戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。

今後説明を表示しない

[OK]

コーパス検索結果 (left1)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1                                              HGE agent infection in immunocompromised mice progresses
2                                              HGE agent was demonstrated in mature and immature myeloi
3                                              HGE agent-infected C3H/HeJ mice were necropsied over 21
4                                              HGE binding, internalization, and proliferation were com
5                                              HGE infection of HL60 cells, bone marrow progenitors, gr
6                                              HGE should be added to the list of infections potentiall
7                                              HGE-agent infection of mice induces pathologic changes s
8                                 Sera from 20 HGE patients with indirect fluorescent-antibody (IFA) ti
9                           Thirty-three of 38 HGE patient serum samples (87%), previously confirmed by
10                  Although the North American HGE sequences showed the highest conservation (>98.1% id
11                This suggests that rP44 is an HGE-E. equi group-specific antigen.
12 romyscus leucopus mice were infected with an HGE agent.
13 lity among serologic tests using E. equi and HGE agent isolates for diagnosis of HGE will occasionall
14 y be useful in discriminating dually HME and HGE IFA-reactive sera.
15 specific serodiagnostic antigens for HME and HGE, respectively, could be used to discriminate IFA dua
16 urface protein 2 (MSP-2) in A. marginale and HGE and OMP-1 in E. chaffeensis.
17 even HGE patient serum samples, a horse anti-HGE serum, and a horse anti-Ehrlichia equi serum recogni
18 eroxidase-positive granules were seen around HGE agent inclusions but not around E. chaffeensis inclu
19 expression, as well as their ability to bind HGE and become infected.
20 idase treatment of HL60 cells prevented both HGE binding and infection.
21 only these rare CD15s-expressing cells bound HGE and became infected.
22 or, early endosomal antigen 1, and rab5, but HGE agent inclusions were not.
23 , Fuc-TVII, allowed binding and infection by HGE.
24             Human gingival epithelial cells (HGE) express two antimicrobial peptides of the beta-defe
25 les from 28 patients with well-characterized HGE and 9 patients with suspected HGE who were investiga
26 mens from 17 patients with culture-confirmed HGE also tested by IFA by using either a human isolate f
27 ummary, most patients with culture-confirmed HGE develop antibodies within 2 weeks of onset of sympto
28  samples from persons with culture-confirmed HGE or patients with Lyme disease and antibodies to the
29 ssay results for sera from culture-confirmed HGE patients, WB was used to confirm the specificity of
30 14 to 44% of acute-phase sera from confirmed HGE patients.
31                   The incidence of confirmed HGE was 31 cases/100,000 in 1997, 51 cases/100,000 in 19
32                          Vacuoles containing HGE bacteria incorporated endocytosed colloidal gold par
33 in neutrophils: morulae (vacuoles containing HGE organisms) are evident in polymorphonuclear leukocyt
34                                 In contrast, HGE agent in THP-1 or HL-60 cells induced no increase in
35 cted C3H mice, in SCID mice, and in cultured HGE bacteria.
36 he substrate in immunoblots to help diagnose HGE.
37 philum, the human granulocytic ehrlichiosis (HGE) agent and a variant (AP-Variant 1) that has not bee
38 SG3) of the human granulocytic ehrlichiosis (HGE) agent has identified a number of immunoreactive pro
39 vitro-grown human granulocytic ehrlichiosis (HGE) agent in horses.
40         The human granulocytic ehrlichiosis (HGE) agent in infected blood specimens remained viable d
41 tein of the human granulocytic ehrlichiosis (HGE) agent is an immunodominant antigen in human infecti
42 es, and the human granulocytic ehrlichiosis (HGE) agent is an obligatory intracellular bacterium of g
43 unties, and human granulocytic ehrlichiosis (HGE) agent isolates were obtained from Humboldt county.
44         The human granulocytic ehrlichiosis (HGE) agent resides and multiplies exclusively in cytopla
45  DNA of the human granulocytic ehrlichiosis (HGE) agent was detected in 17 of 47 mice (36.2%), but on
46         The human granulocytic ehrlichiosis (HGE) agent, which replicates in neutrophils, was found n
47 MPs) of the human granulocytic ehrlichiosis (HGE) agent, with molecular sizes of 44 to 47 kDa, are im
48 tive to the human granulocytic ehrlichiosis (HGE) agent.
