ライフサイエンスコーパス: LASIK

1 LASIK flaps were created using the 150-kHz IntraLase iFS

2 LASIK for primary high mixed astigmatism using optimized

3 LASIK has been shown to have an overall better outcome c

4 LASIK has both a neurotrophic effect on the cornea and l

5 LASIK has quickly become the refractive procedure of cho

6 LASIK significantly increases the refractive index of th

7 LASIK significantly reduced difficulties with night driv

8 sidents in the study performed a mean of 4.4 LASIK surgeries (range 1-10) during residency training s

9 Two topography maps of 98 LASIK participants were recorded preoperatively (Pre), 1

10 The method of creating a LASIK flap does not influence the changes in keratocyte

11 nd microkeratome are able to create accurate LASIK flaps.

12 y of the nerve measurements before and after LASIK (P = 0.24).

13 ues may be used to correct astigmatism after LASIK, but the treatment of irregular astigmatism requir

14 Many complications after LASIK are amenable to further treatment.

15 nd management of several complications after LASIK by reviewing the literature and relaying their own

16 e intensity from the stroma in corneas after LASIK was compared to that in untreated corneas by using

17 y has been found to initially decrease after LASIK, returning to baseline 6 to 12 months postoperativ

18 ve fiber layer thickness or optic disc after LASIK.

19 , 8 female) with postoperative ectasia after LASIK (23 eyes) and PRK (3 eyes) were included with a me

20 neal topography that developed ectasia after LASIK (ectasia group) and 174 eyes from 88 consecutive p

21 Ectasia after LASIK and PRK was arrested by CXL with stabilization or

22 eated with CXL for progressive ectasia after LASIK or PRK at the Institute for Refractive and Ophthal

23 14 patients with postoperative ectasia after LASIK were enrolled.

24 spheroequivalent refraction was found after LASIK.

25 The reduction in tear function after LASIK may induce an increase in osmolarity and consequen

26 al reports of steroid-induced glaucoma after LASIK have been published.

27 r bundles decreases by 90% immediately after LASIK.

28 ost nerve fiber bundles were also lost after LASIK, and these began recovering by the third month, bu

29 found intraocular pressure to be lower after LASIK, most likely an artifact of measurement as a resul

30 rves decreased >90% in the first month after LASIK.

31 rphology remained abnormal at 6 months after LASIK surgery.

32 o its preoperative appearance 6 months after LASIK, but in the flap stroma the nerve fiber bundle mor

33 It increased 6 and 12 months after LASIK, but remained less than half of the preoperative v

34 d at 1 week and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after LASIK.

35 subbasal nerve fiber bundle morphology after LASIK were also investigated.

36 well described complication occurring after LASIK.

37 ective treatment for ectasia occurring after LASIK.

38 en cross-linking for ectasia occurring after LASIK.

39 ection of residual error of refraction after LASIK using the Pulzar 213 nm solid-state laser is an ac

40 ne and the spheroequivalent refraction after LASIK.

41 for the treatment of myopic regression after LASIK compared with control group.

42 In 22 individuals (39 eyes) returning after LASIK, we found no significant difference between the cl

43 ity of vision and patient satisfaction after LASIK can be difficult to assess because of the many var

44 luctuation, and foreign body sensation after LASIK and PRK at postoperative months 1, 3, and 6.

45 ay be responsible for the myopic shift after LASIK.

46 stroma, brightness was 715 +/- 117 SU after LASIK, and was not significantly different from brightne

47 affect recovery of the ocular surface after LASIK and may increase the risk for chronic dry eye.

48 possibility of developing new symptoms after LASIK surgery.

49 cted over time in epithelial thickness after LASIK treatment; however, the posterior stromal thicknes

50 CD according to the opacities thriving after LASIK (R124H) and PRK (R555W).

51 isfaction and higher quality of vision after LASIK.

52 dles decreased by more than 90% 1 week after LASIK and was significantly lower at all times after sur

53 decreased by 20% during the first year after LASIK and remained low through 5 years (P < .001).

