ライフサイエンスコーパス: Mimulus

1 urces currently under development are making Mimulus an excellent system for determining the genetic

2 he genomic resources currently available for Mimulus and discuss future directions for research.

3 henotypic and genetic diversity in the genus Mimulus and highlight how direct genetic studies with Mi

4 nd highlight how direct genetic studies with Mimulus can address a wide spectrum of ecological and ev

5 ndividuals, I investigated the demography of Mimulus cardinalis and Mimulus lewisii across the specie

6 d Mimulus lewisii and hummingbird-pollinated Mimulus cardinalis are a model system for studying repro

7 Mimulus cardinalis LMS (McLMS) is weakly expressed and h

8 Mimulus cardinalis OS (McOS) is expressed similarly to M

9 Mimulus lewisii with hummingbird-pollinated Mimulus cardinalis revealed that bees preferred large fl

10 mulus lewisii and the hummingbird-pollinated Mimulus cardinalis.

11 Mimulus contains a wide array of phenotypic, ecological

12 The recently tetraploid luteus group of Mimulus contains five species native to central Chile, t

13 unia and rice) than to PPRs elsewhere in the Mimulus genome.

14 d for flowering between yellow monkeyflowers Mimulus guttatus (outcrosser, summer flowering) and Mimu

15 d for flowering between yellow monkeyflowers Mimulus guttatus (outcrosser, summer flowering) and Mimu

16 two closely related species of monkeyflower, Mimulus guttatus and M. nasutus.

17 shown that male sterility in hybrids between Mimulus guttatus and Mimulus nasutus is due to interacti

18 two closely related species of monkeyflower, Mimulus guttatus and Mimulus tilingii, to characterize t

19 species of yellow monkeyflowers, outcrossing Mimulus guttatus and selfing M. nasutus.

20 resulting from hybridisation between diploid Mimulus guttatus and tetraploid Mimulus luteus, two spec

21 terns of endosperm and embryo development in Mimulus guttatus and the closely related, serpentine end

22 Leaf trichome density in Mimulus guttatus can be altered by the parental environm

23 ormance, resistance, and tolerance traits in Mimulus guttatus challenged with a generalist pathogen,

24 by identifying and targeting regions of the Mimulus guttatus genome containing large numbers of cand

25 Mimulus guttatus harbors extensive variation in critical

26 ation to copper mine soils in the wildflower Mimulus guttatus identified a locus that appeared to cau

27 * Mimulus guttatus in adjacent contrasting plant community

28 acterized in colonized roots of thermal soil Mimulus guttatus in both isolated plants supporting AMF

29 on in 27 traits for 52 annual populations of Mimulus guttatus sampled from 10 altitudinal transects.

30 s of floral adaptation and speciation in the Mimulus guttatus species complex, we constructed a genet

31 populations of annuals and perennials in the Mimulus guttatus species complex.

32 phic microsatellite data for a population of Mimulus guttatus that has an intermediate selfing rate.

33 ing of a wild population of the monkeyflower Mimulus guttatus to precisely locate over 400,000 bounda

34 pittlebug (Philaenus spumarius) herbivory in Mimulus guttatus using a diallel cross-grown in a greenh

35 e natural population of yellow monkeyflower (Mimulus guttatus).

36 flowering time within natural populations of Mimulus guttatus, collecting the early- and late-floweri

37 from a population of yellow monkey flowers, Mimulus guttatus, in Copperopolis, California, which rec

38 Applying this method to two datasets from Mimulus guttatus, we infer a strong signal of adaptive d

39 lly adapted populations of the monkeyflower, Mimulus guttatus.

40 estimate t and F in a natural population of Mimulus guttatus.

41 age map between two divergent populations of Mimulus guttatus.

42 lopment time, and male fitness components of Mimulus guttatus.

43 tness characters of the yellow monkeyflower, Mimulus guttatus.

44 ion in a primarily outcrossing population of Mimulus guttatus.

