戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。

今後説明を表示しない

[OK]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 for the octamer motif-binding protein (OCT-1/OCT-2).
2 he CD36 promoter refractory to activation by Oct-2.
3 oexpression of Oct-4 but not either Oct-1 or Oct-2.
4  than the closely related POU domain protein Oct-2.
5 wn to interact with POU domains of Oct-1 and Oct-2.
6 ple of a gene activated in neuronal cells by Oct-2.
7  groove within the binding site for Oct-1 or Oct-2.
8 s but MDA-MB-231 also express high levels of Oct-2.
9 ithin the COOH-terminal activation domain of Oct-2.
10  represses neuronal differentiation, whereas Oct-2.2 activates neuron formation.
11 ent with a role in neuronal differentiation, Oct-2.2 expression is induced during differentiation, an
12 ts and Freedoms, came into full operation on Oct 2, 2000.
13          688 patients were recruited between Oct 2, 2008, and July 11, 2011, of which 564 patients wh
14                                      Between Oct 2, 2009, and June 22, 2011, we recruited 15 patients
15  79 patients were enrolled in the study from Oct 2, 2009, to May 31, 2012.
16  completed all four 72 h study stays between Oct 2, 2013, and July 29, 2014, and consumed all the foo
17                    Between May 15, 2012, and Oct 2, 2013, we did an open-label phase 2 trial in patie
18                  Between March 13, 2012, and Oct 2, 2013, we randomly assigned 515 participants: 260
19                                      Between Oct 2, 2014, and Nov 30, 2015, we recruited 807 people w
20 ression experiments demonstrate that isoform Oct-2.4 represses neuronal differentiation, whereas Oct-
21 is study, we show that MiR-210 is induced by Oct-2, a key transcriptional mediator of B cell activati
22                             We conclude that Oct-2 activates CD36 gene expression in mouse B cells vi
23 nce the B-cell-specific transcription factor Oct-2 also directly interacts with Z and inhibits its fu
24    Rather, Ikaros affected the expression of Oct-2 and Bcl-6, other transcription factors that direct
25 and immunoglobulin production, although both Oct-2 and Bob-1 are required for a proper immune respons
26 tigations have shown increased expression of Oct-2 and Bob-1 in lymphomas, and we observed greatly in
27        These include RFX, X2BP, NF-Y, CIITA, OCT-2 and Bob1.
28 dition, human hs4 enhancer activity required Oct-2 and correlated with expression of Oct coactivator
29                 The CD86-induced increase in Oct-2 and IgG1 was less when either Phb1/2 expression wa
30 eased expression of the transcription factor Oct-2 and its coactivator OCA-B (Oct coactivator from B
31 es that the POU2 family transcription factor Oct-2 and its cofactor Bob-1 have an important function
32 uring differentiation, and cells depleted of Oct-2 and its homolog Oct-1 have a reduced capacity to d
33 hat promote NF-kappaB activation to increase Oct-2 and mature IgG1 mRNA and protein expression, as we
34                  These results indicate that Oct-2 and OCA-B interact with the 3' enhancer in regulat
35 r selective Ig isotype expression defects in Oct-2 and OCA-B null mice.
36          We therefore examined the impact of Oct-2 and OCA-B on ORF50 activation.
37                          We show the lack of Oct-2 and OCA-B transcription factors to be responsible,
38 le transcription factors including Oct-1 and Oct-2 and the high mobility group (HMG) protein HMGI(Y)
39  those for the transcription factors IRF and Oct-2 and was coincident with activation and differentia
40 enter B cells and plasma cells, where HoxC4, Oct-2, and Oca-B expression correlates with hs1,2 activa
41                                 HoxC4, Oct-1/Oct-2, and Oca-B recruitment is negligible in pro-B cell
42 at MAT1 interacts with POU domains of Oct-1, Oct-2, and Oct-3 in vitro in a DNA-independent manner.
