ライフサイエンスコーパス: MAR

1 MAR indices ranged from 0.2 to 1.

2 MAR lines had fewer nonexpressing cells than control lin

3 MAR measurement is a promising approach for directly ass

4 MAR measurement predicted drug response using samples as

5 MAR revealed heterogeneity in drug sensitivity not only

6 MAR sequences were also found within the Ig V loci at a

7 MAR was positively correlated and MER was negatively cor

8 MARs comprise one of the few classes of eukaryotic nonco

9 MARs facilitate long-range chromatin remodeling required

10 MARs play varied but poorly understood roles in eukaryot

11 Moreover, experiments in which apoB 3' MAR sequences were removed from integrated transgenes in

12 The 3' MAR alone may be sufficient to protect against silencing

13 such that constructs bearing both 5' and 3' MARs are passed to their offspring with greater frequenc

14 In callus, two of the MAR elements (Adh1 5' MAR and ARS1) reduced transgene silencing but had no eff

15 Three MAR elements, two from maize (Adh1 5' MAR and Mha1 5' MAR) and one from yeast (ARS1), had very

16 In transgenic plants, Adh1 5' MAR had the effect of localizing beta-glucuronidase expr

17 model accounting for the function of Adh1 5' MAR is discussed.

18 nts, two from maize (Adh1 5' MAR and Mha1 5' MAR) and one from yeast (ARS1), had very different effec

19 recognition sites for topoisomerase II and a MAR region were observed in the transgene integration ta

20 sis of nuclear scaffolds failed to confirm a MAR at this site, and extensive mapping demonstrated tha

21 odel, sequence analysis strongly predicted a MAR determinant in close proximity to HSI,II.

22 The demonstration of a DMR and an active MAR in the 5' flank of opossum IGF2 mirrors the regulato

23 erate either poly(ADPr) (PAR) or mono(ADPr) (MAR).

24 Thus, variations in factor binding and MAR activity could potentially influence the extent of l

25 the safety and immunogenicity of the EBO and MAR vaccines given individually and concomitantly.

26 , and is an important priority since PAR and MAR function via distinct mechanisms.

27 tern analysis of proteins bound to pUC18 and MAR plasmids indicates that XRCC4, DNA ligase IV and sca

28 This clustering of DNase HS sites and MARs capable of binding SATB1 and GATA-3 at the 3' end o

29 acute cellular rejection (ACR) or mixed AR (MAR).

30 AT islands in fragile sites can function as MARs both in vitro and in vivo.

31 the different factors do not always occur at MAR sequences.

32 ble (r = 0.909) and 96% of genes attached at MARs are silent (P < 0.001).

33 point out discordance between sequence-based MAR predictions and in vivo MAR function and predict a n

34 ations within the mbr is to disrupt the BCL2 MAR and replace it with the IGH MARs located just downst

35 Because MAR showed variable effects, alternative technologies fo

36 as confirmed to be specific to TRPM1 because MAR serum did not stain these cells in a Trpm1(-/-) mous

37 rotein-conjugated ADP-ribose, including both MAR and PAR.

38 Lys chromatin domain, even when bracketed by MARs, is not resistant to XCI; (iii) transcription facto

39 Sera from two well characterized MAR patients, but not from a control subject, stained hu

40 The computed "MAR potential" and propensity for supercoiling-induced d

41 s (MARs): an exceptionally intense computed 'MAR potential' and profound duplex destabilization and f

42 show that HPV18 promoter contains consensus MAR element in the LCR and E6 sequences where SMAR1 bind

43 rentially associate with plasmids containing MAR DNA sequences.

44 transgene expression, a question arises: Do MARs increase transgene expression by increasing the per

45 Most of the durable MARs mapped outside genes, defining the borders of putat

46 nsport models for the fate of arsenic during MAR, and develop strategies to minimize arsenic release.

47 he mechanisms of arsenic mobilization during MAR.

48 R1-HDAC1 repressor complex at the LCR and E6 MAR sequences, thereby decreasing histone acetylation at

49 he 6 categories--early AMR, early ACR, early MAR, late AMR, late ACR, and late MAR.

50 ly ACR (P = 0.03), but not late versus early MAR (P = 0.3).

51 presents several plausible models to explain MAR effects on transgene expression.

52 xpression sequences with or without flanking MARs in first-generation adenoviral vectors.