49 he agent of human granulocytic ehrlichiosis (HGE) amplified DNA from extracts of these cells.
50 etection of human granulocytic ehrlichiosis (HGE) and determination of etiology when serologic testin
51 disease and human granulocytic ehrlichiosis (HGE) are tick-borne illnesses caused by Borrelia burgdor
52 d of having human granulocytic ehrlichiosis (HGE) but who lacked antibodies to ehrlichiae revealed Ig
53 he agent of human granulocytic ehrlichiosis (HGE) codes for a protein with a predicted molecular size
54 tients with human granulocytic ehrlichiosis (HGE) commonly recognize a 44-kDa antigen.
55 atient with human granulocytic ehrlichiosis (HGE) developed anemia and leukopenia, but by day 24, the
56 ncidence of human granulocytic ehrlichiosis (HGE) in the upper Midwest is uncertain.
57             Human granulocytic ehrlichiosis (HGE) is a febrile tick-borne illness caused by a recentl
58 he agent of human granulocytic ehrlichiosis (HGE) is a newly recognized tick-borne pathogen that resi
59             Human granulocytic ehrlichiosis (HGE) is a potentially fatal, tick-borne disease caused b
60             Human granulocytic ehrlichiosis (HGE) is an emerging febrile systemic disease caused by t
61             Human granulocytic ehrlichiosis (HGE) is an emerging infection caused by an Ehrlichia spe
62             Human granulocytic ehrlichiosis (HGE) is an emerging tick-borne infection with a specific
63 he agent of human granulocytic ehrlichiosis (HGE) is an emerging tick-borne pathogen that resides in
64             Human granulocytic ehrlichiosis (HGE) is an emerging tick-borne zoonosis caused by a stra
65             Human granulocytic ehrlichiosis (HGE) is an emerging tickborne illness caused by an intra
66             Human granulocytic ehrlichiosis (HGE) is an emerging tickborne infection, increasingly re
67 he agent of human granulocytic ehrlichiosis (HGE) is an obligate intracellular bacterium with a tropi
68             Human granulocytic ehrlichiosis (HGE) is caused by infection with an obligatory intracell
69             Human granulocytic ehrlichiosis (HGE) is usually diagnosed by immunofluorescent antibody
70 is (HME) or human granulocytic ehrlichiosis (HGE) may be made on the basis of serologic cross-reactiv
71             Human granulocytic ehrlichiosis (HGE) results in fever, pancytopenia, and mild liver inju
72  studies of human granulocytic ehrlichiosis (HGE) suggest a role for host immune response in resolvin
73 he agent of human granulocytic ehrlichiosis (HGE) to evaluate the importance of these pathways in the
74 he agent of human granulocytic ehrlichiosis (HGE) was assessed in a murine infection model and the ro
75 he agent of human granulocytic ehrlichiosis (HGE) was determined by removing feeding ticks from mice
76 he agent of Human Granulocytic Ehrlichiosis (HGE) was studied to investigate how this pathogen exists
77 h confirmed human granulocytic ehrlichiosis (HGE) were tested for cytoplasmic, nuclear, and platelet
78 he agent of human granulocytic ehrlichiosis (HGE) with primers flanking the hypervariable region, we
79 l system of human granulocytic ehrlichiosis (HGE), C3H/HeJ, C3H-SCID, and Peromyscus leucopus mice we
80 he agent of human granulocytic ehrlichiosis (HGE), Ehrlichia phagocytophila, and Ehrlichia equi proba
81 he agent of human granulocytic ehrlichiosis (HGE), in different groups of adults and children from We
82 he agent of human granulocytic ehrlichiosis (HGE), regardless of host species.
83 tients with human granulocytic ehrlichiosis (HGE), the HGE agent has been seen only in the peripheral
84 he agent of human granulocytic ehrlichiosis (HGE).
85 ng illness, human granulocytic ehrlichiosis (HGE).
86 he agent of human granulocytic ehrlichiosis (HGE).
87 he agent of human granulocytic ehrlichiosis (HGE).
88 ic agent of human granulocytic ehrlichiosis (HGE).
89 e-confirmed human granulocytic ehrlichiosis (HGE).
90 gamma-deficient mice had a markedly elevated HGE bacteria burden with morulae concentration of 282 +/
91                                       Eleven HGE patient serum samples, a horse anti-HGE serum, and a
92         We previously cloned a gene encoding HGE agent 44-kDa major outer membrane protein and design
93 hich we have termed HER2 gene body enhancer (HGE).