54 During the first year after LASIK, subbasal nerve fiber bundles gradually return, al

55 croscopy in vivo during the first year after LASIK.

56 es in haze in the corneal flap 3 years after LASIK and could be used to examine changes in haze after

57 h dry eye symptoms at 1, 2, or 3 years after LASIK was not significantly increased relative to baseli

58 and 35 corneas of 18 patients 3 years after LASIK were examined by slit scanning confocal microscopy

59 Three years after LASIK, image intensity in the flap was 740 +/- 186 SU, a

60 3, and 6 months and 1, 3, and 5 years after LASIK, keratocyte density was measured using confocal mi

61 l volunteers and 17 volunteers 3 years after LASIK.

62 pear to decrease between 2 and 3 years after LASIK.

63 n to preoperative densities by 3 years after LASIK.

64 operties of the cornea through 5 years after LASIK.

65 f diplopia following cataract extraction and LASIK include decompensation of pre-existing strabismus,

66 thelia are a known complication of LASIK and LASIK-like procedures.

67 undergoing PRK (38 eyes of 23 patients) and LASIK (42 eyes of 25 patients) using the Technolas 217z1

68 pherical equivalent (MSE) for myopic PRK and LASIK (P<0.0001), weakly correlated with preoperative MS

69 ase than myopic corrections for both PRK and LASIK (P<0.0001).

70 Wavefront-guided PRK and LASIK are more predictable and provided better results t

71 d improved stability and efficacy of PRK and LASIK when combined with CXL, as well as a potentially d

72 ded better results than conventional PRK and LASIK.

73 ith variability and regression after PRK and LASIK.

74 s, participant satisfaction (with vision and LASIK surgery), and clinical measures (visual acuity, re

75 h 9.1% of surveyed programs not offering any LASIK experience.

76 e randomized to receive femtosecond-assisted LASIK with a conventional 70-degree side cut made with t

77 lowly changing as femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK becomes more widely performed.

78 Femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK is now a waiverable procedure for US military pers

79 Before LASIK and at 1, 3, and 6 months and 1, 3, and 5 years af

80 he predominantly vertical orientation before LASIK.

81 number remains less than half of that before LASIK.

82 ot significantly different from those before LASIK.

83 differences in keratocyte apoptosis between LASIK, epithelial scrape-PRK, and transepithelial PRK.

84 ed to characterize the relationships between LASIK procedure room temperature and humidity and postop

85 Both LASIK and PRK caused an increase in dry eye symptoms and

86 Both LASIK and SMILE substantially decreased the corneal biom

87 Z(4)(0) was not induced by LASIK with the treatment algorithm but was negatively in

88 lasers are efficacious devices for creating LASIK flaps, with accompanying good visual results.

89 than mechanical microkeratomes for creating LASIK flaps.

90 Compared with contact lens wear, current LASIK technology improved ease of night driving, did not

91 opulation, an increase of 1 degrees C during LASIK was associated with a 0.003 diopter (D) more hyper

92 ocedure room temperature nor humidity during LASIK were found to have a clinically significant relati

93 and ambient temperature and humidity during LASIK were recorded.

94 Cataract extraction, LASIK, PRK, PTK, and various combination procedures have

95 Femtosecond LASIK flaps are classically related to complications der

96 Femtosecond LASIK flaps represent significant improvement in morphol

97 Femtosecond-LASIK flaps were thicker in the IL group in comparison t

98 Thin flap LASIK, also referred to as sub-Bowman's keratomileusis,

99 eons to explore the possibility of thin flap LASIK.

100 fect on functioning and well-being following LASIK based on patient and expert input.

101 series, the incidence of diplopia following LASIK has not been reported.

102 HOAs were still increased following LASIK by a factor of 1.23 but not PRK.

103 l anesthesia for cataract extraction and for LASIK procedures, the leading cause of diplopia is decom

104 or while being evaluated as a candidate for LASIK.

105 l stroma creating precise lamellar flaps for LASIK.

106 myopia, which otherwise may not qualify for LASIK.

107 o +2.50 diopters (D), with eyes suitable for LASIK surgery.

