ライフサイエンスコーパス: SRP

1 SRP fosters interweaving multiple knowledge resources to

2 SRP has had many successes: discovery of arsenic's toxic

3 SRP improved the clinical parameters of both groups at 3

4 SRP is also known to contact the ribosome at this site.

5 SRP is coordinated by the National Institute of Environm

6 SRP must continue to address the legacy of hazardous was

7 SRP of inflamed moderate pockets during 6-month PMT, wit

8 SRP scans the nascent chains of translating ribosomes, p

9 SRP together with medical treatment results in a greater

10 SRP was performed in two sessions at 2-week intervals.

11 re categorized into two treatment groups: 1) SRP plus 1% MF and 2) SRP plus placebo.

12 re categorized into two treatment groups: 1) SRP plus 1.2% ATV and 2) SRP plus placebo.

13 omly allocated to three treatment groups: 1) SRP with placebo gel (group 1); 2) SRP with 1.2% RSV gel

14 egorized into two treatment groups: group 1, SRP plus 1.2 mg RSV; group 2, SRP plus placebo.

15 rized into two treatment groups: 1) group 1: SRP + placebo gel and 2) group 2: SRP + 0.5% AZM.

16 sequence, we computationally identified 152 SRP RNAs throughout the phylum Basidiomycota.

17 roups: 1) SRP with placebo gel (group 1); 2) SRP with 1.2% RSV gel (group 2); and 3) SRP with 1.2% AT

18 o treatment groups: 1) SRP plus 1% MF and 2) SRP plus placebo.

19 reatment groups: 1) SRP plus 1.2% ATV and 2) SRP plus placebo.

20 oups: 1) NT group (n = 30), no treatment; 2) SRP group (n = 30), scaling and root planing (SRP) and l

21 with: 1) at least 6 months of follow-up; 2) SRP, in combination with local antimicrobials; and 3) pa

22 oups: group 1, SRP plus 1.2 mg RSV; group 2, SRP plus placebo.

23 ) group 1: SRP + placebo gel and 2) group 2: SRP + 0.5% AZM.

24 In 13 patients (24%), SRP-IgG was detected, and in 17 patients (34%), HMGCR-Ig

25 ; 2) SRP with 1.2% RSV gel (group 2); and 3) SRP with 1.2% ATV gel (group 3).

26 ion with physiologic saline solution; and 3) SRP/SA group (n = 30), SRP and local irrigation with SA

27 ing groups: 1) healthy; 2) periodontitis; 3) SRP; 4) SRP + vitamin D3; 5) SRP + vitamin K2; and 6) SR

28 FDIS + metronidazole; 2) FDIS + placebo; 3) SRP + metronidazole; and 4) SRP + placebo.

29 ent groups: 1) FDIS+MET; 2) FDIS+placebo; 3) SRP+MET; and 4) SRP+placebo.

30 line solution; and 3) SRP/SA group (n = 30), SRP and local irrigation with SA (10(-5) M).

31 IS + placebo; 3) SRP + metronidazole; and 4) SRP + placebo.

32 DIS+MET; 2) FDIS+placebo; 3) SRP+MET; and 4) SRP+placebo.

33 ps: 1) healthy; 2) periodontitis; 3) SRP; 4) SRP + vitamin D3; 5) SRP + vitamin K2; and 6) SRP + vita

34 riodontitis; 3) SRP; 4) SRP + vitamin D3; 5) SRP + vitamin K2; and 6) SRP + vitamins K2 and D3.

35 RP + vitamin D3; 5) SRP + vitamin K2; and 6) SRP + vitamins K2 and D3.

36 on to allow repositioning of the 'activated' SRP-SR complex on the ribosome.

37 rtion of the signal sequence severely affect SRP binding.

38 After SRP, the participants' teeth were randomized to receive

39 ts without obesity with CP at 6 months after SRP.

