ライフサイエンスコーパス: RSD

1 RSD in migration time was between 2 and 3% for selected

2 RSD varied along a latitudinal gradient and were negativ

3 A good precision (0.04% RSD, n=11, 30.00mgNL(-1)) and high sample throughput of

4 erimental error to be minimized to within 1% RSD.

5 ue 3.1%) and 2,3-butanedione 0.10 ng mL(-1) (RSD mean value 2.9%).

6 value 3.4%), ethyl hexanoate 0.61 ng mL(-1) (RSD mean value 3.1%) and 2,3-butanedione 0.10 ng mL(-1)

7 value 4.2%), isoamyl acetate 3.88 ng mL(-1) (RSD mean value 3.4%), ethyl hexanoate 0.61 ng mL(-1) (RS

8 ection limit: ethyl acetate 39.48 ng mL(-1) (RSD mean value 4.2%), isoamyl acetate 3.88 ng mL(-1) (RS

9 peatability and intermediate precision (<10% RSD).

10 Precision better than 10% (RSD) was obtained, superior to that of a combined IR-MW

11 t of detection (LOD) was 0.7 pM miR-221 (15% RSD).

12 and 115%) and precision (repeatability <15% RSD).

13 nation of analytical performance met the 15% RSD FDA criterion.

14 0 muM, a sensitivity of 0.08 A M(-1) cm(-2) (RSD 0.05), a detection limit of 2 muM (RSD 0.09), and a

15 quantification (70-120% recoveries and <20% RSD) for more than 80% of compounds.

16 electrode showed a good repeatability (1.24% RSD) and reproducibility (4.24% RSD).

17 ility (1.24% RSD) and reproducibility (4.24% RSD).

18 he biosensor showed good repeatability (4.3% RSD) and reproducibility (3.8% RSD).

19 -per-trillion level with high precision [<3% RSD (n = 20 manual injection)] using gas chromatography

20 h acceptable recoveries of 99.7% and 100.3% (RSD in %=1.0-2.0).

21 ard deviation (RSD), N = 7; West: 37 +/- 30% RSD, N = 7), and emission rates (36% of repeat measureme

22 limit (20 pM) and high reproducibility (4.4% RSD) for complementary nucleic acid target molecules, al

23 pletely bound sTfR with low variability (<4% RSD) in buffer and allowed for its accurate and precise

24 metric current response with less than <1.5% RSD variation (n = 50).

25 ed the sensing response reproducibility (<5% RSD) with a linear range obtained from 10 to 100 ppm NO2

26 Precision of replicate measurement is 2.5% (RSD) at 20 ng/mL.

27 within 60 s, and the repeatability was 6.5% (RSD).

28 and inter-day precision were less than 5% (% RSD) and the recovery was between 97.4% and 103.6%.

29 nt method provided precision of less than 6% RSD, (n=10) with sample throughput of 15 samples h(-1).

30 results showed an average precision of 2.6% (RSD, 2sigma, n = 8).

31 -103.4%) and very low imprecision [0.5-3.6% (RSD)].

32 good repeatability and reproducibility (<7% RSD) and mean recovery values of 96.66% and 98.91% for t

33 ability (4.3% RSD) and reproducibility (3.8% RSD).

34 very values in the range 82.1-85% with 3.87% RSD, thus, demonstrated the efficiency of proposed aptas

35 e surrogate recoveries were 80-85% with 4-9% RSD.

36 y for metabolites in cell lysate averaged 9% RSD.

37 oducibility (RSD(intraday) of 5.6% and 2.9%; RSD(interday) of 6.9% and 6.0%; both for 0 and 5 mug L(-

38 levels in milk samples were higher than 90% (RSD<5%).

39 ified spiked cereal matrices was good (>90%; RSD<5%).

40 o 9 mM (1.34 x 10(-8) A.mM(-1), r(2) = 0.99, RSD < 10%, n = 3), and the result was output on a semiqu

41 atios was 7.6%, and 95.6% of the pairs had a RSD value of less than 20%, demonstrating high precision

42 hippocampal circuitry, persisted 28 d after RSD.

43 addition, splenocytes cultured 24 days after RSD exhibited a primed inflammatory phenotype.

