ライフサイエンスコーパス: IVC

1 IVC blood contributed 40+/-16% to total systemic venous

2 IVC bypasses bioavailability barriers of oral ingestion,

3 IVC failed to detect one-third of the ospC genotypes det

4 IVC filter patients did not have reduced rates of postop

5 IVC filter placement patients with advanced cancer and t

6 IVC filter use quartiles showed no variation in mortalit

7 IVC filters are increasingly being used as prophylaxis a

8 IVC filters were placed using local anesthesia and consc

9 IVC involvement by hepatic malignancy does not necessari

10 IVC stenosis and thrombosis after liver transplantation

11 IVC was safe in patients and showed the possibility to p

12 IVC-IAGPNA is invariably associated with VR reduction du

13 IVC-IAGPNA was associated with VR reduction in all dogs

14 nt implantation of 85 stents in 22 IFV and 6 IVC.

15 Out of 653 IVC-drawn blood culture pairs, both vials were contamina

16 invasive procedures (272 BDTs, 129 PEGs, 71 IVC filters).

17 Conclusion An absorbable IVC filter can be safely deployed in swine and resorbs g

18 Eleven absorbable IVC filters made from polydioxanone suture were deployed

19 r atrial ganglionated plexus nerve activity (IVC-IAGPNA) is responsible for ventricular rate (VR) con

20 No patient had a major complication after IVC filter placement.

21 a around the IVC filter within 2 weeks after IVC filter deployment with residual microscopic fragment

22 Among IVC results, common ospC genotypes were overrepresented

23 (2 )cavography was judged to be adequate, an IVC filter was deployed.

24 port describes the use of a Wallstent for an IVC obstruction that was unresponsive to conventional ba

25 ous thrombosis (DVT) with the presence of an IVC filter, accounting for type and timing of initiation

26 uma patients with vs without placement of an IVC filter, whether in the presence or absence of venous

27 All patients had received an IVC filter in our institution between January 1980 and A

28 Among 451 trauma patients with an IVC filter and 1343 matched controls without an IVC filt

29 Among patients with an IVC filter and matched controls, age, sex, race/ethnicit

30 of mortality in patients with vs without an IVC filter who survived more than 24 hours from the time

31 filter and 1343 matched controls without an IVC filter, the mean (SD) age was 47.4 (21.5) years.

32 1%, VmaxAo greater than or equal to 10%, and IVC greater than or equal to 8% had a sensitivity of 61%

33 Stenotic/obstructed IFV and IVC may be reconstructed using stents to re-establish ve

34 using a 20 Fr Flexiflow Inverta-PEG kit, and IVC filters were placed percutaneously under ultrasound

35 Here, we report the comparison of MMF and IVC as induction treatment for active lupus nephritis in

36 significant differences between the MMF and IVC groups with regard to rates of adverse events, serio

37 ed at 2 cm from the hepatic vein outlet) and IVC (measured at the level of the hepatic ostium) is >2

38 on, SVC blood is directed toward the RPA and IVC blood is directed toward the LPA.

39 PV fat pad) before projecting to the RPV and IVC-LA fat pads.

40 PP, VmaxAo, SVC, and IVC could be measured in 78.5%, 78.0%, 99.6%, and 78.1%

41 y ablation in the isthmus between the TA and IVC (TI isthmus) terminated the tachycardia in all patie

42 eral cervical vagal nerve activity (VNA) and IVC-IAGPNA during baseline sinus rhythm and during pacin

43 st in using high-dose intravenous ascorbate (IVC) in treating this disease partially because of its l

44 f equal amounts of IVC and SVC blood because IVC contribution to total systemic venous return is smal

45 nd left VNA in the former 5 dogs and between IVC-IAGPNA and right VNA in the last dog.

46 There were good correlations between IVC-IAGPNA and left VNA in the former 5 dogs and between

47 estigate pharmacokinetic interaction between IVC and gemcitabine.

48 We then assessed relationships between IVC filter placement and complications within 30 days of

49 rformed in eight patients with BCS caused by IVC thrombosis.

50 Her postoperative course was complicated by IVC thrombosis.

51 erference to gemcitabine pharmacokinetics by IVC administration.

52 ten are obtained from intravenous catheters (IVC).

