戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。

今後説明を表示しない

[OK]

コーパス検索結果 (left1)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1                                              ORR (67% vs 49%, P = .08) and complete response (CR) or
2                                              ORR and median PFS were similar in patients with T790M-p
3                                              ORR in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population was 17% (
4                                              ORR in the liver was improved with the addition of SIRT
5                                              ORR of 97% and >/=VGPR 73% were seen in patients not ref
6                                              ORR was 28% (nine of 32) in patients with any degree of
7                                              ORR was 37.5% with a complete response rate of 12.5%, me
8                                              ORR was 41% (7/17); 6 additional patients (35%) had stab
9                                              ORR was 46% (95% CI, 34 to 57) for cabozantinib versus 1
10                                              ORR was 6% (five of 83) for glembatumumab vedotin versus
11                                              ORR was 60% and was generally consistent across subgroup
12                                              ORR was 66% (EBd) vs 63% (Bd).
13                                              ORR was evaluated on the basis of PD-L1 IC expression (I
14                                              ORR was higher with mutations in DNMT3A and lower for SR
15                                              ORRs were similar in patients who did and patients who d
16 patients with follicular lymphoma (n = 149), ORR seemed higher for obinutuzumab than rituximab (44.6%
17 vating the facet- and potential-dependent 4e-ORR on Au in alkaline solutions.
18 ein we report the discovery of a dominant 4e-ORR over the whole potential range on {310} surface of A
19  Four-electron oxygen reduction reaction (4e-ORR), a key pathway in energy conversion, is preferred o
20 ere exceptionally capable to catalyze the 4e-ORR in alkaline solution, though limited within a narrow
21 alone, with both being superior in achieving ORR compared with other treatments.
22                    Use of IMs did not affect ORR, although treatment-related select AEs of any grade
23 age, revealing its excellent potential as an ORR electrocatalyst in fuel cells.
24 hat high ORR (eg, statistically exceeding an ORR of 30%) is an appropriate end point for single-arm t
25 therapy following KI discontinuation with an ORR to subsequent KI at 50% and a median PFS of 11.9 mon
26     PFS varied by histology ( P < .001), and ORR was higher in patients with significant papillary (s
27 he ORR ratio (1.09; 90% CI, 0.974-1.211) and ORR difference (5.53; 95% CI, -3.08 to 14.04) were withi
28 rial-level PFS hazard ratio (HR), OS HR, and ORR odds ratio were analyzed using a weighted linear reg
29  not significantly different between LRR and ORR.
30 duration of response, 8.3 vs 2.4 months; and ORR, 32% vs 15%).
31 activity of our carbon foam for both OER and ORR independently, in a three-electrode configuration, a
32 increased number of active sites for OER and ORR.
33 tu catalysts on a carbon support for OER and ORR.
34      There was no association between OS and ORR (R(2) = 0.09; 95% CI, 0 to 0.33) and OS and PFS (R(2
35 ectively) had markedly superior PFS, OS, and ORR compared with patients with right-sided tumors (n =
36 ectively) had markedly superior PFS, OS, and ORR compared with patients with right-sided tumors (n =
37 ed a significant clinical benefit in PFS and ORR over standard-of-care sunitinib as first-line therap
38 el analysis, the association between PFS and ORR was strong (R(2) = 0.89; 95% CI, 0.80 to 0.98).
39          The primary endpoint was safety and ORR.
40 alytic performance than the state of the art ORR catalyst (Pt/C) and the oxygen evolution reaction ca
41 atalytic performance to the state-of-the-art ORR catalyst (Pt/C) and OER catalyst (Ir/C).
42 achieved in relation with the graphene based ORR catalysts applicable for MFCs, still their collectiv
43 MFCs, in which the efforts on graphene based ORR catalysts are highly imperative.
44 ental strategies of competent graphene based ORR catalysts, which are not only applicable for MFCs bu
45 e research efforts devoted on graphene based ORR catalysts.
46 ows linear kinetics; characteristic of being ORR rate limited.
47                                     The best ORR activity is measured with the catalyst at a size of
48 erial, denoted CPM-99Fe/C, exhibits the best ORR activity, comparable to benchmark 20% Pt/C in alkali
49               The Mo-Pt3Ni/C showed the best ORR performance, with a specific activity of 10.3 mA/cm(
50 artial response with lymphocytosis, the best ORR was 96.7%.