53 Due to concern for MAR, a systemic work-up for melanoma was performed by th

54 Alternate mechanisms for MAR function in this system are proposed.

55 Given our continued clinical suspicion for MAR, the patient's serum was sent for evaluation for TRP

56 nd assumed that the degree of departure from MAR varied according to an individual's self-reported HI

57 st assumed that the degree of departure from MAR was the same for all individuals with missing HIV se

58 sed to assess sensitivity to departures from MAR, both when estimating the prevalence of a partially

59 Four serum samples from MAR patients were identified as TRPM1 immunoreactive by

60 we show that the majority of PARPs generate MAR, not PAR, and demonstrate that the H-Y-E motif is no

61 Hence, MAR-like AT-rich non-coding domains can be regarded as a

62 Higher MAR was observed for trade-off tasks involving higher le

63 ve deviants" were defined as having a higher MAR and a lower MER than the respective median values.

64 ated with higher nutritional quality (higher MAR, lower ED), regardless of whether costs were calcula

65 However, MAR did not consistently lower sodium levels.

66 However, MAR sites have encountered arsenic mobilization resultin

67 Three of the five human MARs and the single mouse MAR recruit heterogeneous nucl

68 Two of the human MARs bind hnRNP-A1 in vitro directly within a 35-bp sequ

69 ify SARs and 2 m NaCl extraction to identify MARs revealed that approximately one-half of the sites w

70 upt the BCL2 MAR and replace it with the IGH MARs located just downstream of each breakpoint, we conc

71 mice, suggesting that the visual deficits in MAR are caused by the uptake of TRPM1 autoantibodies int

72 xpression in expressing cells was greater in MAR lines by 1.9- to 2.9-fold.

73 hould be developed alongside improvements in MAR and evaluated in "real-life" salinity-affected setti

74 primary target of autoantibodies produced in MAR patients with reduced b-wave is the TRPM1 cation cha

75 Of the 150 patients, 48% had interocular MAR that differed maximally by a factor of less than 2.

76 he IFS algorithm, and a linear interpolation MAR algorithm.

77 on with that of FBP and linear interpolation MAR, noise with IFS was similar close to and far from th

78 red back projection and linear interpolation MAR.

79 is several-fold greater than that of a known MAR in the c-myc gene.

80 Anabolic load-induced periosteal lamellar MAR (0.58 +/- 0.14; Pkd1(Dmp1-cKO) vs. 1.68 +/- 0.34 mum

81 ACR, early MAR, late AMR, late ACR, and late MAR.

82 ed to the time before CXL for UCVA (0.01 log MAR; 95% confidence interval -0.14 to 0.15, P = .944), B

83 isual acuity (BSCVA) was 0.005 +/- 0.022 log MAR; 2 eyes lost >/=0.1 log MAR.

84 val -0.14 to 0.15, P = .944), BCVA (0.05 log MAR; 95% confidence interval -0.05 to 0.15, P = .310), a

85 rrected visual acuity was 0.04 +/- 0.077 log MAR.

86 05 +/- 0.022 log MAR; 2 eyes lost >/=0.1 log MAR.

87 tion at the base hospital which included log MAR visual acuity, refraction, applanation tonometry and

88 The ability of FRA16B-mediated MAR sites to rearrange depending on the repeat expansion

89 Proviral genomes with the E micro MAR element had increased chromatin accessibility, which

90 In summary, incorporation of the E micro MAR element in lentivirus vectors resulted in enhanced,

91 we evaluated the expression from the E micro MAR element in mice 2 to 24 weeks posttransplant with tr

92 ceiving vectors with the E micro and E micro MAR elements upstream of the PGK promoter, there was a 2

93 ssociated matrix attachment regions (E micro MAR) into lentivirus vectors.

94 vitro transduced with E micro - and E micro MAR-containing lentivectors.

95 ively in B cells transduced with the E micro MAR-containing vector and not other cells types or vecto

96 of the five human MARs and the single mouse MAR recruit heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein A1 (

97 The c-myc MAR is also matrix-associated in CEM cells while localiz

98 nt region (MAR) sequence compared with a non-MAR sequence and were similar in size to DNA loops extra

99 8.9 kt C over the entire lower bathyal north MAR.

