コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 riaxone/Cefotaxime against highly pathogenic MRSA infection.
2 ew and effective antimicrobial agent against MRSA infection.
3 he protective host defense against recurring MRSA infection.
4 anism of host resistance against intradermal MRSA infection.
5 ospital with S. aureus HCAP have evidence of MRSA infection.
6 ally sterile sites in patients with invasive MRSA infection.
7 now an abundant cause of community-acquired MRSA infection.
8 patients had a documented risk factor for CA-MRSA infection.
9 ercent of patients were hospitalized for the MRSA infection.
10 or health problems were not associated with MRSA infection.
11 fold increase in the incidence of subsequent MRSA infection.
12 thletes and estimate the risk for subsequent MRSA infection.
13 directly contributes to pathogenicity during MRSA infection.
14 for the antibiotic selected for treatment of MRSA infection.
15 ive MSSA infection and infants with invasive MRSA infection.
16 novel approaches to address the challenge of MRSA infection.
17 a suitable target for preventing or treating MRSA infection.
18 ancomycin for the treatment of intracellular MRSA infection.
19 atients is associated with increased risk of MRSA infection.
20 ion contributed to lower rates of nosocomial MRSA infection.
21 coccus aureus (MRSA) have increased risk for MRSA infection.
22 %, and only 1 of 5 deaths was related to the MRSA infection.
23 anscriptional regulators in the pathology of MRSA infection.
24 nce and leads to susceptibility to secondary MRSA infection.
25 n SEB-neutralizing mAb, is effective against MRSA infection.
26 eutic strategies to address the challenge of MRSA infection.
27 nt and positive immunomodulatory role during MRSA infections.
28 of the MRSA bundle on health care-associated MRSA infections.
29 future prophylaxis or new treatments for CA-MRSA infections.
30 expressed during superficial and invasive CA-MRSA infections.
31 m children with active known or suspected CA-MRSA infections.
32 screening or reporting in efforts to reduce MRSA infections.
33 ed in 2001, accounted for 82.1% (412/502) of MRSA infections.
34 iant of PVL that is strongly associated with MRSA infections.
35 tics may represent a novel approach to treat MRSA infections.
36 Six strain types accounted for 88.2% of all MRSA infections.
37 miology of America for control of nosocomial MRSA infections.
38 and have previously been associated with CA-MRSA infections.
39 administered to 206 trainees, 22 of whom had MRSA infections.
40 among isolates from patients with recurrent MRSA infections.
41 re now available for the treatment of severe MRSA infections.
42 ass of antibiotics holds promise in fighting MRSA infections.
43 ices that are effective at limiting invasive MRSA infections.
44 timal bacterial clearance during respiratory MRSA infections.
45 unct antivirulence therapy for patients with MRSA infections.
46 ime trends, and long-term risk of subsequent MRSA infections.
47 MRSA) infections were discriminated from non-MRSA infections.
48 of best practice for treating patients with MRSA infections.
49 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection.
50 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection.
51 mice after methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) infection.
52 o eliminate methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) infection.
53 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections.
54 eatment for methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) infections.
55 hicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) infections.
56 e methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus(MRSA) infections.
57 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections.
58 3 (17%) had methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) infections.
59 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections.
60 a significant reduction in Gram-positive or MRSA infections?
74 drawn from an epidemiological network of CA-MRSA infections and colonizations in northern Manhattan
75 dence rates and estimated number of invasive MRSA infections and in-hospital deaths among patients wi
76 A major issue is to identify the sources of MRSA infections and to monitor their epidemic spread.
77 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections and widespread use of vancomycin, MRSA
78 Compared to methicillin-sensitive S. aureus, MRSA infections are associated with greater morbidity an
82 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections are a burden on the health care system.
83 Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections are a global public health problem.
84 hicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) infections are encroaching upon nosocomial setting
85 hicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) infections are frequently associated with strains
86 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections are increasing and may now involve pers
87 hicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) infections are predominantly those affecting skin
88 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections are reported as decreasing, but recent
90 contrast, many community-associated MRSA (CA-MRSA) infections arise in otherwise healthy individuals
91 rsal surveillance, the prevalence density of MRSA infection at each body site had a statistically sig
93 hereas the annual ratio of CA-MRSA in ocular MRSA infections averaged 66.1% and tended to increase ov
94 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections between 2010 and 2014 primarily reflect
95 Injecting drug users accounted for 49% of CA-MRSA infections but only 19% of the HA-MRSA infections (
96 hicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) infections, but there are limited data regarding t
97 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections by demonstrating that oxacillin can be
98 children in the Midwest suggest that serious MRSA infections can be acquired in the community in rura
99 atients with traditional hospital-associated MRSA infections, compared with patients with CA-MRSA inf
100 The restricted treatment options for CA-MRSA infections compound the effect of enhanced virulenc
101 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection continues to rise in many health care se
103 as, rates of invasive health care-associated MRSA infections decreased among patients with health car
105 st injection-drug use (43 percent); previous MRSA infection, diabetes, and chronic hepatitis C (21 pe
106 ty-acquired methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) infections, displays the giant protein Ebh on its
110 of MRSA nasal colonization for ICU-acquired MRSA infections, either lower respiratory tract infectio
111 ese cases underscore the changing profile of MRSA infections, especially in the community-based setti
112 was no difference in clinical resolution of MRSA infection even if the infecting organism was resist
113 cantly increases the severity of bloodstream MRSA infection, even when administered in conjunction wi
114 tic 75b) was efficacious in a mouse model of MRSA infection, exhibiting a long half-life, a high volu
115 invasive (from a normally sterile body site) MRSA infections from 2005 through 2008 were evaluated an
118 Although methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) infection has become increasingly reported, popula
119 hicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) infection has been defined as an MRSA infection in
120 Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection has emerged in patients who do not have
121 hicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) infections has become a significant health care ch
122 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections has been occurring for the last 15 year
123 Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections have become common among both hospitali
124 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections have been acquired primarily in nosocom
125 hicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) infections have spawned efforts to define unique v
126 the "gold standard" of treatment for serious MRSA infections; however, the emergence of less-suscepti
128 s (CA-MRSA) infection has been defined as an MRSA infection in a patient who lacks specific risk fact
129 combinant Reg3gamma administration 4 h after MRSA infection in alcohol-intoxicated mice rescued USA30
130 decolonization without screening to prevent MRSA infection in intensive-care unit (ICU) patients.
