ライフサイエンスコーパス: Marcus theory

1 r and acceptor occurs (the crossing point in Marcus theory).

2 e dependence can be rationalized in terms of Marcus theory.

3 c coupling between units is determined using Marcus theory.

4 t higher driving forces, as predicted by the Marcus theory.

5 ed by the statistical Rice-Ramsperger-Kassel-Marcus theory.

6 ds is a function of DeltapK, as predicted by Marcus theory.

7 consistent with the application of adiabatic Marcus theory.

8 using a combination of DFT computations and Marcus theory.

9 rate are consistent with the predictions of Marcus theory.

10 ctivation energies are reliably described by Marcus theory.

11 the six preferred side chain rotamers using Marcus theory.

12 taG degrees dependence which is predicted by Marcus theory.

13 odeled with the RRKM (Rice-Ramsperger-Kassel-Marcus) theory.

14 Marcus theory analysis indicates that this elevated pK(a

15 The mechanism is discussed in terms of the Marcus theory and the specific protonation/deprotonation

16 two complementary theoretical extensions of Marcus theory applying to those cases, based either on a

17 y band offset is found to be consistent with Marcus theory, as long as one performs a sum over final

18 n transfer compared to the prediction of the Marcus theory, bringing the rate to the experimentally e

19 Marcus theory can also be applied successfully to other

20 Within the context of Marcus theory, catalysis of electron transfer is attribu

21 Employing the Marcus theory for electron transfer, we find near optima

22 nd interpreted in terms of the semiclassical Marcus theory for electron transfer.

23 nt developments in chemical reaction theory (Marcus theory for SN2 reactions), and protein dynamics e

24 Thus, the Marcus theory formalism based on ground-state energetics

25 n mechanism by the cobalt electrolyte in the Marcus theory framework led to substantially different r

26 dence of the rate constants to semiclassical Marcus theory gave lambda of 0.39 eV and 0.11 eV for the

27 Analysis of the BET data using Marcus theory gives reorganization energies for these sy

28 Marcus theory has explained how thermal nuclear motions

29 In the present work, electron transfer (Marcus) theory has been applied to nitrogenase electron

30 Analysis by Marcus theory indicates that, in the absence of CoA, thi

31 ATP hydrolysis) was found to be described by Marcus theory, indicating that electron transfer was rat

32 A model based on Marcus theory is developed to describe recombination, in

33 Marcus theory may explain the dichotomous role of exciti

34 On the basis of estimates from the Marcus theory of charge transfer rates, we identified a

35 The standard Marcus theory of charge transfer reaction in solution, r

36 The Marcus theory of electron transfer predicts a bell-shape

37 analysis of the kinetic data in light of the Marcus theory of electron transfer revealed that small r

38 a charge-hopping mechanism described by the Marcus theory of electron transfer to calculate charge-t

39 In terms of the Marcus theory of outer-sphere electron transfer, we show

40 free-energy relationship (FER) based on the Marcus theory of outer-sphere electron transfer.

41 om the linear response assumption underlying Marcus theory of oxidation.

42 This study shows that Marcus' theory of electron transfer can be applied to th

43 ochrome bc1 complex as would be predicted by Marcus' theory of electron transfer.

44 This study suggests that Marcus' theory of electron transport can predict rates n

45 Using Marcus' theory of heterogeneous electron transfer (ET) a

46 ctions are often highly exergonic, for which Marcus theory predicts reduced electron-transfer rates b

47 The Marcus theory provides a good understanding of the syner

48 ets are thus well described by semiclassical Marcus theory, providing a strong validation of the use

49 According to Marcus' theory, rates of electron transfer reactions dep

50 Evaluation using Marcus theory showed that the activation of H64W HCA II

51 lectron transfer reaction did not conform to Marcus theory, suggesting that an adiabatic event associ

52 shown to vary with the chirality-associated Marcus theory, suggesting that the energy gaps between S

53 ompared to that predicted from semiclassical Marcus theory, supports a charge transfer process that i

54 We offer arguments based on Marcus theory that when condition 2 is met, fulfilling c

55 By fitting these data to semiclassical Marcus theory, the reorganizational energy (lambda) of t

56 c kinetic barrier obtained by application of Marcus theory to chemical rescue of H64A HCA II.

57 ctrolyte, as expected from an application of Marcus theory to semiconductor electrodes.

58 Application of Marcus theory to the sensitized reaction provided an est

59 Marcus theory was applied to analyze the results.

60 Using Marcus theory, we separate nucleophilicity into two inde

61 constant was also studied in the context of Marcus theory, where DeltaG degrees was 39.31-51.48 kJ m

62 This is further supported by a variant of Marcus theory, which predicts that the energy offsets be

63 used to constrain a model based on classical Marcus theory, which provided physically reasonable fits

64 -fit by a parabola generated using classical Marcus theory with a reorganization energy of 0.67 eV.

65 This dependence is described by Marcus theory with a reorganization energy of approximat

66 This indicates that Marcus theory would fail to describe electron-transfer p

67 Analysis of the reaction of the N-quinol by Marcus theory yielded an H(AB) which exceeded the nonadi