ライフサイエンスコーパス: RFLP

1 RFLP analyses revealed different restriction fragment pa

2 RFLP analyses were performed to investigate the presence

3 RFLP analysis of 156 human and 682 avian strains demonst

4 RFLP analysis of the recA amplicons revealed 2 patients

5 RFLP analysis resolved nine eae, nine bfpA, and four per

6 RFLP analysis showed little variation for some of the ge

7 RFLP analysis with IS100 as a probe divided these strain

8 RFLP mapping, DNA gel blot, and sequence analyses showed

9 RFLP may be very useful for studying clusters of PCP in

10 RFLP probes detected pairs of homeologous loci on N7 and

11 RFLP results were available for 930 isolates from 806 in

12 RFLP results were available from 83% of culture-positive

13 ts of complete mtDNA sequences along with 10 RFLP data sets.

14 A molecular map with 102 RFLP, 34 AFLP and six microsatellite markers has been us

15 The genotypes from 957 SSR, 1023 RFLP, 189 SNP, and 177 InDel markers have been entered a

16 ed into 70 distinct clusters belonging to 12 RFLP families.

17 chromosome 3A from WI [CNN(WI3A)], with 142 RFLP probes and 55 SSR markers revealed that the extent

18 mating were genotyped at the same set of 190 RFLP loci.

19 C. burnetii by hybridizing the genomes of 20 RFLP-grouped and four ungrouped isolates from disparate

20 pproximately 300 kb) intervals based on 2050 RFLP probes, including 865 heterologous probes that fost

21 Ls for seven agronomic traits relative to 26 RFLP and 15 SSR chromosome 3A-specific markers on 95 sin

22 allidum repeat (tpr) subfamily II genes, (3) RFLP analysis of the tprC gene, (4) determination of tpr

23 Identification of SSRs within 312 RFLP sequences plus direct mapping of 124 SSRs and explo

24 oid lines (DHLs) that were genotyped for 368 RFLP, 358 AFLP, and 3 isozyme markers.

25 d transmission ratio distortion (TRD) of 729 RFLPs, AFLPs, and isozyme markers distributed across the

26 and identified 75 useful genes along with 93 RFLP markers by comparing 35 different maps of Poaceae s

27 Afut1 RFLP analysis detected 40 types.

28 PMM analysis and Afut1 RFLP analysis, or their combination, appear to provide t

29 An RFLP genomic subtraction was used to isolate male-specif

30 which RFLP was available, 419 (71.6%) had an RFLP pattern with more than five copies of IS6110.

31 Using an RFLP that distinguishes an arginine to histidine change

32 ction fragment length polymorphism analysis (RFLP), PCR fingerprinting, and multilocus sequence typin

33 Fluorescence microscopy, DGGE and RFLP analysis of PCR amplified16S rRNA genes, and multil

34 y of unrelated isolates (by epidemiology and RFLP typing) were also identified by VNTR typing.

35 tumors using 20 different microsatellite and RFLP markers.

36 PMM and RFLP analyses had comparable high degrees of discriminat

37 In general, pyrosequencing and RFLP showed comparable sensitivities in detecting most o

38 ed to CC-01 to assess the mutation rates and RFLP patterns (obtained by digestion with MluI, HincII,

39 [Details of the SNPs and RFLP assays can be found at http://www.sanger.ac.uk and

40 arcasses was used to genotype individuals at RFLP markers of known chromosomal position around the ma

41 e. Hake-ITS1-RFLP (89%) or Hake-Cytochrome b-RFLP (83%).

42 Targeted IS6110-based RFLP genotyping can be applied to rapidly identify speci

43 In an effort to improve IS6110-based RFLP to make it a faster format, DuPont Molecular Diagno

44 pid means of detecting all three motifs, but RFLP analysis was more specific for TPM-A.

45 from their sexual partners were analyzed by RFLP and heteroduplex mobility assays.

