ライフサイエンスコーパス: Medicaid

1 Medicare and OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.65-0.82 for Medicaid).

2 there are disproportionately more blacks in Medicaid.

3 ugh the program and of childbirth covered by Medicaid.

4 re plans operating prior to 2014, 106 exited Medicaid.

5 ncrease in the rate of childbirth covered by Medicaid.

6 located in the 25 states that did not expand Medicaid.

7 caid and in those states that did not expand Medicaid.

8 ong children with asthma who are enrolled in Medicaid.

9 erage increased more in states that expanded Medicaid.

10 ivate insurance (Medicare: 0.12 [0.12-0.12]; Medicaid: 0.082 [0.081-0.083]; no charge: 0.051 [0.047-0

11 ith Medicare (1.56 [1.41-1.74], P < .001) or Medicaid (1.55 [1.39-1.73], P < .001), number of chronic

12 [95% CI, 3.4 to 11.3 percentage points]) and Medicaid (10.5 percentage points [CI, 6.5 to 14.5 percen

13 state sites, RWHAP/Uncomp (57% and 52%) and Medicaid (18% and 18%) coverage were unchanged, while pr

14 ncer diagnosis ($2116 among those insured by Medicaid, $2367 among those insured by the Veterans Heal

15 than were caregivers of children insured by Medicaid (26% [23%-28%]; P < .01) or CHIP (38% [35%-40%]

16 k sites, both RWHAP/Uncomp (20% and 19%) and Medicaid (50% and 50%) coverage were unchanged, while pr

17 Among the patients newly enrolled in Medicaid, 75.7% (1474 of 1947) of those who visited a de

18 1; CHIP, 88% [87%-89%]; P < .01) and dental (Medicaid, 80% [78%-81%]; P < .01; CHIP, 77% [76%-79%]; P

19 more likely to receive a preventive medical (Medicaid, 88% [86%-89%]; P < .01; CHIP, 88% [87%-89%]; P

20 onded to a 20.1 percentage-point increase in Medicaid (95% CI, 18.9-21.3) and an 18.2 percentage-poin

21 %) had private insurance, 11,853 (13.6%) had Medicaid, 9554 (18.4%) had CHIP, and 8125 (10.8%) were u

22 d hazard ratio, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.03-1.98) and Medicaid (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.10-1.52

23 ve cohort study was conducted using Missouri Medicaid administrative claims data (January 1, 2010, to

24 uously enrolled in coverage from the Alabama Medicaid Agency from birth between 2008 and 2012, adjust

25 nstituted the pregnancy cohort nested in the Medicaid Analytic Extract database, which included data

26 inclusion criteria were identified from the Medicaid Analytic Extract database, which includes claim

27 robabilities [95% CIs]), children insured by Medicaid and CHIP were significantly more likely to rece

28 Permanente Northern California or Tennessee Medicaid and eligible to receive RSV immunoprophylaxis.

29 es between hospitals in states that expanded Medicaid and in those states that did not expand Medicai

30 heral artery disease at the 2015 Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services Medicare Evidence Develop

31 onary disease, be insured by the Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services, travel further distances

32 ts beginning warfarin treatment in Tennessee Medicaid and the 5% National Medicare Sample identified

33 ts beginning warfarin treatment in Tennessee Medicaid and the 5% National Medicare Sample, PPI co-the

34 ety-net burden, defined as the proportion of Medicaid and uninsured patient charges for all hospitali

35 63 pregnancies in women who were enrolled in Medicaid and who delivered a live-born infant between 20

36 of patients dually eligible for Medicare and Medicaid) and high medical risk (defined as practices in

37 ) than did caregivers of children insured by Medicaid, and a lower likelihood of insurance always mee

38 ceiving healthcare coverage from commercial, Medicaid, and Medicare payers.

39 were used to assess changes in RWHAP/Uncomp, Medicaid, and private insurance coverage, using Medicare

40 nked to administrative claims from Medicare, Medicaid, and private insurance.