100 and in vivo MAR function and predict a novel MAR-independent mechanism for long-distance activation o

101 over the melt season, totaled just 37-75% of MAR, suggesting nontrivial subglacial water storage even

102 retinogram (ERG) phenotype characteristic of MAR resemble the congenital visual disease caused by mut

103 nd contiguous hGH gene cluster was devoid of MAR activity.

104 At a 1:5 mass ratio of MAR to pUC18, approximately equal amounts of DNA end bin

105 sed PCR MAR assay to investigate the role of MAR-mediated regulation of the beta-globin locus.

106 rovide equivalency of VA defined in terms of MAR and cpd.

107 try could greatly simplify the evaluation of MARs or other sequence elements that affect transgene ex

108 The locations of MARs in aortic adventitial fibroblast (AoAF) cells were

109 ere analyzed extensively for the presence of MARs by in vitro matrix-binding assay, and for interacti

110 t genetic evidence that at least a subset of MARs performs an important biological function, possibly

111 virus Zaire and Sudan glycoproteins and one (MAR) encoding Marburg virus glycoprotein.

112 ree active vaccine groups: EBO vaccine only, MAR vaccine only, and both vaccines.

113 Finally, we demonstrate that our MAR assay, without the need for extended culture ex vivo

114 thier purchases than did other participants (MAR: +13%; MER: -90%.

115 We have employed an in vivo based PCR MAR assay to investigate the role of MAR-mediated regula

116 ing intravitreal injection of TRPM1-positive MAR IgG into wild-type mouse eyes, and the appearance of

117 of live retinal neurons with TRPM1-positive MAR serum resulted in the selective accumulation of IgG

118 omology searches revealed that the predicted MAR reflected the recent insertion of a LINE 3'-UTR segm

119 An excess of conserved predicted MARs is seen in intergenic regions preceding 5' ends of

120 , we analyzed the co-occurrence of predicted MARs with highly conserved noncoding DNA regions in huma

121 onserved noncoding DNA consists of predicted MARs.

122 Conversely, more than half of the predicted MARs co-occur with one or more independently identified

123 th unbalanced data due to missing at random (MAR) measurements.

124 essing sensitivity to the missing-at-random (MAR) assumption.

125 that the single-cell mass accumulation rate (MAR), profiled over many hours with a suspended microcha

126 d on measuring their mass accumulation rate (MAR).

127 gene dose, as were mineral apposition rate (MAR) and expression of Runx2-II, Osteocalcin, Dmp1, and

128 ion rate (BFR), and mineral apposition rate (MAR), improved the trabecular microarchitecture, and dec

129 The highest soot mass accumulation rates (MARs) occurred at the beginning of the Holocene as fuel

130 concentrations and mass accumulation rates (MARs) of soot have mainly occurred since ~1950, the esta

131 below the median, 2) a mean adequacy ratio (MAR) above the median, and 3) a mean excess ratio (MER,

132 Mean adequacy ratio (MAR), mean excess ratio (MER), and energy density (ED) w

133 average, cell lines transformed with the Rb7 MAR-containing vector expressed GFP at levels 2.0- to 3.

134 s to alternatives [managed aquifer recharge (MAR) and rainwater harvesting] that aimed to reduce sodi

135 Managed aquifer recharge (MAR) is a water reuse technique with the potential to me

136 ontaminants during managed aquifer recharge (MAR) poses a challenge to maintaining local groundwater

137 her develop an algorithm 'merge-and-recover (MAR)' to speed up the calculation.

138 s VSD leads to multiple Andreev reflections (MAR), which in the limit of weak tunneling probability s

139 were enriched in a matrix attachment region (MAR) sequence compared with a non-MAR sequence and were

140 ng various nuclear matrix attachment region (MAR) sequences suggest that DNA ends preferentially asso

141 nuclear matrix via matrix attachment region (MAR) sequences, and interaction with MAR-binding protein

142 ented by a nuclear matrix attachment region (MAR), situated about 3 kb 5' of the CTCF site.

143 Matrix attachment region (MAR)-binding proteins have been implicated in the transc

144 DMR and an active Matrix Attachment Region (MAR).

145 prominent nuclear matrix attachment region (MAR).

146 ions from the Modele Atmospherique Regional (MAR) regional climate model (0.056-0.112 km(3)d(-1) vs.

