ライフサイエンスコーパス: Pseudomonas syringae

1 am immunity to the phytopathogenic bacterium Pseudomonas syringae.

2 tase) was suppressed at high temperatures in Pseudomonas syringae.

3 to increased susceptibility to the bacterium Pseudomonas syringae.

4 r their action, as currently best studied in Pseudomonas syringae.

5 radation, and susceptibility to the pathogen Pseudomonas syringae.

6 for stomatal immunity against the bacterium Pseudomonas syringae.

7 ose deposition in response to non-pathogenic Pseudomonas syringae.

8 enhanced PTI against the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae.

9 nerea and susceptibility to the hemibiotroph Pseudomonas syringae.

10 ontaining femtomolar INP concentrations from Pseudomonas syringae.

11 es resistance to both Pythium irregulare and Pseudomonas syringae.

12 confer resistance to the biotrophic pathogen Pseudomonas syringae.

13 HAA production, we discuss its regulation in Pseudomonas syringae.

14 using a novel hetero-regulation module from Pseudomonas syringae.

15 m1 avirulence gene in the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae.

16 a virulent strain of the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae.

17 the T3SS gene cluster of the plant pathogen Pseudomonas syringae.

18 basal defense against the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae.

19 of HopI1, a virulence effector of pathogenic Pseudomonas syringae.

20 ions to the phytopathogens H. parasitica and Pseudomonas syringae.

21 and systemic resistance against the pathogen Pseudomonas syringae.

22 manner by salicylic acid (SA) or by virulent Pseudomonas syringae.

23 ring infection of Arabidopsis with avirulent Pseudomonas syringae.

24 ed into plant cells by pathogenic strains of Pseudomonas syringae.

25 uca sexta) but not to the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae.

26 during colonization of Phaseolus vulgaris by Pseudomonas syringae.

27 hallenged with the phytopathogenic bacterium Pseudomonas syringae.

28 ly in Arabidopsis thaliana basal immunity to Pseudomonas syringae.

29 tis cinerea, Pectobacterium carotovorum, and Pseudomonas syringae.

30 e resistance after inoculation with virulent Pseudomonas syringae.

31 1D (bzr1-1D) mutants conferred resistance to Pseudomonas syringae.

32 ired for a complete defence response against Pseudomonas syringae.

33 thaliana and its facultative plant pathogen, Pseudomonas syringae.

34 nd pathogenicity) gene regulatory network in Pseudomonas syringae.

35 PR1, Constitutive 1 (SNC1) and Resistance to Pseudomonas syringae 2 (RPS2), for ubiquitination and fu

36 o, an effector protein of the plant pathogen Pseudomonas syringae, adopts a helical bundle fold of lo

37 of alginate epimerization, the structure of Pseudomonas syringae AlgG has been determined at 2.1-A r

38 per basal immunity to the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae Although SARD4 knockout plants show

39 mlo2 mlo6 mlo12 triple mutants, as shown for Pseudomonas syringae and Fusarium oxysporum.

40 phid (GPA; Myzus persicae) and the pathogens Pseudomonas syringae and Hyaloperonospora arabidopsidis.

41 isplayed compromised resistance to avirulent Pseudomonas syringae and Hyaloperonospora arabidopsidis.

42 cretion was enhanced in plants infected with Pseudomonas syringae and in response to treatment with s

43 The virulence of Pseudomonas syringae and many other proteobacterial path

44 For Pseudomonas syringae and other plant pathogens, regulati

45 encoded in the genomes of several strains of Pseudomonas syringae and other plant pathogens.

46 se responses to the hemibiotrophic pathogens Pseudomonas syringae and Phytophthora sojae.

