ライフサイエンスコーパス: Lactobacillus

1 obium, Gluconacetobacter, Hydrogenophaga and Lactobacillus.

2 on correlated with increased Bacteroides and Lactobacillus.

3 The most prevalent genera isolated were Lactobacillus (15%), followed by Corynebacterium (14.2%)

4 The increased spleen levels of Lactobacillus 16S rRNA in SDR mice positively correlated

5 In vitro analyses of Lactobacillus 4228 growth characteristics showed that pr

6 We isolated Lactobacillus 4228, sequenced its genome and found it to

7 tirely due to a single phylotype, designated Lactobacillus 4228.

8 l bacterial community types-one dominated by Lactobacillus (59.2%) and the other where Gardnerella va

9 articipants had genital communities with low Lactobacillus abundance and high ecological diversity.

10 the hard-to-culture beer-spoilage bacterium Lactobacillus acetotolerans to enter into the viable put

11 L. lactis subsp. cremoris (R704); QLA - with Lactobacillus acidophilus (LA-5); QLP - with Lactobacill

12 However, Lactobacillus acidophilus appears to require cell membra

13 A specific probiotic formulation composed of Lactobacillus acidophilus CL1285, Lactobacillus casei LB

14 without any exclusion, a probiotic (Bio-K+: Lactobacillus acidophilus CL1285, Lactobacillus casei LB

15 Lactobacillus acidophilus contains unique surface layer

16 Microbiological (Lactococcus lactis and Lactobacillus acidophilus counts, and functionality of t

17 oxalate uptake (>2.4-fold), whereas CM from Lactobacillus acidophilus did not.

18 Lactobacillus acidophilus is a Gram-positive lactic acid

19 xtracts, some increasing 1.4-2 Log cycles of Lactobacillus acidophilus La-5 and Bifidobacterium anima

20 estinal bacterial species (Escherichia coli, Lactobacillus acidophilus, Bifidobacterium animalis subs

21 We show here that Lactobacillus administration also limits infection of le

22 emale with liver abscess and bacteremia from lactobacillus after using probiotics containing lactobac

23 g the numbers of Lactobacillus crispatus and Lactobacillus agilis, and decreasing Lactobacillus saliv

24 ced its genome and found it to be related to Lactobacillus amylovorus.

25 representation of the genera Pseudomonas and Lactobacillus and a reduction in Prevotella.

26 n the gut flora were increased abundances of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium in resistant mice.

27 rp showed prebiotic properties in vitro with Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium strains.

28 inococcus and a higher relative abundance of Lactobacillus and Collinsella These data suggest that at

29 proposed associations between PTB and lower Lactobacillus and higher Gardnerella abundances replicat

30 Specifically, we observed reduced Lactobacillus and increased circulating kynurenine level

31 Saturated LCFA are metabolized by commensal Lactobacillus and promote their growth.

32 ad different levels of the Firmicutes genera Lactobacillus and Staphylococcus compared with healthy c

33 phyromonas, Kingella, Peptostreptococcaceae, Lactobacillus, and Atopobium, were detected only in HIV-

34 Our data revealed that Lactococcus, Lactobacillus, and Coprococcus protect the liver from in

35 n the abundance of Blautia, Catenibacterium, Lactobacillus, and Faecalibacterium species and an incre

36 Blood cultures were monitored at PLGH for Lactobacillus bacteremia through the 10 years' experienc

37 mia through the 10 years' experience, and no Lactobacillus bacteremias were detected.

38 n but only 18% (P = 0.644) in women with non-Lactobacillus bacteria, a threefold difference in effica

39 ifferential gut microbial composition (e.g., Lactobacillus, Bacteroides, and Enterobacteriaceae) and

40 oney bee intestinal bacterial genera such as Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, Snodgrassella, and Gilli

41 We used a water-forming NADH oxidase from Lactobacillus brevis (LbNOX) as a genetic tool for induc

42 robiotic strains namely Lactobacillus casei, Lactobacillus brevis and Lactobacillus plantarum were mi

43 re of an EPS isolated from sourdough isolate Lactobacillus brevis E25 was determined.

44 h of Bifidobacterium adolescentis but not of Lactobacillus brevis.

