戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。

今後説明を表示しない

[OK]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 -1), and human T-cell leukemia virus type 2 (HTLV-2).
2 an T-cell leukemia virus type 1 (HTLV-1), or HTLV-2.
3 g the different pathobiologies of HTLV-1 and HTLV-2.
4 sent a new and distinct molecular subtype of HTLV-2.
5 h an efficiency similar to that of wild-type HTLV-2.
6 ptional repressor p30, which is not found in HTLV-2.
7 hocytes differs from that of both HTLV-1 and HTLV-2.
8 l transformation tropisms between HTLV-1 and HTLV-2.
9 versus the transformation of CD8+ T cells by HTLV-2.
10 sis resulting from infection with HTLV-1 and HTLV-2.
11     Human T-cell lymphotrophic virus type 2 (HTLV-2), a common infection of intravenous drug users an
12                                              HTLV-2, although highly related to HTLV-1 at the molecul
13 ) is a novel retrovirus distantly related to HTLV-2 and displays a host range similar to that demonst
14    Here, we examined the interaction between HTLV-2 and HIV-1 MA proteins and various NAs in vitro.
15 eferential tropism for CD4+ T cells and that HTLV-2 and HTLV-2/TR1 had a preferential tropism for CD8
16 nd nonhuman primate viruses, suggesting that HTLV-2 and the cognate virus simian T-lymphotropic virus
17 comparative biological studies of HTLV-1 and HTLV-2 and ultimately lead to the determination of the f
18 oconversion against viral antigens in HTLV-1/HTLV-2 and Western blot assay.
19  lymphotropic virus type 1 and 2 (HTLV-1 and HTLV-2) and bovine leukaemia virus (BLV).
20 with human T-cell lymphotropic virus type 2 (HTLV-2) and human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)
21 human T-cell leukemia/lymphoma virus type 2 (HTLV-2), and human herpes virus type 8 (HHV-8) genomes.
22       The 3'-processing activities of HIV-1, HTLV-2, and M-MuLV integrases (INs) with their correspon
23                                   HTLV-1 and HTLV-2 antibodies were measured by enzyme immunoassay (E
24 ues elicited humoral and T-cell responses to HTLV-2 antigens at both systemic and mucosal sites.
25                                 Recently, an HTLV-2 antisense viral protein (APH-2) was identified.
26 viously, our group found that HTLV-1 HBZ and HTLV-2 APH-2 had distinct effects in vivo and hypothesiz
27 an T-cell leukemia virus type 1 (HTLV-1) and HTLV-2 are closely related but pathogenically distinct h
28 an T-cell leukemia virus type 1 (HTLV-1) and HTLV-2 are complex retroviruses that persist in the host
29 an T-cell leukemia virus type 1 (HTLV-1) and HTLV-2 are distinct oncogenic retroviruses that infect s
30                                   HTLV-1 and HTLV-2 are highly related complex retroviruses that have
31 an T-cell leukemia virus type 1 (HTLV-1) and HTLV-2 are highly related viruses that differ in disease
32 man T-lymphotropic virus type 1 (HTLV-1) and HTLV-2 are prevalent at low levels among US blood donors
33 man T lymphotropic virus type 1 (HTLV-1) and HTLV-2 are related but pathogenically distinct viruses.
34 an T-cell leukemia virus type 1 (HTLV-1) and HTLV-2 are related deltaretroviruses but are distinct in
35 l leukemia virus type 1 (HTLV-1) and type 2 (HTLV-2) are highly related retroviruses that have distin
36 l leukemia virus type 1 (HTLV-1) and type 2 (HTLV-2) are highly related retroviruses that transform T
37 impetus for the development of an attenuated HTLV-2-based vectored vaccine for HIV-1; this approach c
38 d in the long terminal repeats of HTLV-1 and HTLV-2 but instead contains a unique activator protein-1
39 hows that HTLV-3 is distinct from HTLV-1 and HTLV-2 but is genetically similar to simian T-lymphotrop
40 luding HTLV-1deltaPBM, HTLV-2+C22(+PBM), and HTLV-2+ C18(deltaPBM).
41 Tax viral mutants, including HTLV-1deltaPBM, HTLV-2+C22(+PBM), and HTLV-2+ C18(deltaPBM).
42                              Both HTLV-1 and HTLV-2 can efficiently immortalize and transform T lymph
43 cell leukemia virus type 1 and 2 (HTLV-1 and HTLV-2) can result in syncytium formation, facilitating
44 s of blood samples obtained from a cohort of HTLV-2 carriers.