40 membrane via a Dynamic mode, followed by an SRP-induced conformational transition to a Stable mode t

41 Binding of an SRP-RNC complex exposing a hydrophobic transmembrane seg

42 lves a signal recognition particle (SRP), an SRP receptor, and a translocase.

43 nt chloroplasts (cpSRP54) is not bound to an SRP RNA, an essential SRP component in bacteria, but for

44 the SRP + vitamin D3, SRP + vitamin K2, and SRP + vitamins K2 and D3 groups by oral gavage.

45 Sites treated with SRP + L and SRP alone resulted in statistically significant reductio

46 s in GCF IL-1beta levels between SRP + L and SRP alone were not statistically significant.

47 In the absence of NAC, MetAP and SRP antagonize each other, indicating a novel role for N

48 or NAC in regulating the access of MetAP and SRP to the ribosome.

49 retention exceeding 60% and 80% of NO3-N and SRP inputs, respectively.

50 closed state reveals an ordered SRP RNA and SRP M domain with a signal sequence-bound.

51 conformational rearrangements in the SRP and SRP receptor GTPases; these rearrangements provide effec

52 milar groups, SRP + MM (aged 66.8 years) and SRP alone (aged 67 years), to treat a >/=5 mm posterior

53 In the presence of anti-SRP or anti-HMGCR Abs, mechanisms involved in muscle reg

54 In vitro, anti-SRP and anti-HMGCR Abs induced muscle fiber atrophy and

55 We investigated whether anti-SRP and anti-HMGCR Abs could be involved in muscle damag

56 In muscle biopsies of patients with anti-SRP(+) and anti-HMGCR(+) Abs, a large number of small fi

57 ith generalized AgP were treated with aPDT + SRP (test group) or SRP only (control group).

58 The precise mechanism by which the bacterial SRP receptor, FtsY, interacts with and is regulated at t

59 vel (CAL), were recorded at baseline (before SRP) and at 1, 3, 4, and 6 months.

60 sites showed significant correlation between SRP and the artificial sweetener acesulfame, a promising

61 ding to quantify allosteric coupling between SRP domains.

62 nslocon is guided by the interaction between SRP and translocon-bound FtsY in a quaternary targeting

63 , differences in GCF IL-1beta levels between SRP + L and SRP alone were not statistically significant

64 Patients treated by both SRP and FMD showed improvement in all periodontal clinic

65 ns are still known to be independent of both SRP and GET, so there seems to be a critical need for an

66 sponsible for its recognition and binding by SRP, while positive charges fine-tune the SRP-signal seq

67 exist in two conformations distinguished by SRP interaction kinetics.

68 pecific semantic predictions were indexed by SRP sources within the motor system-in dorsolateral hand

69 The mechanisms used by SRP to ensure fidelity share important conceptual analog

70 performed in the presence of purified canine SRP.

71 Canonical SRP RNA genes have not been identified for some Thermopr

72 plast of green plants, where the chloroplast SRP (cpSRP) post-translationally targets light-harvestin

73 on that substrate binding to the chloroplast SRP is modulated by protein structural dynamics in which

74 ni are ligated together to generate circular SRP RNA molecules that can bind to SRP19 and SRP54.

75 to observe directly and in real-time E. coli SRP binding to actively translating RNCs.

76 Furthermore, combining SRP and sample rotation, we demonstrate the SRP tomograp

77 y of SRP for correct cargos, thus committing SRP-dependent substrates to the pathway.

78 masked, randomized clinical trial comparing SRP with placebo (placebo + SRP group, n = 26) or SRP co

79 uggest coevolution of the two most conserved SRP features-SRP RNA helix 8 and Srp54-in basidiomycetes

80 a test (SRP + probiotic, n = 14) or control (SRP + placebo, n = 14) group.

81 tial RNA is bypassed in the chloroplast (cp) SRP of green plants.

82 istered for 10 days in the SRP + vitamin D3, SRP + vitamin K2, and SRP + vitamins K2 and D3 groups by

83 kg/day NH4-N, 1097 kg/day NO3-N, 656 kg/day SRP).