94 reversible upon removal of the extracellular HGE agent bound to the host cells prior to PMA stimulati
95 mans suggest an immunopathological basis for HGE.
96 , a putative cellular receptor component for HGE.
97 gton County, Minnesota, an area enzootic for HGE.
98                           A murine model for HGE may be useful to assess pathologic lesions, transmis
99 of the 142 individuals who were positive for HGE had at least one serum sample that also reacted to t
100 c, consistent, and simpler serodiagnosis for HGE than the use of whole infected cells or purified HGE
101 may be more useful in diagnostic testing for HGE.
102  incubated with freshly freed host cell-free HGE agent in vitro.
103  HGE, and sera from horses convalescent from HGE and E. equi infection.
104 GE agent, sera from humans convalescent from HGE, and sera from horses convalescent from HGE and E. e
105                    Two clones, one each from HGE agent and E. equi, that were recognized specifically
106 5 was more effective in protecting mice from HGE agent infection than with MAbs 5C11 and 5D13.
107 from dogs and human patients recovering from HGE.
108 ntibodies in 80% of first serum samples from HGE patients.
109 h a low and a high passage of in vitro-grown HGE agent.
110 udy group of individuals suspected of having HGE reaffirmed antibody reactivity to multiple antigens
111                                     However, HGE agent infection had no effect on IRP-1 binding activ
112 s were higher, however, with the local human HGE isolate, but the difference was not statistically si
113 lyzing the role of the major OMP antigens in HGE agent infection and for serodiagnosis.
114 sions concerning management of tick bites in HGE-endemic areas.
115 eptide was detected by immunofluorescence in HGE stimulated with F. nucleatum cell wall, consistent w
116 ssion of hBD-2 mRNA via multiple pathways in HGE in a pattern that is distinct from that of IL-8 expr
117 fic AnkA antibodies reacted with proteins in HGE agent immunoblots, and AnkA monoclonal antibodies de
118 amily in pathogenesis and immune response in HGE.
119 3) fucosylated molecule, plays a key role in HGE infection, an observation that may help explain the
120    However, these antibodies did not inhibit HGE binding, and anti-CD15s was capable of inhibiting th
121 both E. chaffeensis and E. sennetsu, but not HGE agent, in the acute monocytic leukemia cell line THP
122 both E. chaffeensis and E. sennetsu, but not HGE agent, inclusions in THP-1 cells or the cells of the
123 e definition, as confirmed, probable, or not HGE.
124 ection or are caused by immune activation of HGE deserves further study.
125              We demonstrate that adhesion of HGE to both HL60 cells and normal bone marrow cells dire
126                                 The agent of HGE (aoHGE) is an obligate intracellular bacterium that
127 N mice can become infected with the agent of HGE (designated aoHGE) by syringe inoculation or tick-bo
128                We conclude that the agent of HGE appears to enter and modify part of the endocytic pa
129 uggest that vacuoles containing the agent of HGE fail to mature into phagolysosomes.
130  Lyme disease and antibodies to the agent of HGE revealed a reproducible pattern of the immune respon
131 sed by Borrelia burgdorferi and the agent of HGE, respectively.
132 ibodies reactive with the etiologic agent of HGE.
133 tween Ehrlichia chaffeensis and the agent of HGE.
134  confirmed and 59 probable (n = 78) cases of HGE as defined by seroconversion or a fourfold or higher
135              The earliest confirmed cases of HGE occurred in 1987 in Wisconsin and 1988 in Florida.
136                                     Cases of HGE occurred in 21 states; 47 (60%) of the cases occurre
137 112 confirmed cases and 30 probable cases of HGE were identified.
138 mediates play a role in the early control of HGE.
139 d as an improved target for PCR diagnosis of HGE compared with the currently used 16S rRNA gene targe
140 gree and that IFA is useful for diagnosis of HGE in convalescence.
141 equi and HGE agent isolates for diagnosis of HGE will occasionally provide discrepant results and con
142 ance of these pathways in the eradication of HGE bacteria.
143 ts and children without clinical evidence of HGE will test positive for A. phagocytophila antibodies
144 D15s was capable of inhibiting the growth of HGE after its entry into the target cell.
145  approach to the clinical immunodiagnosis of HGE.
