戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。

今後説明を表示しない

[OK]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1  completed 3 or more tests (exclusive of the Mini-Mental State Examination).
2 1.5 SD race-specific decline on the Modified Mini-Mental State Examination).
3 n (Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Boxes and Mini-Mental State Examination).
4 ally higher scores using the multiple-choice Mini Mental State Examination.
5  results comparable to those of the standard Mini Mental State Examination.
6 ding and were cognitively evaluated with the Mini Mental State Examination.
7 untington's Disease Rating Scale, nor on the Mini Mental State Examination.
8 g early stages of dementia compared with the Mini Mental State Examination.
9 late concentrations and higher scores on the Mini Mental State Examination.
10  Recall Test, and general cognition with the Mini Mental State Examination.
11              Cognition was assessed with the Mini Mental State Examination.
12  0.7 point (95% CI, 0.6-0.8) per year on the Mini-Mental State Examination.
13 rment were defined, based on scores from the Mini-Mental State Examination.
14 ssessed cognitive function with the Modified Mini-Mental State Examination.
15 ive function as assessed with the use of the Mini-Mental State Examination.
16  Assessment of Mental State and the Folstein Mini-Mental State Examination.
17 tatus was assessed by using the standardized Mini-Mental State Examination.
18     Cognitive impairment was measured by the mini-mental state examination.
19 els and clinical severity as measured by the Mini-Mental State Examination.
20 function measured annually with the Modified Mini-Mental State Examination.
21 ive performance was assessed with use of the Mini-Mental State Examination.
22 ed with the Clinical Dementia Rating and the Mini-Mental State Examination.
23 s had no significant decline on the Modified Mini-Mental State Examination.
24  in terms of age, family history and initial Mini-Mental State Examination.
25  follow-up (through 2008) using the Modified Mini-Mental State Examination.
26 dapted Cognitive Exam = 0.83-0.88; range for Mini-Mental State Examination = 0.72-0.81).
27  95 subjects with mild cognitive impairment (Mini-Mental State Examination 24-30) and 48 subjects wit
28 ients (n = 7; mean age, 65.1 +/- 6.3 y; mean Mini Mental State Examination, 24.4 +/- 5.7), and health
29 n = 8; mean age +/- SD, 62.6 +/- 7.5 y; mean Mini Mental State Examination, 27.5 +/- 2.1), AD patient
30  and Yahr stages I-III; age, 61.8 +/- 9.7 y; Mini-Mental State Examination, 28.0 +/- 1.4) and 27 cont
31 4 young reference subjects (age 21-39 years, Mini-Mental State Examination 29-30) and n = 173 older t
32 stage 2.5 + or - 0.5) without dementia (mean Mini-Mental State Examination, 29.0 + or - 1.4) underwen
33 lines in global cognition, determined by the Mini-Mental State Examination (3.9 points/year in patien
34 t among those with high cystatin C (Modified Mini-Mental State Examination: 38 vs 25%; adjusted odds
35  function was assessed by using the Modified Mini-Mental State Examination (3MS) </=4 times over 11 y
36 ondary analysis, main outcomes were Modified Mini-Mental State Examination (3MS) and total Impact of
37 ed in 2010) and repeatedly measured Modified Mini-Mental State Examination (3MS) results.
38 cognitive function, we examined the Modified Mini-Mental State Examination (3MS) score (maximum score
39                                 The Modified Mini-Mental State Examination (3MS) was used to assess g
40    Cognition was assessed using the Modified Mini-Mental State Examination (3MSE) 4 times and the Dig
41 nitive function was assessed by the Modified Mini-Mental State Examination (3MSE) and specific cognit
42 randomization into WHI and the last Modified Mini-Mental State Examination (3MSE) for all WHIMS parti
43 function measured annually with the Modified Mini-Mental State Examination (3MSE).
44 impairment based on their performance in the Mini-Mental State Examination, a pattern recognition tas
45                          The multiple-choice Mini Mental State Examination and the standard Mini Ment
46 obable AD with a score of at least 17 on the Mini-Mental State Examination and 16 age-matched control
47 led normal cognition (29 of 30 points on the Mini-Mental State Examination and 27 of 30 points on the
48 uropsychological scores alone, including the Mini-Mental State Examination and a modified version of
49 sion to dementia with a higher accuracy than Mini-Mental State Examination and ADAS-cog.
