コーパス検索結果 (left1)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 MRSA emerged in the mid-1940s, following the acquisition
2 MRSA hand carriage rates in patients, nurses, and dentis
3 MRSA is particularly difficult to treat when it invades
4 MRSA isolates underwent whole-genome sequencing, with a
5 MRSA prevalence decreased by a relative 3.2% countywide,
6 MRSA prevalence was significantly higher in intermediate
7 MRSA strains have acquired a non-native penicillin-bindi
8 MRSA strains lacking STK1 become susceptible to failing
9 MRSA transmission dynamics between the ACH and ILTCFs we
13 ccessed whole genome sequence data for 2,283 MRSA isolates from 1,465 people identified during a 12-m
14 arming genetic relatedness between 7 (20.6%) MRSA isolates and the epidemic EMRSA-15 clone, as well a
15 ment to accelerate ulcer healing and address MRSA into the care of diabetic patients with foot ulcers
18 inhibition), antibacterial activity against MRSA and MSSA and cytotoxicity against NCI-H460, MCF-7 a
19 extracellular bactericidal activity against MRSA at concentrations equal to and four-fold less than
20 hows specific antibacterial activity against MRSA by a membrane-disruptive mechanism without detectab
23 designed, synthesized and evaluated against MRSA and menaquinone utilizing bacteria in aerobic condi
24 nt (>/=99.9% persister cell killing) against MRSA (MBEC < 10 muM), MRSE (MBEC = 2.35 muM), and VRE (M
25 activities (MBEC = 0.59-9.38 microM) against MRSA, MRSE and VRE biofilms while showing minimal red bl
27 nted for 16% (7/44) and 21% (211/985) of all MRSA BSIs and SSTIs, corresponding to 1.2 and 37.4 cases
28 which prompted retrospective analysis of all MRSA isolates obtained from the environment (n = 62), SS
30 resent the mechanistic range shift analysis (MRSA), a method to estimate a suite of range shift param
34 ompetition experiments between S. caprae and MRSA demonstrated a significant reduction in MRSA burden
35 ensus tract-level socioeconomic measures and MRSA incidence, which may include modifiable social (eg,
36 lms formed by a variety of clinical MSSA and MRSA strains and created culture-negative implants in th
38 lenge of accurately targeting empirical anti-MRSA antibiotics with currently available clinical tools
41 lance data for invasive community-associated MRSA cases (isolated from a normally sterile site of an
43 l disparity in invasive community-associated MRSA rates was largely explained by socioeconomic factor
46 l isolates (methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) and Candida albicans) and standard (Pseudomonas ae
47 SSA) and HO methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) BSIs for 2009-2013 at 2 hospitals and used an adju
48 pansion for methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) in cases of cellulitis associated with specific ri
50 d to reduce methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) or methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) burden
51 mmon USA300 methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) strains express a number of toxins, such as Panton
52 , including methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) strains, despite high titers of specific antibodie
53 S. aureus, methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), multidrug-resistant S. aureus (MDRSA), absence of
54 C-harboring methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), which failed to identify from 0 to 41% of tested
55 S.aureus and Methicillin-resistant S.aureus (MRSA) are mediated via the secretion of soluble factors
56 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (M
57 methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and self-assembles to form nanoaggregates on the s
58 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) due to
60 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VRE
65 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has declined over the past decade, but it is uncle
66 Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) have been reported to survive on hospital surfaces
68 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) incidence in the United States is higher among bla
70 Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection is a serious threat to the public health
71 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection was 24% and multidrug resistance (MDR) w
74 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections are a burden on the health care system.
75 Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections are a global public health problem.
76 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections between 2010 and 2014 primarily reflect
77 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections by demonstrating that oxacillin can be
78 Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a bacterium that causes infections in different
79 Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is an emerging cause of catheter-associated urinar
80 Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is responsible for large numbers of postsurgical n
81 Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is the most common healthcare-associated multidrug
84 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) over sensitive isolates (methicillin-sensitive S.