51                       An association between ORR and OS and between PFS and OS was not established, p
52 level, there is a strong association between ORR and PFS.
53 electrocatalysts with high activity for both ORR and OER reactions and their streamlined coupling pro
54 nd good electrocatalytic properties for both ORR and OER.
55 tentials similar to the counterparts of Pt/C ORR electrode and IrO2 OER electrode.
56  provide a promising avenue to develop cheap ORR catalysts from inexpensive, scalable and biological
57                      For patients with CMML, ORR was higher for azacitidine plus lenalidomide versus
58 guration with the nonprecious pCNT@Fe@GL/CNF ORR electrode and Ni-Fe LDH/NiF oxygen evolution reactio
59 lus 20 mg dexamethasone twice weekly cohort (ORR = 50%).
60      Among evaluable patients, the confirmed ORR was 10%; disease control rate (DCR) was 45%, and med
61                                The confirmed ORR was 23% (12 of 52), including four ongoing complete
62                                 In contrast, ORR pathways on single-crystalline facets of shaped nano
63  consistent with the well-known pH-dependent ORR selectivity catalyzed by graphitic carbon materials.
64  90%-96%) and ibrutinib in relapsed disease (ORR 30%-55%), the Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncolo
65                                       During ORR, a peak potential at 0.433 V was recorded, which is
66 nfigurations of the jagged nanowires enhance ORR activity versus more relaxed surfaces.
67             More importantly, their enhanced ORR performances are also demonstrated by virtue of thei
68 lays a significant role in further enhancing ORR performance.
69 n of the Shoup-Szabo equation for extracting ORR mass transport parameters using thin ionomer films w
70 vity comparable to IrO2 for OER and Pt/C for ORR, respectively, along with remarkable long term stabi
71 heoretical first principles calculations for ORR and OER in PEM based systems.
72 viously shown to be excellent candidates for ORR in terms of both activity and long-term stability, f
73 etal and nitrogen doped carbon catalysts for ORR reveal a heterogeneous composition.
74  11.5 milliamperes per square centimeter for ORR (at 0.9 volts versus reversible hydrogen electrode),
75 astuzumab) and -15% to 15% with a 95% CI for ORR difference.
76 undaries were 0.81 to 1.24 with a 90% CI for ORR ratio (proposed biosimilar/trastuzumab) and -15% to
77 d RuO2 as a bifunctional electrocatalyst for ORR and OER, and hold a promise as efficient air electro
78 ials' high-efficiency as electrocatalyst for ORR.
79 trode made from the same electrocatalyst for ORR.
80 arbon-based, metal-free electrocatalysts for ORR and various defects in metal oxides/selenides for OE
81 to be robust metal-free electrocatalysts for ORR in the above-mentioned energy devices.
82 mong the most efficient electrocatalysts for ORR.
83 ives to costly Pt-based electrocatalysts for ORR.
84 velopment of advanced carbon-based NPMCs for ORR in the near future.
85 ter activity and much enhanced stability for ORR and ethanol-oxidation reaction (EOR) than those of d
86  onset potential (1.43 V for OER and 1 V for ORR vs RHE) to that of IrO2 and Pt/C, respectively.
87 oped carbon material is promising metal-free ORR catalyst for fuel cells and capacitor electrode mate
88                               In this group, ORR was 40%, with 27% of patients achieving >/=VGPR.
89 ligible trials were identified; 542 arms had ORR data available for 294 regimens.
90 ast, nanoframes which exhibit extremely high ORR activity simultaneously demonstrate more significant
91  Pt (110) facets of the nanoplates have high ORR specific and mass activities that reach 7.8 milliamp
92              For single-agent regimens, high ORR was associated with regulatory approval; this relati
93                   Our data suggest that high ORR (eg, statistically exceeding an ORR of 30%) is an ap
94         This work demonstrates that the high ORR activity of the Pt3Ni hollow nanoframes depends on s
95 ients with high BCL2 expression had a higher ORR (94% [17/18]) than patients with low BCL2 expression
96 ependent review panel that measured a higher ORR for obinutuzumab (44.6% v 26.7%; P = .01).