41 , 2.35; 95% CI, 2.08 to 2.65) or enrolled in Medicaid (AOR, 2.10; 95% CI, 1.90 to 2.33), or treated a

42 f total hospital expenses, Medicaid revenue, Medicaid as a percentage of total revenue, operating mar

43 rough the program, and childbirth covered by Medicaid before and after the Planned Parenthood exclusi

44 Medicaid beneficiaries enrolled in exiting plans had acc

45 ospective cohort analysis of claims data for Medicaid beneficiaries, aged 18 to 64 years, with incide

46 These exiting plans enrolled 4848310 Medicaid beneficiaries, with a mean of 606039 beneficiar

47 of 29 states and Washington, D.C., expanded Medicaid by September 1, 2015.

48 oved physician performance in an ACO serving Medicaid children.

49 Using 1999-2011 United States Medicaid claims among 69 million beneficiaries, we condu

50 A retrospective study of Medicaid claims data for 28,794 unique pediatric patient

51 Retrospective cross-sectional study using Medicaid claims data from 2005 to 2010.

52 trospective cohort study was conducted using Medicaid claims data from 4 geographically diverse, larg

53 We used Medicaid claims data from Oregon and exploited the quasi

54 Medicaid claims data were obtained from the following st

55 were identified by the presence of 3 or more Medicaid claims with a diagnosis of sickle cell anemia w

56 % datasets from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) were obtained to identify the office stre

57 was significantly increased in patients with Medicaid compared with private insurance (RR, 1.36; 95%

58 The choice for states to expand Medicaid could affect the financial health of hospitals

59 All patients with Medicare or Medicaid coverage and all uninsured patients were includ

60 high adherence, and those with dual Medicare/Medicaid coverage and more cardiologist visits after dis

61 Medicaid coverage increased (23% and 38%; ARRR, 1.82; 95

62 Patients whose private or Medicaid coverage was supplemented by RWHAP were more li

63 8.2 percentage points; P<0.001) and rates of Medicaid coverage were increased (difference-in-differen

64 collection of $600-$1000 per person gaining Medicaid coverage), and health (for example, an estimate

65 Sociodemographic, dual Medicare/Medicaid coverage, comorbidities, not filling high-inten

66 ized children are uninsured, while many have Medicaid coverage.

67 treatment, and hearing loss were drawn from Medicaid data and published estimates.

68 U.S. national Medicaid data from 2001 to 2009 were used to examine tre

69 tus, joint replacement volume, percentage of Medicaid discharges, teaching hospital status, number of

70 ent virologic failure (0.1%-0.6%/month), and Medicaid-discounted ART costs ($15 200-$39 600/year).

71 Hospitals in states that expanded Medicaid eligibility before January 2014 were excluded.

72 Importance: The Affordable Care Act expanded Medicaid eligibility for millions of low-income adults.

73 Importance: Patients with dual Medicare-Medicaid eligibility have a higher burden of chronic dis

74 Expanded Medicaid eligibility is associated with shorter hospital

75 ly patients, older adults with dual Medicare-Medicaid eligibility presenting with MI have superior ra

76 o determine the association between expanded Medicaid eligibility under the Affordable Care Act and d

77 The expansion of Medicaid eligibility under the Affordable Care Act is a

78 of death among men, blacks, and people with Medicaid eligibility was higher than that in the rest of

79 controlled for demographic characteristics, Medicaid eligibility, and area-level covariates.

80 oratory testing by race/ethnicity, age, sex, Medicaid eligibility, and number of chronic conditions f

81 Exposures: Dual Medicare and Medicaid eligibility.

82 This was a retrospective cohort study using Medicaid encounter and pharmacy billing data from 29 US

83 to improve access to dermatology care among Medicaid enrollees and played an especially important ro

84 ducing caries-related treatment visits among Medicaid enrollees.

85 such as dermatologists is often limited for Medicaid enrollees.

86 dren were followed until end of 2006, end of Medicaid enrollment, or occurrence of study outcome.