45 as studied and the effects of inoculant use (Lactobacillus buchneri) and of the ensiling time were as

46 ial yogurts, because they apparently contain Lactobacillus bulgaricus and Streptococcus thermophilus

47 We identified 16 species of Lactobacillus by 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis, 10 of

48 al activity against Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus casei (in both planktonic growth and biofi

49 The effect of the Lactobacillus casei 01 and inulin addition on sheep milk

50 ological (lactic acid bacteria and probiotic Lactobacillus casei 01 counts and survival under gastroi

51 at the general acid/base residue E274 of the Lactobacillus casei alpha1,6-fucosidase, including E274A

52 butanol were identified as relevant VOCs for Lactobacillus casei and Lactobacillus paracasei subsp.

53 butanol were identified as relevant VOCs for Lactobacillus casei and Lactobacillus paracasei subsp. p

54 We selected Lactobacillus casei as a model microorganism to proceed

55 The effect of the amount of immobilized Lactobacillus casei ATCC 393 on wheat grains on the gene

56 f the probiotic culture (free or immobilized Lactobacillus casei ATCC 393 on wheat grains) and the ri

57 lation (Lactobacillus plantarum CECT 220 and Lactobacillus casei CECT 475) in order to evaluate the a

58 aim of the study is to evaluate the role of Lactobacillus casei DG (LC-DG) and its postbiotic (PB) i

59 protective effects of heat-killed LAB strain Lactobacillus casei DK128 (DK128) on influenza viruses.

60 ixture of the three probiotic strains (2:1:1 Lactobacillus casei IMVB-7280, Bifidobacterium animalis

61 omposed of Lactobacillus acidophilus CL1285, Lactobacillus casei LBC80R, and Lactobacillus rhamnosus

62 c (Bio-K+: Lactobacillus acidophilus CL1285, Lactobacillus casei LBC80R, and Lactobacillus rhamnosus

63 ent was determined by microbiological assay (Lactobacillus casei rhamnosus) and tri-enzyme (protease,

64 CI: 0.7, 2.3 bowel movements/wk) but not for Lactobacillus casei Shirota (WMD: -0.2 bowel movements/w

65 actococcus latics subsp. lactis strain X and Lactobacillus casei strain B extracts had an MIC of 10mg

66 ependent growth of chloramphenicol-resistant Lactobacillus casei subspecies rhamnosus (NCIMB 10463).

67 Three probiotic strains namely Lactobacillus casei, Lactobacillus brevis and Lactobacil

68 nd dysbiosis, featured by decreased level of Lactobacillus casei, Lactobacillus johnsonii and increas

69 Lactobacillus casei, Lactobacillus johnsonii, and Lactob

70 es of Veillonella, Clostridium, Bacteroides, Lactobacillus, Collinsella and Prevotella, and reduction

71 ucidates how epithelial glycogen can support Lactobacillus colonization in the genital tract.

72 in vaginal epithelium is thought to support Lactobacillus colonization in vivo, many Lactobacillus i

73 Lactobacillus colonization of the lower female genital t

74 ad the fastest HPV remission rate, and a low Lactobacillus community with high proportions of the gen

75 2%]), Lactobacillus iners (n = 32 [34%]), or Lactobacillus crispatus (n = 22 [24%]).

76 actobacillus reuteri, Enterococcus faecalis, Lactobacillus crispatus and Clostridium orbiscindens) pr

77 bial population by increasing the numbers of Lactobacillus crispatus and Lactobacillus agilis, and de

78 The relative abundances of Lactobacillus crispatus and other Lactobacillus species

79 vealing a diversity of previously undetected Lactobacillus crispatus variants.

80 pecies and subspecies levels, revealing that Lactobacillus crispatus was associated with low risk of

81 Lactobacillus crispatus was the numerically most abundan

82 vaginal microbiota (Lactobacillus iners and Lactobacillus crispatus) or 2 prevalent bacteria associa

83 ates with commensal and pathogenic bacteria: Lactobacillus crispatus, Gardnerella vaginalis, and Neis

84 reased frequencies of Lactobacillus reuteri, Lactobacillus crispatus, Lactobacillus jensenii, and Lac

85 asphaeraphylotype 1 or 2,Lactobacillus iners,Lactobacillus crispatus,Lactobacillus gasseri, andLactob

86 ucosal CD4(+) T cells compared to those with Lactobacillus crispatus-dominant communities.