97 treated patients showed significantly higher ORR (72% v 55%; P = .0038), longer time to first dose re
98 ivity, where a approximately 25 times higher ORR activity than for commercial Pt/C (2.7 A mgPt(-1) at
99          BRAF/MEK was associated with higher ORR (OR, 2.00; 95% CrI, 1.64-2.45) compared with BRAF al
100 AEs of any grade were associated with higher ORR, but no progression-free survival benefit.
101  (DFT) calculations reveal that the improved ORR activity on the PdCuM NPs stems from the catalytical
102  The primary phase II end point was improved ORR.
103                            The difference in ORR selectivity for H2O vs H2O2 depends on the thermodyn
104  accompanied by a significant enhancement in ORR activity.
105 alysts, respectively, and are also stable in ORR conditions, making them among the most efficient ele
106 onto the Mn-graphene nanocomposite increased ORR performance significantly, with a peak potential shi
107 t OV exhibited the highest diffusion-limited ORR current (5.5 mA cm(-2) ) among a series of lambda-Mn
108  the faradaic efficiencies reported for many ORR catalytic systems.
109                                      Maximum ORR and mean ORR were significantly associated with regu
110         Cu nanoparticles produce the maximum ORR rate under these conditions.
111  1 cancer type, the mean ORR and the maximum ORR statistically exceeded were calculated, and their as
112                         Maximum ORR and mean ORR were significantly associated with regulatory approv
113 nation of agents for 1 cancer type, the mean ORR and the maximum ORR statistically exceeded were calc
114 rmation process through correlating measured ORR activity with the change of chemical bonds in precur
115 ute for the development of nonprecious metal ORR catalysts from stable metalloporphyrinic MOFs.
116 results from supported and soluble molecular ORR electrocatalysts must be interpreted with caution, a
117 HR (R2 = 0.19; 95% CI, 0.03-0.49) or 6-month ORR and OS HR (R2 = 0.05; 95% CI, 0.0001-0.31).
118 ths and OS HR but not 9-month PFS or 6-month ORR milestones and OS HR.
119 long-term durability of the bifunctional OER/ORR electrocatalyst.
120 s application to the mechanistic analysis of ORR.
121 f S(2-) and showed insignificant decrease of ORR activity for the Fe-AAPyr.
122                    The recent development of ORR electrocatalysts with novel structures and compositi
123 ol experiments show that such enhancement of ORR by the AuNC is specific to nanoclusters and not to p
124                                Evaluation of ORR thresholds between 20% and 60% as potential trial en
125 vity, strategies behind the modifications of ORR catalysts and update the research efforts devoted on
126 review is to outline the significant role of ORR catalysts, factors influencing the ORR activity, str
127 d experimental results on the selectivity of ORR catalyzed by these materials.
128 ed NSCLC with a large magnitude of effect on ORR may have a large PFS effect.
129 ogic outcomes of laparoscopic (LRR) vs open (ORR) rectal resection for rectal cancer.
130 etastatic uLMS failed to improve PFS, OS, or ORR.
131  positive for T790M who had better outcomes (ORR, 69%; PFS, 16.5 months) as well as a subset of patie
132 ative plasma had overall favorable outcomes (ORR, 46%; median PFS, 8.2 months), tumor genotyping dist
133 ients negative for T790M with poor outcomes (ORR, 25%; PFS, 2.8 months).
134 he oxygen dissociation step from the overall ORR.
135                    In 60 evaluable patients, ORR was 48% (95% confidence interval [CI], 35-62).
136 ilar in patients with T790M-positive plasma (ORR, 63%; PFS, 9.7 months) or T790M-positive tumor (ORR,
137 ved 90% enhancement or 40% suppression in Pt ORR activity under compression or tension, respectively,
138 R) in four patients [(overall response rate (ORR) = 9%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3% to 22%)].
139 tion of response, and overall response rate (ORR) according to the presence of del(17p) compared with
140 objectives included objective response rate (ORR) and 24-week progression-free survival (PFS) rate; o
141                       Overall response rate (ORR) and minimal residual disease (MRD) by next-generati
142 ry endpoints included overall response rate (ORR) and overall survival (OS).
143                     Objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed i
144 dds ratios (OR) for objective response rate (ORR) and serious adverse events.