146                             The incidence of HGE in this region exceeded prior estimates, but it was
147 , but there are few data on the incidence of HGE.
148 genicity- and immunity-related mechanisms of HGE are unknown.
149 differential expression in a murine model of HGE infection and during tick transmission.
150  in splenic neutrophils in a murine model of HGE, demonstrating this phenomenon in vivo.
151 e appropriateness of the mouse as a model of HGE, including its usefulness for the investigation of t
152       Laboratory mice are valuable models of HGE agent infection kinetics and immunity, but initial s
153 within 24 h of attachment, and the number of HGE agent organisms increased in larval ticks during fee
154                                     Onset of HGE was identified from April through December, with cas
155 ole for host immunity in the pathogenesis of HGE.
156 l to examine immunity in the pathogenesis of HGE.
157 laboratory feature during the acute phase of HGE infection.
158 dy staining or polymerase chain reaction) of HGE; 89 were confirmed cases, and 48 were probable cases
159 s observed in the 16S rRNA gene sequences of HGE agent and E. equi isolates from northern California.
160 inetics and immunity, but initial studies of HGE infection in mouse models have failed to demonstrate
161 atory diagnosis and epidemiological study of HGE.
162  with an acute febrile illness suggestive of HGE were identified.
163 and killing capacity underlie the tropism of HGE for granulocytic HL-60 cells and, conversely, the re
164  with Ehrlichia equi-infected neutrophils or HGE agent-infected cultured HL60 cells.
165 ectin glycoprotein ligand, PSGL-1, prevented HGE cell binding and infection, as did enzymatic digesti
166 n annual incidence of confirmed and probable HGE was 9.3 cases per 100,000 residents; there was no in
167 g the 78 patients with confirmed or probable HGE.
168                  We used recombinant protein HGE-44, expressed and purified as a maltose-binding prot
169  from the host cells, noninfectious purified HGE agent stored frozen and thawed also had antiapoptoti
170  the use of whole infected cells or purified HGE agents.
171                                  Recombinant HGE-44, expressed and purified as a glutathione transfer
172 om two aoHGE-infected mice bound recombinant HGE-44.
173                 We conclude that recombinant HGE-44 antigen is a suitable antigen in an ELISA for the
174 tein antigen genes, we prepared and screened HGE agent and Ehrlichia equi genomic DNA expression libr
175                                         Some HGE agent and E. chaffeensis inclusions colocalized with
176                                    Suspected HGE cases were classified, according to the national cas
177            Active surveillance for suspected HGE was conducted from 1997 through 1999 in a 13-county
178 racterized HGE and 9 patients with suspected HGE who were investigated by PCR, blood smear examinatio
179 lood samples from 31 patients with suspected HGE who were previously tested by 16S rRNA gene (16S) PC
180               These results demonstrate that HGE bacteria induce IL-8 production by host cells and, p
181                     RT-PCR demonstrated that HGE organisms inhibited mRNA expression of a single comp
182                             We now show that HGE bacteria, and the HGE-44 protein, induce IL-8 secret
183                                          The HGE agent and E. equi are antigenically diverse, and int
184                                          The HGE agent did not prevent O(2-) generation in human peri
185                                          The HGE agent induced a significant delay in morphological a
186                                          The HGE agent induced expression of interleukin-1beta (IL-1b
187                                          The HGE starts from the 3' end of intron 19 and extends into
188 otting using purified E. chaffeensis and the HGE agent as antigens suggested that heat shock and othe
189   These results suggest that E. equi and the HGE agent found in California are similar or identical b
190 nfection of mice with B. burgdorferi and the HGE agent modulates host immune responses, resulting in
191 f dual infection with B. burgdorferi and the HGE agent on the course of murine Lyme arthritis and gra
192 dorferi reacted positively with rP44 and the HGE agent.
193       We now show that HGE bacteria, and the HGE-44 protein, induce IL-8 secretion in a promyelocytic
194 h an obligatory intracellular bacterium, the HGE agent.
195 ecially in geographic regions where both the HGE agent and E. chaffeensis occur.
196 ion of p44-homologous genes expressed by the HGE agent in a tissue culture would assist in understand
197 integrity of or new protein synthesis by the HGE agent was not required for the inhibition; carbohydr
198 e three cytokines in PBLs by rP44 and by the HGE agent were similar.
