ライフサイエンスコーパス: SPME

1 SPME devices prepared on PBT were evaluated in terms of

2 SPME fibers, without PRC corrections, produced values th

3 SPME GC-MS was a useful tool for monitoring VOC profiles

4 SPME is a promising analytical tool for investigating th

5 SPME is an established sample preparation approach that

6 SPME techniques were further applied to study contaminat

7 SPME-GC/QTOF was selected as the most suitable methodolo

8 SPME-MS proved to be advantageous in use due to better d

9 A SPME-GC-MS method was adapted and validated in order to

10 These results present a SPME methodology, which may be applied as a quality cont

11 ith in situ SPME, using temperature-adjusted SPME fiber-water partition coefficients and lab-derived

12 The new field sampler allows SPME fibers and silicone hollow fibers to be immersed an

13 Although SPME fibers have been used for years, their potential fo

14 ercomparison study between the enzymatic and SPME analyses produced a trend line with a slope of unit

15 The concordance between PE and SPME estimated concentrations for DDE was high (R(2) = 0

16 mouth conditions by using human saliva, and SPME-GC/MS analysis.

17 ls were compared: PE strips, POM strips, and SPME fibers.

18 face area compared to commercially available SPME fibers, allowed for an increased analyte uptake per

19 The reusability and robustness of PIL-based SPME for RNA analysis represents a significant advantage

20 The optimized PIL-based SPME method purified a high quantity of mRNA from crude

21 Furthermore, the PIL-based SPME method was successfully applied for the extraction

22 Following PIL-based SPME of DNA from a dilute cell lysate, the qPCR amplific

23 then thawed at 25 degrees C for 5 min before SPME extraction was performed.

24 e direct coupling of biocompatible SPME (Bio-SPME) fibers to mass spectrometry via nanoelectrospray i

25 interface to couple biocompatible SPME (Bio-SPME) fibers to MS systems for direct electrospray ioniz

26 Given that Bio-SPME-nano-ESI efficiently integrates sampling with analy

27 Our results demonstrated that Bio-SPME-OPP-MS efficiently integrates sampling/sample clean

28 s a robust interface to couple biocompatible SPME (Bio-SPME) fibers to MS systems for direct electros

29 present the direct coupling of biocompatible SPME (Bio-SPME) fibers to mass spectrometry via nanoelec

30 High throughput is achieved by SPME automation using a CTC Analytics platform and custo

31 Volatile compounds were analyzed by SPME-GC-MS in three cvs highly susceptible to medfly att

32 ntification of CLA and volatile compounds by SPME coupled with CG-MS) during two months of storage at

33 c profiles (by HPLC), volatile compounds (by SPME-GC/MS), antioxidant activity, and sensory propertie

34 olatility and polarity were only detected by SPME.

35 Aroma compounds were determined by SPME GC-MS.

36 aining in the liquid phase was determined by SPME-GC-MS.

37 sil Ocimum citriodorum Vis were evaluated by SPME-GC/MS.

38 Traditionally, analytes extracted by SPME fibers are desorbed by washing with suitable solven

39 s-only juices, 41 compounds were isolated by SPME, including 17 of the consensus volatiles.

40 e phase rich in maltodextrin was measured by SPME-GC-MS.

41 mparative study of OSCs profiles obtained by SPME coupled to HPLC-UV and gas chromatography with flam

42 e results were compared to those obtained by SPME/GC-MS.

43 id-phase microextraction-gas chromatography (SPME-GC) data of a collection of 270 wines from Galicia

44 zene (PDMS-DVB) and polyacrylate (PA) coated SPME fibers for the collection of nicotine and its metab

45 using a Carboxen/polydimethylsiloxane-coated SPME fiber.

46 tinine has not been achieved by conventional SPME.

47 However, conventional SPME sampling requires the attainment of equilibrium bet

48 rant when acquired using a 6-time cumulative SPME sampling approach.

49 With this development, SPME fibers can now be reproducibly loaded with derivati

50 c headspace solid-phase microextraction (dHS-SPME) combined with one-dimensional gas chromatography-m

51 ct immersion-solid phase microextraction (DI-SPME) was employed to capture the metabolome of living p

52 hromatography-mass spectrometry platform (DI-SPME- HPLC-ESI -MS) for determination of unconjugated fa

53 The potential of in vivo DI-SPME in quantitative plant metabolomics was assessed by

54 compare analytical precision when different SPME sampling modes are employed.

