戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 g, hiatal hernia repair, fundoplication, and Heller myotomy).
2  prior studies of both POEM and laparoscopic Heller myotomy.
3 perative gastroesophageal reflux (GER) after Heller myotomy.
4  antireflux procedure should be added to the Heller myotomy.
5  a sustained time are pneumatic dilation and Heller myotomy.
6 SD]) is 72% (26%) effective vs 84% (20%) for Heller myotomy.
7 ng this option with pneumatic dilatation and Heller myotomy.
8 nts like pneumatic dilation and laparoscopic Heller myotomy.
9 y (BoTox [71%], pneumatic dilation [91%], or Heller myotomy [100%]) than type I (56% overall) or type
10 tomy plus Dor Fundoplication was superior to Heller myotomy alone in regard to the incidence of posto
11 92, 262 patients have undergone laparoscopic Heller myotomy and been prospectively followed.
12                                 Laparoscopic Heller myotomy and fundoplication was performed through
13                                 Laparoscopic Heller myotomy and partial fundoplication should be cons
14 rgical history, including prior laparoscopic Heller myotomy and/or POEM, should be considered when de
15   BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 2: POEM, laparoscopic Heller myotomy, and pneumatic dilation are effective the
16 per-oral endoscopic myotomy and laparoscopic Heller myotomy can provide durable symptom benefit.
17                                 Laparoscopic Heller myotomy can safely and durably relieve symptoms o
18         At present, pneumatic dilatation and Heller myotomy combined with an anti-reflux procedure ar
19            Among the 209 patients undergoing Heller myotomy for achalasia, 154 received endoscopic th
20 r period (1994-2003), 209 patients underwent Heller myotomy for achalasia.
21 reatment option comparable with laparoscopic Heller myotomy for any of the achalasia syndromes; and 5
22                                              Heller myotomy had no effect in these patients, but sild
23                                              Heller myotomy has been shown to be an effective primary
24                                 Laparoscopic Heller myotomy has been undertaken for over a decade, bu
25  gold standard for achalasia is laparoscopic Heller myotomy (HM) and partial fundoplication.
26 ons and review of comparative data vis a vis Heller myotomy (HM) and pneumatic dilation (PD) and we w
27 nts with failed initial POEM or laparoscopic Heller myotomy; however, the decision among treatment mo
28 erformed 95 laparoscopic and 5 thoracoscopic Heller myotomies in 100 patients (age 49.5 +/- 1.5 years
29 ective therapies for achalasia; laparoscopic Heller myotomy is emerging as the optimal surgical thera
30 , data on the management of achalsia using a Heller myotomy is limited in Africa.
31                                 Laparoscopic Heller myotomy is strongly encouraged for patients with
32 rt- and long-term effects after laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM) and endoscopic balloon dilation (EB
33 des pneumatic dilation (PD) and laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM), including not only clinical aspect
34 ther pneumatic dilation (PD) or laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM), which have comparable rates of suc
35 ents with achalasia were assigned to undergo Heller myotomy or Heller myotomy plus Dor fundoplication
36                                              Heller Myotomy plus Dor Fundoplication was superior to H
37 a were assigned to undergo Heller myotomy or Heller myotomy plus Dor fundoplication.
38 (per-oral endoscopic myotomy or laparoscopic Heller myotomy) to guide adequacy of LES disruption.
39 e report outcomes in 209 patients undergoing Heller myotomy with the majority (74%) undergoing myotom
40 f its surgical counterpart, the laparoscopic Heller myotomy, with superiority for type III (spastic)