87 The rate ratio of incident HPV for low Lactobacillus CST IV-A was 1.86 (95% CI, .52-6.74).

88 In developing biosensor, lyophilised Lactobacillus delbruecki sp. bacterial cells were immobi

89 17; GDPDLd17), representative of the group b Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus (Ldb)-infect

90 We aimed to study the contribution of Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus CRL 454 to B

91 bacillus casei, Lactobacillus johnsonii, and Lactobacillus delbrueckii were associated with at least

92 However, in women with a Lactobacillus-depleted, high-diversity VM, significantly

93 Mechanistically, we identified that Lactobacillus-derived reactive oxygen species may suppre

94 with the decreased abundance of Clostridium, Lactobacillus, Desulfovibrio, and Methylobacterium and a

95 eviously that administration of immunobiotic Lactobacillus directly to the respiratory mucosa protect

96 Within the non-Lactobacillus-dominant CST IV, GBS positive status was s

97 reduced HIV incidence by 61% (P = 0.013) in Lactobacillus-dominant women but only 18% (P = 0.644) in

98 Lactic acid produced by Lactobacillus-dominated microbiota (Nugent score 0-3) wi

99 recently completed sequence of the genome of Lactobacillus fermentum 3872.

100 Lactobacillus fermentum was enriched in oesophageal aden

101 We show here that Lactobacillus fermentum, one of the main probiotics of t

102 his study was to determine whether consuming Lactobacillus gasseri KS-13, Bifidobacterium bifidum G9-

103 While Lactobacillus rhamnosus, Lactobacillus gasseri, and Lactobacillus paracasei were

104 ,Lactobacillus iners,Lactobacillus crispatus,Lactobacillus gasseri, andLactobacillus jensenii We gene

105 f Lactobacillus species as a group, nor with Lactobacillus gasseri, Lactobacillus iners, and Lactobac

106 Lactobacillus gasseri-dominated CSTs had the fastest HPV

107 rheological properties of butter produced by Lactobacillus helveticus fermented cream.

108 Heterologous overexpression of a Lactobacillus helveticus L-lactate dehydrogenase in M. b

109 , Rhizopus oryzae, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Lactobacillus helveticus) on the immunoreactivity, physi

110 Colonization by Lactobacillus in the female genital tract is thought to

111 ng diversity (20/51; 39%) or predominated by Lactobacillus iners (22/51; 42%), L. crispatus (7/51; 14

112 r diverse anaerobic bacteria (n = 39 [42%]), Lactobacillus iners (n = 32 [34%]), or Lactobacillus cri

113 2 predominant species of vaginal microbiota (Lactobacillus iners and Lactobacillus crispatus) or 2 pr

114 with low risk of PTB in both cohorts, while Lactobacillus iners was not, and that a subspecies clade

115 illus crispatus, Lactobacillus jensenii, and Lactobacillus iners).

116 as a group, nor with Lactobacillus gasseri, Lactobacillus iners, and Lactobacillus jensenii individu

117 Lactobacillus iners, Gardnerella vaginalis, Atopobium va

118 erClostridiales),Megasphaeraphylotype 1 or 2,Lactobacillus iners,Lactobacillus crispatus,Lactobacillu

119 bacilli dominated microbiota with prevailing Lactobacillus iners.

120 a multi-repeat cell-surface adhesin found in Lactobacillus inhabitants of the GI tract.

121 The genus Lactobacillus is a taxonomically complex and is composed

122 ort Lactobacillus colonization in vivo, many Lactobacillus isolates cannot utilize glycogen in vitro.

123 ermined the genotypic identification of >100 Lactobacillus isolates from clinical specimens in the co

124 us anaerobius (P < 0.05) and lower levels of Lactobacillus jensenii (P < 0.01) compared to LSIL.

125 tobacillus gasseri, Lactobacillus iners, and Lactobacillus jensenii individually.

126 tobacillus reuteri, Lactobacillus crispatus, Lactobacillus jensenii, and Lactobacillus iners).

