ライフサイエンスコーパス: Pearson correlation coefficient

1 delayed-type hypersensitivity (p < 0.0001 by Pearson correlation coefficient).

2 asticity and viscosity was assessed with the Pearson correlation coefficient.

3 among PLR, MD, and RNFL thickness using the Pearson correlation coefficient.

4 h alpha coefficient for reproducibility, and Pearson correlation coefficient.

5 cellularity, and micronecrosis by using the Pearson correlation coefficient.

6 nd emphysema extent were tested by using the Pearson correlation coefficient.

7 tions among the results was tested using the Pearson correlation coefficient.

8 esions and tumor size was assessed using the Pearson correlation coefficient.

9 nce of obesity in Massachusetts by using the Pearson correlation coefficient.

10 server variability was assessed by using the Pearson correlation coefficient.

11 le is based on the number of anchors and the Pearson correlation coefficient.

12 mor volume measurement was assessed with the Pearson correlation coefficient.

13 values were negatively correlated using the Pearson correlation coefficient.

14 nd depth of target was assessed by using the Pearson correlation coefficient.

15 e test scores, and time to recovery with the Pearson correlation coefficient.

16 elow -950 HU (RA-950) were assessed with the Pearson correlation coefficient.

17 test for mean, and the correlation with the Pearson correlation coefficient.

18 rformed by using nonparametric tests and the Pearson correlation coefficient.

19 e test scores, and time to recovery with the Pearson correlation coefficient.

20 ltration rate (eGFR), were assessed by using Pearson correlation coefficient.

21 ations across measures were tested using the Pearson correlation coefficient.

22 ons among parameters were evaluated with the Pearson correlation coefficient.

23 h histologic findings was evaluated with the Pearson correlation coefficient.

24 linear correlation parameter by computing a Pearson correlation coefficient.

25 d corneal secant modulus was evaluated using Pearson correlation coefficients.

26 en measured values were assessed by means of Pearson correlation coefficients.

27 lated and assessed by Bland-Altman plots and Pearson correlation coefficients.

28 ent genes that have large absolute values of Pearson correlation coefficients.

29 BMD and bone score, including derivation of Pearson correlation coefficients.

30 Volumes were compared by determining Pearson correlation coefficients.

31 pairs were tested by using Cohen's kappa and Pearson correlation coefficients.

32 re log-transformed before calculation of the Pearson correlation coefficients.

33 parameters were correlated with age by using Pearson correlation coefficients.

34 dical conditions was assessed using weighted Pearson correlation coefficients.

35 ly in subjects with darkly pigmented irides (Pearson correlation coefficient 0.793, P = 0.05).

36 orrelated with annual temperature anomalies (Pearson correlation coefficient 0.882, p = 0.005).

37 epithelial thickness at 1, 3, and 9 months (Pearson correlation coefficients 0.485, 0.587 and 0.576)

38 stribution of the traffic and attains a high Pearson correlation coefficient (0.75) when compared wit

39 ions and use of observation-only admissions (Pearson correlation coefficient = 0.01) or discharge to

40 or discharge to a skilled nursing facility (Pearson correlation coefficient = 0.05).

41 ion coefficient = 0.71, P < .001), FAQLQ-TF (Pearson correlation coefficient = 0.35, P = .018), and F

42 coefficient = 0.35, P = .018), and FAQLQ-CF (Pearson correlation coefficient = 0.51, P < .001).

43 leave-one out cross-validation r(2) of 0.46 (Pearson correlation coefficient = 0.68), effectively pre

44 validity of these questionnaires: FAQLQ-AF (Pearson correlation coefficient = 0.71, P < .001), FAQLQ

45 0), correlating well with IS/OS lesion area (Pearson correlation coefficient = 0.848, P < 0.01).

46 with reduction in persephin and pentraxin 3 (Pearson correlation coefficients = 0.682 and 0.638, P =

47 nd ACE levels were significantly correlated (Pearson correlation coefficient, 0.205; P = .001, 2-side

48 ) and poor correlation with gestational age (Pearson correlation coefficient, 0.25; P = .002).