84 s were a primary contributor of the elevated SRP observed in this study.

85 54) is not bound to an SRP RNA, an essential SRP component in bacteria, but forms a stable heterodime

86 ution of the two most conserved SRP features-SRP RNA helix 8 and Srp54-in basidiomycetes.

87 tivity over existing approaches allowing for SRP measurements of unprecedented frequency (8 min), whi

88 eins, which we name Snd1, Snd2 and Snd3 (for SRP-independent targeting), can synthetically compensate

89 Our findings reveal unexpected fungal SRP diversity and suggest coevolution of the two most co

90 tudy) into two statistically similar groups, SRP + MM (aged 66.8 years) and SRP alone (aged 67 years)

91 iven to 90 patients divided into two groups: SRP (n = 45) and FMD (n = 45).

92 Rather, high SRP concentrations were associated with geochemically re

93 These structures reveal the near-identical SRP architecture of these two states, show many of the S

94 utational approaches have failed to identify SRP components from genomes of many lower eukaryotes, ra

95 % (down to 38% of patients) and 95% (26%) in SRP + MM and 82% (42%) and 82% (41%) in SRP at 6 and 12

96 ) in SRP + MM and 82% (42%) and 82% (41%) in SRP at 6 and 12 months, respectively.

97 Facial weakness was more common in SRP-IgG-positive patients.

98 NAC also functions in SRP-dependent targeting and helps to protect substrates

99 ates key interactions between two GTPases in SRP and its receptor, thus enabling rapid delivery of ca

100 (0.9 +/- 0.8 mm) and 13% (0.7 +/- 0.9 mm) in SRP + MM and 11% (0.7 +/- 1.1 mm) and 21% (1.2 +/- 0.9 m

101 (0.7 +/- 1.1 mm) and 21% (1.2 +/- 0.9 mm) in SRP at 6 and 12 months, respectively.

102 reased a significant 61% (P = 0.009) only in SRP + MM at 6 months.

103 metic drug ketamine, play a critical role in SRP, but not in the induction or expression of adult OD

104 n dynamics that are reduced upon binding its SRP binding partner, cpSRP54.

105 The conserved 54-kDa SRP subunit in higher plant chloroplasts (cpSRP54) is no

106 tionally important loop present in all known SRP RNAs.

107 own wastewater contamination (but the lowest SRP).

108 e, we present structures of native mammalian SRP-ribosome complexes in the scanning and engaged state

109 e of locally delivered statins to mechanical SRP is beneficial to increasing bone fill percentage.

110 In PD >/= 7 mm, SRP, MWF, and OS resulted in 9.8%, 14.2%, and 9.38% CAL

111 dentify YlxM as a component of the S. mutans SRP and suggest a regulatory function affecting GTPase a

112 S. mutans SRP pathway mutants demonstrate growth defects, cannot c

113 The C. neoformans SRP RNA displays a predicted structure in which the univ

114 locker, is sufficient to trigger RRP but not SRP exocytosis.

115 retained on average 37% of NO3-N and 45% of SRP inputs, with maximum retention exceeding 60% and 80%

116 tion of 33-99% of NO3-N inputs and 45-99% of SRP inputs.

117 ence analyses showed that, in the absence of SRP RNA, the M-domain of cpSRP54 both accelerates and st

118 or (SR) selectively enhances the affinity of SRP for correct cargos, thus committing SRP-dependent su

119 We report purification and analysis of SRP in the human pathogen Cryptococcus neoformans, provi

120 smokers from treatment by the combination of SRP, MTZ, and AMX.

121 Comparison of SRP in collocate PM2.5 aerosol filter sampling with the

122 RNA is a universally conserved component of SRP that mediates key interactions between two GTPases i

123 These complexes consist of SRP proteins and a single, highly structured SRP RNA.

124 Depletion of SRP, the SRP receptor or the Sec61 translocon in cells l

125 oformans, providing the first description of SRP in basidiomycetous yeast.