147 Nuclear matrix-associated regions (MARs) organize chromatin into functional domains and at

148 termining phenotype matrix attached regions (MARs) on human chromosomes 14-18 were identified as a fu

149 we mapped nuclear matrix attachment regions (MARs) and DNase I hypersensitive (HS) sites over a 100-k

150 Matrix attachment regions (MARs) are DNA sequences that bind an internal nuclear ne

151 s have shown that matrix attachment regions (MARs) can increase expression of transgenes in whole org

152 Human matrix attachment regions (MARs) can insulate transgene expression from chromosomal

153 Matrix attachment regions (MARs) comprise a set of AT-rich DNA elements postulated

154 flanking nuclear matrix attachment regions (MARs) encompassing the protamine domain were created.

155 nd to the nuclear matrix attachment regions (MARs) of the immunoglobulin heavy chain intronic enhance

156 us is provided by matrix attachment regions (MARs) that define a domain larger than 160 kb.

157 includes flanking matrix attachment regions (MARs), an origin of bidirectional replication (OBR), and

158 phoid repeat DNA, matrix-attachment regions (MARs), and the hepatocyte control region enhancer.

159 nce attributes of matrix attachment regions (MARs), domains that organize DNA loops on the nuclear ma

160 ions of predicted matrix attachment regions (MARs), possibly related to replication origins, were not

161 tified as nuclear matrix attachment regions (MARs), while integrations in nonneoplastic cells show no

162 or association at matrix attachment regions (MARs).

163 iption factors at matrix attachment regions (MARs).

164 and its flanking matrix attachment regions (MARs).

165 nction as nuclear matrix attachment regions (MARs).

166 istics of nuclear matrix attachment regions (MARs): an exceptionally intense computed 'MAR potential'

167 might be matrix-scaffold attachment regions, MARs (or S/MARs).

168 motif called the microneme adhesive repeat (MAR).

169 h refracted log minimum angle of resolution (MAR) distance acuity and Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivi

170 actor in the multiple adaptational response (MAR) family, regulates expression of the Yersinia type I

171 LcrF, a multiple adaptational response (MAR) transcription factor, regulates virulence in Yersin

172 Melanoma-associated retinopathy (MAR) is a paraneoplastic syndrome associated with cutane

173 Melanoma-associated retinopathy (MAR) is characterized by night blindness, photopsias, an

174 ibose-protein hydrolase for mono-ADP-ribose (MAR) and poly(ADP-ribose) (PAR) chain removal (de-MARyla

175 either attached singly as mono(ADP-ribose) (MAR) or in polymeric chains as poly(ADP-ribose) (PAR).

176 r a segment of the North Mid-Atlantic Ridge (MAR) using sonar, corers, trawls, traps, and a remotely

177 The mean maximum acceptable annual risk (MAR) for each of the SAEs was calculated for various lev

178 o begin evaluating genome-scale models for S/MAR function.

179 oth NP and uncompacted plasmid VMD2-hRPE65-S/MAR can mediate persistent, long-term improvement in an

180 t both plasmid and NP forms of VMD2-hRPE65-S/MAR improved the disease phenotypes in an rpe65(-/-) mod

181 and observe that NP or plasmid VMD2-hRPE65-S/MAR led to structural and functional improvements in the

182 The iBAC-S/MAR vector is capable of the infectious delivery and ret

183 The iBAC-S/MAR vector was used to deliver and maintain a 135 kb gen

184 Expression studies demonstrated that iBAC-S/MAR-LDLR completely restored LDLR function in CHO ldlr(-

185 lr(-/-) a7 clonal cell lines carrying iBAC-S/MAR-LDLR demonstrated low copy episomal stability of the

186 with a scaffold matrix attachment region (S/MAR) and vitelliform macular dystrophy 2 (VMD2) promoter

187 of the scaffold/matrix attachment region (S/MAR).

188 We show that the S/MAR-containing plasmid exhibited reporter gene expressio

189 S/MARs occur throughout chr4, spaced much more closely tha

190 the use of tiling microarrays to map 1358 S/MARs on Arabidopsis thaliana chromosome 4 (chr4).

191 Arabidopsis S/MARs can be divided into five clusters based on their as

192 While some Arabidopsis S/MARs may define structural domains, most occur near the

193 nucleosome formation, and the majority of S/MARs contain at least one nucleosome-depleted region.

194 To define the role of S/MARs in organizing our genome and to resolve the often c

195 scale distribution and sequence content of S/MARs in vivo.

