コーパス検索結果 (left1)
  通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
  
   1                                              LT indication was defined as DC if the Model for End-Sta
     2                                              LT is complex surgery and the increasing use of high-ris
     3                                              LT recipients needing full assistance (KPS 10%-40%) vs b
     4                                              LT with very old donors has historically been associated
     5                                              LT-Fam also attained higher power than other methods in 
     6                                              LT-scanner's performance is evaluated based on its abili
     7                                              LT/HV patients had higher stage disease (P < 0.001), but
     8                                              LTs catalyze the non-hydrolytic cleavage of the bacteria
     9 lticenter study included 911 patients from 3 LT centers with short, medium, and long wait times (medi
    10 Six episodes of acute rejection (n = 2 KT, 4 LT) occurred, during hepatitis C virus treatment in 4 an
  
    12 g-term renal and survival outcomes among 576 LT recipients who received SRL in a medical center betwe
  
    14 d were 443 posttransplant patients (KT = 60, LT = 347, DLK = 36); 42% had cirrhosis, and 54% had fail
  
    16 2 control groups without prior angiogram, 72 LT recipients matched for cardiovascular risk factors (c
  
    18 values, central corneal thickness, WtW, ACD, LT, and axial length both before and after cycloplegia. 
  
    20 a retrospective cohort study of 34 402 adult LTs between 2002 and 2013 using Vizient inpatient claims
  
  
    23 14 fragment]) were obtained before and after LT (0 [H0], 6, 12, 24, 48 and 72 hours after pulmonary a
  
  
  
  
    28 iated to collect the experience on EVR after LT with the aim of providing guidance for transplant cli
    29 ischarged to a rehabilitation facility after LT (22% vs 3%) and be rehospitalized within the first po
  
  
  
  
  
    35 r Organ Sharing database was queried for all LT performed in the United States between 1994 and 2014.
  
    37 o compare characteristics and outcomes among LT recipients with radiographically apparent HCC lesions
  
  
  
    41 es are equivalently attenuated in IL-33- and LT-deficient mice, and optimal ILC2 activation reflects 
  
  
  
    45 teroid-resistant cascade of Wnt5a, Tgm2, and LTs, which might represent a therapeutic target for airw
    46 a suggest that females may benefit from anti-LT therapy to a greater extent than males, prompting con
    47 herapy after a temporary interruption around LT was highly effective, achieving sustained virological
  
  
    50 mpled to induce family-biased ascertainment, LT-Fam was correctly calibrated whereas ATT, MLM, and CA
    51 th family-biased case-control ascertainment, LT-Fam was correctly calibrated (average chi(2) = 1.00-1
    52 ncluded model for end-stage liver disease at LT >23, time to recurrence, >3 recurrent nodules, maximu
    53 patients with mPAP of 35 mm Hg or greater at LT and correlate their clinical outcomes with hemodynami
    54 d elevated international normalized ratio at LT were associated with increased nonskin cancer risk.  
    55 that enrolled adults with cirrhosis awaiting LT and treated with bridging or down-staging therapies b
  
  
    58  should receive HCV treatment while awaiting LT is between 23 and 27, depending on the UNOS region.  
    59 of PoPH diagnosis, at last evaluation before LT, and within 6 months and beyond 6 months after LT.   
    60 , at the national level, treating HCV before LT increased life expectancy if MELD was </=27 but could
    61  therapy using LDV/SOF with ribavirin before LT is the most cost-effective strategy for patients with
    62 erial hypertension-targeted therapies before LT resulted in significant decreases in both mPAP (36 +/
  
  
    65 nd the water molecules inside the pore, both LT and RT data sets are consistent with the positions ob
    66 .11] at baseline vs 6.25 [4.27] after bright LT, and 8.87 [2.83] at baseline vs 7.33 [3.52] after dim
    67 ] at baseline vs 106.98 [19.37] after bright LT, and 95.11 [19.86] at baseline vs 99.28 [16.94] after
  
    69 ipants were randomized 1:1 to receive bright LT or dim-red LT (controlled condition) twice daily in 1
    70 ] disease duration, 5.9 [3.6] years), bright LT resulted in significant improvements in EDS, as asses
    71 nt cardiorespiratory abnormalities caused by LT-IH are mediated by epigenetic re-programming of the r
    72 ctors (control group I), and 119 consecutive LT recipients without any CV risk factors (control group
  
  
  
    76 unctional status (KPS 10%-40%), living donor LT, pre-LT hemodialysis, and the donor risk index (all P
  
    78  Treating rats with decitabine either during LT-IH or during recovery from LT-IH prevented DNA methyl
    79 , a DNA methylation inhibitor, either during LT-IH or during recovery from LT-IH, prevented DNA methy
  
  
  
  
    84 ipients hospitalized >/=30 days in the first LT year were typically smaller volume and/or transplanti
  
  
    87 gle-center report of recurrent HCC following LT, surgical treatment in well-selected patients is asso
  