199 ected or have been infected naturally by the HGE agent with low-level persistent infection or frequen
200 ecific prevention of O(2-) generation by the HGE agent would be critical in survival of the HGE agent
201 rging febrile systemic disease caused by the HGE agent, an obligatory intracellular bacterium of gran
202 ng NADPH oxidase in human neutrophils by the HGE agent.
203 ent P44-homologous proteins expressed by the HGE agent; and (vi) demonstrated existence of antibodies
204 train of Anaplasma phagocytophila called the HGE agent, an obligatory intracellular bacterium.
205    We previously isolated and cultivated the HGE agent in the promyelocytic leukemia cell line HL-60
206                      All assays detected the HGE agent in blood during early infection, but PCR and t
207 ene fragment is identical among E. equi, the HGE agent, and E. phagocytophila, with the exception of
208  a single mouse was culture positive for the HGE agent.
209                             Furthermore, the HGE agent completely prevented O(2-) release by neutroph
210 h human granulocytic ehrlichiosis (HGE), the HGE agent has been seen only in the peripheral blood gra
211                          To determine if the HGE agent delays the apoptosis of human peripheral blood
212 ed from the p44-18 gene were detected in the HGE agent cultivated in HL-60 cells at 37 degrees C, but
213 transcribed from p44-homologous genes in the HGE agent cultivated in HL-60 cells; (ii) cloned genes c
214 es being expressed were not clustered in the HGE agent genome; (iv) estimated that a minimum copy num
215 ggests that histopathological lesions in the HGE murine model do not result from direct ehrlichia-med
216 cer function and that DNA methylation in the HGE region inhibits the histone modifications characteri
217                     In tick cell layers, the HGE agent induced foci of infection that caused necrotic
218                   The 444 Ep-ank gene of the HGE agent and E. equi isolates from northern California
219 onal antibodies to the 44-kDa antigen of the HGE agent and was infectious for laboratory mice.
220 gest that the 43- and 45-kDa proteins of the HGE agent are encoded by members of the GE MSP-2 multige
221  cells, proving that the blood stages of the HGE agent are infectious for tick cells, as are those re
222  p44 multigene family in transmission of the HGE agent between mammals and ticks.
223 cell culture isolation of two strains of the HGE agent directly from an infected horse and a dog and
224 hese studies suggest that replication of the HGE agent during and after feeding in larvae and during
225 experimental process for transmission of the HGE agent from infected mice (a reservoir model) to nymp
226 tment within HL-60 cells: early forms of the HGE agent have a round reticular appearance while later
227  NOS2(-/-) mice had delayed clearance of the HGE agent in comparison to control or gp91(phox-/-) mice
228 urface properties between populations of the HGE agent in different host environments.
229 n by the major outer membrane protein of the HGE agent in monocytes, which are not the primary host c
230                Proteinase K treatment of the HGE agent or rP44 eliminated the ability to induce these
231 g was used to characterize the nature of the HGE agent replicative inclusions and to compare them wit
232 hat binding of a protein component(s) of the HGE agent to neutrophils and subsequent cross-linking an
233  carbohydrate but not surface protein of the HGE agent was required.
234           Sequence-confirmed products of the HGE agent were amplified from three individuals residing
235 t 44-kDa major surface protein (rP44) of the HGE agent were examined by reverse transcription-PCR and
236  which are not the primary host cells of the HGE agent, contributes to HGE pathogenesis and immunomod
237 volved in the antiapoptotic mechanism of the HGE agent.
238 ine, blocked the antiapoptotic effect of the HGE agent.
239 E agent would be critical in survival of the HGE agent.
240 as determined to be identical to that of the HGE agent.
241 jor antigenic outer membrane proteins of the HGE agent.
242  two PCR-positive mice, contained DNA of the HGE agent.
243 ion of antibodies to a 44-kDa protein of the HGE agent.
244 ere primarily present on the membrane of the HGE agent.
245 is identical to the 16S rDNA sequence of the HGE agent.
246 ultivated in HL60 cells for isolation of the HGE agent.
247 and overrode the antiapoptotic effect of the HGE agent.
248 t or reverse the antiapoptotic effect of the HGE agent.