49 he uptake of the fluorescent glucose analog (Pearson correlation coefficient, 0.54 vs. 0.44, respecti

50 and that measured by pathologists (P < .001; Pearson correlation coefficient, 0.81).

51 plasma viral load assay on the log10 scale (Pearson correlation coefficient, 0.92; P < 0.001).

52 igen levels and tumor-to-liver volume ratio (Pearson correlation coefficients, 0.105 and 0.113, respe

53 the proportion of generalists among regions (Pearson correlation coefficient=0.06; P=.26).

54 5% on AQ and from 14% to 75% on cardiac MRI (Pearson correlation coefficient=0.95, P<0.0001).

55 coefficient=-0.456, P<0.0001] and BMS sites (Pearson correlation coefficient=-0.450, P=0.0006).

56 with changes in calcium scores both in PES (Pearson correlation coefficient=-0.456, P<0.0001] and BM

57 multidetector CT and cardiac MR imaging with Pearson correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman analysi

58 lume, and growth were evaluated by using the Pearson correlation coefficient and difference of means

59 compare different lung function parameters, Pearson correlation coefficient and Fisher z transformat

60 Correlations were examined using the Pearson correlation coefficient and prognostic associati

61 nts that are currently the most widely-used (Pearson correlation coefficient and SD-weighted correlat

62 tudy shows that SCC is an alternative to the Pearson correlation coefficient and the SD-weighted corr

63 nd compare two correlation coefficients, the Pearson correlation coefficient and the Spearman rho, fo

64 The Pearson correlation coefficient and the standard deviati

65 tistical analysis was performed by using the Pearson correlation coefficient and the Wilcoxon rank su

66 Data were analyzed by using the Pearson correlation coefficient and two-sided t tests as

67 n HealthLNK in comparison with MESA, we used Pearson correlation coefficients and Bland-Altman plots.

68 relations between continuous variables using Pearson correlation coefficients and compared categorica

69 with a two-sided Pvalue of .05 to calculate Pearson correlation coefficients and multiple regression

70 CTDI(vol) and D(eff) as variables, by using Pearson correlation coefficients and P values to determi

71 birth cohorts were determined by calculating Pearson correlation coefficients and performing Kaplan-M

72 adjusted for energy, were compared by using Pearson correlation coefficients and the Bland-Altman 95

73 Pearson correlation coefficients and the SD of differenc

74 Paired Student t test, chi(2) test, Pearson correlation coefficient, and analysis of varianc

75 rmed by using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, Pearson correlation coefficient, and Bland-Altman analys

76 indices, including the Jaccard index and the Pearson correlation coefficient, and compare their perfo

77 Tracking was assessed with the use of the Pearson correlation coefficient, and multivariate linear

78 was performed with the t test, chi(2) test, Pearson correlation coefficient, and receiver operating

79 tween data sets were determined by using the Pearson correlation coefficient, and statistical signifi

80 were compared using descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation coefficients, and Bland-Altman plots

81 Wilcoxon tests, Pearson correlation coefficients, and linear regressions

82 urveillance and VTE rates were assessed with Pearson correlation coefficients, and the postdischarge

83 Using the Pearson correlation coefficient as a measure of spectral

84 n on a Protein chip, the use of the pairwise Pearson correlation coefficient as the similarity measur

85 s showed a strong linear association, with a Pearson correlation coefficient between 0.703 and 0.962.

86 The average pairwise Pearson correlation coefficient between activity pattern

87 The Pearson correlation coefficient between experimental dat

88 The Pearson correlation coefficient between sodium SNR and g

89 The Pearson correlation coefficient between sodium SNR and g

90 The Pearson correlation coefficient between the two techniqu

91 Pearson correlation coefficients between observed and Go

92 this correlation, we calculated age-adjusted Pearson correlation coefficients between rates of incarc

93 The Pearson correlation coefficients between the 2 radionucl

94 Pearson correlation coefficients between the gene positi

95 calibration method on calcium measurements, Pearson correlation coefficients between unadjusted and

96 Statistical tests performed include Pearson correlation coefficients, Bland-Altman agreement

97 Lung sections were divided into blocks and Pearson correlation coefficients calculated to compare m

98 rent comparison measures were tested and the Pearson correlation coefficient chosen.