44 Subthreshold stress 24 days after RSD re-established anxiety-like behavior that was associ

45 single cycle of social defeat) 24 days after RSD, and immune and behavioral measures were taken.

46 following subthreshold stress 24 days after RSD.

47 on or anxiety when determined 14 hours after RSD.

48 ng neurons were not affected initially after RSD.

49 revented impairments in spatial memory after RSD but did not prevent deficits in neurogenesis nor did

50 measurements of <1%, and 70 mumol/L with an RSD < 0.4% in the case of ammonium.

51 A high stability between the analyses (RSD = 2.54%) and among the different systems (RSD = 3.13

52 and process efficiencies from 59% to 62% and RSD of less than 8.0% were obtained.

53 with satisfactory results (recovery>95% and RSD%<5%).

54 AMP recoveries were higher than 98%, and RSD less than 7%.

55 In follow-up studies, control and RSD mice were subjected to subthreshold stress at 24 day

56 (S/N=3) and LOQ, preconcentration factor and RSD% were found to be 1.5ngmL(-1), 4.0ngmL(-1), 13 and 2

57 The detection limit and RSD value of the method were found to be 5ppb and 0.5906

58 with a low detection limit of 50 pg/mL, and RSD percent of less than 4.2%.

59 0.1 nM (0.02 ppb), LOQ 0.2 nM (0.05 ppb) and RSD </=4.3% when Au electrode is used as electrochemical

60 e LOD and LOQ are the same as previously and RSD is </=3.8%.

61 owed values in the range of 84.5-105.3%, and RSDs</=5%.

62 ; recoveries were from 74.16% to 110.86% and RSDs for intraday repeatability, interday repeatability

63 assays in both studies and a mean peak area RSD of <15% in the raw data.

64 A peak area RSD of 0.7% obtained for ten replicates of a real sample

65 e measurements demonstrated median peak area RSD values of <20% for the RPC assays and <25% for the H

66 factory repeatability in terms of peak area (RSD<2.9%) and retention time (RSD<0.2%) both for standar

67 epeatabilities were obtained for peak area (%RSD <3.1% and <3.7%) and migration times (%RSD <0.2% and

68 nt precisions for fruit juices, expressed as RSD, were 2.2% and 2.4% for HPLC, respectively, and 1.7%

69 on, preconcentration factor and precision as RSD% were found to be 1.78mugL(-1), 125 and 2.6%, respec

70 acy (trueness as recovery % and precision as RSD%), instrument and method limits of detection and qua

71 ng highly sensitive and reproducible assays (RSD<10%).

72 The average RSD of the peak pair ratios was 7.6%, and 95.6% of the p

73 Moreover, splenectomy before RSD blocked monocyte trafficking to the brain and preven

74 anged from 84% to 104%, while the calculated RSDs were from 3.6% to 4.3%.

75 Performance of the system was characterized (RSD, <10%; R(2), 0.994) and finally, the EME-autosampler

76 was in general lower than 10% and inter-day RSD ranged between 10% and 30%.

77 cise (intra-day RSD=0.27-2.11% and inter-day RSD=2.05-4.87%) and accurate (recovery=96.2-104.3%) and

78 ed AuNP method is simple, precise (intra-day RSD=0.27-2.11% and inter-day RSD=2.05-4.87%) and accurat

79 y RSDs were 2%, 0.8%, and 1% and between-day RSDs were 2%, 0.9%, 2% for TU, 6-TG, and 6-TGR, respecti

80 Within-day RSDs were 2%, 0.8%, and 1% and between-day RSDs were 2%,

81 range) and inter-day repeatability (4 days; RSD never exceeded 12%).

82 ous work showed that repeated social defeat (RSD) in mice promoted stress-sensitization that was char

83 previous work using repeated social defeat (RSD) in mice showed that recruitment of peripheral myelo

84 Repeated social defeat (RSD) is a murine stressor that recapitulates key physiol

85 bility (average relative standard deviation (RSD = 2.3%)).