43                              When crossed to Oct-2(+/-) animals, transheterozygotes were recovered at
44 Gene-targeting studies showed that Oct-1 and Oct-2 are largely dispensable for B-cell development and
45                                    Oct-1 and Oct-2 are members of the POU homeodomain family of trans
46              Our results show that OCA-B and Oct-2 are regulatory partners in this process and that P
47 DNA-binding specificity mutants of Oct-1 and Oct-2 are used to examine their function from varied reg
48  cells and identify the C-terminal domain of Oct-2 as responsible for its unique function in these ce
49 his enhancer was specifically dependent upon Oct-2, as contrasted to the closely related Oct-1 transc
50 ranscription factors, Oct-1 (ubiquitous) and Oct-2 (B lineage specific), which bind the octamer motif
51                                              oct-2-/- B cells displayed aberrant behavior during acti
52          In MDA-MB-231 cells, both Oct-1 and Oct-2 bind the iNOS promoter, forming a higher-order com
53 equence because mutations that blocked Oct-1/Oct-2 binding also eliminated inhibition of the B29 prom
54  elements FROG, TOAD, and the A+T-rich Oct-1/Oct-2 binding motif may be essential for normal B cell d
55        Allele-specific suppression of mutant Oct-2 binding sites in this enhancer by a variant Oct-2
56  kinase A-dependent manner to cooperate with Oct-2 binding to the 3'-IgH enhancer.
57                                        Oct-1/Oct-2 binding was required for the inhibitory activity o
58          The cellular protein Oct-1, but not Oct-2, binds to the K-bZIP element in a sequence-specifi
59 d stable-transfection assays bound Oct-1 and Oct-2, both of which are expressed constitutively in mac
60 ictates the relative potency of Oct-1 versus Oct-2 bound to a promoter.
61 amer element can be bound by either Oct-1 or Oct-2 but requires the expression of Oct-2 to activate t
62 ding pattern formed by NF-kappaB, Oct-1, and Oct-2 (but not by Pax5).
63                              Inactivation of Oct-2 by gene targeting results in normal B cell develop
64                                    Oct-1 and Oct-2 can bind specifically to a site at base pair -55 i
65 ependent expression of genes like the B cell Oct 2 coactivator (OCA-B).
66 nstrate that CD36 is the first example of an Oct-2-dependent gene whose expression in B cells is inde
67 ing activity in vitro and the suppression of Oct-2-directed transcription in vivo.
68 ecursor B cells led to the loss of inducible Oct-2 DNA binding activity in vitro and the suppression
69 in, we have mutated specific residues in the Oct-2 domain in an attempt to probe their importance in
70                        Our data suggest that Oct-2 downregulation in infected cells would be favorabl
71    As Ig promoter-binding factors, Oct-1 and Oct-2 each work together with a B lymphocyte-specific co
72              At 300 degrees C, bicyclo[4.2.0]oct-2-ene (1) isomerizes to bicyclo[2.2.2]oct-2-ene (2)
73 50-300 degrees C, 8-exo-methoxybicyclo[4.2.0]oct-2-ene (1a) undergoes a [1,3] sigmatropic rearrangeme
74  At 275 degrees C, 8-exo-methylbicyclo[4.2.0]oct-2-ene (1a) undergoes a [1,3] sigmatropic rearrangeme
75 .0]oct-2-ene (1) isomerizes to bicyclo[2.2.2]oct-2-ene (2) via a formal [1,3] sigmatropic carbon migr
76 .1]octa-2,6-diene (7), tricyclo[3.2.1.0(4,6)]oct-2-ene (8), and tetracyclo[3.3.0.0(2,8)0(4,6)]octane
77 yl)-1-phenylamino-2-phenyl-cis-bicyclo[3.3.0]oct-2-ene 5 is described.
78 thermal reactions exhibited by bicyclo[4.2.0]oct-2-ene and 7-d and 8-d analogues at 300 degrees C hav
79 ner exploited a rigid 6,8-dioxabicyclo[3.2.1]oct-2-ene template.