99 The popular Pearson correlation coefficient estimates bivariate corr

100 vely similar to one another, with an average Pearson correlation coefficient for these comparisons of

101 tected in the pooled QC samples, the average Pearson correlation coefficients for all peaks between a

102 lustered in PCA scores plot, and the average Pearson correlation coefficients for all peaks of QC sam

103 -out data showed low levels of bias and high Pearson correlation coefficients for calcification (-0.0

104 Age- and energy-adjusted Pearson correlation coefficients for correlations betwee

105 focused on statistically significant (P<.05) Pearson correlation coefficients for methicillin-resista

106 Absolute Pearson correlation coefficients for overall RNFL thickn

107 Pearson correlation coefficients for the mean score and

108 The Pearson correlation coefficients for various carotenoids

109 Pearson correlation coefficients for vitamins E and C in

110 he random forest training, which generates a Pearson correlation coefficient >0.8 between the predict

111 o year with excess cardiovascular mortality (Pearson correlation coefficients >/=0.75, P </= .05 for

112 expression, which is mostly detected via the Pearson correlation coefficient, has played an important

113 k correlation coefficient) and measured ADC (Pearson correlation coefficient) in six prostates ex viv

114 ta on the sign and magnitude of gene-to-gene Pearson correlation coefficients obtained from the pool

115 metastatically aggressive cell lines with a Pearson correlation coefficient of < or = -0.64.

116 d global peripapillary RNFL thickness with a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.60 (P < .0001).

117 - 257,050, R(2) = 0.65, P < 0.0001), with a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.81.

118 A Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.82 with an RMSE of

119 y analyses of solvent exchange rates, with a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.84 obtained.

120 a common set of regulated transcripts with a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.895.

121 ylation values were highly correlated with a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.9 in leave-one-tiss

122 breath samples yielded a slope of 0.93 and a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.9705 (p < 0.05, n =

123 et with the other four was modest, with mean Pearson correlation coefficients of 0.37-0.54.

124 vely correlated with histopathologic volume (Pearson correlation coefficients of 0.49, 0.59, and 0.55

125 egression R2 values of 88%, 82%, and 85% and Pearson correlation coefficients of 92%, 91%, and 92% fo

126 Pearson correlation coefficients of perfusion values for

127 Pairwise associations (Pearson correlation coefficients) of discharge-level pre

128 Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) analysis is common

129 a male sex hormone, testosterone, using the Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) analysis.

130 The Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) between predicted

131 ompartments information, with the ranking by Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) calculated from ge

132 was calculated using a Bland-Altman plot and Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC).

133 ot significantly associated across clusters (Pearson correlation coefficient [PCC] = 0.36; 95% confid

134 ich was correlated with hospital attendance (Pearson correlation coefficient [PCC] = 0.76).

135 This strategy identified >70 compounds with Pearson correlation coefficients (PCCs) >0.4, where redu

136 a well for the cooling portion of the spray (Pearson correlation coefficient R >/= 0.994), but the su

137 lular AQP2 (exosomal AQP2 vs. cellular AQP2, Pearson correlation coefficient r = 0.93).

138 hange bias (less than twofold difference and Pearson correlation coefficient R approximately 0.87-0.8

139 to moderate positive correlation with HOAs (Pearson correlation coefficient r ranged from 0.300 to 0

140 The Cohen kappa and Pearson correlation coefficient R were used to determine

141 hin each participant, were assessed with the Pearson correlation coefficient r.

