: it remains almost "zer
44 ed protein H-NS is a key global regulator in Gram-negative bacteria and is believed to be a crucial p
45 a six-component system that is widespread in Gram-negative bacteria and is thought to mediate retrogr
48 line for pilus production at the surface of Gram-negative bacteria and the archetypical protein-poly
49 ericidal protein that limits contact between Gram-negative bacteria and the colonic epithelial surfac
52 udies have shown that conjugation systems of Gram-negative bacteria are composed of distinct inner an
54 ling and export of amyloid protein sequences.Gram-negative bacteria assemble biofilms from amyloid fi
56 Mouse and human RELMbeta selectively killed Gram-negative bacteria by forming size-selective pores t
58 90 bloodstream isolates of the 4 most common gram-negative bacteria causing bloodstream infections in
59 evalence of MCRPE infection from isolates of Gram-negative bacteria collected at the hospitals from 2
62 pime-tazobactam when tested against clinical Gram-negative bacteria during clinical studies and routi
63 nder a low light dose (0.6 J cm(-2) ) toward Gram-negative bacteria E. coli, making it a remarkably e
64 h TLR4, as well as through activation by the Gram-negative bacteria E. coli, results in reduced NET p
65 s and Enterococcus faecalis, and against the Gram-negative bacteria Escherichia coli, Escherichia col
66 y that targets a highly conserved protein of Gram-negative bacteria essential for the fitness of V. c
67 anism of inter-cellular competition in which Gram-negative bacteria exchange polymorphic toxins using
69 of any known membrane-embedded insertase in Gram-negative bacteria fold into a prepore before membra
71 bat multidrug resistant bacteria, especially Gram-negative bacteria for which the situation is partic
72 will be the effectiveness of EDP on reducing Gram-negative bacteria growth and the opposite trend was
74 ed to invade, reseal, kill, and digest other gram-negative bacteria in soils and water environments.
76 he biosensor construct was tested in several Gram-negative bacteria including Pseudomonas, Shewanella
77 an effective permeability barrier that makes Gram-negative bacteria inherently resistant to many anti
79 genesis of outer-membrane proteins (OMPs) in gram-negative bacteria involves delivery by periplasmic
81 eactivity to antigens from Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria is common in patients suffering f
84 olysaccharide (LPS) in the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria is critical for the assembly of t
86 he mechanism of action of promysalin against Gram-negative bacteria is still not clarified, even if a
89 lex (Bcc) are a group of multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria rarely reported in patients witho
91 ctivity against a panel of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria revealed structure-activity relat
93 represent a major mechanism of resistance in Gram-negative bacteria showing multi-drug or extensively
95 c children, nasopharyngeal colonization with Gram-negative bacteria such as Haemophilus influenzae an
97 Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) is the component of Gram-negative bacteria that activates Toll-like receptor
98 Brucella spp. are facultative intracellular Gram-negative bacteria that cause the zoonotic disease b
99 imeric channels across the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria that mediate the import or export
100 Proteins (PGRPs) kill both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria through simultaneous induction of
101 complexes constitute a primary mechanism for Gram-negative bacteria to expel toxic molecules for surv
102 and utilization of enterobactin permits many Gram-negative bacteria to thrive in environments where l
104 an discriminate between viable and nonviable Gram-negative bacteria to tune the immune response, ther
107 omysalin is active against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria using a microdilution assay.
109 sceptibility profiles of clinically relevant Gram-negative bacteria within two hours of antibiotic in
111 io aeruginosavorus are obligate predators of Gram-negative bacteria, and have been proposed to be use
112 enable gene exchange between five species of Gram-negative bacteria, and that the identity of the gen
113 acellular sensors for both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, but their role in steady-state h
115 HFM and showed that HFM increases rat fecal Gram-negative bacteria, elevates lipopolysaccharides (LP
116 espread antibiotic resistance, especially of Gram-negative bacteria, has become a severe concern for
117 id development of resistance particularly in Gram-negative bacteria, illustrates the urgent need for
118 it is widespread in more than 25 species of Gram-negative bacteria, including enterohemorrhagic E. c
121 The zauPzapA operon is present in diverse Gram-negative bacteria, indicating a common mechanism fo
123 multitude of essential cellular functions in Gram-negative bacteria, mitochondria and chloroplasts.
125 n across the cell envelope are widespread in Gram-negative bacteria, NBs are found exclusively in gam
127 ride (LPS), which is a membrane component of gram-negative bacteria, secrete more EVs than cholangioc
129 light that, although BAM is conserved across Gram-negative bacteria, structural and functional differ
131 le for detecting lipopolysaccharide (LPS) of Gram-negative bacteria, was immobilized on both a large
132 ted excellent sensitivity to trace levels of Gram-negative bacteria, while remaining insensitive to b
133 is markedly induced by avirulent strains of Gram-negative bacteria, Yersinia and Klebsiella, and les
174 g highly effective against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria; and (iii) the concentration of t
175 imics the structural moieties of its natural Gram negative bacterial pathogen-associated molecular pa
176 s and show that constriction in a variety of Gram-negative bacterial cells, including Proteus mirabil
178 nflammasome-based surveillance machinery for Gram-negative bacterial infections has been recently dis
180 gram-positive bacterial isolates (57.9%), 17 gram-negative bacterial isolates (22.4%), and 15 fungal
185 enterica serovar Typhi is a human-restricted Gram-negative bacterial pathogen responsible for causing
186 ss termed "effector-triggered immunity." The Gram-negative bacterial pathogen Yersinia inactivates cr
190 locks into the backbone of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacterial PG utilizing metabolic cell wall
191 ibility profiling for both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacterial species requires at least 48-72
192 pe 6 secretion system (T6SS) is used by many Gram-negative bacterial species to deliver toxic effecto
193 e III and type IV effector proteins from six Gram-negative bacterial species to interact with the euk
194 ncludes well-characterized gram-positive and gram-negative bacterial strains published by ARLG invest
196 needle-tip invasin proteins SipD and IpaD of Gram-negative bacterial type-3 secretion systems that br
199 ions with model biological membranes and the Gram-negative bacterium Shewanella oneidensis MR-1.