87 ring the 2 years after implementation of the Medicaid expansion (2014 and 2015) relative to the 4 yea

88 spitals per fiscal year in 25 states without Medicaid expansion (with sample size varying depending o

89 hospitals per fiscal year in 19 states with Medicaid expansion and between 2200 and 2400 hospitals p

90 cond to fourth quarter of 2014 (post-ACA) in Medicaid expansion and nonexpansion states by family inc

91 ted difference in differences in APC between Medicaid expansion and nonexpansion states.

92 r decreased in all income categories in both Medicaid expansion and nonexpansion states.

93 Hospitals in states with Medicaid expansion experienced a $3.2 million increase (

94 ocated in the 19 states that implemented the Medicaid expansion had significantly increased Medicaid

95 ive: To estimate the association between the Medicaid expansion in 2014 and hospital finances by asse

96 Exposures: Medicaid expansion in 2014, accounting for variation in

97 e: To investigate the effect of the 2014 ACA Medicaid expansion on the location, insurance status, an

98 To investigate the effect of the 2014 ACA Medicaid expansion on the location, insurance status, an

99 tal of 28 374 PLWH followed up in 4 sites in Medicaid expansion states (California, Oregon, and Maryl

100 The EDs treating patients from Medicaid expansion states saw an overall 47.1% decrease

101 .06 million ED visits among patients from 17 Medicaid expansion states, and 7.87 million ED visits am

102 .06 million ED visits among patients from 17 Medicaid expansion states, and 7.87 million ED visits am

103 ially among low-income people who resided in Medicaid expansion states.

104 s can inform state-level decisions about the Medicaid expansion under the Patient Protection and Affo

105 end of 2013 to end of 2014 for patients from Medicaid expansion versus nonexpansion states were done.

106 Medicaid expansion was also significantly associated wit

107 Medicaid expansion was associated with increased insuran

108 d type of ED visits in the first year of ACA Medicaid expansion were found, suggesting that expansion

109 d type of ED visits in the first year of ACA Medicaid expansion were found, suggesting that expansion

110 Characterizing the association of Medicaid expansion with hospitalization after injury is

111 on analyses were used to compare states with Medicaid expansion with states without Medicaid expansio

112 payer systems with liberal, moderate, and no Medicaid expansion, respectively, under the Affordable C

113 tal, relative to hospitals in states without Medicaid expansion.

114 with Medicaid expansion with states without Medicaid expansion.

115 ients who are injured, young, and uninsured, Medicaid expansion/open enrollment in Maryland changed i

116 Implementation of Medicaid expansion/open enrollment transformed the lands

117 tudinal assessment of DCP implementation and Medicaid expansion/open enrollment using risk-adjusted b

118 g the Dependent Coverage Provision (DCP) and Medicaid expansion/open enrollment, and to consider poss

119 The change was primarily driven by Medicaid expansion/open enrollment, which corresponded t

120 ent Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) Medicaid expansions for low-income adults.

121 and Washington, D.C., were participating in Medicaid expansions under the Affordable Care Act.

122 We examined whether Medicaid expansions were associated with changes in insu

123 The ACA Medicaid expansions were associated with higher rates of

124 Medicaid expansions were associated with increased visit

125 Planned Parenthood affiliates from the Texas Medicaid fee-for-service family-planning program, Texas

126 liates from a state-funded replacement for a Medicaid fee-for-service program in Texas was associated

127 METHOD: A national cohort of Medicaid-financed adults clinically diagnosed with delib

128 DSH payment reductions may expose extensive Medicaid financial losses for hospitals serving large ab

129 Participants were enrolled in Medicaid from 3 months before their last menstrual perio

130 P < 0.001) absolute increase in Medicare and Medicaid (from 33%).

131 for confounders, whites with OAG enrolled in Medicaid had 198% higher odds of receiving no glaucoma t

132 icans in California who were uninsured or on Medicaid had significantly increased odds of mortality (

133 ed States since the creation of Medicare and Medicaid in 1965.