50 creased cognitive impairment, as assessed by Mini-Mental State Examination and Alzheimer's Disease As
51 as associated with greater annual decline in Mini-Mental State Examination and category fluency score
52 and general dementia severity as measured by Mini-Mental State Examination and Clinical Dementia Rati
53 ally global cognition was assessed using the Mini-Mental State Examination and clinical progression w
54 rates of hippocampal atrophy, decline on the Mini-Mental State Examination and faster progression on
55 al scores of 0, above cutoff on the modified Mini-Mental State Examination and Free and Cued Selectiv
56 who used both the Adapted Cognitive Exam and Mini-Mental State Examination and indicated the Adapted
57     Cognitive function was assessed with the Mini-Mental State Examination and on the basis of measur
58 bal cognitive impairment, as measured by the Mini-Mental State Examination and the Clinical Dementia
59 ive function was assessed using the Modified Mini-Mental State Examination and the Digit Symbol Subst
60 ated with declines in scores on the Modified Mini-Mental State Examination and the Digit Symbol Subst
61 ation of participants was performed with the Mini-Mental State Examination and the Grober-Buschke, Se
62 ntal white matter were consistent with lower Mini-Mental State Examination and the revised Cambridge
63  however, this association was attenuated by Mini-Mental State Examination and Trail Making Test Part
64 ed over 4.57 m (15 ft), and cognition on the Mini-Mental State Examination and Trail Making Test Part
65 an average of 4.2 years with annual Modified Mini-Mental State Examinations and standardized protocol
66 evaluation of global cognition (the Modified Mini-Mental State Examination) and episodic memory (dela
67 ve performance (global composite measure and Mini-Mental State Examination) and performance on subtes
68 se Assessment Scale-Cognitive [ADAS-cog] and Mini-Mental State Examination) and superior signal stren
69 ology according to ICD-10 and DSM-III-R, the Mini-Mental State Examination, and a vocabulary test.
70 ined as a score less than 80 on the Modified Mini-Mental State Examination, and cognitive decline was
71 ions of the Digit Symbol Test, Block Design, Mini-Mental State Examination, and Controlled Oral Word
72 ore sensitive a marker of cognition than the Mini-Mental State Examination, and easy to use.
73  Glasgow Outcome Scale, a lower score on the Mini-Mental State examination, and fewer years of formal
74 uropsychological battery, evaluated with the Mini-Mental State examination, and rated on a scale of s
75 ified Huntington's Disease Rating Scale, the Mini-Mental State Examination, and vital signs.
76  regression analysis-with age, sex, baseline Mini-Mental State Examination, APOE4, iron, non-Cp coppe
77 asured in 229 patients >/=70 years using the Mini Mental State Examination before and 6 months after
78 rity of dementia determined by scores on the Mini-Mental State Examination, but showed no relationshi
79              Cognitive outcomes included the Mini-Mental State Examination, Center for Epidemiologic
80 sely correlated with performance on Folstein Mini-Mental State Examination, Clinical Dementia Rating
81 ve impairment was grossly assessed using the Mini-Mental State Examination; comorbid physical illness
82 ncreased severity of disease, as measured by Mini-Mental State Examination, correlated with posterior
83  subscales of the Adapted Cognitive Exam and Mini-Mental State Examination (Cronbach's alpha: range f
84                    ChIs significantly slowed Mini-Mental State Examination decline without effect on
85 These brain volumes did not predict Modified Mini-Mental State Examination decline.
86  all subjects were considered, scores on the Mini-Mental State Examination decreased significantly wi
87 holotranscobalamin to vitamin B-12, Modified Mini-Mental State Examination, delayed recall, and depre
88                   No differences in Modified Mini-Mental State Examination, delayed recall, and depre
89 to deteriorate by 0.50 to 1.00 points on the Mini-Mental State Examination during 12 weeks, the progr
90 the feasibility of a visual, multiple-choice Mini Mental State Examination for ICU patients who are u
91 lcholinesterase inhibitors at baseline; mean Mini-Mental State Examination for patients was 19.4 +/-
92       Primary outcomes included the Modified Mini-Mental State examination; four cognitive factors: v
93 ion (Mini-Mental State Examination, Modified Mini-Mental State Examination), functional status (activ
94 files of presymptomatic and mildly affected (mini-mental state examination &gt;/= 20) carriers of seven
95 ed possible or probable Alzheimer's disease (Mini-Mental State Examination &gt;10).
