戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。

今後説明を表示しない

[OK]

コーパス検索結果 (left1)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1                                              PrP(C) cell-surface expression was reduced by down-regul
2                                              PrP(C) contributes to increased proliferation, cell-matr
3                                              PrP(C) is expressed on the basolateral membrane of retin
4                                              PrP(C) misfolds to a pathogenic isoform PrP(Sc), the cau
5                                              PrP(C) protein is also strongly released from schwannoma
6                                              PrP(C) was degraded via the proteasome pathway mediated
7                                              PrP(C), laminin, and metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 (
8                                              PrP(C), the cellular isoform of the prion protein, serve
9                                              PrP(Sc) sialylation was found to be critical for effecti
10 conversion, we systematically tested over 40 PrP(C) variants of susceptible and resistant PrP(C) sequ
11 nsistent with a neuronal function for Abetao/PrP(C) signaling, plaque density, microgliosis, and astr
12 rity between the infectious prion aggregate, PrP(Sc), and the cellular prion protein of the host, PrP
13          Misfolded prion protein aggregates (PrP(Sc)) show remarkable structural diversity and are as
14                                      Altered PrP solubility consistent with significantly reduced PrP
15                                     Although PrP(CWD) was not detected by either method in the initia
16 nal upregulation of NMDARs, we also analyzed PrP knock-out (KO) mice.
17 n where cells expressing either GPI-anchored PrP(C) or transmembrane-anchored PrP(C), which partition
18                            Only GPI-anchored PrP(C) supported persistent PrP(res) propagation.
19 nce of endogenous expression of GPI-anchored PrP(C) To further explore these questions, constructs co
20 ein, PrP(res) We show that only GPI-anchored PrP(C) was able to convert to PrP(res) and able to seria
21 ion of transmembrane PrP(C) and GPI-anchored PrP(res) in distinct membrane environments.
22 PI-anchored PrP(C) or transmembrane-anchored PrP(C), which partitions it to a different location, wer
23    HXMS studies revealed that GPI-anchorless PrP(Sc) is characterized by substantially higher protect
24 vivo transmission barrier between PrP(a) and PrP(b).
25 us pathological amyloids including Abeta and PrP(Sc) suggest PMEL is an excellent model system to stu
26  as sCJDMM2, which share 129 MM genotype and PrP(Sc) type 2 but are associated with quite distinct ph
27 down facilitated the interaction of GP78 and PrP(C), thereby increasing PrP(C) ubiquitination.
28 r pathways underlying PrP(Sc) metabolism and PrP(C) function.
29                                         Anti-PrP antibodies targeting epitopes in the C-terminal doma
30 ministration of FRET donor and acceptor anti-PrP(C) antibodies to living cells yielded a measure of P
31 es and performed serial necropsies to assess PrP(CWD) tissue distribution by real-time quaking-induce
32                                      Because PrP depletion may result in functional upregulation of N
33 ate the in vivo transmission barrier between PrP(a) and PrP(b).
34  of temporal and spatial correlation between PrP(Sc) and cytotoxicity suggests the contribution of ho
35 al significance of such interactions between PrP(C) and disease-associated amyloid-beta species will
36  M6PR (mannose 6-phosphate receptor) blocked PrP(C) internalization, whereas down-regulation of GIT2
37 on of the buried histidine destabilizes both PrP variants, but produces a more drastic effect in the
38 t is composed of significant amounts of both PrP polymorphisms.
39 a denaturation experiments performed on both PrP variants at neutral and low pH, and correlates with
40         Terminal disease is characterized by PrP(CWD) accumulation in the brain and lymphoid tissues
41 imer's disease toxicity could be governed by PrP(C), a partial, but still therapeutically useful, rol
42 , suggesting that impaired uptake of iron by PrP(Sc) combined with inflammation results in retinal ir
43 techolaminergic neurons remains unchanged by PrP(C) reduction after disease onset.