108 change in the corneal refractive power from LASIK and was considered the reference measurement.

109 patients were treated with wavefront-guided LASIK and PRK.

110 t was randomized to undergo wavefront-guided LASIK by the AMO Visx CustomVue S4 IR excimer laser syst

111 819 (45%) wore contacts at baseline and had LASIK, and 287 (16%) wore glasses at baseline and had LA

112 d 287 (16%) wore glasses at baseline and had LASIK.

113 nts 40 years of age or younger when they had LASIK were somewhat more likely to be strongly satisfied

114 r primitive stromal interface scars of human LASIK corneas and from similar regions of normal control

115 yopic PRK, 25% of the change after hyperopic LASIK, and 16% of the change after hyperopic PRK.

116 elated with preoperative MSE after hyperopic LASIK, and not related to preoperative MSE after hyperop

117 Aspheric hyperopic LASIK can increase the depth of focus without impairing

118 Bilateral hyperopic LASIK surgery using a 200-Hz Allegretto excimer laser.

119 Ls in eyes with previous myopic or hyperopic LASIK can result in good refractive results.

120 yes of 17 patients which underwent hyperopic LASIK using a 213 nm solid-state laser (Pulzar Z1, Custo

121 eyes, 102 myopic-PRK eyes, and 106 hyperopic-LASIK/PRK eyes, anterior corneal higher-order aberration

122 s, 61 myopic-LASIK/PRK eyes, and 9 hyperopic-LASIK/PRK eyes.

123 of focus values in myopic-PRK and hyperopic-LASIK/PRK corneas were significantly greater than those

124 mm pupil, depth of focus values in hyperopic-LASIK/PRK corneas were greater than those in normal and

125 ma and fourth-order astigmatism in hyperopic-LASIK/PRK corneas.

126 , especially in corneas with prior hyperopic-LASIK/PRK.

127 the opposite relationship in some hyperopic-LASIK/PRK eyes having the highest anterior surface curva

128 iorly and posteriorly to the lamellar cut in LASIK.

129 he profiles of KS and CS/DS disaccharides in LASIK interface scars are significantly different from t

130 ion of nonsulfated (NSD) KS disaccharides in LASIK interface scars compared with normal controls.

131 y advantages of a customized corneal flap in LASIK, as well as to review the biomechanics that suppor

132 der to provide the appropriate management in LASIK-associated infectious keratitis.

133 Both subbasal and stromal corneal nerves in LASIK flaps recover slowly and do not return to preopera

134 neal sensitivity was better in SMILE than in LASIK eyes 1 month postoperatively (3.5+/-1.79 vs. 2.45+

135 s from laser-assisted in situ keratomileuis (LASIK).

136 Laser-assisted in situ keratomileus (LASIK) creates a permanent flap that remains non-attache

137 Laser in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) can otherwi

138 advantages of laser in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and photorefractive keratectomy (PRK).

139 tomy (PRK) and laser in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) are also used to treat myopia, hyperopia and asti

140 ) measures for laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) are needed.

141 , and laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) compared with unwounded controls in rabbit cornea

142 Although laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) enjoys a high success rate, postoperative residua

143 asty, laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) flap or interface complications, post-radial kera

144 d the laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) flap.

145 m studies with laser in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) have continued to show good safety and efficacy.

146 ront-optimized laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in eyes with low myopia and compound myopic astig

147 cond flaps for laser in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in terms of accuracy and complications.

148 d treatment of laser in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) infections.

149 uided Laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) is a widespread and effective surgical treatment

150 e corneal flap laser in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) is among the most important determinants in the s

151 and following laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) surgery.

152 ds in resident laser in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) training in the USA.

153 y of hyperopic laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) using a 213 nm wavelength solid-state laser.

154 with laser assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) with residual error of refraction.

155 safety versus laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK), it does not achieve the same visual results duri

156 including PRK, laser in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK), thermal keratoplasty, and orthokeratology.

157 have undergone laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK).

158 eratectomy and laser in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK).

159 s occurs after laser in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK).

