1 OSCEs were videotaped and reviewed by two faculty member
2 jective Structured Clinical Examination (
ACS OSCE).
3 The
ACS OSCE is now available for broader implementation.
4 The
ACS OSCE was developed to evaluate and help remediate reside
5 The
ACS OSCE was successfully implemented across diverse institu
6 nts improved markedly, as demonstrated by
an OSCE using a live simulated "patient" and manikin.
7 a final third- or fourth-year
comprehensive OSCE; 53 require a passing OSCE score for graduation.
8 m objective structured clinical
examination (
OSCE) assessment on the examination of shoulder and/or k
9 m Objective Structured Clinical
Examination (
OSCE) immediately after the workshop; the other 2 groups
10 Objective structured clinical
examination (
OSCE) is a key part of medical student assessment.
11 e Objective Structured Clinical
Examination (
OSCE) nutrition score was compared between graduating cl
12 ) Objective Structured Clinical
Examination (
OSCE) rating to assess performance of Registered Nurses
13 n Objective Structured Clinical
Examination (
OSCE).
14 e objective structured clinical
examination (
OSCE).
15 n objective structured clinical
examination [
OSCE]) to assess clinical skills is variable; 82 schools
16 objective structured clinical
examinations (
OSCEs).
17 ents 0.195 (p=0.002) and 0.116 (p=0.002)
for OSCE and mentor grading respectively.
18 ' decision-making that were not evident
from OSCE scoring alone.
19 Identical OSCE scenarios were administered to 2 cohorts of surgica
20 This documented improvement
in OSCE performance reflects the value of a professionalism
21 allocated group performed better on the
knee OSCE than the non-CD group (adjusted P = 0.040), but the
22 nt by videotaped OSCE is as reliable as
live OSCE assessment.
23 eliable and offers some advantages over
live OSCE including more efficient use of examiners' time, in
24 Student performance
on OSCE stations for shoulder or knee examinations was asse
25 end of Year one clinical practice
outcomes (
OSCE and mentor grading).
26 nalysis of variance was conducted of
overall OSCE professionalism scores (% well done) as the depende
27 hose in the comparison cohort on the
overall OSCE (65.4% vs 60.4%; 5.1% difference; 95% confidence in
28 ear comprehensive OSCE; 53 require a
passing OSCE score for graduation.
29 the other 2 groups were tested with the
same OSCE 8 months later.
30 The
same OSCEs were administered to a comparison cohort of studen
31 The mean (+/-1
SEM)
OSCE nutrition score significantly improved after the im
32 Mean values for the
shoulder OSCE checklist were 17.9 by live assessment and 17.4 by
33 em knee station formed part of the
summative OSCE.
34 residents from 7 institutions completed
the OSCE.
35 bility between live and video scores for
the OSCE checklists.
36 group performed significantly better on
the OSCE (P = 0.002) and C-Log (P = 0.005) than the non-CD g
37 Video OSCE has the potential to be reliable and offers some ad
38 o determine whether assessment by
videotaped OSCE is as reliable as live OSCE assessment.