86 The relative standard deviation (RSD%) for intra-day (repeatability) and inter-day (repro

87 protein yields (relative standard deviation (RSD%) of 2.7%-6.4%) and peptide recoveries (4.1-9.0%) ac

88 precision with relative standard deviation (RSD) 0.742% and 6.56% respectively.

89 eproducibility (Relative Standard deviation (RSD) =3.3%) and high selectivity over other miRNAs (i.e.

90 The relative standard deviation (RSD) and the recoveries of the standard addition method

91 th minimal 5.2% relative standard deviation (RSD) at 0.1 mug/L, to accommodate the potentially large

92 The relative standard deviation (RSD) for 10 replicate determinations at 0.5 mug L(-1) of

93 .6, 5.1 and 15% relative standard deviation (RSD) for 199, 14 and 9 discrete frequencies respectively

94 s 2.4% and 2.1% relative standard deviation (RSD) for HOPG- and Al-based EAGs, respectively.

95 The relative standard deviation (RSD) for the seven analyses was 6.8%.

96 retention time relative standard deviation (RSD) of <0.3% across all assays in both studies and a me

97 performs with a relative standard deviation (RSD) of 0.29% for all ion species across the three addit

98 of 200 and the relative standard deviation (RSD) of 2% were achieved (n=11).

99 cibility with a relative standard deviation (RSD) of 3+/-1 and 7+/-4 (all in percentage) in PBS and s

100 0.9995, and the relative standard deviation (RSD) of 3-4%.

101 sample, with a relative standard deviation (RSD) of approximately 2%.

102 to 111% with a relative standard deviation (RSD) of less than 13.2%, at concentrations below 10mugkg

103 nitrate, with a relative standard deviation (RSD) of repeated measurements of <1%, and 70 mumol/L wit

104 xpressed as the relative standard deviation (RSD) of the calibration curve slope (n=12), for inter-da

105 The relative standard deviation (RSD) of the change in current (DeltaC) for reproducibili

106 The average relative standard deviation (RSD) of this method is less than 10%.

107 The relative standard deviation (RSD) using MAI for a mixture of morphine, codeine, oxymo

108 The relative standard deviation (RSD) was 0.1% for a 1microgL(-1) aluminum level.

109 The relative standard deviation (RSD) was found 4.2%.

110 Intra-day relative standard deviation (RSD) was in general lower than 10% and inter-day RSD ran

111 70% to 117% and relative standard deviation (RSD) was lower than 20% at concentration levels of 25, 5

112 te (RR) and the relative standard deviation (RSD) were calculated to express the accuracy and the pre

113 ibility (with a relative standard deviation (RSD)) of 0.6% for peak height 0.7% for peak area.

114 as expressed as relative standard deviation (RSD), and it was evaluated for more than 160 pesticides

115 y, expressed as relative standard deviation (RSD), is less than 2.9% and 5.6% (n </= 8) for the deter

116 oducibility (2% relative standard deviation (RSD), n = 4), along with PFPH headspace stability over a

117 ast: 44 +/- 20% relative standard deviation (RSD), N = 7; West: 37 +/- 30% RSD, N = 7), and emission

118 n, evaluated as relative standard deviation (RSD), was 2.47% (n=10) for a sample containing 2.2% (w/v

119 ng/mL and 3.7% relative standard deviation (RSD).

120 em expressed as relative standard deviation (RSD).

121 ogL(-1) and the relative standard deviation (RSD, n=8) was 1.8%.

122 % and 118% with relative standard deviation (RSD=1.5-14%) for all the investigated pesticides.

123 as percentage relative standard deviation (% RSD) was below 9% for all the amino acids analyzed.

124 The relative standard deviation (%RSD) for 6 replicate measurements of 1.0mugL(-1) cadmium

125 [mean percent relative standard deviation (%RSD) of 17%, n = 3].

126 , expressed as relative standard deviation (%RSD), was of 5.8 and 4.1% (n=10) for Fe (17.8mgkg(-1)) a

127 expressed as relative standard deviation (%, RSD) was below 11.3%.

128 tch (calculated Relative Standard Deviation, RSD%, equal to 0.002%.

129 s (expressed as relative standard deviation, RSD) lower than 16% and 20%, respectively.