46 585 tuberculosis (TB) cases were analyzed by RFLP, representing 98.2% of the 596 culture-positive TB

47 cular epidemiology of PRRSVs is evaluated by RFLP analysis.

48 with 3 to 16 copies of IS6110) were found by RFLP analyses.

49 e group (LG) VIIR and identified the gene by RFLP mapping and genetic complementation.

50 with 1, 2 or 4 copies per haploid genome by RFLP analysis, microsatellite anchors to BACs and by con

51 e easier to interpret than those obtained by RFLP or RAPD analysis.

52 sis of paired-end read information and/or by RFLP mapping.

53 harengus), ND3/4 and ND5/6, were surveyed by RFLP analysis to assess the effects of marker variabilit

54 We used chloroplast RFLPs and nuclear microsatellites to establish the relat

55 ions of doubled haploid lines and codominant RFLP markers.

56 Comparative RFLP mapping demonstrates that multiple independent rear

57 Segregation and definitive RFLP analyses demonstrated that the patient and his sibl

58 a "grass genome model." Using a high-density RFLP map as a framework, a robust physical map of sorghu

59 of amplified C4d genomic DNA for diagnostic RFLP analysis of C4A and C4B; and (4) a highly reproduci

60 Of the five different RFLP patterns obtained, two clustered with Helicobacter

61 estriction enzyme, Tsp5091, yielded distinct RFLP pattern for each species of shrimps having fragment

62 Reunion and Mauritius using chloroplast DNA RFLP markers and random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPDs

63 fragment length polymorphism of genomic DNA (RFLP) and PCR-based random amplification of polymorphic

64 t length polymorphism (RFLP) patterns (i.e., RFLP clustering) because they are infected with the same

65 cosmids were identified that contained eight RFLP marker sequences, and these cosmids were located on

66 ng was faster and less expensive than either RFLP or direct sequencing.

67 Seven of 56 (12.5%) strains exhibited RFLPs following digestion of the proximal region with re

68 this phenomenon by standard fingerprinting (RFLP and VNTR).

69 red the analyzer with conventional flagellin RFLP for typing Campylobacter jejuni.

70 e the amount of DNA for pyroseqencing as for RFLP.

71 -mediated decay, and restriction enzymes for RFLP analysis.

72 capacity of the typing methods was high for RFLP and MIRU-VNTR (allelic diversity [h] = 0.99) but lo

73 probe was less specific and led to only four RFLP types, with 81% belonging to type 1.

74 Data from RFLP, AFLP, and microsatellite analysis were used to cre

75 The humantropic HaeIII and HpaII gag RFLP genotypes in the family of study were not present i

76 These HaeIII and HpaII gag RFLP profiles proved to be components of humantropic PER

77 in kidney transplant recipients in Germany, RFLP analysis demonstrated identical patterns in samples

78 HinfI RFLP revealed absence of the AGA926-928TTC H. pylori gen

79 the two PCR fragments with unpredicted HinfI RFLP, resulting in an EcoRI restriction site.

80 However, RFLP is less amenable to high-throughput analyses of man

81 ed from the same patient showed an identical RFLP pattern.

82 copies at two MIRU alleles but had identical RFLP patterns.

83 tuberculosis isolates belonging to identical RFLP patterns (clusters) were considered to represent re

84 N. veterana type strain also gave identical RFLPs for an amplified portion of the 65-kDa heat shock

85 ing the pccb gene were sequenced to identify RFLPs.

86 and the extent to which small differences in RFLP patterns distinguish between different viral strain

87 usters, and 22 (33%) of the isolates were in RFLP clusters.

88 drograms prepared from digitized PFGE, IS100 RFLP analysis, and IS285 RFLP analysis images, respectiv

89 ep-PCR exhibited 89% concordance with IS1245-RFLP typing of 28 M. avium subspecies avium strains.

90 gitized PFGE, IS100 RFLP analysis, and IS285 RFLP analysis images, respectively.