44 sgenic mice that overexpress hamster PrP(C), PrP(C) overexpression accelerated recombinant PrP fibril
45                     Scrapie infection causes PrP(Sc) accumulation and microglial activation, and surp
46              An elevated expression in CD230/PrP(C) was observed in serum-deprived cells in associati
47 pression of the cellular prion protein CD230/PrP(C) and the immunosuppressive cell surface enzyme ect
48 g feature of prion formation is that certain PrP(C) sequences, such as that of bank vole, can be conv
49 uced transgenic (Tg) mice expressing cognate PrP(C) Although disease transmission to only a subset of
50 re, we show that a C-terminal conformational PrP(Sc)-specific antibody reacts differently to three mu
51 sults show that heterozygous animals contain PrP(Sc) that is composed of significant amounts of both
52                                 In contrast, PrP(C) containing a GPI anchor from which the sialic aci
53                To begin, we produced control PrP(Sc) from PrP(C) using protein misfolding cyclic ampl
54 vealing an essential mechanism that controls PrP(C) levels in CRC.
55 sociated, disease-causing prion protein (Ctm)PrP, increased ALIX and ALG-2 levels are detected along
56                          TgD expressing deer PrP(C) was similarly refractory to deer prions from dise
57 find that peroxymonosulfate rapidly degrades PrP(TSE) from two species.
58 culated intraperitoneally with brain-derived PrP(Sc) or PrP(Sc) produced in PMCAb or dsPMCAb and then
59 cking of brain-, PMCAb-, and dsPMCAb-derived PrP(Sc) to secondary lymphoid organs was monitored in wi
60 een and lymph nodes, whereas dsPMCAb-derived PrP(Sc) was found predominantly in liver.
61 e, whereas administration of dsPMCAb-derived PrP(Sc) with reduced sialylation did not cause prion dis
62 mals inoculated with brain- or PMCAb-derived PrP(Sc) developed prion disease, whereas administration
63  after inoculation, brain- and PMCAb-derived PrP(Sc) were found in spleen and lymph nodes, whereas ds
64                                 Desialylated PrP(C) was less sensitive to cholesterol depletion than
65                 The presence of desialylated PrP(C) in neurons caused the dissociation of cytoplasmic
66  same method but with partially desialylated PrP(C) as a substrate (dsPMCAb).
67 e sialic acid had been removed (desialylated PrP(C)) was not converted to PrP(Sc).
68 aque brain and optic nerve tissues to detect PrP.
69 he flexible N-terminal tail of PrP, exhibits PrP-WT-like protective properties.
70 ulting prions transmitted to mice expressing PrP(C) from the species of prion origin, demonstrating t
71  GP78 was identified as the ubiquitinase for PrP(C), thereby revealing an essential mechanism that co
72 ciation of cytoplasmic phospholipase A2 from PrP-containing membrane rafts and reduced the activation
73 r were expressed in a cell line derived from PrP knockout hippocampal neurons, NpL2.
74      The formation of infectious prions from PrP molecules in vitro has required cofactors and/or unp
75   To begin, we produced control PrP(Sc) from PrP(C) using protein misfolding cyclic amplification wit
76 ation with beads (PMCAb), and also generated PrP(Sc) with reduced sialylation levels using the same m
77 nd the one partially sharing some of the GSS PrP(Sc) molecular features was inoculated into different
78  in transgenic mice that overexpress hamster PrP(C), PrP(C) overexpression accelerated recombinant Pr
79 s, the P102L mutation in recombinant hamster PrP promoted prion formation when seeded by minute amoun
80 ic amplification of mouse prions using horse PrP(C) also failed to infect TgEq but retained tropism f
81  and the cellular prion protein of the host, PrP(C) A puzzling feature of prion formation is that cer
82  human NTD by the bovine NTD resembled human PrP(c) The requirement for an NTD, but not for the speci
83 TD interacts with other regions of the human PrP(c) to increase promiscuity.
84                Plasma and whole blood (125)I-PrP(Sc) reached maximal levels by 30 min and 3 hr, respe
85 m of Alzheimer's disease (AD) by implicating PrP(C) as a potential therapeutic target for AD.