126 Detection of SRP is based on molybdenum blue chemistry with Sn(II) ch

127 V1 play a critical role in the expression of SRP and its behavioral correlate of familiarity recognit

128 NSPT (in the form of SRP) positively affects limited cardiovascular (clinical

129 understanding of the sources and impacts of SRP in atmospheric chemistry.

130 d their evolution coincides with the loss of SRP RNA in green plants.

131 T pairs occur via the rigid-body movement of SRP domains connected by the flexible linker region.

132 A homogeneous population of SRP-ribosome-nascent chain complexes was obtained by the

133 We show that initial recruitment of SRP receptor (SR) selectively enhances the affinity of S

134 c sachet commenced after the last session of SRP.

135 ith placebo (placebo + SRP group, n = 26) or SRP combined with a 6-month regimen of 400 mg oral propo

136 were treated with aPDT + SRP (test group) or SRP only (control group).

137 koid membrane and lumen by the SEC1, TAT, or SRP/ALB3 translocases.

138 cture of the closed state reveals an ordered SRP RNA and SRP M domain with a signal sequence-bound.

139 Our SRP microscope enables fast quantitation of chemicals in

140 We explore the potential of our SRP technology by mapping polymer particles in 3D volume

141 Near constant outflow SRP and DOP concentrations suggest an equilibrium adsorp

142 did not result in an additional benefit over SRP alone.

143 ion of DFT (the specific reaction parameter (SRP) approach to DFT).

144 ay requires the signal recognition particle (SRP) and its cognate receptor (SR), and targets ribosome

145 al targeting by signal recognition particle (SRP) and posttranslational targeting by SecA and SecB.

146 The signal recognition particle (SRP) binds to signal sequences emerging from the ribosom

147 targeting, the signal recognition particle (SRP) binds to the translating ribosome displaying the si

148 sally conserved signal recognition particle (SRP) co-translationally delivers newly synthesized membr

149 The signal recognition particle (SRP) cotranslationally recognizes signal sequences of se

150 The signal recognition particle (SRP) delivers 30% of the proteome to the eukaryotic end

151 The signal recognition particle (SRP) directs translating ribosome-nascent chain complexe

152 ervation of the signal recognition particle (SRP) from bacteria to man, computational approaches have

153 The signal recognition particle (SRP) is an essential ribonucleoprotein particle that med

154 sally conserved signal recognition particle (SRP) is essential for the biogenesis of most integral me

155 es specific for signal recognition particle (SRP) or 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase

156 tionally by the signal recognition particle (SRP) pathway or post-translationally by the mammalian tr

157 and involves a signal recognition particle (SRP), an SRP receptor, and a translocase.

158 s the cytosolic signal recognition particle (SRP), and targets the ribosome-nascent chain complex to

159 equired for the signal recognition particle (SRP), SRP receptors, the translocon, the signal peptidas

160 MetAP), and the signal recognition particle (SRP), which targets secretory and membrane proteins to t

161 The signal recognition particle (SRP)-dependent pathway is essential for correct targetin

162 to utilize the signal recognition particle (SRP)-mediated pathway.

163 ting machinery, signal recognition particle (SRP).

164 ationally via a signal recognition particle (SRP).

165 proteins by the signal recognition particle (SRP).

166 Signal recognition particles (SRPs) are universal ribonucleoprotein complexes found in

167 In periodontal maintenance patients, SRP + L did not enhance clinical outcomes compared to SR

168 In 4- to 6-mm PD, SRP, MWF, and OS resulted in 8.4%, 6.5%, and 5.22% CAL g

169 ts in Thermoproteus tenax created a permuted SRP RNA gene.

170 rements of water-soluble reactive phosphate (SRP) ions in atmospheric particles.

171 s (NH4-N, NO3-N, soluble reactive phosphorus-SRP) along a approximately 300-km arid-land river (Rio G

172 trial comparing SRP with placebo (placebo + SRP group, n = 26) or SRP combined with a 6-month regime

173 RP group (n = 30), scaling and root planing (SRP) and local irrigation with physiologic saline soluti

174 p was treated with scaling and root planing (SRP) and myo-inositol (MI).