47 ognize two bacterial effectors, AvrRps4 from Pseudomonas syringae and PopP2 from Ralstonia solanacear

48 carnitine transporter, designated Cbc, from Pseudomonas syringae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa that is

49 ation is induced by the effector AvrPto from Pseudomonas syringae and that this degradation in Solana

50 isease resistance against the hemibiotrophic Pseudomonas syringae and the necrotrophic Pectobacterium

51 disease resistance to the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae and the oomycete pathogen Hyalopero

52 responding data for the eubacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae and the oomycete pathogen Hyalopero

53 rs during infection with the foliar pathogen Pseudomonas syringae and the vascular pathogen Ralstonia

54 mised nonhost resistance to few pathovars of Pseudomonas syringae and Xanthomonas campestris, but als

55 Plant pathogenic bacteria, like Pseudomonas syringae and Xanthomonas campestris, use the

56 rokiniana but not to the bacterial pathogens Pseudomonas syringae and Xanthomonas oryzae.

57 ion for environmentally ubiquitous taxa like Pseudomonas syringae, and emphasize that classification

58 important plant pathogens (Botrytis cinerea, Pseudomonas syringae, and Fusarium oxysporum) were used

59 , the hemibiotrophic bacterial phytopathogen Pseudomonas syringae, and herbivorous larvae of the moth

60 The Pseudomonas syringae-Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana)

61 Some strains of the foliar pathogen Pseudomonas syringae are adapted for growth and survival

62 ontrast, responses to the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae are unaltered in hub1 plants.

63 from the syringomycin E biosynthetic NRPS of Pseudomonas syringae B301D.

64 In Pseudomonas syringae B728a, expression of the betaine ca

65 Resistance to Pseudomonas syringae bacteria in tomato (Solanum lycoper

66 aliana ios1 mutants were hypersusceptible to Pseudomonas syringae bacteria.

67 aliana ios1 mutants were hypersusceptible to Pseudomonas syringae bacteria.

68 ector protein produced by the plant pathogen Pseudomonas syringae, based on yeast two-hybrid analysis

69 minant jaz2Deltajas mutants are resistant to Pseudomonas syringae but retain unaltered resistance aga

70 The phytopathogenic bacterium Pseudomonas syringae can suppress both pathogen-associat

71 exhibited reduced cell death in response to Pseudomonas syringae carrying avirulent gene avrRpt2, an

72 R863-3p is induced by the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae carrying various effectors.

73 The bacterial plant pathogen Pseudomonas syringae causes economically important disea

74 Pseudomonas syringae causes plant diseases, and the main

75 a virulent strain of the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae, coincident with peak disease sympt

76 The phytopathogen Pseudomonas syringae competes with other epiphytic organ

77 sed susceptibility to the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae, consistent with a role in inducibl

78 sed susceptibility to the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae, consistent with defense-induced li

79 oxaben, displayed enhanced susceptibility to Pseudomonas syringae DC3000 as well as reduced activatio

80 Upon leaf infection with virulent Pseudomonas syringae DC3000, CPLL beads were also used f

81 intact in eds1 mutant plants in response to Pseudomonas syringae delivering the effector protein Avr

82 Pseudomonas syringae delivers a plethora of effector pro

83 Pseudomonas syringae delivers virulence effector protein

84 The bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae depends on effector proteins secret

85 The Pseudomonas syringae effector AvrB interacts with four r

86 The Pseudomonas syringae effector AvrB targets multiple host

87 ary site for subcellular localization of the Pseudomonas syringae effector AvrPphB and five additiona

88 se (HR) typical of ETI is abolished when the Pseudomonas syringae effector AvrRpt2 is bacterially del

89 penetration, in this study we expressed the Pseudomonas syringae effector HopAI known to inactivate

90 We report that the Pseudomonas syringae effector HopB1 acts as a protease t

91 UDOMONAS SYRINGAE5 (RPS5), which detects the Pseudomonas syringae effector protein Avirulence protein

92 sistance protein mediates recognition of the Pseudomonas syringae effector protein AvrPphB.

93 In Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), the Pseudomonas syringae effector proteins AvrB and AvrRpm1

94 rotein kinase Pto confers recognition of the Pseudomonas syringae effectors AvrPto and AvrPtoB.

95 from Solanum pimpinellifolium interacts with Pseudomonas syringae effectors AvrPto or AvrPtoB to acti

96 grammed cell death (PCD) upon recognition of Pseudomonas syringae effectors AvrPto or AvrPtoB.

