戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。

今後説明を表示しない

[OK]

コーパス検索結果 (left1)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1                                              Q-wave MI was noted in 52% to 53%, and thrombolytic ther
2  = 0.003), all MI (2.5% vs. 3.9%, p = 0.02), Q-wave MI (0.1% vs. 0.8%, p = 0.002), stent thrombosis (
3  in 565 patients (54%) including death (9%), Q-wave MI (9%) and target vessel revascularization (36%)
4 y identified with coronary angiography after Q-wave MI, the culprit lesion after NQWMI has not been w
5 unclear if rates of long-term sequelae after Q-wave MI have improved.
6 s, bypass surgery in 13, arrhythmia in 3 and Q wave MI in 2.
7 rence in death (5.6% vs. 5.3%, p = 0.92) and Q wave MI rate (4.3% vs. 2.9%, p = 0.55) after the multi
8 able, the frequency of in-hospital death and Q wave MI was similar to that of a matched consecutive s
9 ence in death (1.4% vs. 0.7%, p = 0.26), and Q-wave MI (1.2% vs. 0%, p = 0.02) was lower following mu
10 it of normal (ULN) in 17.9% of patients, and Q-wave MI developed in 0.6%.
11  included 246 patients with a first anterior Q-wave MI.
12 alyzed 303 patients with previous (>16 days) Q-wave MI by ECG who underwent transthoracic echocardiog
13 97.3%, with 2.7% major complications (death, Q wave MI, coronary artery bypass graft surgery [CABG]).
14           At 1 year, the frequency of death, Q wave MI, CABG and severe angina at 1 year was similar
15 In-hospital composite cardiac events (death, Q-wave MI, urgent in-hospital revascularization) and 8 m
16  The rate of the composite end point (death, Q-wave-MI and target lesion revascularization) at 1-year
17   At six months, 6% of patients died, 1% had Q-wave MI, 17% had repeat TVR, and the overall rate of m
18               The frequencies of in-hospital Q-wave MI, coronary artery bypass graft surgery and deat
19 men and 976 men with unstable angina and non-Q wave MI at the time of enrollment were compared.
20    The proportion of unstable angina and non-Q wave MI for women was similar in the trial and Registr
21 mpared with men with unstable angina and non-Q wave MI have not been extensively studied.
22  2) The outcome with unstable angina and non-Q wave MI is related to severity of illness and not gend
23 evascularization for unstable angina and non-Q wave MI was similar for women and men.
24 uating patients with unstable angina and non-Q wave MI, little prospective information is available o
25 roportionately more men in the trial had non-Q wave MI than men in the Registry.
26  to the hospital with unstable angina or non-Q wave MI.
27 as a higher prevalence of periprocedural non-Q wave MI (28% vs. 16%, p = 0.009) in the multiple SVG g
28 vs. 0.06%, p = 0.009) and periprocedural non-Q wave MI (8.7% vs. 4.2%, p = 0.003) were more frequent
29 useful in risk stratifying patients with non-Q wave MI.
30                                          Non-Q-wave MI (CK-MB > 3 times normal) occurred in 14% of pa
31                                          Non-Q-wave MI (CK-MB > or = 5 times normal) was more frequen
32                                          Non-Q-wave MI with CPK-MB >8x ULN was also a strong predicto
33 ts consisted of 3 deaths, 2 acute MIs, 1 non-Q-wave MI, and 3 cases of CHF.
34   There were 28 patients (16%) who had a non-Q-wave MI.
35 tine evaluation were defined as having a non-Q-wave MI.
36 , and there is no specific ECG sign of a non-Q-wave MI.
37  incidence of peri-procedural Q-wave and non-Q-wave MI.
38 cardial infarction [MI] through 30 days; non-Q-wave MI through 24 h; and ipsilateral stroke or neurol
39 infarction [MI]) in patients who evolved non-Q-wave MI (NQMI) following thrombolytic therapy.
40 e end point of death, postprocedural MI, non-Q-wave MI after PCI hospitalization, or urgent target-le
41 h a significant reduction in the risk of non-Q-wave MI (unadjusted odds ratio 0.18, 95% confidence in
42 butable mainly to a greater frequency of non-Q-wave MI with acolysis (19.6% versus 7.9%, P=0.03).
43  8676 admissions with unstable angina or non-Q-wave MI were enumerated and, of these, 3318 patients w
44 ristics, (2) a higher rate of procedural non-Q-wave MI, and (3) similar TLR and overall major cardiac
45 rdial infarction (MI); positive group, 4 non-Q-wave MIs and 12 myocardial revascularizations; nondiag
46 antly higher frequency of periprocedural non-Q-wave MIs, and 3) equivalent repeat revascularization r
47 ciated with a reduced risk of procedural non-Q-wave MIs.
48 h a lower incidence of procedure-related non-Q-wave MIs (duration of pretreatment <1 day, 29% had MI;
49                             The incidence of Q-wave MI was also higher with acolysis (5.4% versus 2.2
50 blation and stenting than PTCA, the rates of Q-wave MI and survival were device-independent.
51  event-free survival (freedom from dealth or Q wave MI) and relief of angina; however, the need for r
52 erence in death (2.2% versus 0.9%, P=.34) or Q-wave MI (1.4% versus 0.9%, P=.64) between the two grou
53  year mortality (2.5% vs. 3.5%, p = 0.49) or Q-wave MI (2.7% vs. 1.2%, p = 0.48), and the overall car
54 reduced (nonspecified) composite of death or Q-wave MI.
55 times normal), or type 3 (>8 times normal or Q-wave MI).
56 yzed 173 asymptomatic patients with previous Q-wave MI (>16 days) with echocardiographic quantitation
57 ted electrocardiographic evidence of a prior Q-wave MI, but who lacked a history of this diagnosis.
58  age of 69 years) with an initial recognized Q-wave MI from 1950 through 1989, we investigated time t

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。