80 r than [1,3] shifts leading to bicyclo[2.2.2]oct-2-ene, and the ratio of rate constants for [1,3] car
81 identified 8-benzyl-4-oxo-8-azabicyclo[3.2.1]oct-2-ene-6,7-dicarboxylic acid (SD-1008) as a micromola
82 series of substituted 2,3-diazabicyclo[2.2.2]oct-2-enes and some simpler model systems have been stud
83 tification of substituted cis-bicyclo[3.3.0]-oct-2-enes as small molecule agonists of subfamily V orp
84 nt to 5-exo- and 5-endo-methoxybicyclo[2.2.2]oct-2-enes, 2a and 2b, respectively, with a clear prefer
85 ropic rearrangement to 5-methylbicyclo[2.2.2]oct-2-enes, of which the orbital symmetry-allowed si pro
86  to diaryl substituted tricyclo[3.2.1.0(4,6)]oct-2-enes.
87  and phosphorylated RelA (p65) and increased Oct-2 expression and binding to the 3'-IgH enhancer, in
88 he level of NF-kappaB activation, as well as Oct-2 expression and binding to the 3'-IgH enhancer.
89                    Remarkably, if we sustain Oct-2 expression during cell fusion, all the other tissu
90           In the present study, we monitored Oct-2 expression in cells arrested for the activation of
91                              Manipulation of Oct-2 expression in these cell lines demonstrates that i
92 constitutively expressed in many cell types, Oct-2 expression is restricted primarily to B lymphocyte
93  nNOS gene regulatory region is activated by Oct-2 expression vectors upon cotransfection into both n
94 se two signaling pathways leads to increased Oct-2 expression, increased gene activity mediated by NF
95 phoma hybrids can be prevented by preserving Oct-2 expression.
96 d the relative binding affinity of Oct-1 and Oct-2 for the variant octamer motif and determined the f
97                    A 40 amino acid region of Oct-2 from amino acids 142 to 181 functions as an active
98 l defect correlated with a specific block to Oct-2 gene expression at the level of transcription, whe
99                                              OCT-2 immunostaining was primarily restricted in normal
100 s the expression of the transcription factor Oct-2 in a protein kinase C- and NF-kappaB1-dependent ma
101 e further evidence for an essential role for Oct-2 in Ig-secreting cells and identify the C-terminal
102  and we observed greatly increased levels of Oct-2 in lymphoma cells with the t(14;18) translocation.
103 ment and a stringent gene dosage effect with Oct-2 in mediating postnatal survival.
104  discussed in terms of the potential role of Oct-2 in regulating nNOS expression in the nervous syste
105 gh the variant octamer motif binds Oct-1 and Oct-2 in vitro with 5-fold lower affinity than the conse
106                                 Furthermore, Oct-2 induced bcl-2 promoter activity and mediated this
107                 These findings indicate that Oct-2 induction of MiR-210 provides a novel inhibitory m
108 e POU domain transcription factors Oct-1 and Oct-2 interact with the octamer element, a motif conserv
109                             We conclude that Oct-2 is required for B-1 cell maintenance and for norma
110                            Here we show that Oct-2 is required for normal humoral responses upon immu
111 itous and regulates a variety of genes while Oct-2 is restricted to B-cells and neurones.
112                             The finding that Oct-2 is under NF-kappaB control highlights an important
113         The POU domain transcription factor, Oct-2, is essential for the B cell-specific expression o
114 atly reduced in neuronal cell lines in which Oct-2 levels have been reduced by an antisense method, a
115 not detected in animals with a reconstituted oct-2-/- lymphoid system.