145 ew committee-assessed overall response rate (ORR) by 2007 International Working Group criteria.
146 y outcome was week 24 overall response rate (ORR) defined as complete or partial response.
147                     Objective response rate (ORR) is an increasingly important end point for accelera
148 st efficacy with an objective response rate (ORR) of 4% and clinical benefit rate of 21%.
149 itor, demonstrated an overall response rate (ORR) of 60% in advSM but biomarkers predictive of respon
150 e was to evaluate the overall response rate (ORR) of CMP.
151 uate the safety and objective response rate (ORR) of imiquimod in combination with systemic albumin b
152                       Overall response rate (ORR) to first KI was 62% (complete response 14%).
153 r BV plus DTIC, the objective response rate (ORR) was 100% and the complete remission (CR) rate was 6
154                   The overall response rate (ORR) was 21% (14/66), and 15% achieved very good partial
155 uable population, the overall response rate (ORR) was 56% (29/52) and was similar between the 10 mg/k
156                   The overall response rate (ORR) was 67% (44/66); 42% achieved very good partial res
157                 The objective response rate (ORR) was 92%, with 73% achieving complete remission.
158 or number of doses, objective response rate (ORR) was significantly higher in patients who experience
159 erall survival, and objective response rate (ORR) were 11.0 months, 18.5 months, and 29%, respectivel
160  survival (OS), and objective response rate (ORR) were assessed according to tumor location and treat
161  survival (OS), and objective response rate (ORR) were assessed according to tumor location and treat
162 s were calculated for overall response rate (ORR) within 6 months, 9-month progression-free survival
163 y end points included overall response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), progression-free survi
164                     Objective response rate (ORR), overall survival, and safety were secondary end po
165 t was composite CNS objective response rate (ORR), requiring all of the following: >/= 50% reduction
166 verall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), response duration (RD), time to treatment failure
167 primary end point was overall response rate (ORR).
168 primary end point was overall response rate (ORR).
169 primary end point was overall response rate (ORR).
170 e primary outcome was overall response rate (ORR).
171 nts were safety and objective response rate (ORR).
172 int was safety, and objective response rate (ORR, confirmed) was a key secondary end point.
173  were evaluable for objective response rate (ORR; 15%; 95% CI, 7% to 26%).
174 is is generally poor (overall response rate [ORR] 0% to 25%; 2-year overall survival 15%).
175  follicular lymphoma (overall response rate [ORR] 90%-96%) and ibrutinib in relapsed disease (ORR 30%
176                    Objective response rates (ORRs) at any site were similar (68.1% v 76.4% in control
177 tat produce superior overall response rates (ORRs) to azacitidine is not known.
178 ction was significant (ratio of odds ratios [ORR] 1.96, 95% CI 1.11-3.46; p=0.02).
179 eduction reaction/oxygen evolution reaction (ORR/OER) catalytic activities of p-orbital heteroatom-do
180 specific and mass oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) activities with improvement factors of 51.1 and 34.
181 ecessary to boost oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) activity in core/shell M/platinum (Pt) catalysts (w
182  and a comparable oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) activity to that of Pt/C as well as a better stabil
183  of Pt during the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) affects the performance and economic viability of f
184 ytic site for the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) and (ii) demonstration of competitive PEFC performa
185 stability for the oxygen-reduction reaction (ORR) and liquid fuel oxidation reaction is very importan
186 catalysts for the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) and other electrocatalytic processes requires detai
187               The oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) and oxygen evolution reaction (OER) are cornerstone
188 catalysts for the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) and oxygen evolution reaction (OER) in fuel cells o
189 catalysts for the oxygen-reduction reaction (ORR) and oxygen-evolution reaction (OER) is critical for
190 is, including the oxygen-reduction reaction (ORR) and oxygen-evolution reaction (OER), is a critical
191 taneously for the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) and the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) is currentl
192 ns (OH(-)) by the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) at a diffusion-controlled rate in aerated phosphate
193 l modification of oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) catalysts to improve the maximum volumetric power d
194 as precursors for oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) catalysts.
195 irst study of the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) catalyzed by a cofacial porphyrin scaffold accessed
196 c activity toward oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) compared to Pt/C catalyst in both alkaline and acid
197 ctrocatalysis for oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) for proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs) ar
198 w kinetics of the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) impede the widespread uptake of low-temperature fue
199 materials for the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) in acidic media, which is crucial for large-scale d
200 a reactant in the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) in alkaline media, an adequate supply of water is r
201 s very active for oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) in alkaline media.
