ライフサイエンスコーパス: RSD

1 RSD (%) for intra-day and inter-day precisions were betw

2 RSD in migration time was between 2 and 3% for selected

3 RSD of intra-day, inter-day and inter-laboratory precisi

4 RSD significantly reduced blood pressure compared with s

5 -day and inter-day precisions were 0.83-3.01%RSD and 2.20-5.47%RSD, respectively.

6 A good precision (0.04% RSD, n=11, 30.00mgNL(-1)) and high sample throughput of

7 The approach can provide good precision (<1% RSD) in the 1.5-15 nL/min flow range.

8 erimental error to be minimized to within 1% RSD.

9 ments with a droplet internal standard (<10% RSD) and compare the sensitivity of PS-MS and TDGD-MS.

10 peatability and intermediate precision (<10% RSD).

11 pecimens with a precision of better than 10% RSD.

12 Precision better than 10% (RSD) was obtained, superior to that of a combined IR-MW

13 lectrode precision (RSD i(p,a) = 3%, n = 10; RSD calibration slope = 4%, n = 3), and accurate l-Tyr q

14 t of detection (LOD) was 0.7 pM miR-221 (15% RSD).

15 and 115%) and precision (repeatability <15% RSD).

16 quantification (70-120% recoveries and <20% RSD) for more than 80% of compounds.

17 s of 86%-98% with repeatabilities of 3.5-6.3 RSD%.

18 he biosensor showed good repeatability (4.3% RSD) and reproducibility (3.8% RSD).

19 k, cheese and beer (4.9-5.5% error; 4.8-6.3% RSD; n = 5); and 5-400 ug L(-1), 0.4 ug L(-1) and 137, r

20 ple heights within a range of 0.5 mm was <3% RSD.

21 ard deviation (RSD), N = 7; West: 37 +/- 30% RSD, N = 7), and emission rates (36% of repeat measureme

22 licate sampling of the same swipe yield ~30% RSD, this lack of precision is offset by the ability to

23 mA-L mol(-1), and response variability <=4% RSD.

24 8 mA-L mol(-1) and response variability <=4% RSD.

25 precisions were 0.83-3.01%RSD and 2.20-5.47%RSD, respectively.

26 -5) to 0.02 mug L(-1)) of precision (11-0.5% RSD) and repeatability (12-0.5% RSD).

27 ion (11-0.5% RSD) and repeatability (12-0.5% RSD).

28 metric current response with less than <1.5% RSD variation (n = 50).

29 Procedural repeatability was less than 5% RSD, and limits of detection and quantitation were 0.1-2

30 yielded standard deviations of less than 5% RSD.

31 rsample precision (n = 9) was found to be <5%RSD across the various sample compositions.

32 -103.4%) and very low imprecision [0.5-3.6% (RSD)].

33 ed as repeatability were 0.92, 2.2, and 3.7% RSD for 2 ug L(-1) (n = 10) of As, Hg and Se, respective

34 good repeatability and reproducibility (<7% RSD) and mean recovery values of 96.66% and 98.91% for t

35 ection limit (DL) of 3.87 (+/-0.02) x10(-7) (RSD < 4.2%) M, which falls in the ranges of normal as we

36 extraction efficiency (recoveries above 75%, RSDs less than 6%) compared with conventional SPE sorben

37 ained in the sample (protein retention: 79%, RSD: 18%).

38 ability (4.3% RSD) and reproducibility (3.8% RSD).

39 for water samples (3.3-5.7% error; 3.6-6.8% RSD; n = 5).

40 ability of the method is better than 12.8% (%RSD), extraction recoveries range between 34 and 76%, an

41 levels in milk samples were higher than 90% (RSD<5%).

42 l of unconjugated FITC (FITC clearance: 92%, RSD: 3%), while 79% of the HSA/FITC complex remained in

43 ty of the extraction procedure of 0.06-1.95% RSD were obtained.

44 were highly efficiently purified ( R >= 95%, RSD <= 15%, n = 3) and impurities were removed.