97 Virulent Pseudomonas syringae effectors reprogramme NECG expressi

98 tion of AvrRpt2, one of the first identified Pseudomonas syringae effectors, involves cleavage of the

99 stallographic and biochemical studies on the Pseudomonas syringae ethylene-forming enzyme reveal a br

100 n interactions using purified peptides and a Pseudomonas syringae fliC mutant complemented with diffe

101 Strains of the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae, for example, produce proteinaceous

102 ing susceptibility to the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (

103 ains of the gram-negative bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae have been used as models for unders

104 Bacterial effectors, such as Pseudomonas syringae HopM1, induce establishment of the

105 higher resistance to the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae in Arabidopsis.

106 scular propagation of the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae in leaves and, accordingly, some im

107 The plant-pathogenic bacterium Pseudomonas syringae, in which QS controls traits involv

108 ted in enhanced susceptibility to pathogenic Pseudomonas syringae, indicating functional redundancy i

109 acco mosaic virus (TMV)-infected tobacco and Pseudomonas syringae-infected Arabidopsis.

110 * sfr6 mutants were more susceptible to both Pseudomonas syringae infection and UV-C irradiation.

111 expression and is necessary for tolerance of Pseudomonas syringae infection and UV-C irradiation.

112 Both insect feeding and Pseudomonas syringae infection increase NATA1 expression

113 iotic and biotic stresses such as drought or Pseudomonas syringae infection induced a similar increas

114 Pseudomonas syringae infection of hybrids demonstrated t

115 kout mutant displayed enhanced resistance to Pseudomonas syringae infection of immature flowers, but

116 id favored closure of stomata in response to Pseudomonas syringae infection.

117 lved in the Arabidopsis thaliana response to Pseudomonas syringae infection: a cytoplasmic localized

118 The bacterial plant pathogen Pseudomonas syringae injects effector proteins into plan

119 Pseudomonas syringae injects numerous bacterial proteins

120 omato (Solanum lycopersicum) to infection by Pseudomonas syringae involves both detection of pathogen

121 HopZ1 of the plant pathogen Pseudomonas syringae is a member of the widely distribut

122 The bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae is a model for exploring the functi

123 The foliar pathogen Pseudomonas syringae is a useful model for understanding

124 have found that normal infection of the host Pseudomonas syringae is dependent on the action of a hos

125 BIK1-mediated PTI to Pseudomonas syringae is modulated by SA, ET, and jasmona

126 The description of the ecology of Pseudomonas syringae is moving away from that of a ubiqu

127 ce suggest that the bacterial plant pathogen Pseudomonas syringae manipulates auxin physiology in Ara

128 natine (phytotoxin produced by the bacterium Pseudomonas syringae) or fusicoccin (a fungal toxin prod

129 esponse to the injection of avrRpm1-modified Pseudomonas syringae (P = 1.66e-08).

130 JMJ27 is induced in response to virulent Pseudomonas syringae pathogens and is required for resis

131 red after primary leaf infection with either Pseudomonas syringae pathovar japonica (Psj) or Xanthomo

132 During Pseudomonas syringae pathovar tomato (Pst) DC3000 infect

133 genes, scd1-1 plants were more resistant to Pseudomonas syringae pathovar tomato (Pst) DC3000 infect

134 dopsis thaliana ecotype Pi-0 is resistant to Pseudomonas syringae pathovar tomato (Pst) strain DC3000

135 type counterparts to the bacterial pathogens Pseudomonas syringae pathovar tomato and Erwinia amylovo

136 Entry of the foliar pathogen, Pseudomonas syringae pathovar tomato DC3000 (hereafter P

137 ployed T3SS substrates in the plant pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pathovar tomato strain DC3000 posse

138 riggering the Type Three Secretion System in Pseudomonas syringae pathovars.