86 inhibition of glucocerebrosidase activity in PrP-A53T-SNCA mice using the covalent inhibitor condurit
87 P increased in Tg(CJD) mice but decreased in PrP KO mice, indicating divergent changes in hippocampal
88 identify a network of proteins implicated in PrP(C) trafficking and demonstrate the power of this ass
89  our data characterize mediators involved in PrP(c) shedding and the effect of this sPrP(c) on monocy
90 s show the presence of both polymorphisms in PrP(Sc).
91 treatment results in a profound reduction in PrP(C) expression due to a defect in the translocation o
92 L/HIF-1alpha/GP78 axis has a crucial role in PrP(C) accumulation during tumor progression.
93 Similar but less marked changes were seen in PrP KO mice.
94 ls in the cytoplasmic fraction and increased PrP levels in the insoluble fraction are identified in F
95  down-regulation of GIT2 and VPS28 increased PrP(C) internalization.
96 ction of GP78 and PrP(C), thereby increasing PrP(C) ubiquitination.
97 lent-metal-transporter-1 (DMT-1), indicating PrP(C)-mediated iron uptake through DMT-1.
98 r prion protein (PrP(C)) into new infectious PrP(Sc) Interspecies prion transmissibility studies perf
99 ing of the prion protein (PrP(C)) influences PrP(C) misfolding into the disease-associated isoform, P
100             Trials of compounds that inhibit PrP-dependent amyloid-beta toxicity are commencing in hu
101 avoured by a different brain site of initial PrP(Sc) formation in the two diseases.
102 ure was proposed as the basis for initiating PrP conversion, but experimental results have been confl
103  producing a self-replicating, but innocuous PrP(Sc)-like form, termed anti-prion, which can compete
104  by the sialylation status of the inoculated PrP(Sc) Furthermore, this work suggests that the sialyla
105 dues, which helps to understand interspecies PrP propagation on a molecular level.
106                    Conversion of PrP(C) into PrP(Sc) is thought to take place at the cell surface or
107 C) with sialylo-GPIs could be recruited into PrP(Sc), whereas PrP(C) with asialo-GPIs inhibited conve
108                        Its misfolded isoform PrP(Sc) is the causative agent of prion diseases.
109      PrP(C) misfolds to a pathogenic isoform PrP(Sc), the causative agent of neurodegenerative prion
110 protein (PrP(C)) into the pathologic isoform PrP(Sc) is a key feature in prion pathogenesis.
111 folding into the disease-associated isoform, PrP(res), as well as prion propagation and infectivity.
112 lus), irrespective of the presence of 21 kDa PrP(res) in the inoculum, demonstrating that GSS is a ge
113 subtypes exclusively associated with 6-8 kDa PrP(res) have often been considered as non-transmissible
114 adhesion complexes but, unlike cells lacking PrP, ZIP6 deficiency does not abolish polysialylation of
115 ng cyclic amplification (PMCA), which mimics PrP(C)-to-PrP(Sc) conversion with accelerated kinetics,
116                                Mitochondrial PrP(C) was fully processed with mature N-linked glycans
117 ed mitochondria suggested that mitochondrial PrP(C) exists as a transmembrane isoform with the C-term
118                                    At 3 MPE, PrP(CWD) replication had expanded to all systemic lympho
119        These data also suggest that multiple PrP(C) segments containing Asn/Gln residues may act in c
120 e not subclinical carriers of scrapie, as no PrP(Sc) was detected in brains or spleen of these animal
121 s temporally with microglial activation, not PrP(Sc) accumulation, suggesting that impaired uptake of
122                              Tg(CJD) but not PrP KO mice were intrinsically more susceptible than WT
123 ial days (1 and 3) postexposure, we observed PrP(CWD) seeding activity and follicular immunoreactivit
124 heets that encompass residues 139 and 186 of PrP(Sc).
125                         The alpha-helix 2 of PrP contains a string of four threonines, which is unusu
126 rP(C) to rafts are crucial to the ability of PrP(C) to propagate as a prion.
127 sm that regulates the functional activity of PrP(C).