45 o 9 mM (1.34 x 10(-8) A.mM(-1), r(2) = 0.99, RSD < 10%, n = 3), and the result was output on a semiqu

46 atios was 7.6%, and 95.6% of the pairs had a RSD value of less than 20%, demonstrating high precision

47 es increased in the lumbar spinal cord after RSD, there was no accumulation of monocytes or neutrophi

48 olysaccharide) were determined 24 days after RSD sensitization.

49 unique messenger RNA signature 24 days after RSD.

50 l sensitization that persisted 24 days after RSD.

51 luate the blood pressure (BP) response after RSD in sham-controlled randomized trials.

52 ia and neurons remain sensitized weeks after RSD, and only the immune reactivity component of RSD-sen

53 bility of GC/GQDs-NF for both species had an RSD of less than 10%.

54 measurements of <1%, and 70 mumol/L with an RSD < 0.4% in the case of ammonium.

55 Recoveries ranged from 55 to 140% with an RSD <= 20%.

56 ay precision showed little variation with an RSD of 1% and 2%, respectively.

57 ability up to 10 h and repeatability with an RSD of 1.1% (n = 12), as well as a good storage stabilit

58 A high stability between the analyses (RSD = 2.54%) and among the different systems (RSD = 3.13

59 ccuracy and precision (Er minor than 10% and RSD lower than 8%) and a sampling frequency of 180 sampl

60 n recoveries ranged between 70% and 120% and RSD-values were in line with European regulations (CD 20

61 and process efficiencies from 59% to 62% and RSD of less than 8.0% were obtained.

62 with satisfactory results (recovery>95% and RSD%<5%).

63 erformed with a recovery range of 90-97% and RSD of 1-9%.

64 AMP recoveries were higher than 98%, and RSD less than 7%.

65 (S/N=3) and LOQ, preconcentration factor and RSD% were found to be 1.5ngmL(-1), 4.0ngmL(-1), 13 and 2

66 The detection limit and RSD value of the method were found to be 5ppb and 0.5906

67 Under the optimal conditions, LOD and RSD were obtained 17 ng L(-1) and 1.3% respectively.

68 aviors were assessed in unstressed, RSD, and RSD + human MSC groups.

69 nd certified/added concentration values, and RSD of up to 12%.

70 owed values in the range of 84.5-105.3%, and RSDs</=5%.

71 -200 pg mL(-1) for E2 with R(2) = 0.99 and % RSD = 4.35 (n = 3, assay volume 90 uL) was achieved for

72 The average migration times and %RSD for K(+), Na(+), and Li(+) were measured to be 22.04

73 ble relative migration times and a peak area RSD of 20% ( n = 5).

74 e measurements demonstrated median peak area RSD values of <20% for the RPC assays and <25% for the H

75 epeatabilities were obtained for peak area (%RSD <3.1% and <3.7%) and migration times (%RSD <0.2% and

76 on, preconcentration factor and precision as RSD% were found to be 1.78mugL(-1), 125 and 2.6%, respec

77 acy (trueness as recovery % and precision as RSD%), instrument and method limits of detection and qua

78 Limit of detection (LOD), precision (as RSD%), recoveries and enhancement factor for As and Sb w

79 asma caused signal suppression of 51/73% at %RSD of 5.7/6.7% (n = 120).

80 Microglial elimination also attenuated RSD-induced IL-1beta, CCR2, and TLR4 mRNA expression in

81 te traveling-wave IM separators (-3% average RSD).

82 uite reproducible and demonstrate an average RSD of 1.2% for analyte retention times in consecutive t

83 imilarly configured instrumentation (average RSD of 0.82 +/- 0.73%), and systematic differences for D

84 The average RSD of the peak pair ratios was 7.6%, and 95.6% of the p

85 with >=50 patients comparing catheter-based RSD with a sham control were included.

86 d a tipping point to stable integration, but RSD has not, and may therefore reveal the order of event

87 Intra- and inter-day RSD% (n = 3) at two concentration levels of 25 and 250 u

88 range) and inter-day repeatability (4 days; RSD never exceeded 12%).

