戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。

今後説明を表示しない

[OK]

コーパス検索結果 (left1)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1                                              L. amazonensis amastigotes, through activation of extrac
2                                              L. amazonensis is endemic in South America, where it cau
3                                              L. amazonensis metacyclic promastigotes lacking one SODA
4    Inhibition of arginase I or ODC abrogates L. amazonensis replication in infected human macrophages
5                                 In addition, L. amazonensis infection induces an early increase in To
6 ole in downmodulating the Th1 response after L. amazonensis infection.
7 htly more potent than amphotericin B against L. amazonensis.
8 sm underlying this enhanced immunity against L. amazonensis infection remains largely unresolved.
9 f a DNA vaccine to induce protection against L. amazonensis infection.
10 ed in the protective immune response against L. amazonensis infection in vaccinated mice.
11                                     Although L. amazonensis lacking LIT1 grew normally in axenic cult
12 s encoding murine interleukin-12 (IL-12) and L. amazonensis HSP70.
13 d and tested against Leishmania donovani and L. amazonensis intracellular amastigotes.
14 ALB/c mice to infection with L. mexicana and L. amazonensis, does play a significant role in regulati
15 ed by the New World species, L. mexicana and L. amazonensis, we analyzed their course of infection in
16 plex parasites (L. mexicana, L. pifanoi, and L. amazonensis), a critical role for immunoglobulin G-me
17 inst Leishmania spp promastigotes as well as L. amazonensis and L. infantum amastigotes.
18 that the CD4+ T-cell response during chronic L. amazonensis infection is limited during the transitio
19 c Th1 transfer helped recipient mice control L. amazonensis infection established by promastigotes bu
20 particular, neutrophil-derived LTB4 controls L. amazonensis killing, degranulation, and reactive oxyg
21          In comparison to L. major controls, L. amazonensis-infected DCs secreted lower levels of int
22    All phenotypes observed in LHR1/Deltalhr1 L. amazonensis were rescued by expression of episomal LH
23 r inhibiting PERK kinase activity diminished L. amazonensis infection.
24 of the Dectin-1/Syk/ROS/NLRP3 pathway during L. amazonensis phagocytosis is important for macrophage
25     We identified that ROS production during L. amazonensis infection occurs upon engagement of Decti
26 ression in C57BL/6 mice infected with either L. amazonensis or L. major (a healing model).
27 crophages from 5-LO knockout mice eliminated L. amazonensis in the presence of exogenous LTB4, and ma
28  from P2X7 receptor knockout mice eliminated L. amazonensis when incubated with ionomycin.
29 acts (SGE) of Lutzomyia longipalpis enhances L. amazonensis infection.
30 es revealed that Retro-2 curbed experimental L. amazonensis infections in a dose-dependent manner.
31 e were injected locally with IP-10 following L. amazonensis infection, there was a significant delay
32 ls, as local injection of IL-1beta following L. amazonensis infection accelerated Th cell activation
33 n and interleukin-12p40 production following L. amazonensis amastigote infection compared with non-tr
34 ion represents a required upstream event for L. amazonensis-induced LTB4 synthesis.
35 ads to LTB4 formation, which is required for L. amazonensis elimination.
36  the importance of efficient heme uptake for L. amazonensis replication and vertebrate host infectivi
37 comparison of draining lymph node cells from L. amazonensis- and L. major-infected mice at 10 weeks p
38     Antigen stimulation of CD4+ T cells from L. amazonensis-infected mice in vitro in the presence of
39  (IFN-gamma) production of CD4+ T cells from L. amazonensis-infected mice.
40           However, these cells isolated from L. amazonensis-infected mice were not skewed toward eith
41 hmania amazonensis Our inability to generate L. amazonensis SODA null mutants and the lethal phenotyp
42 functional B cells are important for healing L. amazonensis in this infectious disease model.
43 emonstrated after expression in yeast and in L. amazonensis LIT1-null amastigotes.
44        The disease-promoting CD4+ T cells in L. amazonensis-infected mice have the characteristics of
45 ization and membrane association of FCaBP in L. amazonensis suggest that the mechanisms for flagellar
46 ributed partially to compromised immunity in L. amazonensis-infected hosts.
47 responses contributes to the pathogenesis in L. amazonensis-infected mice.
48 responsible for the susceptible phenotype in L. amazonensis-infected hosts and that this parasite may
49 production, may limit the immune response in L. amazonensis-infected mice.
50 ver, the adoptive transfer of ANK cells into L. amazonensis-infected mice markedly increased DC and T
51 ng an important effector function in killing L. amazonensis.