130 The relative standard deviations (RSD) for seven analyses were between 3.2% and 6.5%.

131 8.3-101.2% and Relative Standard Deviations (RSD) of <2%.

132 ion limits and relative standard deviations (RSD) were 0.012-0.032ngmL(-1) and 2.2-2.8% respectively.

133 eeded 75% with relative standard deviations (RSD)<10%.

134 f 70-120% with relative standard deviations (RSDs) 0-19% except for HCB, S-metolachlor and teflubenzu

135 tively and the relative standard deviations (RSDs) below 5.2% and below 9.5% respectively (n=5 at eac

136 oflavin peak % relative standard deviations (RSDs) down to 4.4% and temporal resolutions down to 15 s

137 The relative standard deviations (RSDs) for ASA, ROX and NIT determined from five measurem

138 The relative standard deviations (RSDs) were 2.48-9.82% (n=3).

139 an 0.9957 and relative standard deviations (%RSDs) lower than 3.5%.

140 L(-1), and the relative standard deviations, RSDs, was in the range of 2.1-6.2% (25, 50 and 100 mug L

141 ompared with a reference standard diagnosis (RSD).

142 ompared the rates of species discrimination (RSD).

143 Treatment with minocycline during RSD prevented both microglia activation and monocyte rec

144 erentiation of NPCs that proliferated during RSD was significantly impaired when examined 10 and 28 d

145 Repeatability was excellent; RSD values from 0.1 to 4.4% and 0.2 to 5.7% were observe

146 lity was obtained in day-to-day experiments (RSD < 1.2%, n = 4).

147 ity was very good in run-to-run experiments (RSD < 1.42%, n = 4).

148 PM removal efficiency by the double filter (RSD, 3.2-5.8%) was higher than that by a single filter (

149 producibility approximately 2-fold, to final RSD values of 2.2-4.7% (n = 900).

150 , Cs as a traditional ISTD resulted in final RSDs of 2.5-8.8%, while the traditional Li ISTD performe

151 Furthermore, splenectomy following RSD prevented the recurrence of anxiety in stress-sensit

152 -1)) and inter-sensor reproducibility giving RSD lower than 10%.

153 with good intra- and inter-precisions (0.4>/=RSD </=11.0).

154 e and 90.7%, 92.6%, and 90.8% peak pairs had RSD values of less than 20%.

155 prevented the re-establishment of anxiety in RSD-sensitized mice.

156 es and cytoplasmic foci that are enriched in RSD-6 but are excluded from the Mutator foci.

157 was to examine the role of IL-1 signaling in RSD-induced macrophage trafficking to the brain and anxi

158 etermined for every fifth run, resulting in %RSDs for migration times that ranged from 0.3 to 0.7 (n

159 An additional locus trnH-psbA increased RSD by 2.87%, 1.49% and 3.58% correspondingly.

160 the sensor (Intraday RSD%=2.83 and Interday RSD%=3.51).

161 en 4.80 to 6.41%, 2.73 to 6.44% and interday RSDs were between 2.20 to 7.25% and 2.34 to 5.95% for S2

162 in independent laboratories (interlaboratory RSD < 3% for 98% of molecules).

163 roving the stability of the sensor (Intraday RSD%=2.83 and Interday RSD%=3.51).

164 The intraday RSDs were between 4.80 to 6.41%, 2.73 to 6.44% and inter

165 findings demonstrated that there was limited RSD-induced priming of myeloid cells in IL-1R1(KO) mice

166 A low RSD (0.6%, n = 4) was obtained for day-to-day experiment

167 The low RSD and biases observed in this interlaboratory study il

168 and consistent recoveries (min. 81%) and low RSDs (max. 6%) were achieved for all studied colorants.

169 dardization resulted in better RRs and lower RSDs compared to using only water.

170 The mean RSD was < 2% for 97% of the CCS values, compared to 80%

171 105mgg(-1), and the precision of the method (RSD%) for six replicate measurements was found 3.2%.

172 the detection limit of 0.078 +/- 0.004ng/mL (RSD < 4.7%).