89 Repeated social defeat (RSD) is a mouse model of psychosocial stress that activa

90 Repeated social defeat (RSD) is a murine stressor that recapitulates key physiol

91 Repeated social defeat (RSD) stress in mice increases the release of monocytes f

92 erns associated with repeated social defeat (RSD).

93 ectiveness of renal sympathetic denervation (RSD) in patients with hypertension.

94 to 107.1% with relative standard derivation (RSD) less than 8.8%.

95 R-362-5p have potential to be used to detect RSD/RCD.

96 bility (average relative standard deviation (RSD = 2.3%)).

97 The relative standard deviation (RSD%) for intra-day (repeatability) and inter-day (repro

98 actor of 20 and relative standard deviation (RSD) 4.93%.

99 eproducibility (Relative Standard deviation (RSD) =3.3%) and high selectivity over other miRNAs (i.e.

100 lactose and the relative standard deviation (RSD) for ten consecutive analyses of fruit yoghurt was 0

101 The relative standard deviation (RSD) for the seven analyses was 6.8%.

102 demonstrated by relative standard deviation (RSD) lower than 0.83% for the (1)D and (2)D retention ti

103 performs with a relative standard deviation (RSD) of 0.29% for all ion species across the three addit

104 ting an average relative standard deviation (RSD) of 0.43 +/- 0.20%.

105 cibility with a relative standard deviation (RSD) of 3+/-1 and 7+/-4 (all in percentage) in PBS and s

106 sample, with a relative standard deviation (RSD) of approximately 2%.

107 nitrate, with a relative standard deviation (RSD) of repeated measurements of <1%, and 70 mumol/L wit

108 xpressed as the relative standard deviation (RSD) of the calibration curve slope (n=12), for inter-da

109 n matrix showed relative standard deviation (RSD) values lower than 4.86 and 11.53%, respectively.

110 Relative standard deviation (RSD) values of 2.8% for W1 and 3.6% for W2 were obtained

111 The relative standard deviation (RSD) was 0.1% for a 1microgL(-1) aluminum level.

112 te (RR) and the relative standard deviation (RSD) were calculated to express the accuracy and the pre

113 -day precision (relative standard deviation (RSD)) and recovery.

114 ast: 44 +/- 20% relative standard deviation (RSD), N = 7; West: 37 +/- 30% RSD, N = 7), and emission

115 n, evaluated as relative standard deviation (RSD), was 2.47% (n=10) for a sample containing 2.2% (w/v

116 xpressed as the relative standard deviation (RSD), was 2.82%.

117 es, assessed by relative standard deviation (RSD), were <=20%.

118 The relative standard deviation (RSD, n = 3) at each concentration value was less than 4.

119 f 1.0 nM with a relative standard deviation (RSD, n = 3) of 0.85%.

120 ogL(-1) and the relative standard deviation (RSD, n=8) was 1.8%.

121 as percentage relative standard deviation (% RSD) was below 9% for all the amino acids analyzed.

122 The relative standard deviation (%RSD) for 6 replicate measurements of 1.0mugL(-1) cadmium

123 f 105 ms and a relative standard deviation (%RSD) of 7.7/7.5% without internal standard correction.

124 s expressed as relative standard deviation (%RSD), being better than 1.4% (n = 3).

125 , expressed as relative standard deviation (%RSD), was of 5.8 and 4.1% (n=10) for Fe (17.8mgkg(-1)) a

126 expressed as relative standard deviation (%, RSD) was below 11.3%.

127 The relative standard deviations (RSD%) were also less than 5%.

128 ere achieved (%relative standard deviations (RSD's) 5-16%).

129 The relative standard deviations (RSD) between the cycles for human plasma samples were 0.

130 8.3-101.2% and Relative Standard Deviations (RSD) of <2%.

131 ion limits and relative standard deviations (RSD) were 0.012-0.032ngmL(-1) and 2.2-2.8% respectively.

