ライフサイエンスコーパス: Palmer

1 Palmer et al and Swain et al suggest that our "extra mor

2 instrumental temperature, precipitation, and Palmer Drought Severity Index (PDSI) indicate that growt

3 = .01 for both), fourth quartile mean annual Palmer Hydrological Drought Index (P = .02), third and f

4 sitive anomalies in chlorophyll-a (chl-a) at Palmer Station, occurring every 4-6 years, are constrain

5 mary production observed during the bloom at Palmer Station may be characteristic of high latitude co

6 measured gross and net primary production at Palmer Station during the summer of 2012/2013 via three

7 han half of the seasonal gross production at Palmer Station, the ratio of net-to-gross production rea

8 lankton species during the growing season at Palmer station in the Western Antarctic Peninsula.

9 sions included male gender, biopsy at Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, temporal and superior locations, l

10 limbal epithelial transplantation at Bascom Palmer Eye Institute.

11 presenting at the University of Miami Bascom Palmer Eye Institute with confirmed AK infections in 200

12 ves of the microbiology laboratory of Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, a tertiary referral hospital, from

13 gnosed with Fusarium keratitis at the Bascom Palmer Eye Institute (Miami, FL) from April 2000 to May

14 h iAMD from the COMPLETE study at the Bascom Palmer Eye Institute were evaluated to determine if nGA

15 e of the infections originated at the Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Miami, Florida, although 9 patient

16 led in an SS-OCT imaging study at the Bascom Palmer Eye Institute.

17 t record tracks the 1,500-yr tree-ring-based Palmer Drought Severity Index reconstructions of Cook et

18 In this issue of Blood, Palmer et al provide encouragement that important chroni

19 The accompanying article by Palmer et al., particularly their finding that prepregna

20 sylvian sulcus (pSS), a region attributed by Palmer et al. to area 21a.

21 uprasylvian visual cortex in cats defined by Palmer et al., PMLS (posterior lateral suprasylvian area

22 irements are adequately met, as discussed by Palmer, Meeuse, Lambers, and Wagner and Krab.

23 In this issue of Cell, Palmer and Sorger present data suggesting that cell cult

24 The atmosphere-centric Palmer Drought Severity Index predicts future increases

25 e that regional values of the two cumulative Palmer drought indices do not represent finer-resolution

26 ease incidence with the June moisture index (Palmer Hydrological Drought Index) in the region 2 years

27 y and significantly correlated with May-June Palmer Drought Severity Indices (PDSI).

28 l samples collected from a coastal site near Palmer Station, Antarctica on six occasions throughout a

29 hey are concentrated and dispersed in nearby Palmer Deep by variable tidal forcing on weekly timescal

30 , indoor heating degree days, precipitation, Palmer Hydrological Drought Index, clear sky and issued

31 The Palmer drought indices are widely used by scientists and

32 ation amount, vapor pressure deficit and the Palmer Drought Severity Index (PDSI).

33 se over two decades of data collected by the Palmer Long Term Ecological Research program (PAL-LTER)

34 and variability in variables required by the Palmer model, regional index values are most commonly us

35 feeding holothurians were collected near the Palmer Long Term Ecological Research grid during the aus

36 In particular, calculations of the Palmer Drought Severity Index (PDSI) show a decrease in

37 f evidence collected in conjunction with the Palmer Station Long-Term Ecological Research Project, we

38 ge and is calibrated to resemble traditional Palmer Hydrological Drought Index (PHDI) in the continen

39 's mechanism of action is poorly understood, Palmer et al. help clarify the clinical significance of

40 Comparison with Palmer Drought Sensitivity Index (PDSI) for New Mexico i