134 land), 4 in a state (New York) that expanded Medicaid in 2001, and 2 in nonexpansion states (Texas an

135 Children aged 5 to 19 enrolled in Medicaid in 2009 to 2010 were included.

136 ffiliates, the rate of childbirth covered by Medicaid increased by 1.9 percentage points (a relative

137 .16; CI: 1.08-1.24) compared with white, and Medicaid insurance (OR: 1.18, CI: 1.07-1.30) compared wi

138 nitive impairment, lower education, Medicare/Medicaid insurance (vs private/other coverage), smoking,

139 less likely among older, male patients with Medicaid insurance and advanced tumor stage at diagnosis

140 Blacks with Medicaid insurance demonstrated 291% higher odds (OR = 3

141 relationship between black or Hispanic race, Medicaid insurance, and diabetes associated with higher

142 of open versus MIS were black race, Medicare/Medicaid insurance, and lack of insurance.

143 Hispanic race, Asian race, Medicaid insurance, and no insurance associated inversel

144 ton County (approximately 13 000 of whom are Medicaid insured and 6000 of whom are cared for in Cinci

145 County, had a diagnosis of asthma, and were Medicaid insured were studied.

146 Participants: Uninsured and Medicaid-insured adults aged 18 to 64 years.

147 Uninsured and Medicaid-insured adults aged 18 to 64 years.

148 ospitals recover such uncompensated costs of Medicaid-insured and uninsured patients.

149 ital financial losses from inpatient care of Medicaid-insured children (defined as the reimbursement

150 We evaluated ambulatory encounter claims of Medicaid-insured children in 34 Ohio counties in 2014.

151 en's hospitals had a higher median number of Medicaid-insured discharges (4082; interquartile range [

152 opulation included 1485 hospitals and 843725 Medicaid-insured discharges.

153 For our subsample of FSCHs, Medicaid-insured inpatient financial losses were calcula

154 a-related hospitalizations and ED visits for Medicaid-insured pediatric patients residing in Hamilton

155 ted hospitalizations and ED visits per 10000 Medicaid-insured pediatric patients.

156 improved asthma outcomes for a population of Medicaid-insured pediatric patients.

157 are Hospital payments to FSCHs reduced their Medicaid losses by almost half.

158 children's hospitals had the largest median Medicaid losses from pediatric inpatient care (-$9722367

159 identify types of hospitals with the highest Medicaid losses from pediatric inpatient care and to est

160 set were used to estimate the proportion of Medicaid losses recovered through DSH payments.

161 nterstate variation of health plan exit from Medicaid managed care and evaluate the relationship betw

162 Claims data from a large California Medicaid managed care plan that began offering telederma

163 Retrospective cohort of all comprehensive Medicaid managed care plans (N = 390) during the interva

164 Of the 366 comprehensive Medicaid managed care plans operating prior to 2014, 106

165 provide medical care services for enrollees (Medicaid managed care plans).

166 Six states had a mean of greater than 10% of Medicaid managed care recipients enrolled in plans that

167 Plans that exited from a state's Medicaid market performed significantly worse prior to e

168 ty or patient experience in the plans in the Medicaid market.

169 ondition of reimbursement by the Centers for Medicaid & Medicare Services.

170 The primary outcomes were incident AMI (Medicaid, Medicare, and Veterans Affairs International C

171 95% CI, 1.2-4.5; P = .01) and payer status (Medicaid/Medicare compared with commercial OR, 2.0; 95%

172 t likely to have a readmission compared with Medicaid/no insurance and Medicare populations.

173 in, particularly for minorities and those in Medicaid nonexpansion states.

174 gnosed OAG between 2007 and 2011 enrolled in Medicaid or a large United States managed care network.

175 eds (63% [60%-67%]) than children insured by Medicaid or CHIP.

176 e lowest quartile of patients who either had Medicaid or were uninsured (0%-14%), medium-burden hospi

177 (OR 0.52, P < 0.01) and those with Medicare/Medicaid (OR 0.79, P < 0.01) were less likely to receive

178 Health insurance coverage (private, Medicaid, or none); improvements in coverage over the pr

179 gery for melanoma in patients with Medicare, Medicaid, or private insurance.