96             There was no correlation between Mini Mental State Examination, Hoehn and Yahr score, flu
97 ormance-based screening measures such as the Mini Mental State Examination in corresponding to underl
98 spondents was assessed by using the 30-point Mini-Mental State Examination in 1985; 1,372 respondents
99 sed by comparing Adapted Cognitive Exam with Mini-Mental State Examination in nonintubated patients (
100            Four measurements of the Folstein Mini-Mental State Examination in nonintubated patients o
101                                          The Mini Mental State Examination is a simple, widely used t
102 Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale items, 2 Mini-Mental State Examination items, and all 6 Clinical
103                                          The Mini-Mental State Examination (k = 25) is the most thoro
104 e in neuropsychological test battery scores (Mini-Mental State Examination, Letter Digit Substitution
105       Points were assigned to each variable: Mini Mental State Examination &lt; or =23 received 2 points
106                                 The Modified Mini-Mental State Examination mean total scores in both
107 ulting in 424 Adapted Cognitive Exam and 240 Mini-Mental State Examination measurements.
108 etween groups for ACE-R, ACE-R subscores and Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores at baseline
109 ood samples and cognitive performance by the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE), National Adult Rea
110                  Cognitive performance using Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE), PD staging using m
111 he primary outcome was cognitive severity on Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE).
112 FL was associated with better performance on mini mental state examination (MMSE, F(5,883) = 5.8, p <
113       Cognitive function was measured by the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and assessed by obs
114 y correlated with cognition as determined by Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Cambridge Asses
115 on, and detailed cognitive testing using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Clinical Dement
116                     We analyzed standardized Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and memory, process
117 d whether two cognitive screening tests, the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Mini-Cog, admin
118                           CF was assessed by Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) at baseline and yea
119  participants underwent 6-min walk tests and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) at initial, two-mon
120 ogic Catchment Area study, who completed the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) at three time point
121 logic Catchment Area study who completed the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) during three study
122                                              Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) is one of the most
123 bal cognitive functioning as assessed by the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) is reported here.
124 osis, intermediate M1-M2 Mvarphi type, and a Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) rate of change of +
125 ion between volumetric and MT parameters and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) results.
126 ) vs 2.0 (1.0-3.0) points; P = 0.009], lower Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score (MMSE, [27 (2
127 ypertension, older age, female gender, lower mini-mental state examination (MMSE) score and higher AD
128 onstrated pixel-by-pixel correlation between mini-mental state examination (MMSE) score and microglia
129 0 patients living in the community who had a mini-mental state examination (MMSE) score of 15-26 were
130 Charlson comorbidity index was </= 1 in 75%, Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score was </= 27/30
131 terone with delayed 10-word recall score and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score was assessed
132 unctional Performance Inventory (FPI) score, Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score, and handgrip
133                                     Folstein Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores and neurolog
134                          Outcomes: Change in Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores during the 6
135 en biomarkers of lead exposure and change in Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores in the Norma
136  Although not designed to assess incapacity, Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores less than 20
137 ase Big Data challenge to predict changes in Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores over 24-mont
138                 Imaging studies and Folstein Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores recorded at
139 h omega-3s, antioxidants, and resveratrol on Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores, macrophage
140 aphy perfusion and NCF assessments including Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Alzheimer Disease
141 Battery (CANTAB) computerised batteries, the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), and the Montreal C
142 L (IADL), Mini-Nutritional Assessment (MNA), Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Geriatric Depressi
143 s were compared with regard to scores on the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), the Brief Psychiat
144 s chorea and motor impairment subscales, the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), the HD Activities
145 vania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT), the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), the Mattis Dementi
146 ages 60 years and older, was tested with the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), the Mattis Dementi
147 ssed at baseline and after 8 wk by using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), the Trail Making T
148 e odds of being a low scorer (</= 25) on the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), which is a proxy o
149 general cognition with a battery of 7 tests: Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), word list learning
150  cognitive-domain trials (1340 individuals); Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)-type tests were ava
151  or AD and correlate with performance on the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE).
152 ree tests and cognitive function measured by Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE).
153 s assessed at baseline and annually with the mini-mental state examination (MMSE).
154 ith the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE).