91 tinct patterns (80 patterns) than did IS6110 RFLP (58 patterns), as would be expected in this study s

92 ters and strains demonstrating unique IS6110 RFLP patterns were investigated in interferon- gamma -ac

93 (15.2%) were among the 92 cases with IS6110 RFLP patterns similar to those in clusters, and 2 (5.2%)

94 e tuberculosis from 1999 to 2007 with IS6110 RFLP results presenting five or fewer bands.

95 fell into four clusters identified by IS6110-RFLP and rep-PCR, with 97% concordance observed between

96 riction fragment length polymorphism (IS6110-RFLP) and spoligotyping analyses.

97 riction fragment length polymorphism (IS6110-RFLP) as the high-resolution adjunct.

98 Phylogenetic analysis of the IS6110-RFLP patterns from representative RD(Rio) and LAM strain

99 triction fragment length polymorphism (IS900-RFLP), and IS1311 polymorphism analysis using PCR.

100 of the pigmented isolates had the same IS900-RFLP BstEII and PvuII profiles.

101 The IS900-RFLP BstEII profile was new, but the IS900-RFLP PvuII pr

102 0-RFLP BstEII profile was new, but the IS900-RFLP PvuII profile corresponded to PvuII type 6 of a she

103 cts) than individual methods, i.e. Hake-ITS1-RFLP (89%) or Hake-Cytochrome b-RFLP (83%).

104 K-function analysis of the largest RFLP clusters and families showed they co-localized in s

105 Over 1000 genetically linked RFLP loci in Brassica napus were mapped to homologous po

106 ins are highly prevalent, followed by manual RFLP typing if resolution is not achieved, thereby savin

107 ple and significantly faster than the manual RFLP method (8 h versus 5 days).

108 markers were developed for previously mapped RFLP-based genetic markers so that large genomic clones

109 hort regions derived from genetically mapped RFLPs located throughout the genome.

110 s mutations were assessed by primer-mediated RFLP, allele-specific oligonucleotide hybridization, and

111 m amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) and mtDNA RFLPs markers.

112 Based on a total mtDNA-RFLP approach with 16 hexanucleotide-recognizing restric

113 trategies for SAG1, SAG2, and B1, multilocus RFLP analyses were performed on PCR-amplified parasite D

114 T locus came from the occurrence of multiple RFLPs in lines with varying alleles of the T locus, as w

115 cagA variation, including identification of RFLP types within TPM-A.

116 We confirmed the relatedness of RFLP-grouped isolates and showed that two ungrouped isol

117 he same male parent and used the same set of RFLP probes, facilitating the construction of a consensu

118 power of rep-PCR equaled or exceeded that of RFLP.

119 Based on RFLP analysis, a single Pneumocystis strain caused pneum

120 Based on RFLP, 94% of the isolates could be grouped into NL or BR

121 s using restriction length polymorphism-PCR (RFLP-PCR).

122 a new technology that combines inverse PCR, RFLP, and denaturing high-performance liquid chromatogra

123 stics using genus- and species-specific PCR, RFLP analysis, and 16S rRNA sequence analysis enabled th

124 PCR-RFLP analysis results indicated that the strains represe

125 PCR-RFLP of benA is a simple method for the identification o

126 Genotypes were identified using a PCR-RFLP assay.

127 , were selected for the development of a PCR-RFLP capillary electrophoresis method to discriminate th

128 etermined from blood-derived DNA using a PCR-RFLP method.

129 n fragment length polymorphism analysis (PCR-RFLP).

130 ng the Tag-It Mutation Detection Kit and PCR-RFLP assays.

131 ix culture-negative clinical samples, as PCR-RFLP could not reliably detect penicillin MICs of 0.12 t

132 All mtDNAs were assayed by PCR-RFLP analysis and control region sequencing, and the non

133 n groupings similar to that generated by PCR-RFLP but further differentiated two flaA PCR-RFLP types

134 fla typing by PCR-RFLP grouped one sporadic isolate with the outbreak stra

135 cX4 plasmids were fully characterized by PCR-RFLP.