128                                The amount of PrP(Sc) in the brains and lymphoid tissues of positive p
129 ggregation and the molecular architecture of PrP(Sc) is key to unraveling the pathology of prion dise
130  GPI anchor-directed membrane association of PrP(C) is required for persistent PrP(res) propagation,
131                   A similar beta-cleavage of PrP(C) is observed in mouse retinal lysates.
132 of ferritin by 10-fold and beta-cleavage of PrP(C), the latter likely to block further uptake of iro
133  test could detect the low concentrations of PrP probably present in brains of donors at early stages
134                                Conversion of PrP(C) into PrP(Sc) is thought to take place at the cell
135 recombinant PrP fibril-induced conversion of PrP(C) to the abnormal proteinase K-resistant state, ref
136    Furthermore, infected cells were cured of PrP(Sc) after exposure of AR-12 or AR-14 for only two we
137 ons and monitored the tissue distribution of PrP(CWD) over the first 4 months of infection.
138 show that the flexible, N-terminal domain of PrP(C) functions as a powerful toxicity-transducing effe
139 t required the globular C-terminal domain of PrP(C), which has not been previously implicated in inte
140 docking between N- and C-terminal domains of PrP(C), revealing a novel auto-inhibitory mechanism that
141          Here, we investigated the effect of PrP(C) on polymerization of Abeta under rigorously contr
142 erves to transduce the neurotoxic effects of PrP(Sc), the infectious isoform, but how this occurs is
143 potent as FK506 in attenuating expression of PrP(C).
144 spontaneous cytotoxicity of a mutant form of PrP (Delta105-125).
145                      The precise function of PrP(C) remains elusive but may depend upon its cellular
146 s relevant for understanding the function of PrP.
147                       Finally, incubation of PrP(Sc) with recombinant GRP78 led to the dose-dependent
148 pathy, confirming the crucial involvement of PrP(C) in peripheral myelin maintenance.
149  composed solely of this abnormal isoform of PrP (PrP(Sc)).
150 t that GPI anchoring and the localization of PrP(C) to rafts are crucial to the ability of PrP(C) to
151 roduce and especially by the localization of PrP(Sc) deposits within the brain and the spongiform les
152 ibodies to living cells yielded a measure of PrP(C) surface density, whereas sequential addition of e
153  of this assay for identifying modulators of PrP(C) trafficking.
154 and pharmaceutical screens for modulators of PrP(C) trafficking.
155 rrents associated with neurotoxic mutants of PrP, and the isolated N-terminal domain induces currents
156              Accordingly, the neuroretina of PrP-knock-out mice is iron-deficient.
157               Therefore, the organization of PrP molecules in terms of the density of aggregates gene
158      In addition, a strong overexpression of PrP(C) is observed in human Merlin-deficient mesotheliom
159 udy underscores the therapeutic potential of PrP(C) deletion given that patients already present symp
160 pical PrPres, which was the first product of PrP(C) misfolding in vivo.
161 infectious and neuropathogenic properties of PrP-derived aggregates.
162 ibody visualized the internalization rate of PrP(C) (Z' factor >0.5).
163 ssion and real-time internalization rates of PrP(C) The assay is suitable for high-throughput genetic
164 tures in the normally unstructured region of PrP that influence the infectious and neuropathogenic pr
165                               Reminiscent of PrP, ZIP6 levels are five-fold upregulated during EMT an
166                  Here, we define the role of PrP(C) to rescue or halt established AD endophenotypes i
167  of a particular polymorphism in a sample of PrP(Sc) isolated from sheep heterozygous for their PrP(C
168                  We propose that shedding of PrP(c) could be a potential target for therapeutics to l
169 of HIV-infected people, increase shedding of PrP(c) from human astrocytes by increasing the active fo
170                 In RPE19 cells, silencing of PrP(C) decreases ferritin while over-expression upregula
171 PrP(res) if seeded by an exogenous source of PrP(res) not associated with host cell rafts and without
172 work suggests that the sialylation status of PrP(Sc) plays an important role in prion lymphotropism.
173 s similar to the flexible N-terminal tail of PrP, exhibits PrP-WT-like protective properties.