116  neuronal differentiation, and indicate that Oct-2 may serve as a binary switch to repress differenti
117                    In order to determine how Oct-2 mediates expression of CD36 in B cells, we cloned
118 homa hybrids established a critical role for Oct-2 not only in maintaining Ig gene expression, but in
119                                              oct-2-null T cell behavior was normal, implying a B cell
120 nhancer-binding proteins tested (E2-2, Pu.1, Oct-2, OCA-B, TFE3 and USF) were able to activate I(mu)
121                                We found that Oct-2, on the other hand, inhibited ORF50 expression and
122 of the B cell-specific transcription factors Oct-2 or OCA-B/BOB-1/OBF-1 dramatically affects B cell t
123               Decreased expression of Oct-1, Oct-2, or Bob-1 by RNA interference resulted in apoptosi
124                           This suggests that Oct-2 plays a central role in maintaining the gene expre
125                           Oct-1 (POU2f1) and Oct-2 (POU2f2) are members of the POU family of transcri
126  Oct-1 and the related but tissue-restricted Oct-2 protein bind to a DNA sequence termed the octamer
127  binding sites in this enhancer by a variant Oct-2 protein revealed that in a mature B cell line this
128                       Phosphorylation of the Oct-2 protein was important for this activation and was
129 between Oct-1 and Oct-2 using chimeric Oct-1/Oct-2 proteins in cell fusion assays.
130 g Ig, J chain, and the transcription factors Oct-2, PU.1, and the coactivator OCA-B.
131      The POU transcription factors Oct-1 and Oct-2 regulate the activity of octamer-dependent promote
132       These findings support the notion that Oct-2 regulates gene transcription by both OBF-1-depende
133                                    Oct-1 and Oct-2 represent the prototypical example of related tran
134 amer-binding transcription factors Oct-1 and Oct-2, respectively.
135  transcription as induced by HoxC4 and Oct-1/Oct-2 suggests an important role of these homeodomain pr
136 ing sites for transcriptional factors Oct-1, Oct-2, T cell factor 1alpha, and GATA1.
137                                              Oct-2, therefore, acts as a cell survival factor in t(14
138 tation analysis we found that the ability of Oct-2 to activate bcl-2 required C/EBP, Cdx, and TATA-bi
139 ct-1 or Oct-2 but requires the expression of Oct-2 to activate transcription in B cells.
140 ly expressed Oct-1 and the B cell-restricted Oct-2 to activate transcription via the octamer site (5'
141 ctivator that functions with either Oct-1 or Oct-2 to mediate efficient cell type-specific transcript
142 directly, but interacts with either Oct-1 or Oct-2 to potentiate transcriptional activation.
143 ssociated with increased binding of PU.1 and Oct-2 to the CD20 promoter sequences.
144 ressed POU-homeodomain proteins Oct-1 and/or Oct-2 to these octamer-like sequences plays a central ro
145 mer binding transcription factors (Oct-1 and Oct-2) to mediate efficient cell type-specific transcrip
146    Here we report that overexpression of the Oct-2 transcription factor and octamer coactivator BOB.1
147                                          The Oct-2 transcription factor has been shown previously to
148        Targeted mutation of the gene for the Oct-2 transcription factor in mice caused neonatal letha
149  has been shown previously to bind Oct-1 and Oct-2 transcription factors in vitro.
150 s studies suggested that the 3-deoxy-D-manno-oct-2-ulopyranosonic acid (Kdo) homopolymeric capsular p
151 8)Kdo(2-->4)Kdo (Kdo = 3-deoxy-alpha-d-manno-oct-2-ulopyranosonic acid), displays a germ-line-coded p
152                         3-Deoxy-beta-d-manno-oct-2-ulosonic acid (beta-Kdo) glycosides are mainly fou
153  first committed step in the 3-deoxy-D-manno-oct-2-ulosonic acid (Kdo) biosynthesis pathway.
154                   In plants, 3-deoxy-d-manno-oct-2-ulosonic acid (Kdo) is a monosaccharide that is on
155                              3-Deoxy-d-manno-oct-2-ulosonic acid (Kdo) is an essential component of b
156                              3-Deoxy-d-manno-oct-2-ulosonic acid (Kdo) is an essential component of L
157 educing end by a beta-linked 3-deoxy-d-manno-oct-2-ulosonic acid (Kdo) residue.
