ライフサイエンスコーパス: IADL

1 IADL disability occurs frequently among middle-aged and

2 At least 1 IADL impairment was reported in 18% of participants, mos

3 model to investigate the item sequence of 11 IADL and ADL combined into a single scale and functional

4 ssed by the mRS (OR 4.0 (95% CI 1.6 to 9.6), IADL (OR 2.2 (95% CI 1.1 to 4.6), and impairment in spee

5 ; functional limitation: OR 2.77, 2.01-3.81; IADL impairment: OR 3.12, 2.20-4.41; ADL impairment: OR

6 ties of daily living (ADL)/instrumental ADL (IADL) disability, Centers for Epidemiologic Studies Depr

7 assessment, including ADL, Instrumental ADL (IADL), Mini-Nutritional Assessment (MNA), Mini-Mental St

8 of daily living (ADL) and instrumental ADL (IADL).

9 f daily living (ADLs) and instrumental ADLs (IADLs) for which patients needed assistance.

10 daily living (ADLs), and instrumental ADLs (IADLs) self-reported approximately 9 y later in models s

11 f daily living (ADLs) and instrumental ADLs (IADLs) were evaluated through survey instruments.

12 years, and impairment in instrumental ADLs (IADLs), defined similarly.

13 strumental activities of daily living (ADLs, IADLs), cognition (Mini-Cog test), history of falls, nut

14 of older adults, VA loss adversely affected IADL levels, which subsequently increased the risk for m

15 (P = 0.02), POMA gait scores (P < 0.01), and IADL (P < 0.01).

16 in ADL difficulties (r = 0.15, P = 0.05) and IADL difficulties (r = 0.41, P < 0.001).

17 e associated with new or progressive ADL and IADL disability in a dose-dependent manner, particularly

18 prognostic for functional decline on ADL and IADL, and G8, fTRST (1), and fTRST (2) were prognostic f

19 relation of ECOG PS with ADL (p = 0.51)c and IADL (p = 0.61) was moderate.

20 Peripheral vascular disease and IADL impairment, but not chronological age, may be invol

21 Baseline evaluation of GDS15 and IADL may be proposed to anticipate this event.

22 Geriatric factors (MMSE and IADL) are predictive of severe toxicity or unexpected ho

23 creased by 0.22 standard deviations (SD) and IADL difficulties increased by 0.28 SD annually.

24 inversely associated with impaired ADLs and IADLs [odds ratio (95% CI): 0.60 (0.40, 0.90) and 0.69 (

25 impaired lower-extremity function, ADLs, and IADLs [odds ratio (95% CI): 0.67 (0.47, 0.95), 0.52 (0.3

26 impaired lower-extremity function, ADLs, and IADLs approximately 9 y later, particularly in African A

27 entified characteristics associated with any IADL impairment.

28 Agreement between IADL impairment and frailty was assessed using the weigh

29 evel, and then an overlapping of concomitant IADL and ADL, with bathing and dressing being the earlie

30 , 1.27-2.51]; P < .001) by way of decreasing IADL levels over time.

31 orbidity Index score (P = 0.032), dependence IADLs (P = 0.011), and falls history (P = 0.056).

32 We evaluated IADL and ADL data collected at home every 2-3 years over

33 The pattern of findings was similar for IADLs.

34 ct effects of acuity loss were strongest for IADLs where a 1-unit decline in acuity (logMAR) was asso

35 emporal atrophy were associated with greater IADL deficits.

36 -year follow-up, and 27% had ADL and 43% had IADL disability at baseline.

37 greater proportion of frail participants had IADL impairment (52%) compared to non-frail (11%) person

38 The odds of having IADL dependence at 1-yr among survivors was greater in o

39 as part of clinical practice, namely, HRQOL, IADL disability, and depressive symptoms, were significa

40 03), MMSE </= 27/30 (OR, 3.84), and impaired IADL (OR, 4.67); for dose-intensity reduction of > 33%,

41 10 SD unit increase in the rate of change in IADL difficulties (P < 0.001) per year.

42 y exclusively through associated declines in IADL levels.

