ライフサイエンスコーパス: PTFE

1 PTFE is a safe, temporary alternative to primary wound c

2 PTFE membranes exfoliated prematurely, with an average r

3 PTFE patching was superior to Hemashield in lowering the

4 PTFE stent-grafts can markedly prolong TIPS patency, pot

5 Air is sampled by a PTFE membrane-based diffusion scrubber and collected int

6 arrangement of the graphite disk placed on a PTFE chip platform as well as the solid pin type cathode

7 ter, a nitrofural-impregnated catheter, or a PTFE-coated catheter (control group).

8 Patch infection occurred in 73% of all PTFE patches compared with 8% of SIS patches (P < 0.03).

9 the anterior leaflet was present in 22%, and PTFE neochordal repairs were used in 36% of cases.

10 .73% particulate graft remaining for ADM and PTFE, respectively.

11 ertical loss of 1.1 and 0.25 mm, for ADM and PTFE, respectively.

12 Because CYTOP and PTFE acquire significantly different surface charge dens

13 by making alternate contacts with CYTOP and PTFE thin films.

14 S spectra of proteins adsorbed onto mica and PTFE substrates.

15 ed the presence of neointima in both SIS and PTFE.

16 Moreover, CNT with two different sizes and PTFE membrane with two different pore diameters (0.45 an

17 Both VPC and PTFE had significantly more regression than PC.

18 (betaARKct) in a pig model of arteriovenous PTFE graft failure.

19 n a resilient electrostatic adhesion between PTFE and the metallic surface.

20 135 polytetrafluoroethylene patch closures (PTFE), and 130 vein patch closures (VPC).

21 The pseudoaneurysm rate for the contaminated PTFE patches was 25% compared with 0% in the SIS group (

22 better to wet PTFE (8.0 +/- 1.09 N) than dry PTFE (1.6 +/- 0.66 N).

23 ith PG bone replacement graft material and e-PTFE barriers in mandibular molar Class II furcations.

24 With the introduction of a dedicated e-PTFE covered stent-graft, these problems were completely

25 One of the main drawbacks of the use of e-PTFE covered stent-graft is higher incidence of hepatic

26 ment) and pressurization through an expanded PTFE stentgraft.

27 Twelve TIPS (eight with flexible PTFE-encapsulated balloon-expandable stent-grafts and fo

28 etrafluoroethylene amorphous fluoroplastics (PTFE AF 2400) as a particle binder is presented.

29 perioperative) for Hemashield versus 0% for PTFE patching.

30 shield versus 100%, 100%, 100%, and 100% for PTFE patching.

31 shield versus 100%, 100%, 100%, and 100% for PTFE.

32 Ions were detected up to m/z 1200 for PTFE.

33 ed patency rates of 67% for AVFs and 68% for PTFE grafts.

34 Hemashield versus 98%, 98%, 92%, and 92% for PTFE patching.

35 ashield versus 100%, 100%, 100%, and 92% for PTFE.

36 Fourteen PTFE-covered Wallstents were placed in 13 patients with

37 to PTFE followed by the flow of charges from PTFE to the metal surface.

38 was noted in 6/64 (9%) in PC, 6/13 (46%) in PTFE, and 10/28 (36%) in VPC.

39 ction of charged species from the metal into PTFE followed by the flow of charges from PTFE to the me

40 Conclusion A10-mm PTFE-covered stent leads to better control of RA seconda

41 mg cm(-2) of large CNT deposited on 5.0 mum PTFE enabled sufficiently high mass transfer and collect

42 Patency after DIPS creation with the nitinol PTFE-covered stent-graft was superior to that after TIPS

43 reactors based on polymeric tubing, notably PTFE, are the most common, and such reactors are typical

44 As this is the first documented instance of PTFE AF being used as a particle immobilizer for SPME, a

45 The unit displacement length on PTFE was estimated to be 0.621 nm and is 4 times as lo

46 ne allograft that was covered with an ADM or PTFE membrane.

47 ogrammed VA (PVA), (arteriovenous fistula or PTFE graft) and nonprogrammed VA (UPVA) (tunneled or non

48 surfaces such as glass, silanized glass, or PTFE.

49 x 3-cm patch angioplasty with either SIS or PTFE.