196 ern of distribution and genomic context of S/MARs is thought to be important for processes such as ch

197 This global view of S/MARs provides a framework to begin evaluating genome-sca

198 trix-scaffold attachment regions, MARs (or S/MARs).

199 Scaffold/matrix attachment regions (S/MARs) and locus control regions (LCRs) that are involved

200 Scaffold or matrix attachment regions (S/MARs) are found in all eukaryotes.

201 using scaffold/matrix attachment regions (S/MARs) that establish loop domains.

202 fs and 6-mer enrichment patterns show that S/MARs are preferentially enriched in poly(dA:dT) tracts,

203 The varied functions of the S/MARs as revealed by the different extraction methods hig

204 oci-specific studies, we have surveyed the S/MARs in HeLa S3 cells on human chromosomes 14-18 by arra

205 Genes associated with these S/MARs have an increased probability of expression, which

206 al fold higher than plasmid or NPs without S/MARs.

207 In HGY, soot MARs increased by ~7.7 times in the period 1980-2012 rel

208 The increase in soot MARs is also in line with the emission inventory records

209 dentified six DNase HS clusters, four strong MARs, and several weaker MARs.

210 nding sites, located 4.5 kb apart, in strong MARs.

211 x destabilization (both predictive of strong MARs) correlate with the total number of bizelesin bindi

212 Three of the strong MARs were closely linked to two tissue-specific DNase HS

213 rchy for graft survival with ACR better than MAR better than AMR, which persisted for both early and

214 nstream of each breakpoint, we conclude that MAR exchange is a significant, selectable outcome of the

215 We conclude that MAR-mediated overall increases in transgene expression i

216 n sites on seven PARPs, and demonstrate that MAR and PAR generating PARPs modify similar amino acids,

217 ite-specific recombination demonstrated that MAR sequences were required for the establishment but no

218 We observe that MAR domains exist in tandem repeats, which provide a hig

219 We show that MAR accurately and rapidly defines therapeutic susceptib

220 This study shows that MARs recruit and bind hnRNP-A1 upon transcriptional up-r

221 The MAR algorithm can further speed up the calculation by se

222 The MAR family of transcription factors is well conserved, w

223 The MAR fauna comprises mainly species known from continenta

224 The MAR met criteria for both ACR and AMR.

225 The MAR was similar across the 3 SAEs.

226 The MAR, 3,704,404 km(2) in area, accounts for 44.7% lower b

227 Furthermore, the epitope targeted by the MAR autoantibodies was localized within the amino-termin

228 o test this possibility, we have deleted the MAR from a Chinese hamster ovary variant harboring a sin

229 mine whether the time to at least double the MAR was dependent on age at baseline or starting VA.

230 The hazard for at least doubling the MAR was related to baseline vision and patient age.

231 screened for potential binding sites for the MAR-binding protein, SATB1, and for GATA-3, both of whic

232 ation of segmental reference haplotypes, the MAR algorithm always calculates an exact form of transit

233 This data highlights the MAR assay in both research and clinical applications as

234 15 of 29 (52%, 33-71) participants in the MAR vaccine group had a T-cell response to the Marburg g

235 Nine of 29 (31%, 15-51) participants in the MAR vaccine groups had an antibody response to the Marbu

236 s contains multiple enhancers, including the MAR/intronic (iE(kappa)) and 3' enhancers (3'E(kappa)).

237 level, but betalg transgenes that lacked the MAR were expressed at a lower level than wild-type betal

238 Removal of the MAR did not affect the frequency of betalg transgene exp

239 In callus, two of the MAR elements (Adh1 5' MAR and ARS1) reduced transgene si

240 l replicon mapping shows that removal of the MAR has no significant effect either on the frequency or

241 lkaline conditions show that deletion of the MAR interferes with local separation of daughter chromat

242 l flat plain at 3500 m depth in place of the MAR would contain 85.6 kt C, implying an increase of 173

243 ot affect DNA binding, or by deletion of the MAR-binding domain.

244 lagic biomass displaced by the volume of the MAR.

245 contrast, Ku and DNA-PKcs were found on the MAR plasmid only in the presence of DNA ends suggesting

246 Primary production and export flux over the MAR were not enhanced compared with a nearby reference s

247 ancement of biological productivity over the MAR; oceanic bathypelagic species are replaced by benthi

248 polar cells that is presumed to underlie the MAR syndrome.

249 pectation of scale invariance underlying the MAR scale.