53 of chronic occlusion of inferior vena cava (IVC) and iliocaval confluence with angioplasty and stent

54 ntal finding of complete inferior vena cava (IVC) and obliteration.

55 K (1.5 nmol) through the inferior vena cava (IVC) and subsequently submerged in psiepsilonRACK (0.5 m

56 h an isthmus between the inferior vena cava (IVC) and tricuspid annulus (TA).

57 , and using the aorta or inferior vena cava (IVC) as the input function.

58 ameters of the aorta and inferior vena cava (IVC) at the top of L2 and the bottom of L4 and to measur

59 aturation pulse labeling inferior vena cava (IVC) blood (signal void), and (3) a presaturation pulse

60 /- 5.9, with an aorta-to-inferior vena cava (IVC) CNR of 69.7 +/- 43.9.

61 to remove a retrievable inferior vena cava (IVC) filter can cause severe complications with high tre

62 ntation of an absorbable inferior vena cava (IVC) filter in a swine model.

63 Our experience with inferior vena cava (IVC) filter placement to prevent pulmonary emboli (PE) i

64 eparin and warfarin, and inferior vena cava (IVC) filter placement were not independent predictors of

65 c gastrostomy (PEG), and inferior vena cava (IVC) filter placement.

66 hip between prophylactic inferior vena cava (IVC) filter use, mortality, and VTE.

67 Inferior vena cava (IVC) filters are widely used for prevention of pulmonary

68 The use of inferior vena cava (IVC) filters for prevention of venous thromboembolism (V

69 The use of inferior vena cava (IVC) filters in this population has been increasing, des

70 the role of prophylactic inferior vena cava (IVC) filters to prevent PE.

71 oagulation, placement of inferior vena cava (IVC) filters, clinical outcomes, and comments regarding

72 es concerning the use of inferior vena cava (IVC) filters.

73 reentry (LLR) around the inferior vena cava (IVC) has been described recently.

74 ntrol) were implanted as inferior vena cava (IVC) interposition grafts in juvenile lambs.

75 Obstruction of the inferior vena cava (IVC) is infrequent, membranous obstruction of the IVC (M

76 rmates underwent partial inferior vena cava (IVC) ligation to induce venous thrombosis.

77 cular extension into the inferior vena cava (IVC) or atrium were identified.

78 flow restriction in the inferior vena cava (IVC) results in the development of thrombi structurally

79 l case of nonanastomotic inferior vena cava (IVC) stenosis in a patient with a "piggyback" caval anas

80 ng a murine DVT model of inferior vena cava (IVC) stenosis, we demonstrate that mice with general ind

81 Inferior vena cava (IVC) thrombosis is generally a contraindication to renal

82 ic iliofemoral (I-F) and inferior vena cava (IVC) thrombosis.

83 iated with renal vein or inferior vena cava (IVC) thrombus in up to 10% of cases.

84 PV access from the inferior vena cava (IVC) to the main PV was performed in eight pigs by using

85 occlusion involving the inferior vena cava (IVC) treated by a portal decompressive procedure that by

86 suggested for the use of inferior vena cava (IVC) value instead of FHVP to calculate HVPG when the di

87 vein, hepatic veins, and inferior vena cava (IVC) were evaluated for thrombosis or stenosis by two ra

88 e hepatic segment of the inferior vena cava (IVC) were the vascular anomalies.

89 e of the mouse aorta and inferior vena cava (IVC), not restricting our analysis to the endothelium, t

90 nd reconstruction of the inferior vena cava (IVC), were reviewed.

91 Ten inferior vena cava (IVC)-SMV punctures were performed in six pigs.

92 with extension into the inferior vena cava (IVC).

93 ofemoral veins (IFV) and inferior vena cava (IVC).

94 segment of retrohepatic inferior vena cava (IVC).

95 hepatic and suprahepatic inferior vena cava (IVC).

96 four dogs before and during inferior caval (IVC) occlusion at five different inotropic stages and 14

97 pressure catheters and inferior vena caval (IVC) occluders; four had placement of thoracic aortic ba

98 venous (HV), subhepatic inferior vena caval (IVC), and portal venous (PV) flow rates were measured wi

99 ted initially with intravenous chemotherapy (IVC) and followed up for at least 1 year from last treat

100 years; age range, 15-77 years) with chronic IVC occlusions were treated during a 6-year period.