43 ) was associated with a 0.067 SD increase in IADL difficulties (P < 0.001) at baseline, and a 1-unit

44 he findings confirmed the earliest losses in IADL (shopping, transporting, finances) at the partial l

45 visual acuity loss were related to increased IADL difficulties in men and women and increases in ADL

46 on functional limitation, and instrumental (IADL) and basic activities of daily living (ADL).

47 ting may offer useful insights into limiting IADL difficulties in future cohorts.

48 and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL<8) and cognitive performance were calculated using

49 in Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) (aOR = 2.57, 95% CI: 0.97, 6.78).

50 of Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) and basic Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and tra

51 L) or instrumental activity of daily living (IADL) impairment (n = 3109) compared by gender and livin

52 and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) in community-living older persons.

53 ody Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) Questionnaire.

54 the Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) Scale, and the Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Sc

55 and instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) scales and analyzed with the standardized mean dif

56 and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) showed impairment in 34% of the patients.

57 ted instrumental activities of daily living (IADL), and 4 physically oriented IADL.

58 L), Instrumental Activities in Daily Living (IADL), Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA), Geriatric Depr

59 ed, instrumental activities of daily living (IADL), modified Rankin Scale, and NIH Stroke Score.Compa

60 ith instrumental activities of daily living (IADL).

61 and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL).

62 orm instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs) 1 yr following prolonged mechanical ventilation.

63 orm instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs), depressive symptoms, and cognitive functioning,

64 ted instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs).

65 ] + instrumental activities of daily living [IADL]), cognition, depression, and nutrition.

66 2.16; 95% CI, 1.09 to 4.30; P = .03) and low IADL scores (OR, 2.87; 95% CI, 1.06 to 7.79; P = .04) we

67 peed ([Formula: see text] = 0.018) and lower IADL score ([Formula: see text]0.002).

68 .28]; P < .01) through their effect on lower IADL levels at baseline.

69 Mild IADL deficits are common in individuals with aMCI and sh

70 fined as an inability to perform one or more IADLs unassisted.

71 Disability in one or more IADLs was present in 18.3% of controls as compared with

72 was associated with a greater likelihood of IADL disability (OR = 1.3).

73 e MD worse than -13.5 dB) had higher odds of IADL disability (OR = 4.2, P = 0.02).

74 g glaucoma and control patients, the odds of IADL disability increased 1.6-fold with every 5 dB of VF

75 Index score, history of falls, dependent on IADL, and abnormal Mini-Cog test results predicted posto

76 o prevent the effect of visual impairment on IADL declines may all reduce mortality risk in aging adu

77 les (95% CI, 0.00-0.19 SDs), and 0.09 SDs on IADL scales (95% CI, 0.01 to 0.17 SDs).

78 whites to need assistance with at least one IADL task (95% confidence interval 1.25-2.13).

79 re likely to need assistance on at least one IADL task (odds ratio = 1.49, 95% confidence interval 1.

80 ily living (IADL), and 4 physically oriented IADL.

81 care and greatest in the physically oriented IADL.

82 lculated for relevant Nagi Disability Scale, IADL Scale, and ADL Scale tasks.

83 Older age, male sex, IADL disability, and number of prescription drugs measur

84 The specific IADL disabilities occurring more frequently in both AMD

85 Subjects completed a standard IADL disability questionnaire, with disability defined a

86 Abnormal preadmission performance status, IADL, GDS15, MMSE, GUG, and MNA were associated with inc

87 atients on the ADL, 73.0% of patients on the IADL, 24.1% of patients on the GUG, 19.0% of patients on

88 Two IADLs--remembering appointments, family occasions, holid

89 comes, 14 trials used ADL and 13 trials used IADL scales.

90 e independently associated with frailty were IADL disability (PR, 3.22; 95% CI, 1.72-6.06), depressiv

91 ve functioning predicted mortality only when IADL disability was excluded from the model.

92 oma (OR = 1.4, P = 0.45) was associated with IADL disability.

93 .04 for 1-yr increase in age) and those with IADL dependence before hospitalization (odds ratio 2.27)

94 ociated with self-reported difficulties with IADLs.

95 isability and 26% developed new or worsening IADL disability within 2 years.