173 MS_RHII-RSD gene expression was upregulated under UV stress, and

174 MS_RHII-RSD was previously identified to be the second (p)ppGpp

175 (-2) (RSD 0.05), a detection limit of 2 muM (RSD 0.09), and a good long-term stability, as long as it

176 f 0.5-1.0ngkg(-1) at S/N=3, and precision of RSD% of 11.8.

177 We hypothesize that the spleen of RSD-exposed mice became a reservoir of primed monocytes

178 er with an inter-assay reproducibility of (% RSD, n=3) 4.1%.

179 or UHPLC-PDA) and good precision parameters (RSD lower than 0.06%) were obtained.

180 accurate (>99.9%, R(2) > 0.999) and precise (RSD < 1.5%).

181 The method is precise (RSD < 10%), linear over a wide range (r > 0.99, 0.01-138

182 etection of 3.8 ng/ml, and provided precise (RSD <8.7%) and accurate (recovery >96.6%) results.

183 The validation of a rapid, precise (RSD<4.6%), reliable and sensitive (LOD=0.026microg/mL) l

184 ods are rapid, specific, sensitive, precise (RSD<2.5%) and accurate.

185 iciencies between 70% and 100% and precision RSD lower than 15%.

186 eries for both the pesticides with precision RSD within 4-17% estimated at the limits of quantificati

187 Method precision RSDs were 12.59%.

188 Trueness (recoveries: 86-106%), precision (RSD </=19%), decision limits, detection capabilities and

189 nearity (r(2) higher than 0.995), precision (RSD below 6.8%), and method trueness (relative errors be

190 0.14-169.20mugkg(-1)), acceptable precision (RSD: 0.7-19.1%), satisfactory recovery (69-119%) and hig

191 Good reproducibility and precision (RSD =3.9%, n =10) of the assay indicates the high potent

192 rates between 100% and 104%) and precision (RSD's for repeatability and intermediate precision betwe

193 ining good linearity (r0.998) and precision (RSD)10%.

194 (r(2)=0.998, 0.1-10mug/mL), good precision (RSD<5%) and accuracy (RE<5%), reduced reagent consumptio

195 y-carbon electrode presented high precision (RSD = 0.7%, n = 12), low detection limit (1 mumol L(-1))

196 llic acid (0.02mugL(-1)) and high precision (RSD=1.7%).

197 y (RSD (%)=0.30) and intermediate precision (RSD (%)=0.36) estimates and by Horrat value (0.07).

198 ility (RSD</=2.80%), intermediate precision (RSD</=4.47%), accuracy (recoveries from 90.59%-104.67%),

199 etween 70 and 120%), intermediate precision (RSD<20.0%) and measurement uncertainty tests (<50.0%).

200 ), limit of quantification (LOQ), precision (RSD%) and recovery.

201 rom 3.3 to 31.6microg/L) and LOQ, precision (RSD values for inter-day repeatability were found betwee

202 o 95microg/l) and quantification, precision (RSD values for inter-day repeatability were found betwee

203 n evaluated, showing satisfactory precision (RSD </= 16%) and recoveries ranging from 85 to 100% for

204 e in the range 77.1-87.5% and the precision (RSD < 10%) and accuracy were between 98.2% and 101.6%.

205 range of 0.03-0.83mugL(-1), while precision (RSD) was <3.5%, and enrichment factor was obtained as 10

206 coveries (62.06-129.93%) and high precision (RSDs between 2.52% and 14.57%).

207 cation (0.03-0.4 g/100g honey), precision (% RSD: 0.99-4.03), trueness (bias % 0.4-4.2), and recovery

208 ification (8.9-16.1 mug mL(-1)), precision (%RSD<5.05) and recovery (93.94-103.06%) and satisfactory

209 ce-based readout, with excellent precision (%RSD = 5.7) and detection limit (LOD) of 2.5 ng and 0.5 m

210 antification (18.89-565.65mg/L), precision (%RSD<2.67), and recovery (97.99-101.99%).

211 re within 60-120% with associated precision, RSD<11%.

212 The precisions (%RSD) of the proposed method ranged from 2.1% to 2.5% and

213 We quantified RSD by two DNA barcode combinations (rbcL + matK and rbc

214 Percent mean recovery (+/-%RSD) of ferritin from two control sera samples were 94.3

215 Repeatability (RSD</=2.80%), intermediate precision (RSD</=4.47%), accu

216 owed high reproducibility and repeatability (RSD<5%).