45                                   HTLV-1 and HTLV-2 carry the tax and rex transregulatory genes in se
46                        The results for HIV-1/HTLV-2 chimeric constructs represent strong evidence sup
47 ection animal model and investigated whether HTLV-2 could persistently infect macaques, induce a T-ce
48 s of human T-cell lymphotropic virus type 2 (HTLV-2), designated HTLV-2a and HTLV-2b.
49 elucidate the mechanisms by which HTLV-1 and HTLV-2 determine distinct outcomes are likely to provide
50 man T-lymphotropic virus type 1 (HTLV-1) and HTLV-2 differ in pathogenicity in vivo.
51    These studies demonstrate that HTLV-1 and HTLV-2 differ in their T-cell entry requirements and sug
52                                              HTLV-2 does shares many properties with HTLV-1, includin
53 -cell lymphotropic virus type 1 (HTLV-1) and HTLV-2 encode auxiliary proteins that play important rol
54                                   HTLV-1 and HTLV-2 encode auxiliary proteins that play important rol
55 ession of GLUT-1 in CD4(+) T cells increased HTLV-2 entry, while expression of HSPGs on CD8(+) T cell
56  the roles of HSPGs and GLUT-1 in HTLV-1 and HTLV-2 Env-mediated binding and entry into primary T cel
57                                              HTLV-2/Env1 preferentially transformed CD4+ T cells simi
58 specifically to the ectodomain of HTLV-1 and HTLV-2 envelope glycoproteins, which was reversible with
59 ino terminus of the transmembrane protein of HTLV-2 envelope that is necessary for syncytium inductio
60 rsely, CD8(+) T cells, the primary target of HTLV-2, expressed GLUT-1 at dramatically higher levels t
61  RNA sequences involved in HIV-1 gag-pol and HTLV-2 gag-pro frameshifting.
62 ces may affect how HTLV-1 causes disease but HTLV-2 generally does not.
63 NA is encoded by the antisense strand of the HTLV-2 genome.
64 HTLV-2 infected cells and immunoprecipitated HTLV-2 gp46.
65  highly homologous to HTLV-1, infection with HTLV-2 has not been associated with lymphoproliferative
66                               Infection with HTLV-2 has not been conclusively linked to lymphoprolife
67 m that determines this tropism of HTLV-1 and HTLV-2 has not been determined.
68         Here, we report that both HTLV-1 and HTLV-2 have evolved accessory genes to encode proteins t
69  Therefore, antisense proteins of HTLV-1 and HTLV-2 have evolved different functions in vivo, and fur
70 an T-cell leukemia virus type 1 (HTLV-1) and HTLV-2, have a conserved PPPY motif in the C-terminal re
71                Transcription of the chimeric HTLV-2 (HTLVC-enh) was efficiently directed by this hete
72 nsformation tropism of CD4+ T cells, whereas HTLV-2 immortalizes and transforms primarily CD8+ T cell
73 imited number of individuals shown to harbor HTLV-2 in association with specific diseases has, to dat
74 substrate specificities, while HTLV-1 IN and HTLV-2 IN had more defined sequence requirements.
75 onstration of a definitive etiologic role of HTLV-2 in human disease.
76                                              HTLV-2 IN showed reduced activity with strand transfer a
77                       A higher prevalence of HTLV-2 in the west and southwest may be attributed to en
78 eferential tropism for CD4+ T cells, whereas HTLV-2 in vivo tropism is less clear but appears to favo
79 er, for human immunodeficiency virus type-2 (HTLV-2) IN, the replacement of the guanine with 6-methyl
80 PBM significantly increases both HTLV-1- and HTLV-2-induced primary T-cell proliferation.
81 Two of these antibodies also bound to viable HTLV-2 infected cells and immunoprecipitated HTLV-2 gp46
82                                              HTLV-2-infected cells were reproducibly isolated and had
83                                  Exposure of HTLV-2-infected or naive macaques to SIV(mac251) demonst
84  detectable in most primary lymphocytes from HTLV-2-infected patients.
85 th a late proviral burden peak in HTLV-1- or HTLV-2-infected rabbit CD8(+) T cells, respectively.