45 rimarily outcrossing population of the plant Mimulus guttatus.

46 pes at three nested ecological scales within Mimulus guttatus: annual vs perennial life history races

47 role for imprinted genes in the evolution of Mimulus hybrid seed lethality.

48 ) of cytoplasm-dependent anther sterility in Mimulus hybrids by identifying and targeting regions of

49 ar male sterility and other floral traits in Mimulus hybrids.

50 In interspecific monkeyflower (Mimulus) hybrids, a driving M. guttatus allele (D) exhib

51 have proven the experimental tractability of Mimulus in laboratory and field studies.

52 s developed here, these results suggest that Mimulus is an excellent platform for studying the geneti

53 The plant genus Mimulus is rapidly emerging as a model system for studie

54 g patterns of gene flow of the annual plant, Mimulus laciniatus, at its warm range limit.

55 ted the demography of Mimulus cardinalis and Mimulus lewisii across the species' elevation ranges.

56 The bumblebee-pollinated Mimulus lewisii and hummingbird-pollinated Mimulus cardi

57 rids between the bee-pollinated monkeyflower Mimulus lewisii and the closely related selfer Mimulus p

58 The bumblebee-pollinated Mimulus lewisii and the hummingbird-pollinated M. cardin

59 es of monkeyflower: the bumblebee-pollinated Mimulus lewisii and the hummingbird-pollinated Mimulus c

60 line' floral anthocyanin regulation model in Mimulus lewisii and to examine the different ways of tin

61 Mimulus lewisii flowers are visited primarily by bumbleb

62 Mimulus lewisii LMS (MlLMS) and OS (MlOS) are expressed

63 By analyzing a chemically induced mutant of Mimulus lewisii through bulk segregant analysis and tran

64 nalyze a chemically induced floral mutant of Mimulus lewisii through bulk segregant analysis and tran

65 hybrids produced by crossing bee-pollinated Mimulus lewisii with hummingbird-pollinated Mimulus card

66 noid pigments in the petals of pink-flowered Mimulus lewisii, which is pollinated by bumblebees, and

67 -dominant mutant in the monkeyflower species Mimulus lewisii, with a substantial decrease in corolla

68 ween diploid Mimulus guttatus and tetraploid Mimulus luteus, two species that were introduced into th

69 t recombination initiation described here in Mimulus may reflect ancient and conserved eukaryotic mec

70 nteny within the model flowering plant genus Mimulus (monkeyflowers).

71 guttatus (outcrosser, summer flowering) and Mimulus nasutus (selfer, spring flowering).

72 guttatus (outcrosser, summer flowering) and Mimulus nasutus (selfer, spring flowering).

73 lity in hybrids between Mimulus guttatus and Mimulus nasutus is due to interactions between a mitocho

74 and the closely related, serpentine endemic Mimulus nudatus, and compare them to those of reciprocal

75 mulus lewisii and the closely related selfer Mimulus parishii to determine the genetic basis of diver

76 n in a natural, <140-year-old allopolyploid (Mimulus peregrinus), a resynthesized interspecies triplo

77 We surveyed 40 Mimulus populations from localities across the UK to exa

78 hat nearly complete hybrid male sterility in Mimulus results from a simple genetic incompatibility be

79 number in four replicate (cloned) arrays of Mimulus ringens (Scrophulariaceae), each consisting of g

80 ceptionally strong isolating barrier between Mimulus species, with reciprocal crosses producing < 1%

81 ulated rapidly between these closely related Mimulus species.

82 sity of floral anthocyanin patterns in other Mimulus species.

83 lian segregation distortion within and among Mimulus species.

84 enetic divergence has occurred between these Mimulus species.

85 in related sympetalous species, Linaria and Mimulus, suggesting that changes in boundary gene activi

86 pecies of monkeyflower, Mimulus guttatus and Mimulus tilingii, to characterize the mechanisms and str

87 This hybrid, Mimulus x robertsii, is largely sterile but capable of p