249 ing to the mRNAs from the genomic DNA of the HGE agent; (iii) showed that the genes being expressed w
250                            Although only the HGE agent was present in northwestern Pennsylvania, both
251 blot analysis, all three MAbs recognized the HGE agent but not Ehrlichia chaffeensis, Ehrlichia senne
252                Although much weaker than the HGE agent freshly freed from the host cells, noninfectio
253              These data demonstrate that the HGE agent elicits a prominent IFN-gamma response in mice
254               These results suggest that the HGE agent resides in inclusions which are neither early
255    Electron microscopy demonstrated that the HGE organism resides in a membrane-bound compartment wit
256                                    Thus, the HGE bacterium specifically bound to fucosylated leukocyt
257                            Reactivity to the HGE agent and to either Coxiella burnetii, Rickettsia ri
258 to E. chaffeensis also had antibodies to the HGE agent in at least one serum sample.
259 version or a fourfold or higher titer to the HGE agent than to the Ehrlichia chaffeensis antigens.
260 ctor beta, and IL-2 mRNAs in response to the HGE agent was not remarkable.
261                   Antibodies reactive to the HGE agent were detected in 142 (8.9%) of 1,602 individua
262 ot TNF-alpha or IL-6 mRNA in response to the HGE agent, whereas monocytes expressed all three of thes
263 positive blood samples were identical to the HGE agent.
264 ity to detect WB-confirmed antibodies to the HGE agent.
265 ng feeding in nymphs is a means by which the HGE agent overcomes inefficiencies in acquisition of inf
266 olorado had antibodies that reacted with the HGE agent (genus GMT = 194), suggesting that enzootic cy
267 ent strains of mice were inoculated with the HGE agent and assayed for production of polyclonal and m
268   Sera from two patients coinfected with the HGE agent and B. burgdorferi reacted positively with rP4
269                   Infection of mice with the HGE agent does not induce diagnostically significant B.
270 l blood leukocytes (PBLs) incubated with the HGE agent or a recombinant 44-kDa major surface protein
271 ee sera that were IFA positive only with the HGE agent were examined by Western immunoblot analysis u
272 ies from rabbits and mice immunized with the HGE agent, sera from humans convalescent from HGE, and s
273  rP44, regardless of IFA reactivity with the HGE agent.
274 ocytopenic in response to infection with the HGE agent.
275  and C57BL/6J mice during infection with the HGE agent.
276                                   Therefore, HGE bacteria repress the respiratory burst by down-regul
277                                    The three HGE-agent-only IFA-positive sera reacted only with rP44,
278                                        Thus, HGE is an important cause of morbidity and is now the se
279  TFAP2C, a known regulator of HER2, binds to HGE and is required for its enhancer function and that D
280  host cells of the HGE agent, contributes to HGE pathogenesis and immunomodulation.
281  > vitamin D3) correlated with resistance to HGE.
282 2), derived from HL60 cells and resistant to HGE, was deficient in the expression of alpha-(1, 3)fuco
283  is highly correlated with susceptibility to HGE, and it, and/or a closely related sialylated and alp
284 g differentiation-specific susceptibility to HGE.
285                         Cells susceptible to HGE express sialylated Lewis x (CD15s), a ligand for cel
286 d the sensitivity and specificity of various HGE agent and E. equi antigens used for IFA diagnosis by
287                           The inhibition was HGE agent dose dependent, required ehrlichial contact wi
288 e USG3 strain and another with the Wisconsin HGE and Minnesota canine sequences.
289 ihydroxyvitamin D3) and then challenged with HGE.
290 olar-type H+-ATPase was not colocalized with HGE agent inclusions but was weakly colocalized with E.
291           However, HL-60 cells infected with HGE bacteria did not produce O2- upon activation with PM
292                               Infection with HGE organisms also decreased gp91phox mRNA levels in spl
293 ly infection of C3H/HeN or C57BL/6 mice with HGE bacteria.
294 odies in eight sera from eight patients with HGE and in two sera from two aoHGE-infected mice bound r
295             The average age of patients with HGE was 57 years, and males accounted for 53 (68%) of th
296  the two proteins in sera from patients with HGE.
297 ocytic ehrlichiosis (HME) did not react with HGE-44-MBP antigen, except for one sample (specificity,
298                                 Rodents with HGE agent-specific antibodies were found in New York (23
299 lowest homology occurring between a New York HGE agent and the Swedish E. phagocytophila.
300 ate clades, one including the three New York HGE samples and the USG3 strain and another with the Wis

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。
 
Page Top