127 d by decreased level of Lactobacillus casei, Lactobacillus johnsonii and increased E. coli.

128 Lactobacillus casei, Lactobacillus johnsonii, and Lactobacillus delbrueckii w

129 h significant enrichment of, amongst others, Lactobacillus johnsonii.

130 and decreasing Lactobacillus salivarius and Lactobacillus johnsonii.

131 Mutants of Lactobacillus kefir short-chain alcohol dehydrogenase, u

132 rs were scratched then exposed to lysates of Lactobacillus (L) rhamnosus GG, L. reuteri, L. plantarum

133 ining biomass of 14 alive probiotic strains (Lactobacillus + Lactococcus (6 x 10(10) CFU/g), Bifidoba

134 ionally, Helicobacter, Faecalibacterium, and Lactobacillus levels in stool were highly predictive of

135 Restoring intestinal Lactobacillus levels was sufficient to improve the metab

136 nistic scenario for how a microbiota player (Lactobacillus) may contribute to regulating metabolism a

137 We conclude that B cells are dispensable for Lactobacillus-mediated heterologous immunity and were no

138 this study we explore the role of B cells in Lactobacillus-mediated protection against acute pneumovi

139 Although the mechanisms underlying Lactobacillus-mediated viral suppression remain to be fu

140 icrobiome in mice, particularly by depleting Lactobacillus murinus.

141 resulted in a low-diversity mCT dominated by Lactobacillus (n = 40), and intermediate-diversity (n =

142 Diet-induced obese animals received either Lactobacillus paracasei NFBC 338 transformed to express

143 as relevant VOCs for Lactobacillus casei and Lactobacillus paracasei subsp.

144 Lactobacillus acidophilus (LA-5); QLP - with Lactobacillus paracasei subsp. paracasei (L. casei 01);

145 vestigate the effect of the probiotic strain Lactobacillus paracasei subsp. paracasei, L. casei 431 (

146 as relevant VOCs for Lactobacillus casei and Lactobacillus paracasei subsp. paracasei.

147 cillus rhamnosus, Lactobacillus gasseri, and Lactobacillus paracasei were associated with infections,

148 H (P < 0.001) and positively correlated with Lactobacillus/Pediococcus/Leuconostoc spp. (P = 0.001).G

149 tion on Bifidobacterium spp. (P = 0.008) and Lactobacillus/Pediococcus/Leuconostoc spp. (P = 0.018);

150 us/Pediococcus/Leuconostoc spp. (P = 0.018); Lactobacillus/Pediococcus/Leuconostoc spp. decreased in

151 applied during fermentation carried out with Lactobacillus pentosus OM13 (Trial S) and without starte

152 study confirmed the protective potential of Lactobacillus plantarum (L. plantarum) strains in allevi

153 Among seven sigma factors tested, RpoD from Lactobacillus plantarum (Lpl) appears to be able of init

154 goats' milks (one of them with the probiotic Lactobacillus plantarum and another one without it), and

155 tigated the population dynamics of exogenous Lactobacillus plantarum and its interactions with intest

156 Fermentation using Lactobacillus plantarum and Savinase(R) 16L was carried

157 Zn(II) acquisition from CP by the probiotic Lactobacillus plantarum and the opportunistic human path

158 to or even better than the reference strain Lactobacillus plantarum ATCC 14917, was chosen for furth

159 iotic bacteria: Bifidobacterium infantis and Lactobacillus plantarum by spray drying.

160 tic strains were selected for encapsulation (Lactobacillus plantarum CECT 220 and Lactobacillus casei

161 entation with Lab4 probiotic consortium plus Lactobacillus plantarum CUL66 resulted in significant re

162 The lar operon in Lactobacillus plantarum encodes five Lar proteins (LarA/

163 A Lactobacillus plantarum fermentation product (Bio21B), o

164 The lactate racemase enzyme (LarA) of Lactobacillus plantarum harbors a (SCS)Ni(II) pincer com

165 Lactobacillus plantarum persistence was 10- to 100-fold

166 lled trial of an oral synbiotic preparation (Lactobacillus plantarum plus fructooligosaccharide) in r

167 x-ray crystallography to show that Lar from Lactobacillus plantarum possesses an organometallic nick

168 ed either by natural fermentation (NF) or by Lactobacillus plantarum strain (LPF).