160 ct surgery and laser in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK).

161 rneal flaps in laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK).

162 after laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK).

163 ssociated with laser in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK).

164 ) and laser assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK).

165 econd laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK).

166 ive correction, the creation of the lamellar LASIK flap decreased measured IOP by 0.94 mmHg.

167 Like LASIK, on the one hand, it employs a "flap" and conseque

168 However, based on the published literature, LASIK may be a viable option for some glaucoma patients.

169 After 12 months, LASIK eyes had achieved visual acuity of 20/12.5 or bett

170 o explain 42% of the IOP change after myopic LASIK, 34% of the change after myopic PRK, 25% of the ch

171 ched patients scheduled for bilateral myopic LASIK were enrolled and followed for 6 months after the

172 der correction when combined with low myopic LASIK.

173 ntral 4-mm zone in 94 normal eyes, 61 myopic-LASIK/PRK eyes, and 9 hyperopic-LASIK/PRK eyes.

174 ded to be less than GEP in normal and myopic-LASIK/PRK eyes, with the opposite relationship in some h

175 , 87% (32/37) of PRK eyes and 81% (30/37) of LASIK eyes had UDVA of 20/20 or better (P = .75).

176 ctopic epithelia are a known complication of LASIK and LASIK-like procedures.

177 al symptom scales to evaluate the effects of LASIK surgery in future studies.

178 The safety of LASIK and the implications of LASIK on glaucoma diagnostic testing are reviewed.

179 The safety of LASIK and the implications of LASIK on glaucoma diagnost

180 The safety of LASIK in patients with glaucoma has not been proved.

181 nue to support the use of LASEK over that of LASIK in the correction of refractive error.

182 Percent tissue altered at the time of LASIK was significantly associated with the development

183 discuss the topics relevant to the topic of LASIK in glaucoma patients or suspects.

184 m remains the model for initial treatment of LASIK-associated infectious keratitis.

185 of the toric intraocular lens and the use of LASIK in such aforementioned patients, these indications

186 re room temperature or humidity was found on LASIK refractive outcomes.

187 the fellow eye received wavefront-optimized LASIK by the Alcon Allegretto Wave Eye-Q 400 Hz excimer

188 Wavefront-guided and WF-optimized LASIK using the Alcon WaveLight Allegretto Eye-Q 400-Hz

189 domized to receive WF-guided or WF-optimized LASIK with the WaveLight Allegretto Eye-Q 400-Hz excimer

190 orneal nerves, cut during transplantation or LASIK, never fully regenerate.

191 at 54% of respondents had resident-performed LASIK surgery with 9.1% of surveyed programs not offerin

192 us, pellucid marginal degeneration, and post-LASIK ectasia, in addition to potentially decreasing or

193 n the treatment of both keratoconus and post-LASIK ectasia.

194 CM was significantly greater post-LASIK relative to pre-LASIK (P < 0.05).

195 er multifocal and accommodating IOLs in post-LASIK eyes, the effect of IOL asphericity on visual qual

196 hown promising results for keratoconus, post-LASIK ectasia, and pellucid marginal degeneration.

197 ssive postlaser in-situ keratomileusis (post-LASIK) keratectasia.

198 ap creation technique, pre- and 1-month post-LASIK manifest refraction, and ambient temperature and h

199 Many recent studies of post-LASIK infectious keratitis show the predominance of atyp

200 sia in both keratoconus and progressive post-LASIK keratectasia by means of corneal stiffening.

201 progressive keratoconus and progressive post-LASIK keratectasia.

202 urements were statistically significant post-LASIK compared to preoperation (P < 0.05).

203 ve corneal elevation measurements taken post-LASIK.

204 between the clinically measured pre- to post-LASIK change in MRx and both Scheimpflug photography (P

205 tear syndrome may lead to less postoperative LASIK complications.

206 3 years the numbers remained <60% of the pre-LASIK numbers (P <0.001).

207 ificantly greater post-LASIK relative to pre-LASIK (P < 0.05).

208 for residual refractive error after primary LASIK.