139 ith pathogens, such as Soybean mosaic virus, Pseudomonas syringae, Phytophthora sojae, Phakopsora pac

140 fector HopZ1a produced by the plant pathogen Pseudomonas syringae possesses acetyltransferase activit

141 Pseudomonas syringae produces coronatine, a toxin that m

142 ato, detection by the host Pto kinase of the Pseudomonas syringae proteins AvrPto or AvrPtoB causes l

143 ing proteins (EBPs) HrpR and HrpS (HrpRS) of Pseudomonas syringae (Ps) activate sigma(54)-dependent t

144 rom the Rpg1-b, Rpg3, and Rpg4 loci, against Pseudomonas syringae (Psg) expressing avrB, avrB2 and av

145 A previously unstudied Pseudomonas syringae (Psy) type III effector, HopBB1, in

146 rial causal agent of bleeding canker disease Pseudomonas syringae pv aesculi, and the bark-associated

147 bean (Glycine max) RPG1-B (for resistance to Pseudomonas syringae pv glycinea) mediates species-speci

148 Pseudomonas syringae pv maculicola ES4326 (Pma ES4326) r

149 brassicicola and the bacterial hemibiotroph Pseudomonas syringae pv maculicola ES4326 (Pma ES4326) w

150 ns affected growth of the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv maculicola ES4326.

151 udomonas syringae pv tomato DC3000 (Pst) and Pseudomonas syringae pv maculicola ES4326.

152 PSEUDOMONAS SYRINGAE2 (RPS2), RESISTANCE TO PSEUDOMONAS SYRINGAE PV MACULICOLA1, and RPS5.

153 protein Q), a type III effector secreted by Pseudomonas syringae pv phaseolicola, is widely conserve

154 The bacterium Pseudomonas syringae pv syringae B728a (PsyB728a) uses a

155 monas vesicatoria, Pseudomonas corrugata and Pseudomonas syringae pv syringae.

156 s of L-MA are induced by the foliar pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato (Pst DC3000) and elevated

157 ainst several bacterial pathogens, including Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato (Pst) and the insect pest

158 secretion system-deficient bacterial strain Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato (Pst) DC3000 hrcC(-) and

159 induced by the avirulent bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato (Pst) DC3000/avrRpt2, and

160 inst a surface-deposited bacterial pathogen, Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato (Pst) DC3000; in contrast

161 sceptibility to the hemibiotrophic bacterium Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato (Pst).

162 are more resistant to an avirulent strain of Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato (Pst-AvrRpm1), which was

163 or with an avirulent isolate of the bacteria Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato (PstavrRpt2).

164 he Hrp outer protein Q (HopQ1) effector from Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato (Pto) strain DC3000 is co

165 Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato DC3000 (Pst DC3000), whic

166 pport increased bacterial growth of virulent Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato DC3000 (Pst) and Pseudomo

167 lant defenses against the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato DC3000 (Pst).

168 The virulent bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato DC3000 (PstDC3000) respon

169 epigenetically following disease pressure by Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato DC3000 (PstDC3000).

170 are confirmed in subsequent experiments with Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato DC3000 and Arabidopsis th

171 erived metabolites that induce T3SS genes in Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato DC3000 and report that ma

172 ry but also when leaves were inoculated with Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato DC3000 and roots with the

173 usceptibility to both the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato DC3000 and the fungal pat

174 expression changes following challenge with Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato DC3000 and the nonpathoge

175 ymer increase after infection with avirulent Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato DC3000 avrRpt2(+), and pa

176 and an increased tolerance to the biotrophic Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato DC3000 bacterium and Beet

177 idopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) infected with Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato DC3000 expressing AvrRpt2

178 Infection with Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato DC3000 expressing the bac

179 study demonstrated that foliar infection by Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato DC3000 induced malic acid

180 avirulent strains of the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato DC3000 results in a drast

181 e induction and enhancement of resistance to Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato DC3000 were partially red

182 Empoasca spp.), and (3) bacterial pathogens (Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato DC3000), showing that all

183 ea and Alternaria solani, bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato DC3000, and larvae of the

184 etained susceptibility to bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato DC3000.

185 Arabidopsis against the pathogenic bacterium Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato DC3000.

186 nd led to increased resistance to pathogenic Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato DC3000.

187 nd resistance against the virulent bacterium Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato DC3000.

188 plants with the avirulent bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato DC3000/avrRpt2 induces bi

189 ection with virulent or avirulent strains of Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato generates long-distance S

190 lerated hypersensitive response triggered by Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato in soybean (Glycine max)

191 istance against the hemibiotrophic bacterium Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato, the biotrophic oomycete

192 ersicum) resistance response to its pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato.