174                             The targeting of PrP(C) to synapses was dependent upon both neuronal chol
175 h sialylated GPIs prevented the targeting of PrP(C) to synapses.
176 ally, our results identify the C terminus of PrP(C) as a new and potentially more druggable molecular
177 formational differences in the C terminus of PrP(Sc) also contribute to the phenotypic distinction be
178 derstanding the intracellular trafficking of PrP(C) may, therefore, help elucidate the conversion pro
179  to be critical for effective trafficking of PrP(Sc) to secondary lymphoid organs.
180 sion due to a defect in the translocation of PrP(C) into the endoplasmic reticulum with subsequent de
181                         Among the variety of PrP(C) protein interactors, the neuronal cell adhesion m
182 al animal models, based on the expression of PrPs carrying mutations analogous to human heritable pri
183 sion in Tg(CJD) mice do not depend solely on PrP functional loss.
184 at employed cultured cells claimed that only PrP(C) with sialylo-GPIs could be recruited into PrP(Sc)
185 sitions 136, 154, and 171 of sheep PrP(C) or PrP(Sc).
186                                    Prions or PrP(Sc) are proteinaceous infectious agents that consist
187 ialoglycoprotein called the prion protein or PrP(C) The current work tests a new hypothesis that sial
188 raperitoneally with brain-derived PrP(Sc) or PrP(Sc) produced in PMCAb or dsPMCAb and then monitored
189 f normal prion protein (PrP) into pathogenic PrP conformers is central to prion disease, but the mech
190 ciation of PrP(C) is required for persistent PrP(res) propagation, implicating raft microdomains as a
191 nly GPI-anchored PrP(C) supported persistent PrP(res) propagation.
192 ses, support that mutations might predispose PrP to spontaneously misfold.
193                          Scrapie is a prion (PrP(Sc)) disease of sheep.
194 tor-1alpha (HIF-1alpha) protein and promoted PrP(C) accumulation and tumorigenicity in vivo.
195 , which are composed of a misfolded protein (PrP(Sc)) that self-propagates in the brain of infected i
196 or binding Abeta and cellular prion protein (PrP(C) ), the protein that is thought to have a greater
197 ment, TUDCA-mediated cellular prion protein (PrP(C)) activation was assessed.
198  complex composed of cellular prion protein (PrP(C)) and metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 (mGluR5).
199 PI) membrane anchoring of the prion protein (PrP(C)) directs it to specific regions of cell membranes
200 en proposed that the cellular prion protein (PrP(C)) functions as a cell-surface receptor, which bind
201  given the location of normal prion protein (PrP(C)) in lipid rafts and lipid cofactors generating in
202 reased expression of cellular prion protein (PrP(C)) in schwannoma cells and tissues.
203 ositol (GPI) anchoring of the prion protein (PrP(C)) influences PrP(C) misfolding into the disease-as
204 nsforming the normal cellular prion protein (PrP(C)) into new infectious PrP(Sc) Interspecies prion t
205 ic conversion of the cellular prion protein (PrP(C)) into the pathologic isoform PrP(Sc) is a key fea
206 uals by converting the normal prion protein (PrP(C)) into the pathological isoform.
207      The cellular form of the prion protein (PrP(C)) is a highly conserved glycoprotein mostly expres
208                      Cellular prion protein (PrP(C)) is a mammalian glycoprotein which is usually fou
209 cellular isoform of the human prion protein (PrP(c)) is an adhesion molecule constitutively expressed
210                  The cellular prion protein (PrP(C)) is associated with metastasis, tumor progression
211  initial report that cellular prion protein (PrP(C)) mediates toxicity of amyloid-beta species linked
212 f the Abetao-binding cellular prion protein (PrP(C)) prevents development of memory deficits in APPsw
213           The normal cellular prion protein (PrP(C)) resides in detergent-resistant outer membrane li
214 -beta-Abetao-binding cellular prion protein (PrP(C)) signaling pathway in a familial form of Alzheime
215 (Sc)), a misfolded isoform of prion protein (PrP(C)) that accumulates in the neuroretina.