86      We found that inoculation of irradiated HTLV-2-infected T cells into Indian rhesus macaques elic
87                    However, the link between HTLV-2 infection and leukemia has not been established.
88  longitudinally measure the early HTLV-1 and HTLV-2 infection and replication kinetics in purified CD
89 d CD8+ T cells are susceptible to HTLV-1 and HTLV-2 infection in vitro, and HTLV-1 has a preferential
90 ion of primary T lymphocytes in vitro and in HTLV-2 infection in vivo, we generated APH-2 mutant viru
91 V-1 infection is associated with disease and HTLV-2 infection is not.
92                                              HTLV-2 infection is prevalent among intravenous drug use
93  pathogenesis in animal models of HTLV-1 and HTLV-2 infection.
94 ct pathogenesis resulting from HTLV-1 versus HTLV-2 infections.
95                   Additionally for HIV-1 and HTLV-2 INs, we observed an increase in the 3'-processing
96            In situ hybridization analysis of HTLV-2 integration revealed no obvious chromosomal integ
97                                              HTLV-2 is aleukemic and predominantly immortalizes/trans
98                                     Although HTLV-2 is highly homologous to HTLV-1, infection with HT
99                                              HTLV-2 is highly related to HTLV-1 at the genetic level
100    Conversely, the in vivo T-cell tropism of HTLV-2 is less clear, although it appears that CD8+ T ce
101 eurologic and inflammatory diseases, whereas HTLV-2 is less clearly associated with human disease.
102                                 In contrast, HTLV-2 is much less pathogenic with reports of only a fe
103 1 mainly causes adult T cell leukemia, while HTLV-2 is not associated with leukemia.
104 ree of sequence homology, but infection with HTLV-2 is relatively nonpathogenic compared to HTLV-1.
105 t study with recombinants between HTLV-1 and HTLV-2 is the initial step in elucidating the different
106 with both leukemia and neurologic disorders, HTLV-2 lacks a strong etiologic association with disease
107 ant designed to mimic the basic character of HTLV-2 MA alpha-helix II dramatically improves binding a
108            Mutation of two basic residues in HTLV-2 MA alpha-helix II, previously implicated in BLV g
109                                              HTLV-2 MA also binds NAs with higher affinity than HTLV-
110                                              HTLV-2 MA binds with high affinity and specificity to RN
111                                              HTLV-2 MA displays higher NA binding affinity and better
112 reased viral infectious spread, and enhanced HTLV-2-mediated cellular proliferation.
113 estigate the functional role of APH-2 in the HTLV-2-mediated immortalization of primary T lymphocytes
114    Using cell lines that were susceptible to HTLV-2-mediated syncytium formation but were nonfusogeni
115  MA also binds NAs with higher affinity than HTLV-2 NC and displays more robust chaperone function.
116 oes not appear to be related to EBV, HTLV-1, HTLV-2, or HHV-8 infection.
117 of genetic recombination with either HTLV-1, HTLV-2, or STLV-3.
118 at the accessory gene products of HTLV-1 and HTLV-2 ORF II (p30II and p28II, respectively) are able t
119 ted the transformation tropism of HTLV-1 and HTLV-2 over a 9-week period using in vitro cell growth/i
120               HTLV-1 p30(II) and the related HTLV-2 p28(II) inhibit virion production by binding to a
121   Using molecular clones of HTLV-1 (Ach) and HTLV-2 (pH6neo), we constructed recombinants in which ta
122                         In vitro, HTLV-1 and HTLV-2 predominantly transform CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells
123 CI], 4.1-6.1), and 300 were seropositive for HTLV-2 (prevalence, 14.7 cases/per 100 000; 95% CI, 13.0
124                               The HTLV-1 and HTLV-2 prevalences among US blood donors has declined si
125 ith HTLV-1, the transformation efficiency of HTLV-2 producer cells was proportionately related to the
126               GLI-2/THP has no effect on the HTLV-2 promoter, activates expression from the promoters
127         Functional comparisons of HTLV-1 and HTLV-2 proteins provide a better understanding about how
128                  The antisense strand of the HTLV-2 proviral genome also encodes a protein termed APH
129               In this study, we use a unique HTLV-2 provirus (HTLV(c-enh)) that replicates by a Tax-i
130                                Low levels of HTLV-2 provirus DNA were detected in the blood, lymphoid
131 increased susceptibility to both HTLV-1- and HTLV-2-pseudotyped particles.
132         Therefore, for this study HTLV-1 and HTLV-2 recombinants were generated to assess the contrib
133 erived from the putative packaging signal of HTLV-2 relative to nonspecific NA.