101 In vitro compartmentalisation (IVC), a technique for selecting genes encoding enzymes b

102 mulsion-based in vitro compartmentalization (IVC) method to select RBPs with defined specificity.

103 mulsion-based in vitro compartmentalization (IVC) to devise a method for the selection of zinc finger

104 phenotype by in vitro compartmentalization (IVC) using water-in-oil emulsions.

105 dwell times are associated with complicated IVC filter retrieval.

106 ue velocities during isovolumic contraction (IVC) (peak positive and peak negative), ejection (S) and

107 V deformation during isovolumic contraction (IVC) and isovolumic relaxation (IVR) might represent a t

108 feri in the tick vector by in vitro culture (IVC) and direct PCR (dPCR) were compared.

109 dvantages over intravenous cyclophosphamide (IVC) for the treatment of lupus nephritis, but these the

110 alent to intravenous pulse cyclophosphamide (IVC) for the induction treatment of lupus nephritis.

111 ardiography, of inferior vena cava diameter (IVC) measured using transthoracic echocardiography, of t

112 Differential IVC (the difference between peak positive and peak negat

113 then reestablished using a conduit of donor IVC and portal vein with a portasystemic shunt.

114 lare after induction treatment with low-dose IVC.

115 and venous anomalies, and 1 had a duplicated IVC draining the left renal vein.

116 During IVC, flow from the LV apex accelerated toward the base,

117 tal cancer fixed to critical structures (eg, IVC and pelvic sidewall) are considered locally "unresec

118 114 patients who presented with tip-embedded IVC filters for removal from January 2005 to April 2014.

119 fully retrieve 109 of 114 (96%) tip-embedded IVC filters on an intention-to-treat basis.

120 ue can be safely used to remove tip-embedded IVC filters.

121 Successful I-F (+/-IVC) stenting in limbs with venous outflow obstruction a

122 IQR, 3-11.8 months) after successful I-F (+/-IVC) stenting, venous outflow (OF1, OF4) and calf muscle

123 ion) for chronic obliteration of the I-F (+/-IVC) trunks, on the venous hemodynamics of the limb, the

124 d with the control group, limbs with I-F +/- IVC thrombosis before stenting had reduced venous outflo

125 limbs to those stented without prior I-F +/- IVC thrombosis, nor infrainguinal clots on duplex, were

126 A total of 285 (75%) patients had an FHVP-IVC difference within +/-2 mm Hg (no discrepancy) and 95

127 Following IVC (vincristine, etoposide, and carboplatin), adjuvant

128 48 hours following IVC ligation, IVC thrombosis was evident in 60% of WT mi

129 For IVC-drawn blood cultures, some authorities recommend dis

130 for BDT, $164,088 for PEG, and $123,682 for IVC filter.

131 2 )cavograms were obtained and evaluated for IVC diameter, location of renal veins, and presence of t

132 raction out of the IVC or open incisions for IVC management after laparoscopic dissection.

133 Indications for IVC filter placement were DVT or PE in the presence of c

134 to completely intracorporeal techniques for IVC tumor thrombectomy from incremental advancements in

135 and CAS in patients with BCS resulting from IVC occlusion.

136 of blood when obtaining blood cultures from IVCs does not reduce CR.

137 nching) and a decrease in expression of GnTs IVC and V (promote N-glycan branching) as detected by re

138 es, supragranular (layers II-IVB), granular (IVC), and infragranular (V-VI), across the entirety of V

139 Successful MR imaging-guided IVC-SMV punctures were performed in all 10 procedures (1

140 Twelve patients had IVCs that remained patent after a mean follow-up of 19 m

141 ut-off value for HVPG-Free, but not for HVPG-IVC, among which 25 patients (26%) were misclassified re

142 ent, WHVP-FHVP (HVPG-Free) or WHVP-IVC (HVPG-IVC), better correlates with orthotopic liver transplant

143 tly of being calculated as HVPG-Free or HVPG-IVC.

144 /-5 mm Hg) was significantly lower than HVPG-IVC (17+/-5.5 mm Hg; P<0.001).