132 6-6.9% (n = 3) relative standard deviations (RSD), and possessing several advantages such as simplici

133 The relative standard deviations (RSDs) for ASA, ROX and NIT determined from five measurem

134 Relative standard deviations (RSDs) of 4.5% and 4.3% were obtained from seven replicat

135 atch-to-batch relative standard deviations (%RSDs) were quite reasonable.

136 es of the Antarctic Ross Sea dinoflagellate (RSD), which harbors long-term but temporary kleptoplasts

137 up-regulated in those with residual disease (RSD).

138 ing 15-years of raindrop size distributions (RSD) and 60-years of hourly rain gauges data, we estimat

139 Repeatability was excellent; RSD values from 0.1 to 4.4% and 0.2 to 5.7% were observe

140 producibility approximately 2-fold, to final RSD values of 2.2-4.7% (n = 900).

141 , Cs as a traditional ISTD resulted in final RSDs of 2.5-8.8%, while the traditional Li ISTD performe

142 ilitate increased pain sensitivity following RSD.

143 with good intra- and inter-precisions (0.4>/=RSD </=11.0).

144 e and 90.7%, 92.6%, and 90.8% peak pairs had RSD values of less than 20%.

145 chemical-based population estimates had high RSD (>44%) for BOD, COD, and ammonium between sites, sug

146 d the development of mechanical allodynia in RSD-exposed mice.

147 yte accumulation in the brain and anxiety in RSD-sensitized mice.

148 362-5p appeared up-regulated at 12 months in RSD and recurrent disease (RCD).

149 e, there was robust microglial reactivity in RSD-sensitized mice associated with prolonged sickness b

150 ied immune reactivity ex vivo and in vivo in RSD-sensitized mice.

151 Low RSD values indicate the good repeatability and reproduci

152 A low RSD (0.6%, n = 4) was obtained for day-to-day experiment

153 The low RSD and biases observed in this interlaboratory study il

154 muA/Ach decade and also exhibited a very low RSD of 2.6%, revealing good device-to-device reproducibi

155 range between 0.10 and 1.0 ug/L with a low %RSD value (<3.7).

156 ar over a broad concentration range and low %RSD values established high precision for the method.

157 nd higher precision (i.e., a 1.5 times lower RSD for peak intensity and a 1.8 times lower RSD for pea

158 RSD for peak intensity and a 1.8 times lower RSD for peak width on average).

159 dardization resulted in better RRs and lower RSDs compared to using only water.

160 105mgg(-1), and the precision of the method (RSD%) for six replicate measurements was found 3.2%.

161 The repeatability of the method (RSD%, n = 6) was lower than 7.6%, while HorRat values ra

162 the detection limit of 0.078 +/- 0.004ng/mL (RSD < 4.7%).

163 Moreover, RSD promotes stress sensitization, in which exposure to

164 Murine RSD-induced innate immune activation as well as depressi

165 e to acute stress 24 days after cessation of RSD causes anxiety recurrence.

166 and only the immune reactivity component of RSD-sensitized microglia was prevented by elimination/re

167 Moreover, elimination of RSD-sensitized microglia prevented monocyte accumulation

168 owed excellent interassay reproducibility of RSD (relative standard deviation) < 5% for n = 3.

169 valuate the long-term efficacy and safety of RSD in patients with hypertension.

170 The inter-day and intra-day values of RSD% were obtained in the range of 0.10-2.91 and 2.21-4.

171 accurate (>99.9%, R(2) > 0.999) and precise (RSD < 1.5%).

172 The method is precise (RSD < 10%), linear over a wide range (r > 0.99, 0.01-138

173 The validation of a rapid, precise (RSD<4.6%), reliable and sensitive (LOD=0.026microg/mL) l

174 Method precision RSDs were 12.59%.

175 Trueness (recoveries: 86-106%), precision (RSD </=19%), decision limits, detection capabilities and

176 nearity (r(2) higher than 0.995), precision (RSD below 6.8%), and method trueness (relative errors be

177 0.14-169.20mugkg(-1)), acceptable precision (RSD: 0.7-19.1%), satisfactory recovery (69-119%) and hig

178 excellent accuracy (95-120%) and precision (RSD < 12%).