216 -encoded cellular form of the prion protein (PrP(C)) to selectively propagate optimized prion conform
217  of a sheep's normal cellular prion protein (PrP(C)).
218 amined for disease-associated prion protein (PrP(Sc)) by Western blotting (WB), antigen capture enzym
219            Disease-associated prion protein (PrP(Sc)) was detected in brain and lymphoid tissues from
220 aused by an abnormally folded prion protein (PrP(Sc)).
221  use solid-state NMR to study prion protein (PrP) amyloids from human, mouse and Syrian hamster and s
222                           The prion protein (PrP) evolved from the subbranch of ZIP metal ion transpo
223 at confer transmissibility to prion protein (PrP) fibrils, we have analyzed synthetic PrP amyloids wi
224 range of mutations within the prion protein (PrP) gene.
225  isoform of the host cellular prion protein (PrP) in the brain.
226      The conversion of normal prion protein (PrP) into pathogenic PrP conformers is central to prion
227 generative disorder caused by prion protein (PrP) misfolding, clinically recognized by cognitive and
228 rion seeding and mutations of prion protein (PrP) on the structure and transmission properties of syn
229       Prions derived from the prion protein (PrP) were first characterized as infectious agents that
230                  The cellular prion protein, PrP(C), is attached by a glycosylphosphatidylinositol an
231 idylinositol (GPI)-anchorless prion protein, PrP(C), together with hydrogen-deuterium exchange couple
232 tious, misfolded forms of the prion protein, PrP(res) We show that only GPI-anchored PrP(C) was able
233 Ag Kit to detect the abnormal prion protein, PrP.
234     Misofolding of mammalian prion proteins (PrP) is believed to be the cause of a group of rare and
235 osed solely of this abnormal isoform of PrP (PrP(Sc)).
236 onformational properties of the scrapie PrP (PrP(Sc)) grossly identified types 1 and 2.
237                                  By RT-QuIC, PrP(Sc) was detected in lymphoid and/or brain tissue fro
238 s allowed amino acid substitutions in rabbit PrP and accurate analysis of misfolding propensities.
239 ased the misfolding susceptibility of rabbit PrP.IMPORTANCE Prion disorders are invariably fatal, unt
240                     Using recombinant rabbit PrP as a model, this study describes critical molecular
241 tease-resistant misfolded recombinant rabbit PrP was generated.
242 stration, using highly purified radiolabeled PrP(Sc).
243 rP(C) overexpression accelerated recombinant PrP fibril-induced conversion of PrP(C) to the abnormal
244 dology based on the use of human recombinant PrP (recPMCA) generated different self-propagating misfo
245 abbit recombinant PrP from mouse recombinant PrP.
246                 Wild-type rabbit recombinant PrP could not be misfolded into a protease-resistant sel
247 tution that distinguishes rabbit recombinant PrP from mouse recombinant PrP.
248                Therefore, rabbit recombinant PrP mutants were designed to contain every single amino
249 were identified that make rabbit recombinant PrP susceptible to misfolding, and using these, protease
250 trypsin was used to digest sheep recombinant PrP to identify a set of characteristic peptides [M132LG
251 r a nonraft transmembrane sequence redirects PrP(C) away from rafts.
252 ed that AR-12 and its analogue AR-14 reduced PrP(Sc) levels after only 72 hours of treatment.
253 bility consistent with significantly reduced PrP levels in the cytoplasmic fraction and increased PrP
254 gnificant changes in the profile of regional PrP(Sc) deposition in the brains of animals that were tr
255 PrP(C) variants of susceptible and resistant PrP(C) sequences in a prion conversion assay.
256 proteinase K (PK)-sensitive and PK-resistant PrP(Sc) and samples containing only the PK-resistant PrP
257 and samples containing only the PK-resistant PrP(Sc).
258 rion seeding activity and protease-resistant PrP without transmissible spongiform encephalopathy (TSE
259 se-dependent reduction of protease-resistant PrP(Sc) in vitro.
260 and conformational properties of the scrapie PrP (PrP(Sc)) grossly identified types 1 and 2.