52 LHR1-complemented (LHR1/Deltalhr1 plus LHR1) L. amazonensis strains.
53                             L. major (LV39), L. amazonensis and L. mexicana were the most efficient u
54 head challenge infection with 107 metacyclic L. amazonensis promastigotes at 4 wk demonstrated protec
55 d amastigotes in IFN-gamma-stimulated Mphis, L. amazonensis-specific Th1 transfer helped recipient mi
56 fection established by promastigotes but not L. amazonensis infection established by amastigotes.
57                                     Notably, L. amazonensis amastigote infection failed to activate D
58 , we identify and characterize LIT1, a novel L. amazonensis membrane protein with extensive similarit
59 f interleukin-10 (IL-10), in CD4(+) cells of L. amazonensis-infected mice, we further examined whethe
60                               The failure of L. amazonensis-infected C3H mice to respond to IL-12 was
61 lation of the macrophage-mediated killing of L. amazonensis in vitro and a less robust antibody respo
62 e ear with 10(5) metacyclic promastigotes of L. amazonensis together with SGE (equivalent to 0.5 glan
63 he complicated pathogenic immune response of L. amazonensis.
64 via NADPH oxidase during the early stages of L. amazonensis infection is critical for inflammasome ac
65 ranscription-PCR in all life-cycle stages of L. amazonensis.
66                         Adoptive transfer of L. amazonensis-specific Th1 cells prior to infection ove
67                                 Treatment of L. amazonensis-infected mice with the highly-specific mi
68 ent mice infected with either L. mexicana or L. amazonensis failed to control the lesion progression,
69 rprised to find that IFN-gamma could promote L. amazonensis amastigote replication in macrophages (Mp
70  we observed that ATP was not able to reduce L. amazonensis load.
71          This was supported by the fact that L. amazonensis amastigotes limited the production of IL-
72             These experiments indicated that L. amazonensis resistance to killing in vivo is only par
73 iginal sites of inoculation, indicating that L. amazonensis can persist in vivo independently of the
74                  In this study, we show that L. amazonensis or its lipophosphoglycan can induce neutr
75                 Previous studies showed that L. amazonensis incorporates heme through the transmembra
76                We have previously shown that L. amazonensis-infected C57BL/6 mice have profound impai
77                   These results suggest that L. amazonensis amastigotes may condition DCs of a suscep
78 ults reveal a quite unexpected aspect of the L. amazonensis parasite and have important implications
79 ential of a DNA-based vaccine, we tested the L. amazonensis gene encoding P4 nuclease as well as adju
80                  One possibility is that the L. amazonensis parasite modulates antigen-presenting cel
81         Moreover, we immunized mice with the L. amazonensis vaccines to determine if this vaccine reg
82 ay not always be indicative of protection to L. amazonensis infection.
83 tion in macrophages, and mouse resistance to L. amazonensis infection in vivo.
84 ngly, inflammasome activation in response to L. amazonensis is impaired by inhibitors of NADPH oxidas
85  pathology, and therefore, susceptibility to L. amazonensis infection.
86 because IL-4-/- mice remained susceptible to L. amazonensis infection, even after IL-12 administratio
87                          After 2 to 4 weeks, L. amazonensis-infected mice had significantly delayed a
88 se mechanism of pathogenesis associated with L. amazonensis infection remains largely unresolved.
89  of bone marrow-derived dendritic cells with L. amazonensis amastigotes resulted in rapid and signifi
90 4/IL-12, or P4/HSP70 prior to challenge with L. amazonensis promastigotes.
91  protective response in mice challenged with L. amazonensis and L. pifanoi.
92  infection of C3HeB/FeJ mice for 7 days with L. amazonensis promoted an immature CD11c(+) DC phenotyp
93  between MHC class II -/- mice infected with L. amazonensis and Leishmania major suggest that these p
94 e response of mice chronically infected with L. amazonensis can be enhanced towards a Th1 phenotype b
95         We found that C3H mice infected with L. amazonensis exhibited decreased IL-12 production, whi
96  functions at early stages of infection with L. amazonensis parasites and provide a compelling ration
97                               Infection with L. amazonensis promastigotes led to increased 1/2 phosph
98 cells exposed to SGE prior to infection with L. amazonensis.
99 d dendritic cells (DCs) of C57BL/6 mice with L. amazonensis or Leishmania major promastigotes and ass
100  could be enhanced in vitro and in vivo with L. amazonensis antigen-pulsed bone marrow-derived dendri
101                                          Yet L. amazonensis-infected DCs produced elevated levels of

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。
 
Page Top