202  for the cathodic oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) in microbial fuel cells (MFCs).
203 ctro-catalyst for oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) in proton exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cells, oxyge
204 tive site for the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) is different under acidic and alkaline conditions.
205 efficiency of the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) is furnished from a systematic electrochemical stud
206               The oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) is of great importance for various renewable energy
207 athode towards an oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) is one of the high-priority research directions for
208  work reports the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) kinetics of metal nanoparticle catalysts between 50
209 of the multi-step oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) makes it difficult to investigate the oxygen dissoc
210  We find that the oxygen-reduction reaction (ORR) on CNTs initially produces LiO2, which subsequently
211 s results for the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) on Pt UME-NPEs in 0.1 M H2SO4 are also shown.
212 esulting from the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) or hydrogen peroxide reduction on platinum, has bee
213  activity for the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) requires optimization of both the specific activity
214         Here, the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) was studied under proton diffusion-limited conditio
215  that facilitates the O2 reduction reaction (ORR), a PCET process important in fuel cells and O2 redu
216 c activity in the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR), as evidenced by an onset potential of +0.97 V, exc
217 rsion through the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR), carbon-based metal-free catalysts have also been d
218 EMFC), namely the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR), necessitates an accurate and detailed structural u
219 ctivities for the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR), oxygen evolution reaction (OER), and hydrogen evol
220 actions including oxygen reduction reaction (ORR), oxygen evolution reaction (OER), and hydrogen evol
221  as a support for oxygen reduction reaction (ORR)-active ordered intermetallic Fe3 Pt NPs.
222 catalysts for the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR).
223  activity for the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR).
224 ocatalyst for the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR).
225 ocatalyst for the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR).
226  the two-electron oxygen reduction reaction (ORR); however, the chemical potential of H2 replaces an
227 molecular oxygen (oxygen reduction reaction, ORR), which makes them fuel-cell cathode catalysts with
228 he oxygen reduction and evolution reactions (ORR and OER) are vital for the performances of rechargea
229 or oxygen reduction and evolution reactions (ORR and OER) in energy conversion devices.
230 trocatalysts for oxygen reduction reactions (ORR) in fuel cells.
231 w the contributions of the oxygen reduction (ORR) and the oxygen evolution (OER) half-reactions on th
232 tic search was used to identify the reported ORR for each eligible treatment arm that had been presen
233  atomic Fe catalyst has achieved respectable ORR activity in challenging acidic media (0.5 M H2SO4),
234                                   Respective ORRs were 20%, 22%, and 20%.
235 R activity) and Pt/C (92 % vs. 78 % retained ORR activity after 10 h running) in alkaline electrolyte
236 of the polydopamine-coated material revealed ORR occurring via 4.14 and 4.00 electrons, respectively.
237                 Secondary end point revealed ORR of 12% (10 of 83) versus 12% (five of 41) overall, a
238                     Moreover, the reversible ORR/OER activity trend for a wide variety of M-C3N4 comp
239                    Unplanned analysis showed ORR of 18% (five of 28) versus 0% (0 of 11) in patients
240 h azacitidine-based combinations had similar ORR to azacitidine monotherapy, although patients with C
241 ombination of PomCyDex results in a superior ORR and PFS compared with PomDex in patients with lenali
242 ted with polydopamine, resulting in superior ORR activity compared to the uncoated PDA structures.
243 potential trial end points demonstrated that ORR statistically exceeding 30% with a single agent had
244                                          The ORR activity of the material was further improved by int
245                                          The ORR activity versus the bulk lattice parameter follows a
246                                          The ORR activity was investigated using chemical and electro
247                                          The ORR for G-FC was 62% (13/21), with 10% CR and 14% CRi, i
248                                          The ORR for patients with Fuhrman grade 4 and/or sarcomatoid
249                                          The ORR for the entire cohort was 95%, and the 12-month prog
250                                          The ORR rates of Ag, Au, Cu, Ni, Pd, Rh and Pt measured at 6
251                                          The ORR ratio (1.09; 90% CI, 0.974-1.211) and ORR difference
252                                          The ORR was 100% in patients with del(17p)/TP53 mutations an
253                                          The ORR was 31.0% (95% CI, 17.6 to 47.1) in 42 response-eval
254                                          The ORR was 32.6%, and the median DOR was 7.4 months.
255                                          The ORR was 38.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 23-54.8%) a
256                                          The ORR was 52% in 42 evaluable lenalidomide-refractory pati
257                                          The ORR was 67% (23% complete response), with a median durat
258 ment of electrocatalysts for the OER and the ORR is of essential importance.
