ライフサイエンスコーパス: Micrococcus

1 (6), Corynebacterium (8), Lactobacillus (2), Micrococcus (2), Neisseria mucosa (1), Escherichia coli

2 nase (IKK) mutant forms completely inhibited micrococcus- and PGN-induced activation of NF-kappaB and

3 fy common blood culture contaminants such as Micrococcus, Corynebacterium, and Bacillus.

4 nging from 45% identity for the homolog from Micrococcus luteus (FtsZ[Ml]) to 91% identity for the ho

5 lf thymus, salmon testes, and the bacterium, micrococcus luteus (lysodeikticus) containing different

6 Micrococcus luteus (NCTC2665, "Fleming strain") has one

7 Micrococcus luteus , a Gram-positive bacterium, is incap

8 al activity of dendrigraft poly-L-lysines on Micrococcus luteus and Erwinia carotovora.

9 After the intraperitoneal injection of Micrococcus luteus and Escherichia coli, the peptide was

10 opin A gene was induced by the G(+) bacteria Micrococcus luteus and Staphylococcus aureus, but not by

11 Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, and Micrococcus luteus and the yeast, Candida albicans.

12 ssessed by qualitative agar plate test using Micrococcus luteus as substrate showing that both the un

13 exhibit biphasic kinetics in the clearing of Micrococcus luteus cell suspensions, suggesting preferen

14 the biosynthesis of the teichuronic acid of Micrococcus luteus cell walls.

15 the D52A and D52A/N46A ChEWL complexes with Micrococcus luteus cells are 3- and 4-fold higher, respe

16 The best ligand was Micrococcus luteus lipomannan, followed by Enterococcus

17 Micrococcus luteus secretes a small protein called Rpf,

18 In contrast, against Micrococcus luteus the TA(-) mutant exhibited no defect

19 In contrast to Uvr(A)BC, the Micrococcus luteus UV endonuclease efficiently incises u

20 uence similarity to the Escherichia coli and Micrococcus luteus UvrA proteins involved in excision re

21 y against Bacillus subtilis (but not against Micrococcus luteus), as well as against the parental and

22 nonpathogenic bacteria (Escherichia coli and Micrococcus luteus).

23 Four genomic DNAs of differing GC content (Micrococcus luteus, 72% GC; Escherichia coli, 50% GC; ca

24 Transcription termination factor Rho from Micrococcus luteus, a high G + C Gram-positive bacterium

25 The growth of Micrococcus luteus, a soil microorganism that belongs to

26 , Escherichia coli, Lactobacillus plantarum, Micrococcus luteus, and Staphylococcus aureus support th

27 as purified from the Gram-positive bacterium Micrococcus luteus, and the complete gene sequence was d

28 te inhibited the growth of Escherichia coli, Micrococcus luteus, Bacillus subtilis, and Klebsiella pn

29 Staphylococcus epidermidis, Micrococcus luteus, Brevibacterium linens, Pseudomonas f

30 Rpf from Micrococcus luteus, the founder member of this protein f

31 of resuscitation-promoting factor (Rpf) from Micrococcus luteus, which is an extremely potent anti-do

32 studies using gram-positive model bacterium Micrococcus luteus.

33 d yeast and interacts with peptidoglycan and Micrococcus luteus.

34 , H2B, and H4, for growth inhibition against Micrococcus luteus.

35 a means to distinguish Escherichia coli from Micrococcus luteus.

36 ium tuberculosis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and Micrococcus luteus.

37 d prophenoloxidase activation in response to Micrococcus luteus.

38 y from hemolymph activated by treatment with Micrococcus luteus.

39 the resuscitation-promoting factor (Rpf) of Micrococcus luteus.

40 enic and highly lysozyme-sensitive bacterium Micrococcus luteus.

41 s whose predicted products resemble Rpf from Micrococcus luteus.

42 the most common erroneous identification was Micrococcus luteus.

43 rat liver carcinoma cells in the presence of Micrococcus lysodeicticus DNA at pH 5.8 and 7.4.

44 conferring protection to fluorescein-labeled Micrococcus lysodeikticus from lysozyme-mediated hydroly

45 e activity of immune pupal hemolymph against Micrococcus lysodeikticus was 11 times greater when comp

46 lysozyme sensing concept based on the use of Micrococcus lysodeikticus whole cells adsorbed on graphe

47 I of ascorbate peroxidase and catalase from Micrococcus lysodeikticus, in which the radical has been

48 properties toward cell wall preparations of Micrococcus lysodeikticus.

49 o HIV-1 inhibition, AVL is capable of lysing Micrococcus lysodeikticus.

50 C4 promoter accessibility as demonstrated by micrococcus nuclease digestion (P<0.05) and chromatin im

51 Deinococcus (formerly Micrococcus) radiodurans is remarkable for its extraordi

52 thalate-grown Arthrobacter keyseri (formerly Micrococcus sp.) 12B to the corresponding 2-substituted

53 Among the actinobacteria four Micrococcus species produced MSH, but MSH was not found

54 with heat-killed bacteria (Vibrio, Bacillus, Micrococcus spp. mixture).

55 lococci, aerobic and anaerobic diphtheroids, Micrococcus spp., Bacillus spp., and viridans group stre

56 ulase-negative Staphylococcus strains, and 8 Micrococcus strains) in freshly reconstituted master mix