158 ulted in increased levels of 3-deoxy-d-manno-oct-2-ulosonic acid (Kdo) sugar in membrane extracts, wh
159 aA catalyzes the transfer of 3-deoxy-d-manno-oct-2-ulosonic acid (Kdo) to the lipid A precursor of LP
160  recombinants expressing the 3-deoxy-D-manno-oct-2-ulosonic acid (Kdo) transferase gene kdtA of C. tr
161 annose (Man) and one each of 3-deoxy-d-manno-oct-2-ulosonic acid (Kdo), Gal, GalN, and l-rhamnose res
162 esize an isosteric analog of 3-deoxy-D-manno-oct-2-ulosonic acid (Kdo), known as D-glycero-D-talo-oct
163 CPS via multiple residues of 3-deoxy-D-manno-oct-2-ulosonic acid (Kdo), referred to as a poly-Kdo lin
164 anno-heptose (Hep) and 3-deoxy-alpha-D-manno-oct-2-ulosonic acid (Kdo)-containing inner core oligosac
165 d-heptose), but not by 3-deoxy-alpha-d-manno-oct-2-ulosonic acid (Kdo).
166 hemical reporter 8-azido-3,8-dideoxy-d-manno-oct-2-ulosonic acid (Kdo-N3) has been reported, its inco
167 osonic acid (Kdo), known as D-glycero-D-talo-oct-2-ulosonic acid (Ko), in which the axial hydrogen at
168    Substrates containing the 3-deoxy-d-manno-oct-2-ulosonic acid disaccharide are dephosphorylated at
169 ety with a beta-linked poly-(3-deoxy-d-manno-oct-2-ulosonic acid) (poly-Kdo) linker attached to the r
170                         Kdo (3-deoxy-d-manno-oct-2-ulosonic acid) is an eight-carbon sugar mostly con
171 inated by a beta-linked Kdo (3-deoxy-d-manno-oct-2-ulosonic acid) residue added by a third GT module
172  of anhydro-Kdo (4,7-anhydro-3-deoxy-d-manno-oct-2-ulosonic acid) with Arg343 and Asp325.
173 the functional differences between Oct-1 and Oct-2 using chimeric Oct-1/Oct-2 proteins in cell fusion
174                    One transcription factor, Oct-2, was studied in detail and found to be a bifunctio
175                                    Oct-1 and Oct-2 were recruited to the enhancer upon macrophage sti
176  the downstream 5.1 promoter is activated by Oct-2, whereas the 5.2 promoter is unaffected.
177      These two sites recruit HoxC4 and Oct-1/Oct-2, which act synergistically with the Oca-B coactiva
178 otifs, we observed the direct interaction of Oct-2 with all three sites both in vitro by EMSA and in
179                     Interaction of Oct-1 and Oct-2 with the B29 A+T-rich sequence was confirmed using
180 ain containing transcription factor Oct-1 or Oct-2, with the B-cell-specific coactivator OCA-B (Bob-1
181 (4-chlorophenyl)-8-methyl-8-azabicyclo[3.2.1]oct-2- yl]methyl](2-mercaptoethyl)amino]ethyl]amino]-eth
182 -chlorophenyl)-8-methyl-8-azabicyclo [3.2.1] oct-2-yl]-methyl] (2-mercaptoethyl) amino] ethyl] amino]
183 (4-chlorophenyl)-8-methyl-8-azabicyclo[3,2,1]oct-2-yl]methyl ](2-mercaptoethyl) amino]ethyl]-amino]et
184 4-chlorophenyl)-8-methyl-8-azabicyclo [3.2.1]oct-2-yl]methyl](2-mercaptoethyl)amino]ethy] amino]ethan

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。
 
Page Top