55 matrix compatibility, make the use of direct SPME very practical as a quantification approach and the

56 This preliminary assessment of direct SPME-MS showed high sensitivity (ng/mL), acceptable repr

57 bserved in comparisons of fish sampled by DP-SPME relative to comparable fish not sampled by this met

58 th-profiling solid-phase microextraction (DP-SPME) technique, which utilizes a single soft, flexible

59 ccuracy and depth-profiling capability of DP-SPME was established in vitro within a multilayer gel sy

60 y controlled solid-phase microextraction (EC-SPME) using a electro-synthesised nanostructure conducti

61 of benzoate in beverage samples using the EC-SPME-spectrophotometric method.

62 stically identical to those determined by Eq-SPME.

63 gainst the conventional equilibrium SPME (Eq-SPME) using a range of sediments and conditions.

64 Compared to Eq-SPME that required weeks or even months, the fiber conce

65 d sensitivity over headspace and equilibrium SPME sampling.

66 SI-SPME against the conventional equilibrium SPME (Eq-SPME) using a range of sediments and conditions

67 s were chosen: solid phase micro extraction (SPME); Purge and Trap extraction and solvent assisted fl

68 s by headspace solid phase micro extraction (SPME-GC-MS), and photobleaching of photosensitizers in m

69 re explored by solid phase micro-extraction (SPME) and gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometr

70 antified using Solid Phase Micro-Extraction (SPME) based on a sorptive polymer such as polydimethylsi

71 s monitored by solid phase micro-extraction (SPME) GC-MS.

72 nylamine using solid phase micro-extraction (SPME) was examined for its suitability to detect DPA con

73 determined by solid phase micro-extraction (SPME), coupled with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry

74 Finally, the proposed thin-film SPME devices made on a PBT were evaluated by conducting

75 AF being used as a particle immobilizer for SPME, an assessment of the analyte uptake rate and extra

76 Four SPME fibre coatings including polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS

77 lved generating gas-phase ions directly from SPME fibers without the need for any additional sample p

78 ce above a solid or liquid sample (headspace SPME), or to directly sample a liquid (immersion SPME).

79 HS-SPME and LLE-GC/MS analyses revealed that metabolism of

80 HS-SPME-GC-MS was used to sample and analyse volatile compo

81 GC-FID/MS (after HS-SPME and ultrasonic solvent extraction) and targeted HPL

82 An HS-SPME method was developed using multivariate experimenta

83 An HS-SPME-GC-MS method and a recently developed HPLC-MS/MS me

84 hromatography-mass spectrometry analysis (HS-SPME-GC-MS), were carried out after 1, 20, 40 and 60 day

85 sis (AEDA): volatile isolates obtained by HS-SPME from an aqueous extract and by Stir-Bar Sorptive Ex

86 All samples were analysed by HS-SPME-GC-IT/MS and subjected to sensory evaluation.

87 d, stabilised at five RHs and analysed by HS-SPME-GC-MS for volatiles.

88 ality rice cultivars were investigated by HS-SPME-GC-MS to define fingerprinting and identify chemica

89 in two consecutive years were obtained by HS-SPME-GC-MS.

90 ure mediums were isolated and analysed by HS-SPME-GC/MS.

91 ion areas for Italian sparkling wines, by HS-SPME-GCxGC-TOF-MS and multivariate analysis.

92 c platform for tomato samples obtained by HS-SPME/GC-qMS here described, and the interrelationship de

93 which 37 were verified by DI/GC and 31 by HS-SPME/GC.

94 graphy with mass spectrometric detection (HS-SPME-GC-MS) analysis.

95 oupled to a mass spectrometric detection (HS-SPME-GC-MS) as well as headspace extraction in combinati

96 Headspace solid-phase micro-extraction (HS-SPME) was applied for the very first time to the samplin

97 y headspace solid phase micro extraction (HS-SPME-GC-MS) on conventional roasted cocoa beans, ILR-CIS

98 n of MS-based metabolomic fingerprinting (HS-SPME-GC-MS) and chemometric tools has been implemented a

99 and optimized as effective parameters in HS-SPME.

100 headspace solid-phase microextraction (MA-HS-SPME) and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS).