209 er estimation in challenging eyes with prior LASIK/photorefractive keratectomy was most accurately pr

210 Both eyes of 21 patients received LASIK for myopia or myopic astigmatism.

211 PRK caused greater vision fluctuations than LASIK.

212 hniques offer a higher degree of safety than LASIK, they are associated with more pain and a slower v

213 e ever mindful of the important effects that LASIK may have on diagnostic testing.

214 The LASIK flaps with an inverted side cut are associated wit

215 The LASIK surgery and the postoperative care were performed

216 s were treated with an excimer laser and the LASIK technique between 2000 and 2010.

217 S) (Deltadi-6S) CS/DS disaccharides from the LASIK interface scar was significantly higher than norma

218 4-GlcNAc(6S) (DSD) KS disaccharides from the LASIK interface scars were significantly lower than in n

219 up and did not significantly increase in the LASIK group (mean +/- SD -0.16 +/- 0.17 mum to -0.17 +/-

220 s (D) in the PRK and -0.16 +/- 0.34 D in the LASIK group (P = .222).

221 mum to 0.496 +/- 0.17 mum (P = .013) in the LASIK group at 1 year.

222 , which remained significantly higher in the LASIK group than in the SMILE group 6 months after surge

223 cal properties with greater reduction in the LASIK group.

224 In the stromal bed (posterior to the LASIK flap interface), there were no significant changes

225 higher in the SMILE group compared with the LASIK group 1 and 6 months after surgery.

226 elow, LASEK may also prove to be superior to LASIK in customized ablations.

227 r aberrations in comparison with traditional LASIK.

228 m 88 consecutive patients with uncomplicated LASIK and at least 3 years of postoperative follow-up.

229 oreign body sensation in patients undergoing LASIK and photorefractive keratectomy (PRK).

230 Consecutive patients undergoing LASIK at the Duke Eye Center who consented to participat

231 observational studies of patients undergoing LASIK surgery for myopia, hyperopia, or astigmatism.

232 total of 70 eyes from 37 subjects undergoing LASIK were measured preoperatively.

233 postoperative month 1 than those undergoing LASIK.

234 een corneas of 11 patients who had undergone LASIK to correct myopia from -2.0 D to -11.0 D were exam

235 ere studied of 11 patients who had undergone LASIK to correct myopia from -2.0 D to -11.0 D.

236 questionnaire to patients who have undergone LASIK surgery is a new approach to assess symptoms and s

237 opic, given the millions that have undergone LASIK.

238 s) in patients who have previously undergone LASIK.

239 All cases underwent LASIK surgery using the sixth-generation excimer laser A

240 Forty myopic eyes underwent LASIK using an excimer laser with refraction ranging fro

241 Participants underwent LASIK surgery for myopia, hyperopia, and/or astigmatism.

242 he second group included eyes that underwent LASIK procedure using the EX500 Allegretto excimer laser

243 Twenty eyes of 10 patients who underwent LASIK for myopia were examined clinically and by real-ti

244 Patients who underwent LASIK had a 0.94 mmHg (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.8

245 sted of 24 eyes of 24 patients who underwent LASIK.

246 Compared with continued contact lens wear, LASIK significantly reduced the self-reported rates of e

247 improve clinical outcomes of those for whom LASIK-based techniques are not an option.

248 urface and corneal innervation compared with LASIK, further reducing the incidence of dry eye disease

249 The Patient-Reported Outcomes With LASIK (PROWL) studies were prospective observational stu

250 urgery in the Patient-Reported Outcomes With LASIK (PROWL) studies.

251 ual acuities and complications reported with LASIK flaps created using femtosecond lasers are within

252 isfaction with vision, and satisfaction with LASIK surgery in the Patient-Reported Outcomes With LASI

253 isfaction with vision, and satisfaction with LASIK surgery.

254 glasses wearers were strongly satisfied with LASIK at year 3.

255 vefront combined with LASEK rather than with LASIK may offer the best refractive outcome.

256 One eye was treated with LASIK and the fellow eye was treated with PRK.