180 definitive surgery, followed by Medicare and Medicaid patients (519 [14%], 609 [17%], and 79 [24%], r

181 s using the ED for concussion care (478/1290 Medicaid patients [37%] used the ED vs 435/6652 private

182 Medicaid patients experienced the most surgical delays.

183 nutes (-6.2% [CI, -8.9% to -3.5%]) among all Medicaid patients from expansion states.

184 7.7-8.5) to 4.7 (95% CI, 4.3-5.1) per 10000 Medicaid patients per month by June 30, 2014, a 41.8% (9

185 ed the pattern of health care use, with more Medicaid patients using the ED for concussion care (478/

186 ort study between 1999 and 2012 of Tennessee Medicaid patients with chronic noncancer pain and no evi

187 ding demonstration of clinical rationale for Medicaid patients with inappropriate PCIs.

188 010 to 10.6% in 2014 (from 15.3% to 6.8% for Medicaid patients, and from 18.6% to 11.2% for other pat

189 rring more frequently in black and uninsured/Medicaid patients, raising concern that increased NOM us

190 For Medicaid patients, the decrease was from 340 patients to

191 = 3667) privately insured, and 4% (n = 331) Medicaid patients.

192 vered by commercial payers, 26246 covered by Medicaid payers, and 1854 covered by Medicare payers wer

193 Importance: Medicaid payments tend to be less than the cost of care.

194 Medicaid performance improvement initiatives should targ

195 Consistent primary care among the pediatric Medicaid population is challenging, but these findings s

196 care medicine by the premature/neonatal and Medicaid populations should be considered by healthcare

197 d-related decedents, age </=64 years, in the Medicaid program and characterized their clinical diagno

198 th the future of the Affordable Care Act and Medicaid program unclear, it is critical to examine the

199 2006 and 2014, health plan exit from the US Medicaid program was frequent.

200 cluded inpatients aged 18 to 64 years in the Medicaid program who were discharged with a first-listed

201 ed death among nonelderly individuals in the Medicaid program, focusing on decedents with and without

202 drawal of a managed care plan from a state's Medicaid program.

203 Insurers that provide these plans can exit Medicaid programs each year, with unclear effects on qua

204 State Medicaid programs have increasingly contracted with insu

205 ealthcare system since the 1965 Medicare and Medicaid provisions of the Social Security Act.

206 Medicaid quality indicators track diabetes mellitus and

207 ns with commercial health insurance and 3394 Medicaid recipients met the study inclusion criteria.

208 s, the difference in LOS for Medicaid vs non-Medicaid recipients varied significantly by state.

209 with those with commercial health insurance, Medicaid recipients were 234% more likely to not receive

210 Medicaid recipients who were the oldest ICU survivors (>

211 Irrespective of race/ethnicity, Medicaid recipients with OAG are receiving substantially

212 to improve the quality of glaucoma care for Medicaid recipients, especially racial minorities.

213 For Medicaid recipients, mean LOS in Washington, DC, was sig

214 with shorter hospital LOS in mildly injured Medicaid recipients.

215 ns were 35%, 19%, and 30%, respectively, for Medicaid recipients.

216 Among children enrolled in Medicaid, residence in inner-city areas did not confer i

217 .9 to $5.6 million; P = .008) in mean annual Medicaid revenue per hospital, relative to hospitals in

218 dicaid expansion had significantly increased Medicaid revenue, decreased uncompensated care costs, an

219 as a percentage of total hospital expenses, Medicaid revenue, Medicaid as a percentage of total reve

220 eased by 17.3% (37.9-31.4%), whereas that by Medicaid rose by 18.3% (14.5-17.2%).

221 reviews data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) 2013 Medicare Provider Utilizati

222 btained data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) and enrolled facilities.

223 Is) are used by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) as pay-for-performance metrics.

224 In 2009, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) began publicly reporting 30-day

225 1.9% due to current Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) complications].

226 luated the impact of Centers of Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) guidance after newly introduced

227 mologists using the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Open Payments and Provider Utili

228 The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) recently released the Overall Ho

229 imbursements from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) to ophthalmologists, differ by s

230 h was not adopted by Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS).