179 Good reproducibility and precision (RSD =3.9%, n =10) of the assay indicates the high potent

180 e recoveries (from 67 to 97%) and precision (RSD values < 5%) were achieved for the selected analytes

181 rates between 100% and 104%) and precision (RSD's for repeatability and intermediate precision betwe

182 ining good linearity (r0.998) and precision (RSD)10%.

183 inearity (r(2) >=0.98), inter-day precision (RSD <=9.0%) as well as method detection limits (MDLs bel

184 4.9 mg L(-1), respectively), good precision (RSD < 4%), low reagent and sample consumption per one me

185 Good precision (RSD < 7%) and accuracy (recoveries between 91 and 108%)

186 (r(2)=0.998, 0.1-10mug/mL), good precision (RSD<5%) and accuracy (RE<5%), reduced reagent consumptio

187 M, LOD = 0.1 muM), interelectrode precision (RSD i(p,a) = 3%, n = 10; RSD calibration slope = 4%, n =

188 y (RSD (%)=0.30) and intermediate precision (RSD (%)=0.36) estimates and by Horrat value (0.07).

189 RSD = 2.6%), with an intermediate precision (RSD = 9.4%) and recovery (99-105%).

190 ility (RSD</=2.80%), intermediate precision (RSD</=4.47%), accuracy (recoveries from 90.59%-104.67%),

191 rom 3.3 to 31.6microg/L) and LOQ, precision (RSD values for inter-day repeatability were found betwee

192 o 95microg/l) and quantification, precision (RSD values for inter-day repeatability were found betwee

193 ecovery of 70-120%), selectivity, precision (RSD <= 20%), limits of quantification (LOQs = 0.6-6.0 ug

194 +/- 1.5%-108.3 +/- 2.2%) and good precision (RSDs 0.11%-4.5%) were obtained.

195 coveries (62.06-129.93%) and high precision (RSDs between 2.52% and 14.57%).

196 ity (RSDs <= 4%) and intermediate precision (RSDs <= 7%) prove the good precision of the proposed met

197 f the method was reflected in its precision (RSDs < 10%) for incurred residues.

198 cation (0.03-0.4 g/100g honey), precision (% RSD: 0.99-4.03), trueness (bias % 0.4-4.2), and recovery

199 The precision (% RSD) was 1.84, 2.31 and 2.73, for Cu, Fe and Mg, respect

200 ce-based readout, with excellent precision (%RSD = 5.7) and detection limit (LOD) of 2.5 ng and 0.5 m

201 e between 83% and 109%) and good precision (%RSD was less than 6.0% and 4.5% for intra-day and inter-

202 antification (18.89-565.65mg/L), precision (%RSD<2.67), and recovery (97.99-101.99%).

203 The precisions (%RSD) of the proposed method ranged from 2.1% to 2.5% and

204 Repeatability (RSD</=2.80%), intermediate precision (RSD</=4.47%), accu

205 of linearity (r(2) > 0.9980), repeatability (RSD <= 3%), recovery (>=89%) and LOQ (<=20 ug.L(-1)) wer

206 owed high reproducibility and repeatability (RSD<5%).

207 detection of 0.9 ng L(-1) and repeatability (RSD) of 2% at 100 ng L(-1) were achieved.

208 nt precision was confirmed by repeatability (RSD (%)=0.30) and intermediate precision (RSD (%)=0.36)

209 n was calculated as intra-day repeatability (RSD in the 5-20% range) and inter-day repeatability (4 d

210 raw human urine and excellent repeatability (RSD </= 3.9%), linearity (r(2) >/= 0.9989), and limits o

211 Excellent repeatability (RSD = 0.4%, N = 10) and limit of detection (0.1 mumol L(

212 r), and thereby validated for repeatability (RSD% 1-10%), accuracy (+/-1.0-15%), and linearity (r(2)

213 owards 2,4-D (1-100ppb), good repeatability (RSD 6%), stability and a LOD (0.3ppb) lower than herbici

214 hod demonstrates satisfactory repeatability (RSD = 2.6%), with an intermediate precision (RSD = 9.4%)