134 onstrated that the phosphorylation status of HTLV-2 Rex (Rex-2) correlates with RNA binding and inhib
135  C terminus is important for the function of HTLV-2 Rex (Rex-2).
136   In this study, we assessed the role of the HTLV-2 rex gene in viral RNA expression and Gag protein
137                     These data indicate that HTLV-2 Rex increases the stability and promotes nucleus-
138                          We demonstrate that HTLV-2 Rex is a potent inhibitor of splicing in vitro at
139          Human T-cell leukemia virus type 2 (HTLV-2) Rex is a transacting regulatory protein required
140 rameshifting efficiencies for shuffled HIV-1/HTLV-2 RNA elements in a background of HIV-1 or HTLV-2 s
141 V-2 RNA elements in a background of HIV-1 or HTLV-2 sequences.
142                                              HTLV-2 seropositivity was associated with female sex, ol
143 d is genetically equidistant from HTLV-1 and HTLV-2, sharing about 62% identity.
144          At the early weeks, both HTLV-1 and HTLV-2 showed proportionate growth of CD4(+) and CD8(+)
145 ll-mediated immune response was different in HTLV-2/SIV(mac251) coinfected animals versus SIV(mac251)
146                 In addition, like HTLV-1 and HTLV-2, STLV-2(pan-p) was infectious in rabbits.
147  T cells, which do not bind either HTLV-1 or HTLV-2 SU and do not express detectable levels of HSPGs,
148 -1 envelope recombinant virus containing the HTLV-2 SU domain.
149                  Binding studies with HTLV-1/HTLV-2 SU recombinants showed that preferential binding
150 arily binds to activated CD4(+) T cells, and HTLV-2 SU, which primarily binds to activated CD8(+) T c
151 family of viruses, we have characterized the HTLV-2 subtypes present in several urban areas in Brazil
152                  Under these conditions, the HTLV-2 surface glycoprotein (SU) binding and viral entry
153  had an antibody response to both HTLV-1 and HTLV-2 SUs.
154                                        Thus, HTLV-2 targets mucosal sites, persists, and importantly
155                                 In contrast, HTLV-2 Tax (Tax2) did not detectably alter p21 or p27 ge
156 tors were constructed encoding the HTLV-1 or HTLV-2 tax genes (Tax1 and Tax2, respectively) and the g
157  present study, we evaluated the activity of HTLV-2 Tax in promoting aberrant proliferation of human
158  This comparison of the action of HTLV-1 and HTLV-2 Tax proteins on p53 function will provide importa
159              We generated several HTLV-1 and HTLV-2 Tax viral mutants, including HTLV-1deltaPBM, HTLV
160 lysis of human T-cell leukemia virus type 2 (HTLV-2) Tax (Tax-2) was performed to identify regions wi
161 ell leukemia virus types 1 and 2 (HTLV-1 and HTLV-2) that promotes the accumulation of full-length an
162 blem we constructed a mutant of HTLV type 2 (HTLV-2) that replicates by a Tax-independent mechanism.
163 lones allowed us to correlate the ability of HTLV-2 to induce syncytia with the ability to replicate
164              To better assess the ability of HTLV-2 to transform lymphocytes, a limiting dilution ass
165 tropism for CD4+ T cells and that HTLV-2 and HTLV-2/TR1 had a preferential tropism for CD8(+) T cells
166 owth potential compared to uninfected cells; HTLV-2 transformants required the continued presence of
167                             Clonality of the HTLV-2 transformants was confirmed by Southern blot anal
168                            To assess whether HTLV-2 transformation may also result in constitutive ac
169 r in human T-cell lymphotropic virus type 2 (HTLV-2)-transformed cells.
170                                          All HTLV-2-transformed populations were CD2 and/or CD3 posit
171 STAT pathway, six interleukin-2-independent, HTLV-2-transformed T-cell lines were analyzed for the pr
172  64 amino acids at the amino terminus of the HTLV-2 transmembrane protein, p21, the retention of whic
173 vity required an upstream ACA, unique to the HTLV-2 U5 end.
174 -1) and human T cell leukemia virus type II (HTLV-2) use a similar mechanism for -1 translational fra
175                                   HTLV-1 and HTLV-2 were detected in both CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells w
176                                 In contrast, HTLV-2, which expresses Tax2, is non-leukemogenic.
177 e ancestor of HTLV-3 is as old as HTLV-1 and HTLV-2, with an inferred divergence time of 36,087 to 54
178 ere indistinguishable from that of wild-type HTLV-2 (wtHTLV-2), indicating that, like HBZ, APH-2 is d

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。
 
Page Top