201 arainfluenzae is a nutritionally fastidious, Gram-negative bacterium with an oropharyngeal/nasopharyn
202 This method was successfully applied to a Gram-negative bacterium; it has yet to be implemented in
205 tudies support a uniquely nuanced pathway of Gram-negative CAMPs resistance and provide a more detail
206 However, recent evidence points towards a Gram-negative cell plan for Planctomycetes, although in-
207 ns and proteomic analyses support an altered Gram-negative cell plan for Planctomycetes, including a
208 Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans is a Gram-negative commensal bacterium of the oral cavity whi
211 ro susceptibilities, inappropriate (initial) gram-negative coverage was given in 9 of 245 (4%) and 18
212 tial distribution of the main colonizer, the Gram-negative Curvibacter sp., along the body axis.
214 lling efficiency toward both B. subtilis and Gram negative E. coli, features that demonstrate the pro
215 CD/linalool-IC-NFs inhibited growth of model Gram-negative (E. coli) and Gram-positive (S. aureus) ba
216 in vitro susceptibility of Gram-positive and Gram-negative endophthalmitis bacterial isolates to vanc
217 and the crystal structure of a PRF from the Gram-negative endophytic bacterium Burkholderia phytofir
219 the gastric pathogen Helicobacter pylori, a Gram-negative epsilonproteobacterium, encodes two protei
221 nce with previously identified DSDs from the Gram-negative genus, Acinetobacter, but instead shows li
223 vitro activity against clinically important gram-negative, gram-positive aerobic, and facultative ba
224 gardless of the inciting bacterial stimulus (gram-negative, gram-positive, or bacterial products).
225 of antimicrobial resistance, particularly in Gram-negative hospital pathogens, which has led to renew
226 TTOT (48.21 versus 11.75 h; P < 0.001), the Gram-negative infection (GNI) TTOT (71.83 versus 35.98 h
231 Pseudomonas aeruginosa MexAB-OprM pump in a Gram-negative membrane model that contained both inner a
234 Here, we have addressed this question in the Gram-negative model bacterium Burkholderia thailandensis
236 teriaceae isolates, 5 Gram-positive cocci, 5 Gram-negative nonfermenting species, 9 Mycobacterium tub
237 f the Burkholderia cepacia complex (Bcc) are Gram-negative opportunisitic bacteria that are capable o
239 is a potent phospholipase A2 secreted by the Gram-negative opportunistic pathogen, Pseudomonas aerugi
244 ram-positive (OR, 0.73; 95% CI, .55-.97) and gram-negative organisms (0.51; .33-.78) but not yeast (0
246 ens, novobiocin has limited activity against Gram-negative organisms due to the presence of the lipop
248 e report that GA is antibacterial, targeting Gram-negative organisms with higher activity towards Pse
253 icle considers the cases of the non-invasive Gram-negative pathogen Vibrio cholerae and the invasive
256 cterial activities against Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens (Staphylococcus aureus, Enteroba
257 CDI systems are distributed widely among Gram-negative pathogens and are thought to mediate inter
258 vel E3 ligase (NEL) domain that is unique to Gram-negative pathogens and whose activity is repressed
259 bacterial clearance in, animal models of the Gram-negative pathogens Haemophilus influenzae and Neiss
261 ype II secretion (T2S) is one means by which Gram-negative pathogens secrete proteins into the extrac
262 bapenemase-producing organisms, or CPOs, are Gram-negative pathogens that produce a transmissible car
263 d apparatus functions in the injectisomes of gram-negative pathogens to export virulence factors into
264 and fluoroquinolone resistance among common Gram-negative pathogens, and the emergence of MRSA, high
265 e of the major contributors to resistance in Gram-negative pathogens, by efficiently expelling a broa
266 on (T3S), a protein export pathway common to Gram-negative pathogens, comprises a trans-envelope syri
267 rio bacteriovorus bacteria naturally prey on Gram-negative pathogens, including antibiotic-resistant
268 r process that occurs in the injectisomes of gram-negative pathogens, is termed type-III secretion.
279 ival of microbiota members from the dominant Gram-negative phylum Bacteroidetes depends on their abil
281 g, modifying and finally destroying walls of Gram-negative prey bacteria, modifying their own PG as t
282 lipopolysaccharide, a cell wall component of Gram-negative Proteobacteria and known inducer of lupus
283 eriovorus and Micavibrio aeruginosavorus are Gram-negative proteobacteria that are obligate predators
284 ons: gram-positive Staphylococcus aureus and gram-negative Pseudomonas aeruginosa (99.3 +/- 1.9% and
286 ic Gram-positive rods and other uncultivable Gram-negative rods, and, rarely, opportunistic microorga
287 at recurrent nonlethal gastric infections of Gram-negative Salmonella enterica Typhimurium (ST), a ma
288 NAs in monocytes isolated from patients with Gram-negative sepsis compared with healthy control subje
292 e a number of clinical isolates of important Gram-negative species-Enterobacter cloacae, Escherichia
297 13 showed moderate activity against the MDR Gram-negative strains, with MICs in the range of 16-32 m
299 al NADases predicted to transit not only the Gram-negative T6SS but also the Gram-positive type VII s
WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。