217 nt precision was confirmed by repeatability (RSD (%)=0.30) and intermediate precision (RSD (%)=0.36)

218 n was calculated as intra-day repeatability (RSD in the 5-20% range) and inter-day repeatability (4 d

219 Besides, an excellent repeatability (RSD < 7.6%), within-laboratory reproducibility (RSD<10.5

220 raw human urine and excellent repeatability (RSD </= 3.9%), linearity (r(2) >/= 0.9989), and limits o

221 owards 2,4-D (1-100ppb), good repeatability (RSD 6%), stability and a LOD (0.3ppb) lower than herbici

222 owed high intra- and interday repeatability (RSD < 1%), and they were not affected by the complexity

223 uantification (16.2mg GAE/L), repeatability (RSD=4%), reproducibility (RSD=6.8%) and recovery (>85.41

224 ) and satisfactory precision: repeatability (RSD 14.9%) and within-laboratory reproducibility (RSD 17

225 Intraday quantification repeatability (RSD in peak height) was 3.2% (n = 5).

226 A separation repeatability (RSD in retention time) of 1.4% (n = 5) was obtained for

227 The repeatability (RSD%) for a fiber (n = 3) was less than 10% for all anal

228 rs were extracted with high repeatability (% RSD for hexyl butanoate and butyl butanoate of 16.5 and

229 linearity (R(2) = 0.986) and repeatability (%RSD 8-10%) in the range of 0.25-2.0 mg/mL.

230 Linearity (r(2)) and repeatability (%RSD of migration time, peak height, and corrected peak a

231 tification (LOQ), precision (repeatability) (RSD%) and accuracy (recovery).

232 retention time and peak area repeatability, (RSD% 0.80 and 8.68, respectively) as well as linearity (

233 demonstrated to be reproducible, repetitive (RSD<1.5%) and highly sensitive to ortho-dihydroxylated a

234 L), repeatability (RSD=4%), reproducibility (RSD=6.8%) and recovery (>85.41%); it is thus effective a

235 n fishes, respectively) and reproducibility (RSD </=9.6% for measurements on waters and </=8.8% on fi

236 (LOD = 1.23 ng mL(-1)) and reproducibility (RSD = 9.7%).

237 wing good repeatability and reproducibility (RSD lower than 6% in all the cases).

238 tstanding repeatability and reproducibility (RSD(intraday) of 5.6% and 2.9%; RSD(interday) of 6.9% an

239 A M(-1) cm(-2)), very good reproducibility (RSD% ranging from 2 to 10 for different SPEs), short res

240 very=112%) and intermediate reproducibility (RSD=12%) of the method.

241 4.9%) and within-laboratory reproducibility (RSD 17.2%) were obtained.

242 < 7.6%), within-laboratory reproducibility (RSD<10.5%), recovery (87-97%) and linearity (R(2)>0.99)

243 00 nm for nitrate), showing reproducibility (RSD = 1.2% and 3.6% for peak height and 0.9% and 2.9% fo

244 ve for the analyte, and the reproducibility (RSD%), checked on different days on the same wine, alway

245 Good retention-time reproducibility (RSD < 0.17%) demonstrated that the pumping system could

246 .88 fM with an interassay reproducibility (% RSD, n = 3) of 8.4%.

247 58.8 fM with an interassay reproducibility (%RSD of n = 3) < 17.2%, and in buffer down to 5.88 fM wit

248 ed good sorbent-to-sorbent reproducibility (%RSD<8) and each sorbent could be used up to 30 times (%R

249 range 3-20 ng mL(-1), with reproducibility (%RSD < 10%; n = 6) and linearity (R(2) > 0.99).

250 oach is accurate, precise, and reproducible (RSD < 15%) over multiple days and concentrations.