101 ollected via solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME) and analysed by gas chromatography.

102 by headspace solid-phase-microextraction (HS-SPME) and gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrome

103 om headspace solid phase microextraction (HS-SPME) and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-qMS)

104 ), Headspace Solid Phase Microextraction (HS-SPME) and Headspace Sorptive Extraction (HSSE), in combi

105 ng headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME) and separation/detection by gas chromatography-mas

106 Headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME) combined with comprehensive two-dimensional gas ch

107 nd headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME) combined with gas chromatography-quadrupole mass s

108 of headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME) conditions and relative humidity (RH) on the relea

109 ng headspace solid phase microextraction (HS-SPME) coupled to comprehensive two-dimensional gas chrom

110 or headspace-solid phase microextraction (HS-SPME) coupled with gas chromatography (GC).

111 on Headspace Solid Phase Microextraction (HS-SPME) coupled with Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometric

112 he headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME) coupled with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry

113 Headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME) coupled with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry

114 a head-space solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME) coupled with GC-MS technique.

115 of headspace solid phase microextraction (HS-SPME) coupled with the comprehensive two-dimensional gas

116 ng headspace-solid phase microextraction (HS-SPME) followed by gas chromatography/quadrupole-mass spe

117 ic headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME) followed by thermal desorption gas chromatography-

118 or headspace solid phase microextraction (HS-SPME) method in baby formula samples and detected using

119 a headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME) method on the analysis of Muscat-based wines volat

120 ng headspace solid phase microextraction (HS-SPME) with a PDMS/Carboxen/DVB fibre, coupled with gas c

121 ng headspace solid phase microextraction (HS-SPME) with an online pyrolysis system coupled with isoto

122 ng headspace solid phase microextraction (HS-SPME) with multicomponent fiber as sampling technique, r

123 ng Headspace Solid-Phase MicroExtraction (HS-SPME), combined with GC-MS, to an aqueous extract obtain

124 of headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME-GC-MS).

125 trometry in selected ion monitoring mode (HS-SPME-GC-SIM-MS) allowed quantitative determination of de

126 dspace solid phase microextraction-GC-MS (HS-SPME-GC-MS), headspace-GC-FID (HS-GC-FID) and stir bar s

127 date the aromatic composition by means of HS-SPME coupled with GC-MS; ii) assess the polyphenolic con

128 Parameters affecting the efficiency of HS-SPME procedure were selected by response surface methodo

129 the two chromatographic methods (GC-O or HS-SPME-GC-MS), together or separately, could be used as a

130 etermined by liquid-liquid-extraction- or HS-SPME-GC/MS at various stages in the winemaking process.

131 rable to or better than those of previous HS-SPME reports were achieved, 0.010-1.04 ng/g.

132 A robust HS-SPME and GC/MS method was developed for analyzing the co

133 The most significant HS-SPME parameters, namely fibre polymer, ionic strength an

134 omatography coupled to Mass Spectrometry (HS-SPME GC-MS) has been used to compare the concentrations

135 ion gas chromatography mass spectrometry (HS-SPME-GC-MS) experiments showed that 3-phenylpropanal, 3-

136 to gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (HS-SPME-GC-MS) was applied to quantify four NAms in differe

137 ion gas chromatography mass spectrometry (HS-SPME-GC/MS).

138 and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (HS-SPME-GC/MS).

139 ography/time-of-flight mass spectrometry (HS-SPME-GC/TOF-MS) by comparison of spectra with unlabeled

140 hy with time-of-flight mass spectrometry (HS-SPME/GCxGC-TOFMS).

141 in matrix composition and structure, the HS-SPME allows studying of matrix-related changes in foods.

142 multiple extraction temperatures for the HS-SPME procedure proved to be an excellent alternative for

143 ken into account in interpretation of the HS-SPME results.

144 te the influence of the parameters on the HS-SPME technique.

145 was applied to insect samples before the HS-SPME-GC-MS analysis.

146 54 compounds systematically found in the HS-SPME-GC-MS chromatograms were used as input data.

147 The HS-SPME-IMS is precise, selective and sensitive analytical

148 The HS-SPME/GC/MS analysis was used as a control system to chec

149 was crushed and mixed with water prior to HS-SPME analysis, and GC-MS was used to determine the volat

150 A targeted approach using HS-SPME-GC-MS was performed to compare flavour compounds of

151 ms in red wine have been quantified using HS-SPME-GC-MS.