155                         All had 'passed' the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE).
156  cognitive areas, including in scores on the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE; -2.4 points over 36
157 es, which decreases with worse performance), Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE; 0 [worst] to 30 [be
158 e-cognitive subscale (ADAS-Cog; p=0.011) and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE; p=0.004) at 1 year;
159 ve function was assessed with the use of the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE; score range, 0 to 3
160                                   Sequential Mini-Mental State Examinations (MMSE) demonstrated an 80
161  for global cognitive impairment (defined as Mini Mental State Examination [MMSE] </=25) using data f
162 ve safety (based on scores from the 30-point Mini Mental State Examination [MMSE]), and adverse event
163 = 42; mean age +/- SD, 66.6 +/- 10.6 y; mean Mini-Mental State Examination [MMSE] score +/- SD, 22.2
164 atients aged 84 (SD 6) years with severe AD (mini-mental state examination [MMSE] score 5-12 points),
165  with patient characteristics (age, sex, and Mini-Mental State Examination [MMSE] score), magnetic re
166 age, 64 [2] years; 38% female; and mean [SE] Mini-Mental State Examination [MMSE] score, 28 [0.3]), 6
167 s with mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease (mini-mental state examination [MMSE] scores 10-24) at 11
168 ician) and secondary outcomes for cognition (Mini-Mental State Examination, Modified Mini-Mental Stat
169 nified Multiple System Atrophy Rating Scale, Mini-Mental State Examination, Montreal Cognitive Assess
170 al measures of disease severity, such as the Mini-Mental State Examination (n = 51) and ALS Functiona
171 cation of 16.2 +/- 2.3 years, a score on the Mini Mental State Examination of 28.6 +/- 1.5, a glycosy
172     Cognitive function was assessed with the Mini-Mental State Examination on >/=3 occasions during 1
173 ted significantly with cognition assessed by mini-mental state examination or AD assessment scale-cog
174 ; 15%) had worse baseline scores on Modified Mini-Mental State Examination or Digit Symbol Substituti
175  Free and Cued Selective Reminding test, ten Mini-Mental State Examination orientation items, Digit S
176  cognitive decline as reflected by decreased Mini-Mental State Examination (P < 0.001) and increased
177 predicted the rate of change on the Modified Mini-Mental State Examination (p < 0.001).
178 hey performed better than noncarriers on the Mini-Mental State Examination (P = .010) and were more l
179  annual decline on a modified version of the Mini-Mental State Examination (p = 0.035).
180 o difference between the treatment groups in Mini-Mental State Examination (P =.22) or Neuropsychiatr
181 caregiver distress (P =.006), but not on the Mini-Mental State Examination (P =.76).
182 ic memory, processing speed, vocabulary, and Mini-Mental State Examination performance, but not in re
183 reasoning, processing speed, vocabulary, and Mini-Mental State Examination performance.
184 elirium was associated with loss of 1.0 more Mini-Mental State Examination points per year (95% confi
185                 Cognition averaged 0.8 MMSE (mini-mental state examination) points better (95% CI 0.5
186                                              Mini-Mental State Examination (range, 0-30, with 30 bein
187                              Multiple-choice Mini Mental State Examination results correlated satisfa
188 ults correlated satisfactorily with standard Mini Mental State Examination results in all three speak
189 nificantly correlated with Boston naming and mini-mental state examination results.
190 8 patients with impaired baseline cognition (Mini Mental State Examination score <26 points), 18 pati
191 ents with mild to moderate probable AD (mean Mini Mental State Examination score 24 of a possible 30
192 e of >/=3 points decrease or increase in the Mini Mental State Examination score between baseline and
193 l medical records in 8 patients with a major Mini Mental State Examination score decrease of >/=5 poi
194  Examination < or =23 received 2 points, and Mini Mental State Examination score of 24 to 27 received
195  the Karnofsky performance score, and of the Mini Mental State Examination score was not different be
196 : prior stroke or transient ischemic attack, Mini Mental State Examination score, abnormal serum albu
197  71.7+/-11.2 y) and 9 controls with a normal Mini-Mental State Examination score (mean age, 68.7+/-5.
198 regression model showed a lower preoperative Mini-Mental State Examination score (p < 0.001; odds rat
199 axia syndrome (n = 32, mean age = 68.7, mean Mini-Mental State Examination score = 26.8).
200                           The mean change in Mini-Mental State Examination score among participants r
201 0.77) points/year faster decline in Modified Mini-Mental State Examination score and a 0.42 (95% conf
202 se of more than 1 point annually in Modified Mini-Mental State Examination score during up to 5 years
203 iffer significantly between groups; the mean Mini-Mental State Examination score for both groups was
204 iffer significantly between groups; the mean Mini-Mental State Examination score for both groups was
205  were cognition as measured by the change in Mini-Mental State Examination score from baseline to wee
206 dexes were significantly correlated with the Mini-Mental State Examination score in all tested subjec
207 2 months or in the number of patients with a Mini-Mental State Examination score in the clinically im
208  patients were judged to have mild dementia (mini-mental state examination score MMSE=23), mean yearl
209 9-year follow-up period, or had a decline in Mini-Mental State Examination score of >/=5 points.