251 thod not only generates highly reproducible (RSD 4%) injuries but also allows for repeated wounding i

252 n of 70 muM, a highly reproducible response (RSD 4.2%) and a good selectivity in the presence of stru

253 nd a classification method random forest RF (RSD = 3.52%, AUC = 0.66 +/- 0.03) had highest prognostic

254 efficient, as precision and accuracy showed RSD no greater than 5% and recoveries within the 88-119%

255 SD = 2.54%) and among the different systems (RSD = 3.13%) was obtained for the determination of gluco

256 We show here that RSD caused transient impairments in spatial memory recal

257 Here, we show that RSD promoted hippocampal neuroinflammatory activation th

258 The RSD agreement ranged from 80% to 94% for the dataset of

259 The RSD decreased to below 15% when Ra-226 concentration inc

260 The RSD of purity measurement was 0.0-0.8%, comparable to co

261 The RSD of the within-run variability was 6% and the inter-d

262 The RSD values obtained using MAI are comparable to those us

263 The RSD values ranged from 1.92 to 2.37.

264 The RSD was compared with the majority diagnosis of experts.

265 The RSD% of Fu and HMFu for five analyses was 4.4 and 4.9, r

266 lassifications between the 8 experts and the RSD (weighted kappa, 0-0.75; mean, 0.30).

267 The limit of detection and the RSD% were lower than 5 ppb and below 8%, respectively.

268 n of classifications between experts and the RSD.

269 ively, meanwhile for impedimetric assays the RSD values were 9+/-5 in PBS and 12+/-6 in serum.

270 tem classification of plus disease, with the RSD as a function of the field of view and vessel type.

271 limit of pY reached down to 30 amol with the RSD lower than 5.70 % (n = 5 at pmol level).

272 accuracy of the 11 experts compared with the RSD.

273 The % RSD of intra-day precision varied between 0.4% and 4%, w

274 ethod ranged between 82.7% and 127% and the %RSD values were lower than 10% for all analytes determin

275 m a series of 100 sequential injections the %RSDs were determined for every fifth run, resulting in %

276 of peak area (RSD<2.9%) and retention time (RSD<0.2%) both for standards and real samples.

277 each sorbent could be used up to 30 times (%RSD<6).

278 (%RSD <3.1% and <3.7%) and migration times (%RSD <0.2% and <1.4%) for intra- and inter-day respective

279 ty terms, obtaining a very acceptable value (RSD 4%).

280 atization reaction was observed over 1 week (RSD < 9%), and the linear concentration range was evalua

281 lent extraction yields from 84% to 101% with RSD lower than 7.5% on model compounds.

282 ical recoveries ranged from 81 to 110%, with RSD below 10%, whereas the matrix effect was between -17

283 sented recoveries between 70% and 118%, with RSD lower than 19% for spike levels between 10 and 100 m

284 (-1) and recoveries between 70 and 120% with RSD lower than 20%.

285 recoveries ranged between 62 and 125%, with RSD<20% for all veterinary drugs in all types of milk un

286 rage recovery was between 60% and 128%, with RSD 0.2-19.8%.

287 ined for diquat were between 77 and 85% with RSD values 20%, for all spike levels studied.

288 d adequate reproducibility and accuracy with RSD 1.14-3.42% (n=15) and recovery 98.0-110.0%, respecti

289 trix and internal standards application with RSD of 10-15%.

290 s with the detection limit of 100 pCi/L with RSD of 45% (standard mode) and 67% (collision mode).

291 113% for Cd and from 95 to 108% for Pb, with RSD below 10 and 7%, respectively.

292 S/G ratios) and correlated these ratios with RSD.

293 sensors display a good reproducibility (with RSD of 2.5% and 4.2%, respectively), along with good dis

294 Retention times reproduced well with RSD values of 2.6% or less.

295 average recoveries between 68 and 103% with RSDs in the range 14.4-25.4%.

296 ve recovery values in the range 70-120% with RSDs lower than 16% and LODs between 0.21 and 4.77mug/L

297 fied samples ranged from 89.2 to 96.8%, with RSDs lower than 7.3%.

298 0-120% overall recoveries were achieved with RSDs<20% for most herbicides.

299 he traditional Li ISTD performed poorly with RSDs of 6.3-14.2%.

300 oped biosensor was found satisfactory with % RSD (n=5) 0.351.