145 To determine if IVC filter insertion in trauma patients affects overall

146 l heart defects and stenotic or occluded IFV/IVC may encounter femoral venous access problems during

147 Infrahepatic IVC and portal venous blood flow were shunted to the axi

148 The infrarenal IVC, lungs, heart, liver, kidneys, and spleen were harve

149 espiration in the upper part of intrahepatic IVC proximal to a large collateral vein as well as prost

150 ffered among various laminae; 2) layers IVA, IVC, and VI, which had high CO activity, were labeled mo

151 three bands that corresponded to layers IVA, IVC, and VI.

152 the inferior vena cava-left atrial junction (IVC-LA fat pad) and the right pulmonary vein-atrial junc

153 Changes occurring in layer IVC may influence the formation of heteromers and protec

154 a and -beta mRNA and protein levels in layer IVC of area 17 are subject to activity-dependent regulat

155 In layer IVC, subunit staining formed a radial lattice.

156 rs of myelinated axons at the level of layer IVC, and that in layers V and VI their number is reduced

157 In tangential sections through layer IVC, these axon bundles are regularly arranged.

158 s are visualized simultaneously within layer IVC in electron microscopic preparations, it is apparent

159 It was highly expressed in layers IVC and VI, which contained high levels of CO, and more

160 48 hours following IVC ligation, IVC thrombosis was evident in 60% of WT mice and 25% of

161 We report a case of membranous IVC obstruction at the junction of hepatic and suprahepa

162 ow levels or were undetectable in the murine IVC.

163 TEVG resembled the native IVC histologically and had comparable collagen (157.9 +/

164 led studies compared the effectiveness of no IVC filter vs IVC filter on PE, fatal PE, deep vein thro

165 eal space up to the level of the obliterated IVC, a collateral venous branch was identified at the co

166 ssive procedure that bypassed the obstructed IVC; and the third group, who had advanced cirrhosis and

167 and stent placement in chronically occluded IVCs has a good intermediate-term outcome and should be

168 f SVC blood flowed into the RPA, 67+/-12% of IVC blood flowed toward the LPA.

169 LPA blood is composed of equal amounts of IVC and SVC blood because IVC contribution to total syst

170 Analysis of IVC thrombosis revealed greater thrombus weight, length,

171 dence is low but supports the association of IVC filter placement with a lower incidence of PE and fa

172 ce to suggest that the potential benefits of IVC filters outweigh the significant risks of therapy.

173 MOIVC is a rare cause of IVC obstruction with typical radiological features.

174 ed data reporting the safety and efficacy of IVC filter use in bariatric surgical patients is highly

175 larger definitive trials testing efficacy of IVC in treating advanced pancreatic cancer.

176 ent remains asymptomatic with no evidence of IVC compromise through 20 months of follow-up.

177 Results There was no evidence of IVC thrombosis, device migration, caval penetration, or

178 Laparoscopic management of IVC tumor thrombi has been demonstrated in animal models

179 ear-old patient with iatrogenic occlusion of IVC following L3/L4 discectomy.

180 Iatrogenic permanent occlusion of IVC was successfully treated with recanalization and imp

181 The prevalence of prophylactic placement of IVC filters has increased among trauma patients.

182 lated and hospitals placed into quartiles of IVC filter use.

183 Risk-adjusted rates of IVC filter placement were calculated and hospitals place

184 iability (0.6% to 9.6%) in adjusted rates of IVC filter utilization.

185 Rates of IVC placement within quartiles were 0.7%, 1.3%, 2.1%, an

186 ation rates (CR), we assessed the results of IVC-drawn blood cultures for adults.

187 eview board-approved retrospective review of IVC filter retrievals between January 2002 and July 2011

188 , exist regarding the efficacy and safety of IVC filters.

189 lished reports on the efficacy and safety of IVC filters.

190 spective controlled observational studies of IVC filters versus none in patients at risk of PE.

191 f SVC was significantly greater than that of IVC (P = 0.02) and PP (P = 0.01).

192 ombosis or pulmonary embolism at the time of IVC filter placement.