136 sion (1.0000) compared to a conventional PCR-RFLP test.

137 ere verified experimentally using either PCR-RFLP or genomic Invader assays.

138 o sporadic strains were distinct by flaA PCR-RFLP but differed only by a single base substitution in

139 RFLP but further differentiated two flaA PCR-RFLP types (with a 1-bp difference in the 582-bp region)

140 ypes of chloroplast DNA (cpDNA) markers (PCR-RFLP, cpSSR) to study the phylogeography of the species

141 In this study, a novel PCR-RFLP protocol was developed as a tool to authenticate fo

142 estriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) method that rapidly and accurately distinguishes A

143 estriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) method.

144 fragment length polymorphism technique (PCR-RFLP).

145 , TaqI and ApaI) was performed using the PCR-RFLP method.

146 Of 102 PCR-positive samples, the PCR-RFLP patterns resulted in four different types, 32 sampl

147 ant genotypes were characterized through PCR-RFLP on DNA isolated from peripheral lymphocytes, and th

148 for GSTM1, GSTP1, and p53 codon 72 using PCR-RFLP techniques.

149 th CAD and 307 healthy individuals using PCR-RFLP.

150 PCR/RFLP assay was used to detect A2142G and A2143G point mu

151 olorectal adenoma, we genotyped CCND1 by PCR/RFLP on 161 incident sporadic adenoma cases and 213 cont

152 estriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR/RFLP).

153 The PCR/RFLP assay was a rapid and accurate H.pylori diagnostic

154 Here, we performed RFLP analyses using Insertion Sequence elements to resol

155 PGRS RFLP and spoligotyping were performed using standardized

156 oligotypes and 87 (67.4%) shared common PGRS RFLP patterns.

157 sequence located in the plasmid pTBN12 (PGRS RFLP) and spoligotyping (based on the polymorphism of th

158 nd restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analyses.

159 on restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis after polymerase chain reaction amplifica

160 ed restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis and spoligotyping.

161 t1 restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis and three PCR-based molecular typing meth

162 ed restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis as a primary screen to assess the amount

163 Restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis is one of the tools commonly used to stud

164 ng restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates wi

165 CR-restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis of oxyR.

166 CR-restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis of rrf (5S)-rrl (23S) intergenic spacer a

167 2) restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis of T. pallidum repeat (tpr) subfamily II

168 CR-restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis of the oxyR gene.

169 Restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis of the PCR-amplified proximal region of t

170 ed restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis of three virulence genes (eae, bfpA, and

171 by restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis was investigated for the rapid detection

172 Restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis was used to compare Pneumocystis isolates

173 m, restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis with HaeIII enzyme was performed in the p

174 nd restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis with insertion sequences IS100 and IS285

175 by restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis.

176 or restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis.

177 to restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis.

178 nd restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis.

179 by restriction-fragment-length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis.

180 to restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis.

181 by restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) and nucleotide sequence comparisons, appears to be

182 CR-restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) and real-time LightCycler (LC) PCR hybridization a

183 10 restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) and spoligotyping.

184 10 restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) and spoligotyping.

185 a restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) assay that allows the rapid detection of iSTOP-med

186 A restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) assay was developed to identify and differentiate

187 a restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) at position -307 in the promoter of the TNFA gene

188 A) restriction-fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) data and allozymes.

189 nd restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) markers.

190 a restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) method and the RT-PCR assay, and discrepant sample

191 CR-restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) method previously applied to these 27 isolates and

192 by restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) of the rRNA operons, with three distinct patterns

193 a restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) on the ATP1A2 gene.

194 ng Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism (RFLP) or sequencing.