  
    90     A total of 47,591 adults wait-listed for LT from HCV, hepatitis B virus (HBV), and nonalcoholic s
    91 conducted an analysis of patients listed for LT in the United Network for Organ Sharing/Organ Procure
  
  
    94 nce and should be the preferred strategy for LT recipients with undetectable or low-level viremia at 
  
  
  
  
    99  either during LT-IH or during recovery from LT-IH prevented DNA methylation of AOE genes, normalized
   100  either during LT-IH or during recovery from LT-IH, prevented DNA methylation, normalized the express
  
  
  
   104  under a liability threshold model; however, LT-Fam uses published narrow-sense heritability estimate
  
  
  
  
  
  
   111 h evidence of continuing virus production in LT despite ART, indicated two important sources for rebo
  
   113 plus daclatasvir was efficacious and safe in LT, KT, and DLK transplant recipients; ribavirin did not
  
   115 ode the heat-stable (ST) and/or heat-labile (LT) enterotoxins, as well as surface structures, known a
   116 lar angiogenesis and diminishing lactotroph (LT) VEGFR2 expression, lifting reproductive axis repress
  
   118 -stimulated neutrophils produce leukotriene (LT)B4, we examined the effect of propofol on LTB4 produc
  
   120 accumulation of protoporphyrin in the liver, LT without hematopoietic stem cell transplantation leave
  
   122    We show that evolutionarily conserved MCV LT phosphorylation sites are constitutively recognized b
  
  
   125 n = 152) and 19.4% (n = 13) of "CF negative" LT + STp (n = 67) expressing isolates analyzed harbored 
   126 lude that CS30 is common among "CF negative" LT + STp isolates and is associated with ETEC that cause
   127 hat we use is demonstrated by the ability of LT-scanner to identify the known targets of FDA-approved
  
   129 stoperative cardiac events within 90 days of LT predicted poor survival in study group as well as con
  
   131      To determine the safety and efficacy of LT on excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) associated with
  
   133 recipient matching criteria, the outcomes of LT with donors >/=70 and <70 years are comparable with a
  
  
  
  
   138 ence: microvascular invasion, AFP at time of LT, and the sum of the largest viable tumor diameter and
   139 eous kidney transplantation (KT) (at time of LT, group 1) and 61 with delayed KT (performed at a late
  
   141 on a very large patient cohort, the value of LT in the management of HEHE and to identify risk factor
   142 cipient cohort clearly confirms the value of LT in the treatment of this rare disorder and also permi
   143 in gonadotroph function opposite to those of LTs, with up-regulation and down-regulation of gonadotro
  
  
  
  
   148  risk factors for CMV infection in pediatric LT recipients managed with ganciclovir-based preemptive 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
   157 r CRE infection were acquisition of CRE post-LT, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score greater than
   158 d the host microbiota within three days post-LT, in association with a reduction in richness and dive
  
  
   161 tment regimens that are recommended for post-LT patients are not safe in patients with severe renal i
   162 o not address the treatment options for post-LT patients with severe renal impairment or who are on d
  
  
   165 had superior 5-year RFS (72%) and lower post-LT recurrence (HR 0.52, P < 0.001) compared with both un
   166  3 treatment-naive HCV genotype 1a male post-LT patients on hemodialysis who were treated with EBR/GZ
  
  
   169 st sensitive to the utility of patients post-LT, treatment sustained virological response rates, LT c
   170 n response to LRT independently predict post-LT recurrence, serving as a surrogate for underlying tum
  
  
   173  patient-level, whereas center-specific post-LT healthcare utilization is associated with certain cen
   174  of RETREAT, which may help standardize post-LT surveillance, provide a framework for tumor staging a
  
  
  
   178  include variables from the first three post-LT days only (AUROC of 0.818, 0.776-0.856, p = 0.001).  
   179 ing long-term outcomes of pre-LT versus post-LT HCV treatment with oral direct-acting antivirals for 
  
  
   182 regression, HCC was not associated with post-LT survival among all patients (hazard ratio, 1.15; 95% 
   183  pre-LT hospitalization predicts 1-year post-LT hospitalization independent of MELD score at the pati
  
  
   186     RETREAT was able to stratify 5-year post-LT recurrence risk ranging from less than 3% with a scor
   187 pendently associated with higher 1-year post-LT transplant costs were older age, poor functional stat
  
   189 ion (hazard ratio [HR], 4.8; P < 0.001), pre-LT waiting time of 120 days or less (HR, 2.6; P = 0.01) 
  
  
   192 ociation between hospitalization 90 days pre-LT and the number of days alive and out of the hospital 
  
   194 e analysis, recipient's age and elevated pre-LT international normalized ratio were associated with i
   195 who would benefit (and not benefit) from pre-LT treatment based on their Model for End-Stage Liver Di
   196 n, the threshold MELD score to treat HCV pre-LT varied between 23 and 27 and was lower for UNOS regio
  