210 r older, had moderate Alzheimer's disease (a mini-mental state examination score of 12-19), and had b
211       Participants with mild-to-moderate AD (Mini-Mental State Examination score of 13-26) were recru
212 f 8 patients with AD with an average (+/-SD) Mini-Mental State Examination score of 14.7+/-8.4 (mean
213 portional hazards models included a baseline Mini-Mental State Examination score of 17 or less, basel
214 han subjects with undetectable SAA to have a Mini-Mental State Examination score of 24 (the sample's
215 tremor score of 3 or greater for any limb, a Mini-Mental State Examination score of 25 or less, a his
216 tudy, were cognitively normal at baseline (a Mini-Mental State Examination score of 26 or higher) wit
217                                 A decline in Mini-Mental State Examination score of 3 points over 6 m
218 ssions-Severity agitation score >/=4), and a Mini-Mental State Examination score of 8 to 28 participa
219  in instrumental activities of daily living, Mini-Mental State Examination score of less than 20, and
220 anxiety score, and a 1-point increase in the Mini-Mental State Examination score was associated with
221    Seventy-five subjects with mild dementia (Mini-Mental State Examination score>/=18) underwent a co
222 derate-severe, mild, or none, as assessed by Mini-Mental State Examination score); and disability in
223 n disease and baseline cognitive impairment (Mini-Mental State Examination score, 10-26).
224 -AV-45 was performed on 16 patients with AD (Mini-Mental State Examination score, 19.3 +/- 3.1; mean
225                                 Based on the Mini-Mental State Examination score, 21 patients were in
226 mpairment without general cognitive decline (Mini-Mental State Examination score, 25 +/- 1) at the ti
227 ) and 16 cognitively healthy controls (HCs) (Mini-Mental State Examination score, 29.8 +/- 0.45; mean
228 ome predictor variables, for example gender, Mini-Mental State Examination score, and apathy/indiffer
229 y rate-corrected at cluster level; age, sex, Mini-Mental State Examination score, and center as nuisa
230 AD diagnosis, severity of AD measured by the Mini-Mental State Examination score, and interaction wit
231  low cognitive function (r = 0.48), based on Mini-Mental State Examination score, and were similar ac
232 ve performance (per SD increment of Modified Mini-Mental State Examination score, aOR = 0.74, 95% CI:
233 ments included patient demographic features, Mini-Mental State Examination score, Blessed Dementia Ra
234 as having AD (54% female, mean [SD], 67 [8]; Mini-Mental State Examination score, mean [SD], 21 [5]),
235 lar dementia (37% female, mean [SD], 76 [9]; Mini-Mental State Examination score, mean [SD], 24 [4]),
236  complaints (42% female, mean [SD], 59 [59]; Mini-Mental State Examination score, mean [SD], 28 [2]).
237 s controlling for age, gender, education and Mini-Mental State Examination score, patients with behav
238 variates such as age, gender, education, and Mini-Mental State Examination score.
239 uid amyloid-beta1-42 was associated with low Mini-Mental State Examination score.
240 ed age at onset, disease duration, and final Mini-Mental State Examination score.
241                    Normal performance on the Mini-Mental State Examination (score >/= 24) was require
242 s, cognitive performance, as measured by the Mini-Mental State Examination (score range, 0-30), was b
243  Barthel index (rho = -0.305, p = 0.001) and Mini Mental State Examination scores (rho = -0.314, p =
244 ese associations were independent of age and Mini Mental State Examination scores.
245 by Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes and Mini Mental State Examination scores.
246 r AD (95% CI, 2.54-5.82; P < .001) and lower Mini-Mental State Examination scores (-1.605; range, -3.