169 and reversed by treatment with an exogenous Lactobacillus plantarum strain.

170 Here, adult zebrafish were supplemented with Lactobacillus plantarum to determine the effects of prob

171 ntestinal persistence and gene expression of Lactobacillus plantarum WCFS1 in healthy and health-comp

172 ing antibiotics and recreated by adding back Lactobacillus plantarum We suggest that the evolutionary

173 actobacillus casei, Lactobacillus brevis and Lactobacillus plantarum were microencapsulated with resi

174 natural commensals (including the probiotic Lactobacillus plantarum).

175 g of the respiratory tract with immunobiotic Lactobacillus plantarum, a regimen that results in prote

176 otective behaviour of WPI for two strains of Lactobacillus plantarum, A17 and B21, during spray dryin

177 the genetic basis of lactate racemization in Lactobacillus plantarum.

178 ctive priming of the respiratory mucosa with Lactobacillus plantarum; transcripts are detected both l

179 Prevalence of a Lactobacillus-poor vaginal community state type (CST 4)

180 No B cells were detected in lung tissue of Lactobacillus-primed B cell deficient muMT mice or Jh mi

181 We found that Lactobacillus-primed mice feature elevated levels of air

182 d B cell deficient muMT mice or Jh mice, and Lactobacillus-primed muMT mice had no characteristic inf

183 Lactobacillus priming results in a moderate reduction in

184 Lactobacillus, Pseudomonas, and Rickettsia species were

185 P = .005), Dermabacter (r = 0.37, P = .008), Lactobacillus (r = 0.45, P = .001), Peptostreptococcus (

186 tructure of glucansucrase GTF180-DeltaN from Lactobacillus reuteri 180 in complex with the acceptor s

187 the glucansucrase of the probiotic bacterium Lactobacillus reuteri 180, was shown to vary in differen

188 structure to a previously reported EPS from Lactobacillus reuteri 180.

189 s licheniformis, Escherichia coli JM109, and Lactobacillus reuteri ATCC PTA 4659.

190 R-Cas9 function in the lactic acid bacterium Lactobacillus reuteri ATCC PTA 6475.

191 ctive in selectively promoting the growth of Lactobacillus reuteri C1 strain as evidenced by the opti

192 Rodent-derived strains of Lactobacillus reuteri densely colonize the forestomach o

193 we demonstrate that administration of hdc(+)Lactobacillus reuteri in the gut resulted in luminal hdc

194 a novel cell-surface protein, Lar_0958 from Lactobacillus reuteri JCM 1112(T) , mediating adhesion o

195 This prompted us to explore the SAR of the Lactobacillus reuteri membrane-active antibiotic reuteri

196 Remodeling microbiota with Lactobacillus reuteri prolonged survival and reduced mul

197 nt vivaria, correlating with the presence of Lactobacillus reuteri This species induced DP IELs in ge

198 we screened several bacteria and identified Lactobacillus reuteri to be a promising candidate for ad

199 ccus epidermidis) and intestinal microbiota (Lactobacillus reuteri, Enterococcus faecalis, Lactobacil

200 opobium vaginae and decreased frequencies of Lactobacillus reuteri, Lactobacillus crispatus, Lactobac

201 ts on clinical and biochemical parameters of Lactobacillus reuteri-containing probiotic supplementati

202 ffects that can be attenuated with probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri.

203 tered with or without the supplementation of Lactobacillus rhamnosus (P) to zebrafish in order to exp

204 of bacteria: Lactobacillus rhamnosus B 442, Lactobacillus rhamnosus 1937, and Lactococcus lactis JBB

205 that biofilm formation by Bacillus subtilis, Lactobacillus rhamnosus and Pseudomonas fluorescens indu

206 The following strains of bacteria: Lactobacillus rhamnosus B 442, Lactobacillus rhamnosus 1

207 controlled randomized trial of the probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus CGMCC 1.3724 and peanut OIT (pro

208 ilus CL1285, Lactobacillus casei LBC80R, and Lactobacillus rhamnosus CLR2 (Bio-K+) has been marketed

