コーパス検索結果 (left1)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 Q-wave MI was noted in 52% to 53%, and thrombolytic ther
2 = 0.003), all MI (2.5% vs. 3.9%, p = 0.02), Q-wave MI (0.1% vs. 0.8%, p = 0.002), stent thrombosis (
3 in 565 patients (54%) including death (9%), Q-wave MI (9%) and target vessel revascularization (36%)
4 y identified with coronary angiography after Q-wave MI, the culprit lesion after NQWMI has not been w
7 rence in death (5.6% vs. 5.3%, p = 0.92) and Q wave MI rate (4.3% vs. 2.9%, p = 0.55) after the multi
8 able, the frequency of in-hospital death and Q wave MI was similar to that of a matched consecutive s
9 ence in death (1.4% vs. 0.7%, p = 0.26), and Q-wave MI (1.2% vs. 0%, p = 0.02) was lower following mu
12 alyzed 303 patients with previous (>16 days) Q-wave MI by ECG who underwent transthoracic echocardiog
13 97.3%, with 2.7% major complications (death, Q wave MI, coronary artery bypass graft surgery [CABG]).
15 In-hospital composite cardiac events (death, Q-wave MI, urgent in-hospital revascularization) and 8 m
16 The rate of the composite end point (death, Q-wave-MI and target lesion revascularization) at 1-year
17 At six months, 6% of patients died, 1% had Q-wave MI, 17% had repeat TVR, and the overall rate of m
20 The proportion of unstable angina and non-Q wave MI for women was similar in the trial and Registr
22 2) The outcome with unstable angina and non-Q wave MI is related to severity of illness and not gend
24 uating patients with unstable angina and non-Q wave MI, little prospective information is available o
27 as a higher prevalence of periprocedural non-Q wave MI (28% vs. 16%, p = 0.009) in the multiple SVG g
28 vs. 0.06%, p = 0.009) and periprocedural non-Q wave MI (8.7% vs. 4.2%, p = 0.003) were more frequent
38 cardial infarction [MI] through 30 days; non-Q-wave MI through 24 h; and ipsilateral stroke or neurol
40 e end point of death, postprocedural MI, non-Q-wave MI after PCI hospitalization, or urgent target-le
41 h a significant reduction in the risk of non-Q-wave MI (unadjusted odds ratio 0.18, 95% confidence in
42 butable mainly to a greater frequency of non-Q-wave MI with acolysis (19.6% versus 7.9%, P=0.03).
43 8676 admissions with unstable angina or non-Q-wave MI were enumerated and, of these, 3318 patients w
44 ristics, (2) a higher rate of procedural non-Q-wave MI, and (3) similar TLR and overall major cardiac
45 rdial infarction (MI); positive group, 4 non-Q-wave MIs and 12 myocardial revascularizations; nondiag
46 antly higher frequency of periprocedural non-Q-wave MIs, and 3) equivalent repeat revascularization r
48 h a lower incidence of procedure-related non-Q-wave MIs (duration of pretreatment <1 day, 29% had MI;
51 event-free survival (freedom from dealth or Q wave MI) and relief of angina; however, the need for r
52 erence in death (2.2% versus 0.9%, P=.34) or Q-wave MI (1.4% versus 0.9%, P=.64) between the two grou
53 year mortality (2.5% vs. 3.5%, p = 0.49) or Q-wave MI (2.7% vs. 1.2%, p = 0.48), and the overall car
56 yzed 173 asymptomatic patients with previous Q-wave MI (>16 days) with echocardiographic quantitation
57 ted electrocardiographic evidence of a prior Q-wave MI, but who lacked a history of this diagnosis.
58 age of 69 years) with an initial recognized Q-wave MI from 1950 through 1989, we investigated time t
WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。