250 fference of VA was determined by whether the MAR between the two eyes differed by less than a factor

251 t factor A preferentially associate with the MAR plasmid in the absence or presence of DNA ends.

252 lar to staining for TRPM1, staining with the MAR sera was strong in dendritic tips and somas and was

253 -binding assay, and for interaction with the MAR-binding proteins cut-like protein x/CCAAT-displaceme

254 The MARs of the c-myc domain do not act to prevent the assoc

255 ed at the WT frequency even when Emu and the MARs were absent together.

256 In concert, the MARs bounding this domain likely synergize to regulate t

257 Interestingly, the MARs may convey a selective reproductive advantage, such

258 We show that upon removal of the MARs, the locus becomes subject to position effects.

259 t less than the WT frequency when Emu or the MARs were individually absent.

260 om moderate daily symptoms to remission, the MARs ranged from 0.69% to 0.81% and from 0.39% to 0.55%,

261 Thus, the MARs bounding the PRM1 --> PRM2 --> TNP2 protamine domai

262 M1 gene, and Western blots probed with these MAR sera showed the expected band size ( approximately 1

263 ding 5' ends of genes, suggesting that these MARs are primarily involved in transcriptional control.

264 This MAR may represent the 5' anchorage site for a chromosoma

265 exhibited enhanced caspase cleavage of this MAR-associating protein.

266 direct lines of evidence suggested that this MAR might be required for origin activation in early S p

267 Three MAR elements, two from maize (Adh1 5' MAR and Mha1 5' MA

268 indicates that DNA end-binding activities to MAR sequences was 7-21-fold higher than pUC18.

269 ability of DNA-PKcs/Ku to direct DNA ends to MAR and pUC18 plasmid DNA is a new activity for DNA-PK a

270 and structural constraints limiting PARPs to MAR synthesis do not limit their ability to modify canon

271 was characterized for conditions relevant to MAR operations.

272 t integrated viral genomes may be subject to MAR-mediated transcriptional effects should facilitate e

273 ntegrated tumor virus genomes are subject to MAR-mediated transcriptional regulation, providing insig

274 SATB1 binds to MARs within the MMTV provirus to repress transcription.

275 become evident: the enzyme used to transform MAR/PAR into phosphoribose must be purified from the rat

276 n from shallow, aerated sediments underlying MAR infiltration basins.

277 nd-drinking subjects (SAD), marijuana users (MAR), smoking-and-marijuana users (SAM), marijuana-and-d

278 del to estimate each subject's unblurred VA (MAR(0) in minutes of arc) and equivalent intrinsic blur

279 ear matrices, which indicates their in vitro MAR function.

280 n sequence-based MAR predictions and in vivo MAR function and predict a novel MAR-independent mechani

281 trix-associated DNA indicating their in vivo MAR function.

282 usters, four strong MARs, and several weaker MARs.

283 associated with transcript presence whereas MARs contained within a gene are associated with silence

284 ts expressing mini-white transgenes in which MAR sequences from the human apoB gene were arranged in

285 e potential of a tag-based pipeline in which MAR/PAR is hydrolyzed down to phosphoribose, leaving a 2

286 ends is necessary for their association with MAR DNA.

287 region (MAR) sequences, and interaction with MAR-binding proteins have been shown to alter chromatin

288 model, the ERG findings in the patients with MAR are more consistent with an attenuation of the DBC c

289 oral response functions of the patients with MAR had normal amplitudes at frequencies of 32 Hz and hi

290 at the vision of at least some patients with MAR is compromised due to autoantibody-mediated inactiva

291 sensitivity loss shown by the patients with MAR is consistent with the dysfunction at the level of t

292 Both patients with MAR showed a loss of contrast sensitivity compared to no

293 The patients with MAR showed abnormal ERG responses to luminance increment

294 Two patients with MAR syndrome whose sera produced immunolabeling of retin

295 e delayed VEP responses of the patients with MAR to luminance increments may represent a late respons

296 ntrast sensitivity deficits of patients with MAR under photopic conditions are not specific to the MC

297 Results in patients with MAR were compared with those in 10 visually normal obser

298 Two patients with MAR, ages 57 and 61 years, with normal Snellen visual ac

299 Staining of mouse and primate retina with MAR sera revealed immunoreactivity in all types of ON bi

300 died the effects of flanking transgenes with MARs on transgene expression levels in maize callus and