135 iven the high rates of primary and recurring MRSA infections in humans, it appears that antibodies to
138 period, the rates of health care-associated MRSA infections in non-ICUs fell from 0.47 per 1000 pati
141 sociated MRSA (CA-MRSA) has caused increased MRSA infections in the general population, including chi
142 aureus (MRSA) USA300 is the leading cause of MRSA infections in the United States and has caused an e
147 ections and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) infections in 4 Connecticut metropolitan areas (po
148 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections in children have occurred primarily in
149 hicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) infections in patients without traditional risk fa
150 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections in the outpatient setting has led to a
151 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections in the United States have been caused b
154 independently associated with postdischarge MRSA infection included MRSA colonization (matched odds
155 e being developed primarily for treatment of MRSA infections, including tedizolid, dalbavancin, and o
156 hicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) infections, including serious invasive infections
159 significantly associated with mortality for MRSA infection irrespective of the source of infection o
163 Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection is a serious threat to the public health
164 hicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) infections is increasing in the United States, and
165 A infections, compared with patients with CA-MRSA infections, is independent of the vancomycin MIC, s
168 culminate in lysis of neutrophils during CA-MRSA infection may serve as a novel therapeutic interven
169 o have sex with men, and multidrug-resistant MRSA infection might be sexually transmitted in this pop
176 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections occurred in US dialysis patients in 201
177 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection occurs at highly endemic levels in inten
178 of CA-MRSA infections but only 19% of the HA-MRSA infections (odds ratio, 4.2; 95% confidence interva
179 tly associated with MRSA pneumonia: previous MRSA infection or colonisation (odds ratio 6.21, 95% CI
182 primary outcomes were prevalence density of MRSA infections per 1000 occupied bed days (OBDs) in hos
183 Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections pose a major challenge in health care,
184 Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections present a serious challenge because of
186 .7 to 101.6]; P < 0.001) independent of past MRSA infection (relative risk, 2.1 [CI, 1.2 to 3.7]; P =
189 equency or not significantly associated with MRSA infection risk in our population of newly identifie
190 ischarge was similar after invasive MSSA and MRSA infections (risk ratio, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.96-1.49).
191 [95% CI], 3.56 to 10.72; P < 0.0001), prior MRSA infection (RR, 3.97; 95% CI, 1.94 to 8.12; P = 0.00
192 adoptively transferred to burned mice at the MRSA infection site, an abscess formed, and the infectio
193 ntribution of this leukotoxin to invasive CA-MRSA infections such as pneumonia remains controversial.
196 lso at highest risk for community-associated MRSA infection; these subgroups included individuals wit
197 inal results linked the dramatic increase in MRSA infections to an expanding community reservoir of M
199 rses of 4 subjects with 3-6 recurrent USA300 MRSA infections, using patient clinical data, including
200 rm (6-20 months) probability of developing a MRSA infection was 19% among colonized hemodialysis pati
203 he incidence rate of hospital-onset invasive MRSA infections was 1.02 per 10,000 population in 2005 a
205 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection was 24% and multidrug resistance (MDR) w
206 om sample of patients with culture-confirmed MRSA infection; we oversampled patients from the Geising
207 pendently associated with community-acquired MRSA infection were black race (prevalence ratio, 1.53 [
208 recent culture-positive community-associated MRSA infection were enrolled from 2012 to 2013 at St Lou
209 7 cases of community-associated [correction] MRSA infection were reported, representing between 8 and
217 of infants who died after invasive MSSA and MRSA infections were similar at 237 of 2474 (9.6%) and 1
219 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections were discriminated from non-MRSA infect
221 tibility testing in 100 of 175 patients with MRSA infection who received antibiotics (57 percent).
223 these outcomes observed with vancomycin for MRSA infections with elevated vancomycin MIC values.
224 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections with minimum inhibitory concentration (
225 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections with vancomycin MICs of 2 mug/ml and co
226 o current clinical practice for treatment of MRSA infection, with the potential to significantly impr
227 cus aureus (MRSA) clones are responsible for MRSA infections worldwide, and those of different lineag
WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。