209 ilus CL1285, Lactobacillus casei LBC80R, and Lactobacillus rhamnosus CLR2) within 12 hours of the ant

210 on the growth of diarrhea-reducing probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (LGG) and Escherichia coli Ni

211 when they are administrated orally and apply Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (LGG) as a probiotic model to

212 sein formula (EHCF) containing the probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (LGG) can reduce the occurren

213 ollowing their co-culture with the commensal Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (LGG) grown under anaerobic c

214 We report the effect of the probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (LGG) on intestinal function,

215 x steroid-deficient mice with the probiotics Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (LGG) or the commercially ava

216 ctive of this study was to determine whether Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG culture supernatant (LCS) has

217 The viability of yogurt culture bacteria and Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG were higher than 10(6)cfu/g.

218 andard yogurt culture and a probiotic strain Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG were used.

219 glycerol and used for the immobilisation of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG.

220 uperinfection secondary to administration of Lactobacillus rhamnosus in an 11-month-old female with t

221 Lactobacillus rhamnosus L34 attenuated GI leakage in the

222 nic epithelial cells in vitro In conclusion, Lactobacillus rhamnosus L34 attenuated the severity of s

223 We evaluated the therapeutic effects of Lactobacillus rhamnosus L34 in a new sepsis model of ora

224 matory effect of the conditioned medium from Lactobacillus rhamnosus L34 was also demonstrated by the

225 ial is to evaluate the clinical effects of a Lactobacillus rhamnosus SP1-containing probiotic sachet

226 e immunomodulatory effects of Gram-positive (Lactobacillus rhamnosus strain GG [LGG]) and Gram-negati

227 first time, to our knowledge, that probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus strain GG inhibits both PMA- and

228 Lactobacillus rhamnosus strain GG, a well known probioti

229 sis of bacterial 16S libraries revealed that Lactobacillus rhamnosus was able to modulate the gut mic

230 ay exposure of zebrafish larvae to probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus, high-throughput sequence analys

231 While Lactobacillus rhamnosus, Lactobacillus gasseri, and Lact

232 e to the SDR stressor specifically increased Lactobacillus RNA in the spleen, which localized in sple

233 ty dust genera were assignable (Clostridium, Lactobacillus, Ruminococcus, and Eubacterium, ranging fr

234 ts of ultrasound (US) frequency, addition of Lactobacillus sakei culture and drying time on key nutri

235 addition of starter culture Biostar Sprint (Lactobacillus sakei, Staphylococcus carnosus, Staphyloco

236 tus and Lactobacillus agilis, and decreasing Lactobacillus salivarius and Lactobacillus johnsonii.

237 is trial, we have evaluated the potential of Lactobacillus salivarius PS2 to prevent this condition w

238 with levels of serum autoantibodies, whereas Lactobacillus salivarius was over-represented in individ

239 via wiggsiae, Parascardovia denticolens, and Lactobacillus salivarius were found almost exclusively i

240 ion of cell-free enzyme extracts (CFEs) from Lactobacillus sanfranciscensis (SF), Hafnia alvei (HF) a

241 ance and the frequency of occurrence of each Lactobacillus sp.

242 ce gavaged with either oral Streptococcus or Lactobacillus sp. bacteria induced a location pattern of

243 g the niche and pathogenic potential of each Lactobacillus sp. can be of importance to both clinical

244 alcohol dehydrogenase (from Aromatoleum sp., Lactobacillus sp., or Bacillus sp.) operating in tandem

245 ple colorimetric method for the detection of Lactobacillus species (spp.) and Staphylococcus aureus (

246 nal community characterized by a decrease in Lactobacillus species and an increase in diverse anaerob

247 oportions of metabolically active indigenous Lactobacillus species and increases in the Desulfovibrio

248 Lactobacillus species are generally acid resistant and a

249 GI and to ponder whether these or any of the Lactobacillus species are truly indigenous to the human

250 ns between HPV and the relative abundance of Lactobacillus species as a group, nor with Lactobacillus

251 ition of bacterial communities in the ileum (Lactobacillus species became the most abundant) and prev

252 We observed gradual Lactobacillus species growth, indicating that untargeted

253 Furthermore, stable codominance of multiple Lactobacillus species in a single community is infrequen

254 Only a handful of Lactobacillus species is found in caries lesions, but th

255 ion in sepsis is well known, but the role of Lactobacillus species probiotics is still controversial.