195 10 restriction fragment-length polymorphism (RFLP) pattern clusters and strains demonstrating unique

196 iI restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) pattern, while isolates of the other four serotype

197 10 restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) patterns (i.e., RFLP clustering) because they are

198 he restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) patterns obtained by restriction endonuclease anal

199 CR-restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) patterns were analyzed.

200 ng restriction-fragment-length polymorphism (RFLP) patterns.

201 ag restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) profiles resulting from single nucleotide polymorp

202 al restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) typing by agarose gel electrophoresis, we compared

203 ed restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) typing compared to a combination of variable numbe

204 ed restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) typing method is highly discriminatory; however, i

205 al Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism (RFLP), a mismatch is usually introduced near the end of

206 10 restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP), and 24-locus-based mycobacterial interspersed rep

207 g, restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP), and direct conventional sequencing (for dhfr) com

208 of restriction-fragment length polymorphism (RFLP), rapid amplified polymorphic DNA, and Lior serotyp

209 10-restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP), spoligotyping, mycobacterial interspersed repetit

210 se restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP).

211 R) restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP).

212 th restriction fragment-length polymorphism (RFLP).

213 by restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP).

214 or restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP).

215 ed restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP-PCR) analysis, but found no association between rs2

216 by restriction fragment length polymorphism [RFLP] analysis) that correctly identified all LAM family

217 y restriction fragment-length polymorphisms (RFLP).

218 g restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLP).

219 ) restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLPs) and cytochrome oxidase (cox 1/2) sequence typing

220 c restriction-fragment-length polymorphisms (RFLPs) based on the discrete duplication patterns of the

221 e restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLPs) for an amplified portion of the 16S rRNA gene.

222 l restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLPs).

223 Long-range PCR and PshAI-RFLP analyses conclusively revealed that the short genes

224 of RAS mutant allele assayed by quantitative RFLP analysis was 28% (N12), 19% (N13), 25% (N61), and 2

225 se isolates had identical or closely related RFLP patterns were considered a cluster.

226 Although the resulting RFLP patterns of the couples were almost identical, mino

227 Isolation of the same RFLP type from a household chicken and a human within 1

228 ere genotyped using manual and semiautomated RFLP typing methods.

229 The overall performance of semiautomated RFLP compared to manual typing was excellent, with high

230 with minimal human effort, the semiautomated RFLP can be a very useful tool as a first-line method fo

231 The semiautomated RFLP system is technically simple and significantly fast

232 is study aimed to evaluate the semiautomated RFLP typing against the standard manual method.

233 ning method based on antibiotic sensitivity, RFLP patterns, and 16S rRNA and ITS sequence analyses, 4

234 Three hundred seventy RFLP loci were mapped onto 23 linkage groups, spanning 2

235 mplified portion of the 16S rRNA gene showed RFLP patterns that were unlike those obtained for the ty

236 23 countries were characterized by in-silico RFLP analysis.

237 biting variable susceptibilities had similar RFLP patterns.

238 es using 33 microsatellite markers, a single RFLP, and 15 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) loci.

239 The Ag85C(103) SNP RFLP, as compared to results obtained using a PCR method

240 ssed genes that showed S -haplotype-specific RFLP.

241 -0.948) and population differentiation (G(ST(RFLP))=0.700-0.782) with a phylogeographic pattern that

242 In large-scale studies, RFLP typing has practical processing and analysis limita

243 ssociated with a terminus of the D-subgenome RFLP linkage group (LG) D04 by linkage analysis of an in

244 T-RFLP did not reveal spatial structuring of communities a

245 T-RFLP results indicate Ag spiked SBRs were similar in a 1

246 Both cloning and T-RFLP indicated differences between AM communities in the

247 y comparative statistical analyses of both T-RFLP and 16S rRNA gene sequence datasets revealed that s

248 ment one day after addition as analyzed by T-RFLP analysis of 16S-rRNA genes.

249 tightly linked with community composition (T-RFLP).

250 al choice of restriction endonucleases for T-RFLP by finding sets of four restriction endonucleases t

251 vestigated in parallel using 16S rRNA gene T-RFLP and amplicon sequencing.