152 olatile organic compound production using HS-SPME-GC/MS analysis.

153 ing coffee aroma and flavor obtained with HS-SPME of the ground coffee and in-solution SBSE/SPME samp

154 Another HSA-SPME air sampling approach, in which two devices are joi

155 urface area solid-phase microextraction (HSA-SPME), developed for time-critical, high-volume sampling

156 The previously reported HSA-SPME sampling device, which provides 10-fold greater sur

157 Finally, the tandem HSA-SPME device was employed for the headspace sampling of a

158 Power requirements for the HSA-SPME desorption process were 30-fold lower than those fo

159 Comparisons of the HSA-SPME device when using fixed sampling times for the chem

160 hosphonate (DIMP), demonstrated that the HSA-SPME device yielded a greater chromatographic response (

161 lutions using headspace and direct immersion SPME gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GC/MS).

162 Direct immersion SPME limited the occurrence of the artifacts, which conf

163 samples using headspace and direct immersion SPME.

164 ), or to directly sample a liquid (immersion SPME).

165 matical model for the processes occurring in SPME extraction of analyte(s) from an aqueous sample med

166 ed model captures the phenomena occurring in SPME, leading to a clearer understanding of this process

167 The obtained ionogel SPME fibers exhibited high extractability for aromatic v

168 r optimized conditions, the proposed ionogel SPME fiber coatings enabled the achievement of excellent

169 line in-tube solid-phase microextraction (IT-SPME) to Cap-LC-DAD, the effect of the dilution can be s

170 vity and concentration-dependent signals, IT-SPME-Cap-LC responds to changes in the particle's hydrod

171 ffective materials as support to manufacture SPME biocompatible devices for a wide range of applicati

172 ls, analysed by solid-phase microextraction (SPME GC-MS).

173 raw state using solid-phase microextraction (SPME) and cooked state using simultaneous distillation e

174 traction (SPE), solid-phase microextraction (SPME) and gas chromatography (GC), and phenols by ultra-

175 ed on headspace solid-phase microextraction (SPME) and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS),

176 es, analysed by solid phase microextraction (SPME) and gas chromatography-mass-spectrometry (GC/MS),

177 ect coupling of solid phase microextraction (SPME) and mass spectrometry (MS) has shown its great pot

178 action (DHE) or solid-phase microextraction (SPME) and solid phase extraction (SPE), respectively, fo

179 eadspace (SHS), solid-phase microextraction (SPME) and solvent-assisted flavour evaporation (SAFE) co

180 atography using solid phase microextraction (SPME) as a sample pre-treatment procedure.

181 que utilizing a solid-phase microextraction (SPME) Carboxen/PDMS SPME fiber.

182 w generation of solid-phase microextraction (SPME) coatings based on polytetrafluoroethylene amorphou

183 reparing porous solid phase microextraction (SPME) coatings by the sputtering of silicon onto silica

184 e determined by solid-phase microextraction (SPME) coupled to gas chromatography with micro-electron

185 headspace (HS) solid-phase microextraction (SPME) coupled with gas-chromatography mass spectrometry

186 lop a sensitive solid-phase microextraction (SPME) device for direct and rapid analysis of untreated

187 s new thin-film solid phase microextraction (SPME) devices prepared on plastic as potential single-us

188 nd evaluated as solid-phase microextraction (SPME) fiber coatings.

189 65 mum DVB/PDMS solid phase microextraction (SPME) fiber.

190 ibution between solid-phase microextraction (SPME) fibers and water was used in this study to measure

191 es collected on solid-phase microextraction (SPME) fibers by mass spectrometry (MS).

192 To date, solid-phase microextraction (SPME) fibers used for in vivo bioanalysis can be too fra

193 acrylate-coated solid-phase microextraction (SPME) fibers was applied to determine sorption of polar

194 rried out using solid-phase microextraction (SPME) followed by a comprehensive two-dimensional gas ch

195 re subjected to Solid Phase Microextraction (SPME) Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (GC/MS) analy

196 headspace (HS) solid phase microextraction (SPME) GC/MS data objects of 7 polychlorinated biphenyl (

197 nfigurations of solid-phase microextraction (SPME) have been directly coupled to mass spectrometry, r

198 headspace (HS) solid-phase microextraction (SPME) in combination with gas chromatographic (GC) separ

199 irect immersion solid phase microextraction (SPME) in vegetables.