193 s either the AvrPto or AvrPtoB effector from Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato.

194 oculation with the phytopathogenic bacterium Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato.

195 r, led to plants with enhanced resistance to Pseudomonas syringae pv.

196 Arabidopsis thaliana to the foliar pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv.

197 ween Arabidopsis and its bacterial pathogen, Pseudomonas syringae pv.

198 t is suffering from attacks of the bacterial Pseudomonas syringae pv.

199 The introduction of Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae (Psa) severely damag

200 in limiting growth of the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. maculicola (Pma) ES4326 and act

201 s important for defense against the pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. maculicola ES4326 (Pma ES4326).

202 nes and resistance to the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. maculicola ES4326.

203 ) gene expression, to the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. maculicola.

204 hallenged with the cereal bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. oryzae, transgenic EFR wheat li

205 Loss of a GI from the bean pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. phaseolicola (Pph) is driven by

206 nst Xanthomonas citri subsp. citri (Xcc) and Pseudomonas syringae pv. phaseolicola (Psp) NPS3121.

207 The ethylene-forming enzyme (EFE) from Pseudomonas syringae pv. phaseolicola PK2 is a member of

208 rved this phenomenon with the plant pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. phaseolicola where isolates tha

209 AvrRps4, an effector protein from Pseudomonas syringae pv. pisi, triggers RPS4-dependent i

210 spectively, the complete hrp/hrc region from Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae 61 into the genome of

211 study, the role of (p)ppGpp on virulence of Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae B728a (PssB728a) was i

212 Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae B728a is a resident on

213 Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae B728a is known to prod

214 ion and fitness benefits of syringafactin by Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae B728a on leaves.

215 The transcript profiles of Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae B728a support a model

216 levels of an unknown surfactant produced by Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae B728a that was not det

217 Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae cell densities fluctua

218 mely the halogenase SyrB2 from the bacterium Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae.

219 anced resistance to tobacco mosaic virus and Pseudomonas syringae pv. tabaci.

220 creases the susceptibility of Arabidopsis to Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato (Pst) DC3000 independent

221 r disease response to the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato (Pst) DC3000, including

222 istance to the biotrophic bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato (Pst) DC3000.

223 induced by the avirulent bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato (Pst) DC3000/avrRpt2, an

224 or Fen kinase to determine immunity against Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato (Pst).

225 is highly induced by the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato (Pst).

226 response to infection of bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato (Pst).

227 resistant to the virulent bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato (Pto) DC3000.

228 * Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato (Pto) T1 is pathogenic i

229 he ability to resist COR-producing pathogens Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato and P. syringae pv. macu

230 The plant pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 (DC3000) is found

231 h to investigate the role of siderophores in Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 (DC3000) virulenc

232 of PvdS, a group IV sigma factor encoded by Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 (DC3000), a plant

233 n filament organization after infection with Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 (Pst DC3000), dem

234 ld-type plants, against avirulent strains of Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 (Pst) carrying Av

235 RT2 displayed reduced resistance to virulent Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 (PstDC3000).

236 characterized the molecular function of the Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 (Pto) effector Ho

237 e resistance against the biotrophic bacteria Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 and for susceptib

238 d contributes to resistance to the bacterium Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 and the fungal pa

239 9-mediated PCD, as well as non-host pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 and the general e

240 Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 is a bacterial pa

241 tly increased upon infection with pathogenic Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 lacking hopQ1-1 [

242 The bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 must detoxify pla

243 merina BMM (PcBMM), but not to the bacterium Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 or to the oomycet

244 activating jasmonate signalling, for example Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 produces coronati

245 Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 produces the phyt

246 ve been investigating how the plant pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 responds to iron

247 The bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 suppresses the tw

248 As a counter-defense, the plant pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 uses the virulenc

249 verexpressing this gene were challenged with Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000, which is a bacte

250 olicin M-like bacteriocin, syringacin M from Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000.

251 effector genes using the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000.