261 l degeneration is attributed to PrP-scrapie (PrP(Sc)), a misfolded isoform of prion protein (PrP(C))
262  Previously, our laboratory showed that shed PrP(c) (sPrP(c)) is increased in the cerebrospinal fluid
263 isms at positions 136, 154, and 171 of sheep PrP(C) or PrP(Sc).
264             Building on data which suggested PrP and ZIP6 are critical during epithelial-to-mesenchym
265 in (PrP) fibrils, we have analyzed synthetic PrP amyloids with or without the human prion disease-ass
266 ure and transmission properties of synthetic PrP aggregates.
267 se results define the potential of targeting PrP(C) as a disease-modifying therapy for certain AD-rel
268 less sensitive to cholesterol depletion than PrP(C) and was not released from cells by treatment with
269 ld age, mutation, or overexpression and that PrP(C) may affect mitochondrial function.
270                         We demonstrated that PrP(C) specifically inhibited elongation of Abeta fibril
271                         Our study found that PrP(C) degradation decreased tumor progression in colore
272                            Here we show that PrP(C) is present in brain mitochondria from 6-12 week o
273                              We suggest that PrP(C) and its interactor, LR/37/67 kDa, could be potent
274        Taken together, our data suggest that PrP(C) can be found in mitochondria in the absence of di
275                     Our results suggest that PrP(C) recognizes structural features common to both Abe
276                       Our data suggests that PrP and ZIP6 inherited the ability to interact with NCAM
277                   Our evidence suggests that PrP's centrally located proline and lysine residues act
278 o diseases, which preferentially involve the PrP(Sc) component that is sensitive to digestion with pr
279                                By 4 MPE, the PrP(CWD) burden in all lymphoid tissues had increased an
280        However, the molecular details of the PrP(C)-Abeta interaction remain uncertain.
281        Our detailed comparative study of the PrP(Sc) conformers has revealed major differences betwee
282                We propose that targeting the PrP(C)-mGluR5 complex will reverse aberrant Abetao-trigg
283 ) isolated from sheep heterozygous for their PrP(C) proteins.
284 ciated retinal degeneration is attributed to PrP-scrapie (PrP(Sc)), a misfolded isoform of prion prot
285 embrane PrP(C) variants resist conversion to PrP(res) when transfected into scrapie-infected N2a neur
286 y GPI-anchored PrP(C) was able to convert to PrP(res) and able to serially propagate.
287 hether transmembrane PrP(C) might convert to PrP(res) if seeded by an exogenous source of PrP(res) no
288 d (desialylated PrP(C)) was not converted to PrP(Sc).
289 dues determine high or low susceptibility to PrP(Sc) propagation, protein misfolding cyclic amplifica
290 amplification (PMCA), which mimics PrP(C)-to-PrP(Sc) conversion with accelerated kinetics, was used.
291 us studies showed that nonraft transmembrane PrP(C) variants resist conversion to PrP(res) when trans
292 , likely due to segregation of transmembrane PrP(C) and GPI-anchored PrP(res) in distinct membrane en
293 s, it remained unclear whether transmembrane PrP(C) might convert to PrP(res) if seeded by an exogeno
294 s in the in vitro formation of transmissible PrP amyloids.IMPORTANCE Many diseases involve the damagi
295  C-terminal domains (residues 90-231) of two PrP variants exhibiting different pH-induced susceptibil
296 ols to identify cellular pathways underlying PrP(Sc) metabolism and PrP(C) function.
297 amino-terminal domain of human and bank vole PrP(c)s requires interaction with the rest of the molecu
298 PIs could be recruited into PrP(Sc), whereas PrP(C) with asialo-GPIs inhibited conversion.
299             Furthermore, we examined whether PrP(c) participates in glutamate uptake and found that r
300 ein 78 (GP78), which interacts directly with PrP(C).
301 s that the sialylation status of GPIs within PrP(Sc) is regulated in a cell-, tissue-, or host-specif
302 PrP23-144 (which corresponds to the Y145Stop PrP variant associated with a Gerstmann-Straussler-Schei

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。
 
Page Top