200 Solid-phase microextraction (SPME) is a biomimetic tool ideally suited for measuring

201 Solid-phase microextraction (SPME) is a popular sampling technique in which chemical

202 Solid-phase microextraction (SPME) is a solvent-less sample preparation method which

203 Solid-phase microextraction (SPME) is a well-known sampling and sample preparation te

204 reported, this solid-phase microextraction (SPME) method delivered a robust 'Wonderful' volatile pro

205 We developed a solid phase microextraction (SPME) method to quantify the cis- and trans-isomers of 4

206 n this study, a solid-phase microextraction (SPME) method was developed for the purification of mRNA

207 Solid phase microextraction (SPME) on-fiber derivatization methods have facilitated t

208 experiments by solid-phase microextraction (SPME) resulting in partitioning coefficients of solid-wa

209 with cumulative solid phase microextraction (SPME) sampling for volatile sample enrichment is present

210 Multiple solid-phase microextraction (SPME) sampling with GC-O located odour-active regions; G

211 cted, using the solid phase microextraction (SPME) technique, and HMF was quantified, using a piezoel

212 uid (PIL)-based solid-phase microextraction (SPME) was applied for the extraction and purification of

213 ect coupling of Solid-Phase Microextraction (SPME) with mass spectrometry, based on thermal desorptio

214 In vivo solid-phase microextraction (SPME), a rapid and simple sample preparation method, wil

215 tion technique, solid phase microextraction (SPME), coupled to liquid chromatography with UV detectio

216 were sampled by solid-phase microextraction (SPME), followed by thermal injection and a ~7 min GC sep

217 Solid phase microextraction (SPME), polydimethylsiloxane stir bar sorptive extraction

218 with the use of solid-phase microextraction (SPME).

219 shooting using solid-phase microextraction (SPME).

220 sampling using solid-phase microextraction (SPME).

221 lid-phase microextraction-transmission mode (SPME-TM) device made of poly(etheretherketone) (PEEK) me

222 id Phase Micro Extraction-Transmission Mode (SPME-TM) is a technology conceived as an effective syner

223 nalysed using spectrophotometry-UV and GC-MS-SPME, respectively.

224 To address this limitation, a new SPME device is herein presented which incorporates an ex

225 Moreover, the new SPME probes were used to validate an analytical method f

226 - and solvent-assisted desorption, these new SPME probes will properly suit various metabolomics appl

227 From comparative analysis of SPME-tITP-CE with direct injection CE, the SPME-tITP pro

228 coating materials for future applications of SPME and related sample preparation techniques.

229 The coupling of SPME and HPLC showed to be reliable, fast, sensible and

230 -FID) was employed to evaluate the effect of SPME fractionation conditions (heating time and temperat

231 echnique combines the attractive features of SPME microsampling using minimal sample volumes with the

232 by the mature seeds were sampled by mean of SPME.

233 grees C), and the extraction performances of SPME fibers with 1.0 or 2.0 mum of sputtered silicon wer

234 artifacts, which confirms the suitability of SPME for in vivo applications.

235 SI-SPME highly feasible, allowing the use of SPME under nonequilibrium conditions with much shorter o

236 romas was followed by an -in vivo intra-oral SPME approach.

237 exposure was studied by means of intra-oral SPME/GC-MS using three different panellists.

238 c ionic liquid (PIL) and a polyacrylate (PA) SPME sorbent coating was optimized to enhance the extrac

239 d-phase microextraction (SPME) Carboxen/PDMS SPME fiber.

240 PEEK SPME-TM devices proved to be robust and were therefore u

241 ternal standards and sampled using gas-phase SPME.

242 This research highlights plastic SPME-TM's potential usefulness as a method for rapidly s

243 r studied PILs and a commercial polyacrylate SPME fiber.

244 In this study, we present SPME-TM as a novel tool for the ultrafast enrichment of

245 Finally, the recessed SPME device was applied to an on-site application for th

246 ME of the ground coffee and in-solution SBSE/SPME sampling combined with GC-MS to evaluate their comp

247 s spectrometry without compounds separation (SPME-MS) was used for differentiation of white as well a

248 iber with stable isotope labeled analogs (SI-SPME) to circumvent the need for long sampling time, and

249 quilibrium could be reliably estimated by SI-SPME in 1 day under agitated conditions or 20 days under

250 The Cf values predicted by SI-SPME were statistically identical to those determined by

251 isotropic, validating the assumption for SI-SPME.