231 yment Data from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS).

232 hip programs by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS).

233 mbursement from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS).

234 e claims data from the Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS[1st]), and the same selected diag

235 to patient-specific Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services administrative claims for analyses.

236 The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services adopted the Early Management Bundle, S

237 Administration and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services along with several recent publications

238 al designation in the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services ambulance fee schedule by zip code.

239 yment Data from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services among fee-for-service (FFS) Medicare b

240 2013 and 2014, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and the National Cardiovascular Data R

241 data from the 2015 Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services annual files, downloaded from the Hosp

242 Administration and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services are moving toward eliminating current

243 Million Hearts and the Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services as a strategy to assess a value-based

244 rug Administration, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services communications combined with recent in

245 The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services coverage includes 3 posttherapy (18)F-

246 Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services data were used to calculate associated

247 Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services definitions of an "eligible death" for

248 ere identified from Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Discharge Status Codes.

249 mation Files from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services for 1,114 stand-alone and 2,230 Medica

250 were linked with the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services for 15397 patients to evaluate 30-day

251 ange plans from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services for the 2016 enrollment year.

252 these limitations, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services has not yet included PCI readmission a

253 Commission, and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services has proposed a similar requirement.

254 ing (STS-CABG), and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Hospital Consumer Assessment of Health

255 The US Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Hospital Readmissions Reduction Progra

256 We divided the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services hospital-wide readmission measure coho

257 Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services inpatient claims data and Internationa

258 g the patients with Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services linkage data, the mortality at 30 days

259 D ascertainment via Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services linkage, using Cox regression with lat

260 009 in 5 states using Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services linked minimum data set data from SNFs

261 The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use

262 spective study, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Open Payments database for payments to

263 ves as the basis for a Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services program designed to evaluate the Milli

264 RATIONALE: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services recently implemented financial penalti

265 .x via linkage with Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services research files.

266 ers that resulted in Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services stating that the use of meters in crit

267 Recipients and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services to evaluate whether anti-human leukocy

268 which directed the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services to expand the payment bundle for renal

269 was proposed by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services to obtain and reward a greater value o

270 ary initiative of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to test the effect of holding an entit

271 Compare data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services were linked and used to characterize a

272 data linked from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services were used to provide 1-year events.

273 The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services will evaluate provider costs through e

274 The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services' Hospital Compare program initially re

275 rsement data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, drug pricing databases, and Centers f

276 racteristics (average Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services-hierarchical condition categories risk

277 ants with available Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services-linked data.

278 es published by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.

279 laims data from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.

280 lly reported by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.

281 and were receiving Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.

282 al records from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.

283 with data from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.

284 on System from the US Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.

285 f payments from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.

286 ply using data from Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.

287 In a large cohort of youths insured by Medicaid, the use of SSRIs or SNRIs-the most commonly us

288 des claims data for all children enrolled in Medicaid throughout the United States.

289 -authors discuss why the United States needs Medicaid to address its epidemic of opioid abuse.

290 d a 125.7% (CI, 89.2% to 162.6%) increase in Medicaid visits after 12 months of ACA expansion.

291 graphic variables, the difference in LOS for Medicaid vs non-Medicaid recipients varied significantly

292 ; 95% CI, 1.22-2.17), and private insurance (Medicaid vs private insurance: OR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.28-0.

293 nurses and social workers from two Michigan Medicaid Waiver Sites participated in the training progr

294 Expansion of Medicaid was associated with a decline of $2.8 million (

295 Those with private insurance and Medicaid were 5% and 12% less likely, respectively, to b

296 Patients with private insurance and Medicaid were 6% and 7% less likely, respectively, to be

297 ansion of health coverage since Medicare and Medicaid were enacted.

298 losses from pediatric inpatients covered by Medicaid were much larger for FSCHs than for other hospi

299 ta furnished by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid were used to identify cataract surgery claims a

300 relying on RWHAP/Uncomp coverage shifted to Medicaid, while in New York and nonexpansion state sites

301 sample of 1360101 pregnant women enrolled in Medicaid with a live-born infant constituted the pregnan