215 ned results proved sufficient repeatability (RSD = 2.4%), reproducibility (RSD = 2.56%), accuracy (97

216 The repeatability (RSD%) for a fiber (n = 3) was less than 10% for all anal

217 The results for repeatability (RSDs <= 4%) and intermediate precision (RSDs <= 7%) prov

218 rs were extracted with high repeatability (% RSD for hexyl butanoate and butyl butanoate of 16.5 and

219 Linearity (r(2)) and repeatability (%RSD of migration time, peak height, and corrected peak a

220 f recovery (86.6-104.5%) and repeatability (%RSDs < 7.8, n = 3, C = 15 and 30 ug g(-1)) in foodstuffs

221 ctors were 62-66 with proper repeatability (%RSDs < 6.8, n = 3).

222 tification (LOQ), precision (repeatability) (RSD%) and accuracy (recovery).

223 peatability with RSDs < 10%, reproducibility RSDs < 20%, and accuracy ranging from 75 to 118% and fro

224 repeatability (RSD = 2.4%), reproducibility (RSD = 2.56%), accuracy (97.2-104.4% recovery), and robus

225 formed on the uPAD achieved reproducibility (RSD approximately 10% and intra-and inter-day precision

226 (LOD = 1.23 ng mL(-1)) and reproducibility (RSD = 9.7%).

227 89.51%, and batch to batch reproducibility (RSD > 1) in glycopeptides enrichment.

228 and 2500 muM with excellent reproducibility (RSD = 2.2%, at 500 muM, n = 7), and a limit of detection

229 Good reproducibility (RSD of 8%) and long-term stability (up to 3 weeks) of th

230 ion, fast response and high reproducibility (RSD ~ 8%) of the proposed method highlight its suitabili

231 ation limit (and 0.536 nM), reproducibility (RSD 2.01%).

232 ll as good sample-to-sample reproducibility (RSD < 10%).

233 ve for the analyte, and the reproducibility (RSD%), checked on different days on the same wine, alway

234 Good retention-time reproducibility (RSD < 0.17%) demonstrated that the pumping system could

235 Good reproducibility (RSDs < 5%) was achieved over 24 cycles of extraction and

236 range 3-20 ng mL(-1), with reproducibility (%RSD < 10%; n = 6) and linearity (R(2) > 0.99).

237 thod not only generates highly reproducible (RSD 4%) injuries but also allows for repeated wounding i

238 r were 0.018 mug L(-1) and 25, respectively (RSD > 3%).

239 8-97% for the Orbitrap and QqQ respectively (RSD lower than 14.3%) and limits of quantification from

240 ctory performances and reproducible results (RSD = 4.2%; n = 30) using differential pulse voltammetry

241 racy (97.2-104.4% recovery), and robustness (RSD = 3.25%).

242 Precision and sensitivity (RSD <10%) were in accordance with the different guidelin

243 Compared with sham, RSD was also associated with a significant decrease in d

244 to the analysis of tea and fruits and showed RSD (n = 3) not exceeding 9.6, 8.5, and 9.7%, respective

245 h minor OPI pollution and constant signals (%RSD = 8.5%, FWHM of 177 ms +/- 8.5%, n = 10 557).

246 (peak area) reproducibilities of the system (RSD) were 4.15% and 6.79%, respectively.

247 SD = 2.54%) and among the different systems (RSD = 3.13%) was obtained for the determination of gluco

248 We show that RSD has retained its ancestral secondary plastid and has

249 The RSD of purity measurement was 0.0-0.8%, comparable to co

250 The RSD of the slopes obtained for different calibrations pe

251 The RSD of the within-run variability was 6% and the inter-d

252 The RSD values ranged at 2.95%-5.34% (intra-day) and 4.37%-7

253 In addition, the RSD's were less than 1.25% in all cases and less than 1%

254 ively, meanwhile for impedimetric assays the RSD values were 9+/-5 in PBS and 12+/-6 in serum.

255 Moreover, the RSD for the CRP levels measured on ten independently fab

256 limit of pY reached down to 30 amol with the RSD lower than 5.70 % (n = 5 at pmol level).