252 ards and mass spectrometry nowadays makes SI-SPME highly feasible, allowing the use of SPME under non

253 ng time, and evaluated the performance of SI-SPME against the conventional equilibrium SPME (Eq-SPME)

254 The SI-SPME method was further applied successfully to field se

255 predicted within a factor of 4 with in situ SPME, using temperature-adjusted SPME fiber-water partit

256 Some SPME extraction parameters were optimized.

257 action-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (SPME-GC-MS) and two-dimensional GC-MS.

258 action gas chromatography mass spectrometry (SPME-GC-MS), and quantification using in-house synthesiz

259 action gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (SPME-GC-MS).

260 action-Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry (SPME-GC/MS).

261 Of the studied SPME sorbent coatings, the PIL containing carboxylic aci

262 The proposed micelle assisted TF-SPME method offers suppression/enhancement free electros

263 The developed micelle assisted TF-SPME protocol using the 96-blade system requires only 30

264 th thin film solid phase microextraction (TF-SPME) and liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry

265 ed thin-film solid phase microextraction (TF-SPME) using a zwitterionic detergent 3-[(3-cholamidoprop

266 Two types of TF-SPME passive samplers, including a retracted thin film d

267 imal interaction of the micelles with the TF-SPME coating, and chromatographic stationary phase and a

268 e measured using PE and POM, indicating that SPME may not have been fully equilibrated with waters be

269 The SPME fiber coating selected was 100 mum PDMS.

270 ion directly between the vapor phase and the SPME fiber.

271 f SPME-tITP-CE with direct injection CE, the SPME-tITP process improved comprehensiveness and sensiti

272 and computational simulation describing the SPME process is required for experimentalists to underst

273 TP), the desorption of the analytes from the SPME devices in our setup is completely separated from t

274 tes were quantitatively transferred from the SPME to the DBDI source, and the use of an active capill

275 s are completely eliminated by inserting the SPME fiber directly into the MS.

276 The selectivity of the SPME method toward mRNA was enhanced by functionalizing

277 grees C for 10 min prior to loading onto the SPME fiber.

278 The results obtained were compared to SPME-GC/MS analysis in which compounds were resolved by

279 28 and 71 days of ripening and subjected to SPME GC/MS analysis.

280 ted by loading the sample inside the in-tube SPME device (withdraw of sample via plunger), where extr

281 n of sample, revealing the developed in-tube SPME device as an ideal probe for forensic application,

282 (LC-MS/MS) or direct coupling of the in-tube SPME device to the MS.

283 The in-tube SPME device was shown to be very sensitive, with high to

284 The sensitivity of TV-SPME is nearly twice that of liquid injection for cotini

285 dition, increased sampling selectivity of TV-SPME permits detection of both nicotine and cotinine in

286 lly vaporized (total vaporization SPME or TV-SPME) so that analytes partition directly between the va

287 TWA-SPME was found to have increased sensitivity over headsp

288 lts with those obtained by the commonly used SPME methodology, optimisation of SBSE achieved better r

289 Using SPME, 36 compounds were isolated in whole pressed 'Wonde

290 Using SPME-GCMS, this study provides evidence that purified O.

291 ical changes, and volatiles formation (using SPME-GC/MS) was investigated.

292 ati) were characterised and identified using SPME GC-O, GC-PFPD and confirmed using GC-MS.

293 rganic compounds (VOCs) were monitored using SPME GC-MS.

294 varieties grown in Egypt were profiled using SPME-GCMS coupled to multivariate data analysis to explo

295 determined using ICP-OES and volatiles using SPME-GC/MS.

296 ple is totally vaporized (total vaporization SPME or TV-SPME) so that analytes partition directly bet

297 The detection limit of in vivo SPME in fish muscle was 0.12 ng/g for geosmin and 0.21 n

298 imally invasive, and easily executed in vivo SPME is now possible opening the door to near endless sa

299 The in vivo SPME sampling approach has been demonstrated as capable

300 hed light into the implementation of in vivo SPME strategies in quantitative metabolomics studies of