247 isease progression as reflected by decreased Mini-Mental State Examination scores (beta = -1.077, P <
248 was associated with higher baseline Modified Mini-Mental State Examination scores (p < 0.001) and a c
249      We found a positive correlation between Mini-Mental State Examination scores and cortical thickn
250 otein-binding was positively correlated with Mini-Mental State Examination scores and grey matter vol
251 ppocampal volumes, and a trend towards lower Mini-Mental State Examination scores and higher Clinical
252 ment Scale (cognitive behaviour section) and mini-mental state examination scores as measures of gene
253 xcluding participants with baseline Modified Mini-Mental State Examination scores at or below the scr
254 eened) individuals with mild to moderate AD (Mini-Mental State Examination scores between 14 and 26,
255 and women (n = 132) older than 60 years with Mini-Mental State Examination scores greater than 26 and
256  high phosphorylated tau correlated with low Mini-Mental State Examination scores in Alzheimer's dise
257                                          The Mini-Mental State Examination scores in the highest tert
258                                              Mini-Mental State Examination scores in the hypothermic
259 0.44; P=0.13), significantly correlated with mini-mental state examination scores in the subset of ca
260 um and incident dementia and (ii) decline in Mini-Mental State Examination scores in the whole group.
261 ess, but adjusting for years of education or Mini-Mental State Examination scores more completely rem
262 nd Yahr scale) was 3.3 (SD=0.9), and all had Mini-Mental State Examination scores of 24 or higher.
263 al blood flow was not correlated with either mini-mental state examination scores or age.
264 l participants were functionally normal with Mini-Mental State Examination scores ranging between 26
265                            Participants with Mini-Mental State Examination scores that declined by 3
266 ts with a diagnosis of probable AD had their mini-mental state examination scores transformed into ti
267 als with mild to moderate Alzheimer disease (Mini-Mental State Examination scores, 14-26) was conduct
268                           Using the Modified Mini-Mental State Examination scores, we assessed normat
269 ual Retention Test, Trail Making Test B, and Mini-Mental State Examination scores.
270 erity of impairment in AD as indicated using Mini-Mental State Examination scores.
271 ed a significant association between SAA and Mini-Mental State Examination scores.
272 ges, and wakefulness after sleep onset); and Mini-Mental State Examination scores.
273 obal Impression Change (CGI-C), Standardised Mini Mental State Examination, Severe Impairment Battery
274                          Scales included the Mini-Mental State Examination, Short Test of Mental Stat
275 case, diminished performance on the Modified Mini-Mental State Examination should be more common in p
276 ease (a score of 5 to 13 on the Standardized Mini-Mental State Examination [SMMSE, on which scores ra
277 of Parkinson's disease, including cognition (Mini-Mental State Examination, Stroop Test, Letter-Digit
278 ange in neuropsychometric test scores on the Mini-Mental State Examination, the cognitive and modifie
279                        For the commonly used Mini-Mental State Examination, the median LR for a posit
280        Administration of the multiple-choice Mini Mental State Examination to ICU patients was straig
281 e Assessment Scale-Cognitive (ADAS-Cog), the Mini-Mental State Examination (to assess cognition), the
282                          The multiple-choice Mini Mental State Examination tool's role in neurorehabi
283  important decline (> or =2 SDs) in Modified Mini-Mental State Examination total score (6.7%) compare
284 ognitive function was evaluated by using the Mini-Mental State Examination Trail-Making Test B, and c
285 ual Retention Test, Trail Making Test B, and Mini-Mental State Examination up to 5 times over 9 years
286 for each cognitive domain: global cognition (Mini Mental State Examination); verbal fluency (Isaac's
287                                            A Mini-Mental State Examination was also performed.
288 random assignment, the baseline score on the Mini-Mental State Examination was higher in the placebo
289  of cognitive functioning (measured with the Mini-Mental State Examination) was generally the best pr
290 ly, cognitive impairment, as measured by the Mini-Mental State Examination, was correlated with sleep
291 ni Mental State Examination and the standard Mini Mental State Examination were compared across three
292 rarater reliabilities of the multiple-choice Mini Mental State Examination were tested on both intuba
293                   Adapted Cognitive Exam and Mini-Mental State Examination were performed by 76 diffe
294             Age, race, gender, education and Mini-Mental State Examination were significant predictor
295 ation (> or =3-point decline on the modified Mini-Mental State Examination) were determined by logist
296                 Associations with cognition (Mini-Mental State Examination) were investigated by usin
297 ly living), and cognitive function (modified Mini-Mental State Examination) were measured at hospital
298 core of between 5 and 13 on the Standardised Mini-Mental State Examination) were recruited from 15 se
299 ests--Trails B, Digit Symbol, and a modified Mini-Mental State Examination--were administered at base
300  measured by using a battery of 7 tests: the Mini-Mental State Examination, word list learning, digit

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。
 
Page Top