50 When heated (>350 degrees C), the outer PTFE layer shrinks while the inner FEP layer melts, resu

51 A second, parallel PTFE-lined transcaval shunt was created in this patient;

52 itional modifier, perfluoropropylvinylether (PTFE-TFM); and fluorinated ethylene propylene (FEP).

53 luded the following: polytetrafluorethylene (PTFE); polytetrafluoroethylene with an additional modifi

54 access surgery using polytetrafluorethylene (PTFE) graft placement for dialysis was chosen as a repro

55 tric method using a polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) cell as a diffuse reflector.

56 film deposited on a polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) membrane was assembled and employed for the determ

57 mber created from a polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) ring placed under the serosa of the stomach.

58 PMLDS) coupled to a polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) total-consumption micronebulizer is presented.

59 mposed of amorphous polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) with a static contact angle of 112.4 degrees for

60 erved homograft and polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) in 66 cases (54 pulmonary, 12 aortic homografts),

61 of an arteriovenous polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) graft, the most common form of hemodialysis access

62 or an 8-mm-diameter polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE)-covered stent in a consecutive series of patients

63 (AVFs) and 23% for polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) grafts.

64 th impressions from polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE [Teflon]; BioPore; Millipore, Billerica, MA) membra

65 al-insulator [e.g., polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE)] interfaces: injection of charged species from the

66 s) by using nitinol polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE)-covered stent-grafts.

67 nous anastomosis of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) grafts in 25 patients (11 men, 14 women; age range

68 redict the depth of Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) layer purely on the basis of relative intensity of

69 2-mm thick sheet of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) to overcome this situation in 21 transplants for 1

70 rs of balls made of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), and borosilicate g

71 s were conducted on polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) specimen and a reasonably good agreement was found

72 inally, in tests on polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), we found that geckos clung significantly better t

73 mal matrix (ADM) or polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) membrane.

74 pared with standard polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) catheterisation.

75 two small, sterile polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) tubes into the deltoid region under strict aseptic

76 and C(14)) through polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) filters (0.45 microm pore size) revealed a narrow

77 we compared SIS to polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) as a vascular patch for arterial repair in the pre

78 e), (PNIPAM) within polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) to form a multi-dimensional pore array.

79 The outer porous PTFE membrane provides complete selectivity for NO over

80 ent at the venous anastomosis of recanalized PTFE grafts can salvage hemodialysis access function.

81 included a scanning mobility particle sizer, PTFE and quartz filter samples, and transmission electro

82 (n = 48) undergoing placement of a standard PTFE graft were randomized in a 2:1:1 ratio to the treat

83 Here we use three standard PTFE particles (sphere, circular cylinder, and tent) and

84 s-most" endovascular aortounifemoral stented PTFE graft was used, combined with occlusion of the cont

85 an outer layer of poly(tetrafluoroethylene) (PTFE) and an inner layer of FEP.

86 oluene (TNT) from poly(tetrafluoroethylene) (PTFE) surfaces where limits of detection are as low as 5

87 nventional smooth poly(tetrafluoroethylene) (PTFE) surfaces, with examination by MS and tandem mass s

88 urbid sublayer of poly(tetrafluoroethylene) (PTFE) through a highly diffusely scattering overlayer of

89 acid) (PLA), and poly(tetrafluoroethylene) (PTFE), are analyzed using PADI.

90 he fabrication of poly(tetrafluoroethylene) (PTFE)-covered electrodes in which arrays of holes ( appr

91 ind a microporous poly(tetrafluoroethylene) (PTFE; Gore-tex) gas-permeable membrane.

92 using 10-keV C60+ for all samples other than PTFE, as compared to those observed from 10 keV Ga+ prim

93 The PTFE coating provides electrical insulation of most of t

94 The PTFE implant provides sustained gene delivery, is safe,

95 osition (as reflected by OHP content) in the PTFE tubes without an effect on total protein accumulati

96 verse effects associated with the use of the PTFE patch.

97 e observed kinetics were proportional to the PTFE surface area; the effects of PMMA and glass balls w

98 This PTFE-encapsulated stent-graft is biocompatible and safe

99 ), other valved conduits in 14, and unvalved PTFE in 8 cases.

100 hat geckos clung significantly better to wet PTFE (8.0 +/- 1.09 N) than dry PTFE (1.6 +/- 0.66 N).

101 (180 patients) were randomized into 100 with PTFE patching and 100 with Hemashield.

102 false aneurysm formation when compared with PTFE.