ライフサイエンスコーパス: MRCP

1 MRCP and ERCP images were read centrally by 3 radiologis

2 MRCP by using the respiratory-triggered isotropic 3D fas

3 MRCP findings were considered useful in all those cases.

4 MRCP findings were correlated with those at direct chola

5 MRCP has high sensitivity and very high specificity for

6 MRCP image quality was also evaluated.

7 MRCP image quality was not interpretable in two cases du

8 MRCP image was typical in 4 out of 9 malignant cases.

9 MRCP is a reliable non-invasive imaging method for demon

10 MRCP is the method of choice in diagnosing pathologies o

11 MRCP may obviate ERCP, particularly in patients who cann

12 MRCP obviated endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatogr

13 MRCP revealed pancreatic duct strictures in two and scle

14 MRCP technique utilizes T2-weighted sequences, in which

15 MRCP was performed at 1.5 T in 53 consecutive patients (

16 MRCP was performed in a 1.5-Tesla magnet (Philips) with

17 MRCP yielded an accuracy of 100% in determining the pres

18 MRCP-based two-dimensional brain maps were created to il

19 MRCPs produced by finger taps were markedly reduced in P

20 MRCPs were derived from back-averaging the electroenceph

21 258 patients were enrolled in the study; 251 MRCP image sets were assessed, and 236 patients had eval

22 0%, 87%, and 76% (CT) and 70%, 92%, and 80% (MRCP), respectively.

23 nts were reported in 38.0% of patients after MRCP and 68.1% after ERCP.

24 Two radiologists reviewed MRCP images alone, MRCP images with nonenhanced T1 - and T2-weighted MR ima

25 ancreas MR imaging protocol that included an MRCP sequence.

26 anch pancreatic duct (BPD) IPMNs with CT and MRCP, respectively.

27 ion of malignancy were calculated for CT and MRCP.

28 Very good correlation between ERCP and MRCP findings was demonstrated.

29 nd biliary ducts as depicted on the ERCP and MRCP images.

30 enhanced T1 - and T2-weighted MR images, and MRCP images with nonenhanced and gadolinium-enhanced dyn

31 At MRCP, segments not detected or mischaracterized were eit

32 t are almost equivalent to those provided at MRCP.

33 f 196 segments analyzed, 17 were not seen at MRCP (sensitivity, 91%).

34 Of the segments visualized at MRCP, 14 were incorrectly characterized (accuracy, 92%).

35 Patients underwent a baseline MRCP that was immediately followed by administration of

36 R) imaging with MR cholangiopancreatography (MRCP), four patients; endoscopic ultrasonography (US), 2

37 tic resonance (MR) cholangiopancreatography (MRCP), because of an enlargement of the pancreatic duct

38 magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) and positron emission tomography (PET) scanning, a

39 magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) studies.

40 magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP).

41 magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP).

42 ed immunodeficiency syndrome cholangiopathy, MRCP depicted the biliary tract as clearly as did ERCP (

43 liary dilatation, apart from cholelithiasis, MRCP picture is often atypical and therefore, the final

44 identified duct abnormalities in RG1068-cine MRCP image sets with significantly higher levels of sens

45 Diagnostic MRCP examinations were obtained in 299 (99.7%) subjects.

46 RG1068-enhanced MRCP might also better identify patients in need of ther

47 nally, the indications for secretin-enhanced MRCP will be discussed to define which patients will ben

48 s review, the technique of secretin-enhanced MRCP, which has the aim to depict the whole pancreatic d

49 k-slab approach, while permitting the entire MRCP examination to be performed in a single breath hold

50 After failed ERCP, MRCP delineated the pancreaticobiliary tract and helped

51 ications of E or PD had ductal anatomy (ERCP/MRCP) which predicted failure because of significant dis

52 A(z)) was significantly (P < .05) larger for MRCP images interpreted with T1 - and T2-weighted images

53 included 224 patients who were referred for MRCP.

54 for reader 1, 0.8404 for reader 2) than for MRCP images alone (0.8144 for reader 1, 0.8122 for reade

55 Compared with images from MRCP, those from RG1068-stimulated MRCP are improved in

56 sensitivity (P < .0001) than in images from MRCP, with minimal loss of specificity.

57 The possible way to improve MRCP is using it with intravenous injection of hepatobil

58 cal check-up program that routinely includes MRCP studies.