257 ecoveries were in the range 80-108% with the RSD of less than 8%.

258 The RSDs of the repeatability and intermediate precision wer

259 The %RSD were lower than 3.7%.

260 ethod ranged between 82.7% and 127% and the %RSD values were lower than 10% for all analytes determin

261 The %RSDs was in the range of 2.0-4.4% at concentrations of 0

262 (%RSD <3.1% and <3.7%) and migration times (%RSD <0.2% and <1.4%) for intra- and inter-day respective

263 Mice were exposed to RSD, microglia were eliminated by colony-stimulating fac

264 in male mice was increased with exposure to RSD.

265 When microglia were eliminated prior to RSD and repopulated and mice were subjected to acute str

266 e <4% and <14%, respectively, as compared to RSDs as high as 30% as obtained with the batchwise plasm

267 Together, RSD-induced allodynia was associated with microglia-medi

268 -like behaviors were assessed in unstressed, RSD, and RSD + human MSC groups.

269 The intra and inter-day precision values (RSD %) were in the range of 1.80%-7.56% and 2.97%-8.23%,

270 The intra-day precision values (RSD (%), n = 7) of 3.5% for the melamine concentration o

271 he intra- and interday repeatability values (RSD %) were 0.26-0.41% for retention time, and 2.25-2.11

272 Overall, excellent technical variance (RSD = 10%) and good mutual agreement was demonstrated fo

273 2)), repeatability (coefficient of variation RSD), limit of detection and quantification.

274 were between 0.001 and 0.010 mug L(-1) with RSD below 9.0%.

275 lent extraction yields from 84% to 101% with RSD lower than 7.5% on model compounds.

276 ries showed values between 57 and 101%, with RSD <= 12%.

277 -1) and recoveries between 91 and 107%, with RSD <= 5.3%.

278 resented recoveries between 93 and 110% with RSD <16% and the limit of quantification below the MRL f

279 ical recoveries ranged from 81 to 110%, with RSD below 10%, whereas the matrix effect was between -17

280 recoveries ranged between 62 and 125%, with RSD<20% for all veterinary drugs in all types of milk un

281 rage recovery was between 60% and 128%, with RSD 0.2-19.8%.

282 ined for diquat were between 77 and 85% with RSD values 20%, for all spike levels studied.

283 trix and internal standards application with RSD of 10-15%.

284 reduction in daytime ASBP was observed with RSD in second-generation trials (6.12 mm Hg vs. 2.14 mm

285 113% for Cd and from 95 to 108% for Pb, with RSD below 10 and 7%, respectively.

286 , achieving also satisfactory precision with RSD values lower than 19% in all cases.

287 sensors display a good reproducibility (with RSD of 2.5% and 4.2%, respectively), along with good dis

288 nificantly greater for patients treated with RSD than sham procedure (WMD -3.65 mm Hg, 95% CI: -5.33

289 19.8% and 26.8% fewer features in urine with RSD < 5% than full-scan and DIA).

290 Recoveries ranged between 80 and 112% with RSDs lower than 15%.

291 Recoveries ranged from 95 to 114 % with RSDs below 12%.

292 ve recovery values in the range 70-120% with RSDs lower than 16% and LODs between 0.21 and 4.77mug/L

293 fication levels were higher than 86.7%, with RSDs (n = 9) lower than 15.1%.

294 fied samples ranged from 89.2 to 96.8%, with RSDs lower than 7.3%.

295 average recovery ranged from 70% to 93% with RSDs less than 9%.

296 .99 and good recoveries of 85.12-94.96% with RSDs <= 5.58% spiked at three various concentration leve

297 0-120% overall recoveries were achieved with RSDs<20% for most herbicides.

298 he traditional Li ISTD performed poorly with RSDs of 6.3-14.2%.

299 r range of 0.1-2000 ng/g, repeatability with RSDs < 10%, reproducibility RSDs < 20%, and accuracy ran

300 ge of their true concentrations and yielding RSD <= 25% at three validation levels.