85 Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) phenotypes were predicted using PPFS2 and compared
91 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) via regulation of principal virulence factors (eg,
92 Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) was first observed in 1960, less than one year aft
93 Meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) was first reported in 1998 at 7.7% and represented
95 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), Listeria monocytogenes and Enterococcus faecalis,
103 vidence of a higher prevalence of S. aureus, MRSA, and MDRSA among children living with an IHO worker
104 ethicillin-resistant Sthaphylococcus aureus, MRSA and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, P. aeruginosa) were ana
106 cantly increases the severity of bloodstream MRSA infection, even when administered in conjunction wi
109 % confidence interval (CI): 1.07, 1.83], but MRSA nasal carriage prevalence was uncommon (2-3%) in IH
111 s, the difference in risk-benefit profile by MRSA status suggests that MRSA-screening-directed prophy
113 hicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) are the cause of a severe pandemic consisting prim
114 hicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) causes infections associated with extensive tissue
115 hicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) epidemic in the United States is largely attributa
117 thicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus(CA-MRSA) isolates have revealed a wide diversity of genetic
118 culminate in lysis of neutrophils during CA-MRSA infection may serve as a novel therapeutic interven
124 , these data suggest that neutrophils fed CA-MRSA underwent a novel form of lytic programmed cell dea
127 estors, including USA500 and a "historic" CA-MRSA from Western Australia, were shown to be only dista
128 trol programmes targeting transmission of CA-MRSA will be required to control MRSA in both the commun
135 caused by drug-resistant strains, designated MRSA (methicillin-resistant S. aureus), is associated wi
137 nization vs Universal Clearance to Eradicate MRSA]) showed that body surface decolonisation reduced a
139 genome sequencing a collection of the first MRSA isolates allows us to reconstruct the evolutionary
141 sults show that screening all admissions for MRSA is unlikely to be cost effective in England at the
142 e, chlorhexidine bathing, decolonization for MRSA, and hydrogen peroxide vaporizer for MDR-AB) were u
144 fundamental infection control practices for MRSA and MDR-AB (ie, contact precautions, private room/c
145 STK1, despite being nonessential protein for MRSA survival, it can serve as an important therapeutic
146 e reference method, the positivity rates for MRSA in the population evaluated were 11.1% (122/1,103)
147 vealed that catheterization was required for MRSA to achieve high-level, persistent infection in the
151 egies for "step-down" antibiotic therapy for MRSA-BSI; (4) management of staphylococcal BSIs in neona
156 no evidence of community transmission of HA-MRSA strains, implying that HA-MRSA cases identified in
157 mission of HA-MRSA strains, implying that HA-MRSA cases identified in the community originate from th
158 rying numbers, misidentifying mecC-harboring MRSA as methicillin-susceptible S. aureus This study und
162 ability to correctly identify mecC-harboring MRSA, including three (semi)automated antimicrobial susc
166 nicity were significantly associated with HO-MRSA BSIs whereas Hispanic ethnicity was negatively asso
172 level factors associated with differences in MRSA incidence and inverse odds ratio-weighted mediation
173 t of vancomycin dosing on patient outcome in MRSA bloodstream infection (BSI); (2) defining, testing,
174 MRSA demonstrated a significant reduction in MRSA burden using murine models of both skin colonizatio
176 e number needed to treat to prevent 1 SSI in MRSA-colonized patients is estimated to be 53, compared
177 d with postdischarge MRSA infection included MRSA colonization (matched odds ratio [mOR], 7.71; 95% c
180 , it does not effectively kill intracellular MRSA due to the molecular size and polarity that limit i
182 the macrophages infected with intracellular MRSA bacteria, the RBC-nanogels significantly inhibited
188 Staphylococcus aureus clonal complex 398 (LA-MRSA CC398) is causing an increasing number of skin and
189 ssess the phylogenetic relationship among LA-MRSA CC398 isolates from Danish pigs and cases of BSI an
190 hicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (LA-MRSA) is an emerging problem in many parts of the world.