252 y cell sorting and phylogenetic tools like T-RFLP.

253 A multiplex T-RFLP test was developed to detect and identify Salmonell

254 Users of T-RFLP frequently overlook the resolving power of well-cho

255 restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP) analysis is a widespread technique for rapidly fin

256 restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP) approach.

257 erminal restriction fragment polymorphism (T-RFLP) experiments.

258 restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP) of 18S rDNA and cloning to assess diversity of AM

259 restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP), high-throughput sequencing and clone library anal

260 restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP).

261 restriction fragment length polymorphism (t-RFLP).

262 restriction fragment length polymorphism, T-RFLP) were performed to evaluate the response of the SBR

263 Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism; T-RFLP).

264 ction fragment (TRF) length polymorphisms (T-RFLP) due to 16S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) sequence diversity

265 s much higher throughput and lower cost than RFLP.

266 PyroTyping is more rapid than RFLP and presents the same discriminatory power, thus, i

267 osequencing was slightly more sensitive than RFLP and direct sequencing.

268 Our results showed that RFLP profiles can be used to assign F. tularensis strain

269 0.5 to 1.45%, respectively, suggesting that RFLP analysis cannot accurately predict genetic relatedn

270 The RFLP may indicate susceptibility to the effect of lead o

271 The RFLP pattern was reproducible in samples containing >100

272 The RFLP profiles of 17 epidemiologically unrelated isolates

273 The concordance between the RFLP and MIRU typing was complete, with the exception of

274 ubset that were incorrectly called 2a by the RFLP method (n = 75).

275 markers filled most of the gaps left by the RFLP/SSR markers demonstrating that AFLP technology is e

276 e fragments on the basis of the order of the RFLP markers employed and suggested that the zebra chrom

277 e genetically variable, the stability of the RFLP pattern of a PRRSV during in vivo replication was e

278 The results also showed that the RFLP technique might not be sufficiently sensitive to de

279 genes of 10 Helicobacter spp. validated the RFLP-based identification of these isolates.

280 CC-RCC and non-neoplastic samples using the RFLPs generated by each variant did not reveal allelic f

281 uced humantropic PERV, indicating that these RFLP profiles relate specifically to this family's linea

282 Through RFLP analysis, we determined the respective frequencies

283 nalyses showed that the distribution of TNFA RFLP alleles (TNF1 and TNF2) and the TNF MSM alleles (TN

284 R typing is a likely suitable alternative to RFLP to differentiate clinical isolates in this setting,

285 breakpoint, In(10)17Rk DNA was subjected to RFLP analysis with single copy sequences derived from th

286 the epi locus has been placed on the tomato RFLP map on the long arm of chromosome 4 and does not de

287 The unique RFLP patterns were also obtained in processed shrimp pro

288 (33%), and VNII (2%), as determined by URA5 RFLP.

289 llisepticum outbreaks can be performed using RFLP and/or sequence analysis of the pvpA gene.

290 However, variant RFLP patterns characterize strains from each geographic

291 revealed no obvious correlation between wbiI RFLP type and species.

292 as also no apparent correlation between wbiI RFLP type and the ability of a single Bcc isolate to inf

293 ther four serotypes could have multiple wbiI RFLP types.

294 tbreaks involved isolates with the same wbiI RFLP type, indicating that wbiI RFLP typing may be a use

295 he same wbiI RFLP type, indicating that wbiI RFLP typing may be a useful tool to help track Bcc outbr

296 Of the 585 cases for which RFLP was available, 419 (71.6%) had an RFLP pattern with

297 ients with tuberculosis, in combination with RFLP analysis, has the potential to enhance tuberculosis

298 rst study combining IGS sequencing data with RFLP analysis of genomic DNA.

299 ete, with the exception of two isolates with RFLP patterns that differed by one band each from the re

300 pmpH and pmpE yielded RFLP patterns that clustered the 15 serovars into ocular