252 The interaction of tomato with Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato is an established model

253 tomato (Solanum lycopersicum), resistance to Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato is elicited by the inter

254 The type III effector protein AvrPto from Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato is secreted into plant c

255 The agronomical relevant tomato-Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato pathosystem is widely us

256 '-ends of transcripts for the plant pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato str. DC3000.

257 icola and susceptibility to the hemibiotroph Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato strain DC3000 (Pto DC300

258 Plant pathogenic bacteria, such as Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato strain DC3000, the causa

259 double mutant showed enhanced resistance to Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato, which is consistent wit

260 a as well as the plant pathogenic bacterium, Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato.

261 nse in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) against Pseudomonas syringae relies on the recognition of E3 lig

262 hat these antisera reacted with flagellae of Pseudomonas syringae, reported to be glycosylated with a

263 The pathogen Pseudomonas syringae requires a type-III protein secreti

264 us, and that CPSF30 activity is required for Pseudomonas syringae resistance.

265 n of Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) with Pseudomonas syringae revealed that LPO is predominantly

266 In response to pathogens such as Pseudomonas syringae, SA is synthesized and activates wi

267 Pseudomonas syringae secretes c. 30 effectors, some of w

268 Pseudomonas syringae secretes effectors from its type II

269 ctor proteins (T3Es) from the plant pathogen Pseudomonas syringae serves as an example to systematica

270 ot sim-1, was more susceptible to a virulent Pseudomonas syringae strain, and this susceptibility cou

271 nce genes, host range, and aggressiveness of Pseudomonas syringae strains closely related to the toma

272 Pseudomonas syringae strategies to alter host auxin biol

273 ry of ice nucleation-active bacteria such as Pseudomonas syringae supports that they have been part o

274 h is produced by plant pathogenic strains of Pseudomonas syringae, suppresses host defense responses

275 We found that the Pseudomonas syringae T3SS was restricted in its ability

276 PRX33 knockdown line is more susceptible to Pseudomonas syringae than wild-type plants.

277 etyltransferase carried by the phytopathogen Pseudomonas syringae that elicits effector-triggered imm

278 or protein from the bacterial plant pathogen Pseudomonas syringae that suppresses plant immunity by i

279 creased resistance to the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae These results suggest that ANT and

280 For the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae, these molecules are often effector

281 ent, avirulent and non-pathogenic strains of Pseudomonas syringae, thus limiting the defense function

282 The ability of Pseudomonas syringae to grow and cause diseases in plant

283 are utilized by the bacterial phytopathogen Pseudomonas syringae to promote pathogenesis.

284 ipase D beta1 (PLDbeta1)-deficient plants by Pseudomonas syringae tomato pv DC3000 (Pst DC30000) resu

285 dmr6 mutants show loss of susceptibility to Pseudomonas syringae, transgenic dmr6 plants expressing

286 hat high humidity can effectively compromise Pseudomonas syringae-triggered stomatal closure in both

287 that SA promotes the interaction between the Pseudomonas syringae type III effector AvrPtoB and NPR1.

288 The Pseudomonas syringae type III effector HopU1 is a mono-A

289 * Pseudomonas syringae type III effectors are known to sup

290 Pseudomonas syringae type III effectors are known to sup

291 The Pseudomonas syringae type III-secreted effector HopU1 is

292 * Gene expression responses to Pseudomonas syringae, ultraviolet-C (UV-C) irradiation,

293 Pseudomonas syringae uses the two-component system RhpRS

294 coronatine (COR) promotes various aspects of Pseudomonas syringae virulence, including invasion throu

295 plants and the nonpathogenic hrpA mutant of Pseudomonas syringae was able to grow rapidly in the mut

296 y data of Arabidopsis thaliana infected with Pseudomonas syringae, we analyzed Arabidopsis defense re

297 bacterial bioreporters of the phytopathogen Pseudomonas syringae were constructed that couple a QAC-

298 One such effector is AvrPtoB of Pseudomonas syringae, which degrades host protein kinase

299 A homologous enzyme from Pseudomonas syringae whose encoding gene ( orf3) shares

300 opsis thaliana leaves infected with virulent Pseudomonas syringae within 8 h of infection.