195 emonstrates that the increasing number of LA-MRSA CC398 BSIs occurred in parallel with a much larger
197 Our data demonstrate a low burden of LA-MRSA in the East of England, but the detection of mecC-M
198 to describe the molecular epidemiology of LA-MRSA isolated in the East of England (broadly Cambridge
200 sed over the years, peaking in 2014, when LA-MRSA CC398 accounted for 16% (7/44) and 21% (211/985) of
204 rotection studies in mice against the lethal MRSA challenge indicated that at high concentration neit
207 hat the RBC-nanogels effectively neutralized MRSA-associated toxins in extracellular environment and
218 ities (ILTCFs), the transmission dynamics of MRSA between healthcare settings is not well understood.
219 ram-negative pathogens, and the emergence of MRSA, highlight the growing challenge of bloodstream inf
221 e genes and disrupt the biofilm formation of MRSA clearly indicated that Inh2-B1 serves as a therapeu
223 this burden, as the timely identification of MRSA colonization or infection facilitates infection con
224 s encompassing in vitro growth inhibition of MRSA, and in vivo protection studies in mice against the
225 nce study revealed multiple introductions of MRSA CC398 in a UK Equine Hospital, identifying an emerg
226 e surveillance and outbreak investigation of MRSA in the United Kingdom and Ireland and have shown th
227 occus aureus (including clinical isolates of MRSA and MSSA) and Staphylococcus epidermidis identified
229 auranofin is efficacious in a mouse model of MRSA systemic infection and significantly reduces the ba
232 United Kingdom shows that the proportion of MRSA bacteremias apportioned to hospitals is decreasing,
233 This study identified preventable routes of MRSA CC398 introduction and transmission: human occupati
239 o current clinical practice for treatment of MRSA infection, with the potential to significantly impr
240 s of patient outcomes for clinical trials of MRSA-BSI; (3) testing new strategies for "step-down" ant
243 encing (WGS) can refine our understanding of MRSA transmission and microevolution in congregate setti
244 to significantly attenuate the virulence of MRSA despite the pathogen being resistant to this drug.
246 eived as a vertical intervention focusing on MRSA, it also expanded infection prevention and control
248 delineate the impact of propofol sedation on MRSA bloodstream infections in mice in the presence and
254 independently associated with postdischarge MRSA infection included MRSA colonization (matched odds
256 decolonization without screening to prevent MRSA infection in intensive-care unit (ICU) patients.
257 tly associated with MRSA pneumonia: previous MRSA infection or colonisation (odds ratio 6.21, 95% CI
259 ers the urinary tract environment to promote MRSA CAUTI pathogenesis by inducing the release of Fg, w
265 In 2013, a cluster-randomised trial (REDUCE MRSA Trial [Randomized Evaluation of Decolonization vs U
267 -positive individuals with 27 highly related MRSA isolates who were linked to the GP surgery, 2 of wh
268 Menaquinone (MK-4) supplementation rescued MRSA growth, suggesting these compounds inhibit MK biosy
269 of the problematic fluoroquinolone-resistant MRSA, VRE, and S. pneumoniae, and the possibility to off
270 tal types (acute, teaching, and specialist), MRSA prevalence, and transmission potentials using proba
273 benefit profile by MRSA status suggests that MRSA-screening-directed prophylaxis may optimize benefit
279 Facilities with >/=75% compliance with the MRSA prevention bundle experienced a 17.4% reduction in
282 a and sepsis, we show that oxacillin-treated MRSA strains are significantly attenuated in virulence.
283 spp. and Staphylococcus spp., including two MRSA strains 0.3-8 mug/mL) than for the majority of Gram
290 f antimicrobial regimens possessing in vitro MRSA activity provide improved outcomes compared with tr
292 k factors were independently associated with MRSA pneumonia: previous MRSA infection or colonisation
298 cal performance characteristics of the Xpert MRSA NxG assay with prospectively collected rayon nasal
299 .434-5.971) and initial DFU culture yielding MRSA (2.030; 1.452-2.838) predicted DFU-ISIs and that DF
300 Patients with initial DFU cultures yielding MRSA and protracted open ulcers had a high 24-month cumu
WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。