193 The use of IVC filters for gastric bypass patients varied widely ac

194 We aim to review the evidence for the use of IVC filters in bariatric surgical patients, describe tre

195 een a number of studies reviewing the use of IVC filters in select populations for the prophylactic p

196 The use of IVC filters in this population should be reexamined beca

197 Overall, the use of IVC filters, especially in prophylactic situations, will

198 The respiratory influence on IVC flow was the same in all groups.

199 bolic disease with either anticoagulation or IVC filters.

200 s to open-label MMF (target dosage 3 g/d) or IVC (0.5 to 1.0 g/m(2) in monthly pulses) in a 24-wk ind

201 oscopy performed two hours following partial IVC ligation revealed that leukocyte firm attachment was

202 patch angioplasty, resulting in a permanent IVC occlusion, as confirmed by angiography.

203 went liver transplantation using a piggyback IVC anastomosis.

204 During ischemia, positive IVC velocity was zero in ischemic walls with TEN >20%.

205 At reperfusion, positive IVC velocity correlated better with TEN (r = -0.94, p <

206 we report the development of radiopaque PPDO IVC filters based on gold nanoparticles (AuNPs).

207 uced PE-related mortality after preoperative IVC filter insertion.

208 l of 497 patients who underwent preoperative IVC filter insertion demonstrated DVT rates of 0% to 20.

209 ypass patients (8.5%) underwent preoperative IVC filter placement, most of whom (65%) had no history

210 Prophylactic IVC filters for gastric bypass surgery do not reduce the

211 A prophylactic IVC filter was placed in 803 (2%) of 39,456 patients.

212 rophylaxis and patient factors, prophylactic IVC filter placement was associated with an increased in

213 High rates of prophylactic IVC filter placement have no effect on reducing trauma p

214 data on the overall efficacy of prophylactic IVC filters with regard to outcomes.

215 nding and descending aortic flows (Q(SVC), Q(IVC), Q(PA), Q(PV), Q(Ao), and Q(Dao), respectively), bo

216 <9, hospitalization <3 days, or who received IVC filter after occurrence of VTE event.

217 Overall, patients receiving IVC filters had lower risk for subsequent PE (OR: 0.50;

218 or liver was reimplanted using the recipient IVC as the source of portal blood.

219 be a good candidate material for resorbable IVC filters.

220 lize the IVC and treat a severe retrohepatic IVC stenosis.

221 ion of a severe stenosis in the retrohepatic IVC.

222 We review the literature on robotic IVC surgery.

223 our commonly used guide wires in a simulated IVC.

224 atterns of engagement were determined in six IVC filters with four commonly used guide wires in a sim

225 d (stages III and IVB), or metastatic (stage IVC).

226 icantly increased in all patients with stage IVC disease.

227 d sex-matched control subjects with standard IVC filter retrieval were used for comparison.

228 = 1) or occlusion (n = 2), and suprahepatic IVC stenosis (n = 1).

229 y subtracting infrahepatic from suprahepatic IVC flow and PV flow from estimated TLBF, respectively.

230 SVC had a greater diagnostic accuracy than IVC and PP, but its measurement requires transesophageal

231 The IVC filter complication rate remains low; however, so do

232 The IVC was reconstructed with ringed Gore-Tex tube graft (n

233 The IVC-to-aorta venous-to-arterial enhancement ratio averag

234 enriched in aorta over other tissues and the IVC.

235 monstrated neointimal hyperplasia around the IVC filter within 2 weeks after IVC filter deployment wi

236 involving the lower right atrium around the IVC in 7 patients, figure-of-8 double-loop reentry aroun

237 supported by a reentrant circuit around the IVC or a figure-of-8 double-loop reentry involving both

238 ed with reduced platelet accumulation at the IVC wall after 6 hours of stenosis.

239 TIVCC was produced by banding the IVC for 10 days in 7 dogs, whereas in the 6 control dogs

240 forms a line of conduction block between the IVC and coronary sinus (CS) ostium and forms a second is

241 a line of fixed conduction block between the IVC and the CS; (2) the EVR and the TA provide boundarie

242 ure-of-8 double-loop reentry around both the IVC and TA in 4, and single reentrant loop around the TA

243 -of-8 double-loop reentry involving both the IVC and TA.

244 asionally combined with open surgery for the IVC control aspect of the procedure.