142 d dose and tumor reduction was found, with a Pearson correlation coefficient (R(2)) of 0.64 for tumor

143 The maximum possible squared Pearson correlation coefficient (R(2)) on large data set

144 etermination of tPSA in serum samples with a Pearson correlation coefficient (R(2)=0.96).

145 I) and other prognostic factors by using the Pearson correlation coefficient (r).

146 bserver's scores was calculated by using the Pearson correlation coefficient (r).

147 l results and available measurements yielded Pearson correlation coefficients (R) >/= 0.8 at >/= 5 si

148 Pearson correlation coefficients (r), corrected for atte

149 ely with the likelihood of cancer detection (Pearson correlation coefficient [r] = -.4778 after log-l

150 ve findings and/or histopathologic findings (Pearson correlation coefficient [r] and Cohen kappa coef

151 es) and agreement between area measurements (Pearson correlation coefficient [r] values) were calcula

152 group, many indices were highly correlated (Pearson correlation coefficient |r| >/= 0.80), making it

153 here was no correlation between IOP and ICP (Pearson correlation coefficient, r = 0.07; p = 0.59).

154 ncipal component analysis weighting schemes (Pearson correlation coefficient, r=0.98).

155 ent correlation with absorbance-based assay (Pearson correlation coefficient, r=0.992).

156 DNA-RNA (R-loop) complex structures, with a Pearson correlation coefficient ranging from 0.775 to 0.

157 h moderately advanced stages of damage, with Pearson correlation coefficients ranging from 0.64 to 0.

158 Pearson correlation coefficient, receiver operating char

159 Although Pearson correlation coefficients relating the target and

160 Fisher's Z transformation indicated the Pearson correlation coefficient rho >/= 0.8 for all devi

161 related with tyrosine phosphorylation of AR (Pearson correlation coefficient rho = 0.71, P < 0.0001).

162 We show that the Pearson correlation coefficient, rho L, between two LOD

163 The Pearson correlation coefficient showed a cubic function

164 ke and patient age was assessed by using the Pearson correlation coefficient test.

165 oposed topological approach has a 84% higher Pearson correlation coefficient than the current state-o

166 les were considered "preclinical." Using the Pearson correlation coefficient, the authors examined th

167 g order were the weighted kappa coefficient, Pearson correlation coefficient, the unweighted kappa co

168 nalyses were performed by using Spearman and Pearson correlation coefficients to evaluate the relatio

169 The median Pearson correlation coefficient was 0.40 (range: -0.04 t

170 The average energy-adjusted Pearson correlation coefficient was 0.46 for comparative

171 For the 75 paired samples, the Pearson correlation coefficient was 0.842.

172 The Pearson correlation coefficient was 0.99 at the state le

173 The weighted Pearson correlation coefficient was calculated for hospi

174 blication and to assess results over time; a Pearson correlation coefficient was calculated to assess

175 Pearson correlation coefficient was computed between the

176 A Pearson correlation coefficient was determined between t

177 A high Pearson correlation coefficient was obtained for the 2 r

178 The Pearson correlation coefficient was used to assess the c

179 The Pearson correlation coefficient was used to measure corr

180 Pearson correlation coefficients were 0.71 (95% CI 0.29-

181 ghted and unweighted kappa coefficients, and Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated as stat

182 Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated for cor

183 At the optimal setting, Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated to asse

184 For pairwise correlations between variables, Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated.

185 Bland-Altman 95% limits of agreement and Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated.

186 Thereafter, several models based on Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated.

187 ng general linear modeling, and side-to-side Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated.

188 Pearson correlation coefficients were computed between b

189 Pearson correlation coefficients were used to assess rel

190 Pearson correlation coefficients were used to assess the

191 Pearson correlation coefficients were used to evaluate t

192 n signed rank test and analysis of variance; Pearson correlation coefficients were used to evaluate t

193 Pearson correlation coefficients were used to evaluate t

194 Pearson correlation coefficients were used to investigat

195 nd DSN, our predicted response reached a 0.6 Pearson correlation coefficient with observed responses

196 Pearson correlation coefficients with corresponding p-va