59 MATERIAL/METHODS: MRCP examinations of 148 patients (48 men and 100 women;

60 during eccentric than concentric movements, MRCP-indicated cortical activation was greater both in a

61 nt pain and jaundice.Detailed imaging by MRI/MRCP should be done.

62 etic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRI/MRCP), are helpful in the diagnosis of hydatid disease.

63 s were 94% and 13% for positive and negative MRCP results, respectively.

64 The accuracy of MRCP and MR imaging in determining the presence and leve

65 The accuracy of MRCP was evaluated using ERCP as the standard.

66 tation was determined mainly on the basis of MRCP and ECPW examinations, and, in individual cases, du

67 onhealthy control subjects), (c) blinding of MRCP image readers to reference-standard results, (d) pr

68 abdominal 64-detector CT within 2 months of MRCP and/or ERCP.

69 Furthermore, the frequency and number of MRCP images necessary to achieve a temporal resolution a

70 Sensitivity and specificity of MRCP for PSC detection across all studies were 0.86 and

71 e administration of secretin, as depicted on MRCP images, will be illustrated.

72 D (>10-mm diameter), or thick septa at CT or MRCP may be used as independent predictors of malignancy

73 results, (d) prospective study with ERCP or MRCP performed after subject recruitment into the study,

74 agnetic resonance cholangio-pancreatography (MRCP) and their prevalence in our population.

75 derived movement-related cortical potential (MRCP) is greater and occurs earlier for controlling huma

76 Movement-related cortical potential (MRCP) was derived by trigger-averaging 40 EEG epochs in

77 asured movement-related cortical potentials (MRCPs) in these patients to determine whether cortical f

78 In patients with high pretest probabilities, MRCP enabled confirmation of PSC; in patients with low p

79 in patients with low pretest probabilities, MRCP enabled exclusion of PSC.

80 In many cases of suspected PSC, MRCP is sufficient for diagnosis, and, thus, the risks a

81 Half-Fourier RARE MRCP enables accurate evaluation of pancreaticobiliary d

82 -hold, heavily T2-weighted half-Fourier RARE MRCP was performed in 265 patients with suspected pancre

83 By means of a regular MRCP protocol it was impossible to reveal any disorders

84 lowed by administration of RG1068 and repeat MRCP and then underwent ERCP within 30 days; they were f

85 Two radiologists reviewed MRCP images alone, MRCP images with nonenhanced T1 - and

86 med in a 1.5-Tesla magnet (Philips) with SSH MRCP 3DHR and SSHMRCP rad protocol.

87 to reveal disorders undetected by a standard MRCP.

88 synthetic human secretin (RG1068)-stimulated MRCP detects pancreatic duct abnormalities with higher l

89 ages from MRCP, those from RG1068-stimulated MRCP are improved in many aspects and could aid in diagn

90 ities with higher levels of sensitivity than MRCP.

91 The MRCP negative potential (NP) related to motor task prepa

92 Two independent readers evaluated the MRCP images for strictures, dilatation, and intraductal

93 the large pyramidal cells that generate the MRCP.

94 The loss of the MRCP may serve as a useful marker of upper motor neuron

95 te spatial and temporal distributions of the MRCP signals.

96 e of this study was to determine whether the MRCP signals differ between the two types of maximal-eff

97 of gadolinium-enhanced dynamic MR images to MRCP images with nonenhanced T1- and T2-weighted images

98 Sixty-one patients underwent MRCP and 54 patients underwent ERCP (21 patients underwe

99 age, 51 years; range, 15-91 years) underwent MRCP by using the respiratory-triggered isotropic 3D fas

100 in which the diagnosis was identified using MRCP, whereas in the remaining 12 cases ECPW examination

101 anced dynamic images and heavily T2-weighted MRCP images.

102 T2-weighted MRCP included thick- and thin-slab single-shot fast spin

103 DTPA in combination with regular T2-weighted MRCP may be helpful in detecting anomalies of the biliar

104 ses to identify prospective studies in which MRCP was evaluated and compared with endoscopic retrogra

105 re reported to be temporally associated with MRCP and ERCP, respectively.

106 T1- and less heavily T2-weighted images with MRCP images significantly improved the diagnostic accura

107 Positive and negative likelihood ratios with MRCP were 15.3 and 0.15, respectively.