256 that priming of respiratory mucosa with live Lactobacillus species promotes robust and prolonged surv

257 ndances of Lactobacillus crispatus and other Lactobacillus species were inversely associated with vag

258 commensals (Bacteroides, Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus species), and were non-hemolytic and non-t

259 is (BV) is characterized by low abundance of Lactobacillus species, high pH, and immune cell infiltra

260 etween devices when compared to those with a Lactobacillus species-dominant VM (p = 0.0049).

261 ntified the principle taxa in the culture as Lactobacillus species.

262 thesize saturated LCFA and the proportion of Lactobacillus species.

263 ly associated with the numbers of indigenous Lactobacillus species.

264 ; pinteraction=0.652); or between those with Lactobacillus spp morphotypes and those without (70.48%

265 alis or Bacteroides spp and non-detection of Lactobacillus spp) as markers of abnormal microbiota.

266 ciated with decreasing relative abundance of Lactobacillus spp.

267 cterised by high-diversity and low levels of Lactobacillus spp. (community state type-CST IV) with in

268 nonacquisition group had consistently higher Lactobacillus spp. abundance than those in the acquisiti

269 tion limit was 105CFU/ml in pure culture for Lactobacillus spp. and 120CFU/ml in pure culture for S.

270 crobiome was characteristically dominated by Lactobacillus spp. and low alpha-diversity, unlike North

271 Lactobacillus spp. are part of the normal human flora an

272 ings indicate that during stressor exposure, Lactobacillus spp. can translocate to the spleen and pri

273 amatically changes postpartum to become less Lactobacillus spp. dominant with increased alpha-diversi

274 In contrast, Lactobacillus spp. from the duodenum of non-CD controls

275 Human isolates of Lactobacillus spp. have differing site associations and

276 Lactobacillus spp. positively affect IBS symptoms, altho

277 were hydrolyzed with commercial enzymes and Lactobacillus spp. strains.

278 ects had abnormal community composition, and Lactobacillus spp. was associated with lack of MDRO acqu

279 types are dominated by lactic-acid producing Lactobacillus spp. while the fifth is commonly composed

280 stridium leptum group, Enterobactericaea and Lactobacillus spp.) were determined in faecal samples fr

281 icial bacteria such as Bifidobacterium spp., Lactobacillus spp., Bacteroides acidifaciens, and Bacter

282 rmented with indigenous probiotic strains of Lactobacillus spp., compared with fermented bovine milk.

283 udy in humans reduced intestinal survival of Lactobacillus spp., increased TH17 cells and increased b

284 ceae and increased the relative abundance of Lactobacillus spp., two groups of bacteria previously sh

285 inflamed gut was accompanied by expansion of Lactobacillus spp., which are beneficial commensal organ

286 terobactericaea, Clostridium leptum group or Lactobacillus spp..

287 d the presence of the main human subtypes of Lactobacillus spp./ BV-related species in the vaginal mi

288 rties were found in BLG degraded by both the Lactobacillus strain and digestive enzymes.

289 The Lactobacillus strain identification was not performed an

290 Here we report the genome sequences of 213 Lactobacillus strains and associated genera, and their e

291 enuated after inoculation of mice with three Lactobacillus strains capable of metabolizing tryptophan

292 S was evaluated in vitro using two probiotic Lactobacillus strains.

293 mbers of the gut microbiota (Acetobacter and Lactobacillus), suggesting that the acidic region has ba

294 aintaining elevated kynurenine levels during Lactobacillus supplementation diminished the treatment b

295 the amount of fecal Salmonella bacteria with Lactobacillus treatment was demonstrated.

296 rtion of lactate-producing bacteria (such as Lactobacillus, Turicibacter and Streptococcus) were foun

297 Some species associated with non-Lactobacillus vaginal microbiota may trigger immune resp

298 Genus Lactobacillus was decreased at birth in infants with cho

299 nting Bifidobacterium, Faecalibacterium, and Lactobacillus were significantly increased in response t

300 etectible mucosal tenofovir was lower in non-Lactobacillus women, negatively correlating with G. vagi