259                For BV plus bendamustine, the ORR was 100% and the CR rate was 88%.
260                          When catalyzing the ORR, FeNx Cy moieties are more selective than Fe particl
261                             In contrast, the ORR activity is mostly unaffected by the ligand chemistr
262 carfilzomib plus low-dose dexamethasone, the ORR was 55% with a safety profile comparable to that of
263 polarized sufficiently negative to drive the ORR or H2O2 reduction on the platinum surface, mainly us
264  The nanoporous Pt surface formed during the ORR was visualized by AFM and high-resolution SEM, which
265 at moderately negative potentials during the ORR.
266  is then applied to successfully explain the ORR/OER activities of other transition-metal spinels, in
267 to that of precious metal benchmarks for the ORR and OER in alkaline media.
268  electrocatalysts have been designed for the ORR or the OER; however, the origin of the advanced acti
269 ontributes to the excellent activity for the ORR.
270 its excellent activity and stability for the ORR/OER in alkaline media.
271 dral site is the activity descriptor for the ORR/OER of spinels, consolidating the role of electron o
272         These radicals are produced from the ORR byproduct, hydrogen peroxide, through a 1 electron r
273 of transferred electrons (n) involved in the ORR was >3.8, indicating a dominant quasi-4-electron pat
274  the addition of dexamethasone increased the ORR with all responses of >/=partial response occurring
275 le of ORR catalysts, factors influencing the ORR activity, strategies behind the modifications of ORR
276 up of 23 months (range, 1 to 43 months), the ORR was 38% for patients receiving azacitidine, 49% for
277 y-evaluable patients treated at the MTD, the ORR was 90%.
278             An in-depth investigation of the ORR in acid reveals a behavior which is similar to that
279 old surfaces exhibit high sensitivity of the ORR pathway to its atomic structures.
280 By comparing theoretical calculations of the ORR selectivity at a well-defined graphene nanostructure
281              Here, a descriptor study on the ORR/OER of spinel oxides is presented.
282 e prior therapies (range, two to seven), the ORR was 19%; median response duration, 6.0 months (95% C
283 en applied to acidic electrolytes, shows the ORR preferring the two-electron pathway, consistent with
284                          We have studied the ORR on eight platinum (Pt)-lanthanide and Pt-alkaline ea
285 the assignment of descriptors related to the ORR activity and stability.
286 omprehensive framework for understanding the ORR and PCET processes in general.
287 ate of the rate constant associated with the ORR.
288                                          The ORRs were 70% and 49% (P = .03) for patients treated wit
289 containing more elements which contribute to ORR activity.
290 superior electrocatalytic activities towards ORR, besides excellent stability and good methanol toler
291 utstanding electrocatalytic activity towards ORR comparable to the commercial Pt/C catalyst in neutra
292 %; PFS, 9.7 months) or T790M-positive tumor (ORR, 62%; PFS, 9.7 months) results.
293 RR and 79 (6.1%) of 1292 patients undergoing ORR (RR, 1.17; 95% CI, 0.89-1.53; P = .26; I2 = 0%) in 9
294 R and 104 (10.4%) of 998 patients undergoing ORR (RR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.05-1.64; P = .02; I2 = 0%) in 5
295 ized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing LRR vs ORR.
296 tions in DNMT3A and lower for SRSF2, whereas ORR duration improved with fewer mutations.
297 her in patients undergoing LRR compared with ORR.
298 it, including uRCC, where it correlated with ORR (43% v 11%), median PFS (12.9 v 1.9 months), and ove
299 95, to June 30, 2016, that compared LRR with ORR for histologically proven rectal cancer in adult pat
300                                In this work, ORR mass transport behavior is reported for methylated h

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。
 
Page Top