   198 l status (KPS 10%-40%), living donor LT, pre-LT hemodialysis, and the donor risk index (all P < .001)
  
   200 e invasion (HR = 2.2; P = 0.03), but not pre-LT extrahepatic disease, were significant risk factors f
   201 ghty-seven LT recipients with history of pre-LT angiogram (December 2005 to December 2012) were compa
   202 al trial comparing long-term outcomes of pre-LT versus post-LT HCV treatment with oral direct-acting 
   203  their health and cost outcomes based on pre-LT versus post-LT treatment with an all-oral DAA regimen
  
   205 licy research; our results indicate that pre-LT treatment with a highly effective, all-oral DAA regim
  
  
  
  
   210      However, 5-year OS for CLRT and primary LT was not significantly different among patients with (
   211 ell-compensated cirrhosis instead of primary LT because it may lead to better utilization of donor li
  
   213 atment sustained virological response rates, LT costs, and baseline Model for End-Stage Liver Disease
   214 ive in controlling CMV in children receiving LT, with lower costs and lower exposure to antivirals.  
  
   216 ndomized 1:1 to receive bright LT or dim-red LT (controlled condition) twice daily in 1-hour interval
  
   218 83] at baseline vs 7.33 [3.52] after dim-red LT) and the Parkinson's Disease Sleep Scale (97.24 [22.4
  
   220 Del-1 deficiency in mice resulted in reduced LT-HSC proliferation and infringed preferentially upon m
  
  
   223 ias in the efficiency of clinically relevant LT biosynthesis inhibitors, showing that their effects a
   224  of pediatric patients undergoing sequential LT and stem cell transplantation have been described in 
  
   226 inhibitor reduces Skp2 levels and stabilizes LT, leading to enhanced MCV replication and transmission
  
  
  
  
  
   232  rats at either 13 months of age (long-term, LT) or 19 months of age (short-term, ST) and tested memo
   233 ectroporation thresholds were 54% lower than LTs for symmetric waveforms and 33% lower for asymmetric
   234 Taken together, these findings indicate that LT reduces c-Jun protein levels via two distinct mechani
  
  
  
  
  
   240     We sought to study the activation of the LT and Wnt pathways during early- or late-onset allergic
  
  
  
   244 in obesity and NASH-related additions to the LT waitlist in the United States and make projections fo
  
  
   247 irty-one distinct products distinguish these LTs with respect to substrate recognition, catalytic act
   248 e, the lens densitometry and lens thickness (LT) measurements were performed after dilation of the pu
   249  2.5 mm and 3.0 mm diameter, lens thickness (LT), central corneal thickness (CCT) and white-to-white 
   250 nterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), corneal power (CP), noncycloplegic subjective refra
  
  
  
   254 efined as time from initial HCC diagnosis to LT, was less than 6 months in 32.4%, 6 to 18 months in 5
   255 for HCV patients with HCC or DCC relative to LT is an important area of clinical and policy research;
   256 tem (PDS) with or without heat-labile toxin (LT) from Escherichia coli or subcutaneously with aluminu
   257 oteins combine to form anthrax lethal toxin (LT), whose proximal targets are mitogen-activated kinase
   258 me superfamily, the lytic transglycosylases (LTs), occupies the space between the two membranes of Gr
  
  
  
  
   263      We analyzed trends in liver transplant (LT) wait-listing (WL) to explore potential impact of eff
   264 C) who are listed for liver transplantation (LT) are often treated while on the waiting list with loc
  
   266 perative period after liver transplantation (LT) between donation after circulatory death (DCD) and d
   267 ts with HCC requiring liver transplantation (LT) but do not include objective measures of tumor biolo
  
  
  
  
  
   273 Although the value of liver transplantation (LT) is well established, its place in the management of 
   274 ression, and death in liver transplantation (LT) recipients with preformed or de novo HLA donor-speci
   275 s (HBV) recurrence in liver transplantation (LT) recipients, but HBIG is costly and inconvenient to a
   276 e whole experience of liver transplantation (LT) with donors >/=70 years in a single center not apply
   277 tion before and after liver transplantation (LT), and its association with center characteristics, is
   278 HCC) recurrence after liver transplantation (LT), but no reliable risk score has been established to 
   279 nt complication after liver transplantation (LT), but the role of pre-existing renal insufficiency an
  
   281 -fetoprotein (AFP) at liver transplantation (LT), microvascular invasion, and the sum of the largest 
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
   292 ting Milan criteria by imaging who underwent LT at the University of Toronto transplant center using 
   293 he records of all the children who underwent LT between 2008 and 2014 were retrospectively analyzed. 
  
  
   296 urvival of patients treated with CLRT versus LT, stratified by the stage of liver disease, extent of 
  
  
   299 sity prevalence was strongly associated with LT waitlist additions 9 years later in derivation and va
   300 ion of rBet v 1 with PDS in combination with LT from E. coli induced allergen-specific IgG antibodies
WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。