245 For the IVC, a mean of 72% was in the L2-L4 ROI.

246 le to successfully puncture the SMV from the IVC with direct visualization of the needle and all retr

247 4% and 31+/-17%, respectively, came from the IVC.

248 nine deaths in the MMF group and five in the IVC group.

249 hildren in the atrial group and 17.2% in the IVC group.

250 The level of podoplanin in the IVC increased after 48 hours of stenosis to a substantia

251 e suture were deployed via a catheter in the IVC of 11 swine.

252 and venous development when implanted in the IVC of a juvenile lamb model.

253 Podoplanin was expressed in the IVC wall, where it was localized in the vicinity of the

254 r partial (stenosis) flow restriction in the IVC.

255 -F femoral vein sheath and advanced into the IVC by using a real-time gradient-recalled-echo sequence

256 fracture, filter tip incorporation into the IVC wall, and retrieval failure.

257 is infrequent, membranous obstruction of the IVC (MOIVC) being one of its rare causes.

258 Use of the IVC as the input function resulted in significantly high

259 More than half (57%) of the IVC filter patients in the latter group had a fatal pulm

260 Eight percent (38 of 451) of the IVC filters were removed at Boston Medical Center during

261 Obstruction of the IVC occurs in only 1-2% of patients after liver transpla

262 hand-assisted thrombus retraction out of the IVC or open incisions for IVC management after laparosco

263 p or hook of the filter from the wall of the IVC.

264 stent placement, was used to recanalize the IVC and treat a severe retrohepatic IVC stenosis.

265 ism or complications directly related to the IVC filter itself, including filter migration or thrombo

266 ss the SVC-Ao fat pad and go directly to the IVC-LA or RPV fat pad and then innervate the atrial myoc

267 /16 of these had thrombosis extending to the IVC.

268 the main PV to be in direct contact with the IVC in all animals.

269 reduction only when it coactivates with the IVC-IAGPNA.

270 We present proof-of-principle for this IVC selection method by selecting a specific high-affini

271 cult and the complications of the thrombosed IVC may compromise life.

272 with end-stage renal disease and thrombosed IVCs were reviewed.

273 ed to MMF compared with 98 (53.0%) of 185 to IVC.

274 EDP decreased significantly from baseline to IVC occlusion (both p < 0.001).

275 went catheter-directed thrombolysis prior to IVC recanalization.

276 bjective of showing that MMF was superior to IVC as induction treatment for lupus nephritis.

277 ohort studies suggest that those who undergo IVC filter insertion preoperatively may be at higher ris

278 population similar to patients who underwent IVC filter insertion at Boston Medical Center (a level I

279 to enable selection of other proteins using IVC.

280 rdium, and site and size of the great veins (IVC and SVC).

281 The wall of the ventral IVC was ruptured during the operation.

282 mpared the effectiveness of no IVC filter vs IVC filter on PE, fatal PE, deep vein thrombosis, and/or

283 tically higher in wild-type than in VWF(-/-) IVC.

284 The level of extension was IVC in 134 and atrium in 31.

285 nable to identify any patient group for whom IVC filters were associated with improved outcomes.

286 hich gradient, WHVP-FHVP (HVPG-Free) or WHVP-IVC (HVPG-IVC), better correlates with orthotopic liver

287 re accurate in assessing prognosis than WHVP-IVC, HVPG should be calculated as the gradient between W

288 nd fatal PE (0.09 [0.01-0.81]; I(2)=0%) with IVC filter placement, without any statistical heterogene

289 e had received preoperative therapy (55 with IVC extension and 14 with atrial extension) for a median

290 enough to outweigh the harms associated with IVC filter placement remains unclear.

291 tter quality of life for small children with IVC thrombosis during an age when dialysis treatment is

292 fter multimodality treatments initiated with IVC, 50% of salvaged Group D retinoblastoma eyes had <20

293 rted experiences of robotic nephrectomy with IVC tumor thrombectomy, thus far, demonstrate feasibilit

294 gradient between WHVP and FHVP, but not with IVC, in order to optimize its prognostic value and in id

295 cardiographic follow-up in two patients with IVC stents demonstrated wide patency.

296 ded to treat to prevent 1 additional PE with IVC filters is estimated to range from 109 (95% CI, 93-1