175 use to mechanical scaling and root planing (SRP) and placebo in each group, with minimum 10 particip

176 est group received scaling and root planing (SRP) and probiotic-containing lozenges.

177 ected and received scaling and root planing (SRP) combined with MTZ (400 mg three times daily) and AM

178 ) as an adjunct to scaling and root planing (SRP) for treating chronic periodontitis in patients with

179 system adjunct to scaling and root planing (SRP) for treatment of Class II furcation defects.

180 s as an adjunct to scaling and root planing (SRP) for treatment of patients with CP.

181 PDT) adjunctive to scaling and root planing (SRP) in patients with AgP.

182 , as an adjunct to scaling and root planing (SRP) in the treatment of intrabony defects in chronic pe

183 l as an adjunct to scaling and root planing (SRP) in the treatment of moderate and severe chronic per

184 d as an adjunct to scaling and root planing (SRP) in the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes m

185 ate the effects of scaling and root planing (SRP) on clinical parameters and circulating levels of le

186 effect of MMs plus scaling and root planing (SRP) on these sites.

187 with conventional scaling and root planing (SRP) over weeks or same-day full-mouth disinfection (FDI

188 riodontal therapy, scaling and root planing (SRP) per quadrant and one-stage full-mouth disinfection

189 e effectiveness of scaling and root planing (SRP) plus the adjunctive use of diode laser therapy to S

190 s as an adjunct to scaling and root planing (SRP) provide additional benefits in the treatment of per

191 out antibiotics by scaling and root planing (SRP) to remove dental biofilm.

192 therapy, including scaling and root planing (SRP), and were assigned randomly to a test (SRP + probio

193 ms, in addition to scaling and root planing (SRP), for the treatment of intrabony defects (IBDs) in p

194 In 1- to 3-mm PD, scaling and root planing (SRP), modified Widman flap (MWF), and osseous surgery (O

195 ) over traditional scaling and root planing (SRP), with or without adjunctive metronidazole, when tre

196 itizer (PS); or 3) scaling and root planing (SRP).

197 s (DMt2) receiving scaling and root planing (SRP).

198 SPT in the form of scaling and root planing [SRP]) (n = 35).

199 riodontal therapy (scaling and root planing [SRP]) on gingival interleukin (IL)-1beta and IL-10, seru

200 Ps) coated with stimuli-responsive polymers (SRPs) exhibit tunable optical properties responding to e

201 efore call the semantic readiness potential (SRP).

202 nd stimulus-selective response potentiation (SRP) resulting from enriched visual experience.

203 of stimulus-selective response potentiation (SRP), occurred in layer 4 of V1 as OSH developed.

204 The Superfund Research Program (SRP) is an academically based, multidisciplinary, transl

205 Health Sciences Superfund Research Program (SRP), as mandated by Congress, has evolved to become a p

206 ssel-beam-based stimulated Raman projection (SRP) microscopy and tomography for label-free volumetric

207 400 mg oral propolis once daily (propolis + SRP group, n = 24) was performed in patients with long-s

208 s strikingly simple: as originally proposed, SRP only stably engages translating RNCs exposing a func

209 with either anti-signal recognition protein (SRP) or anti-3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase (H

210 The control group received SRP and placebo lozenges.

211 Patients with periodontitis received SRP and surgery, and HVs received prophylaxis.

212 ing SRP and vitamins and the group receiving SRP alone.

213 lar bone levels between the groups receiving SRP and vitamins and the group receiving SRP alone.

214 EGTA, are essentially involved in recruiting SRP vesicles.

215 We show that TF regulates SRP function at three distinct stages, including binding

216 .4%, 6.5%, and 5.22% CAL gain, respectively; SRP, MWF, and OS resulted in 18.7%, 25.4%, and 30.8% PD

217 8%, 14.2%, and 9.38% CAL gain, respectively; SRP, MWF, and OS resulted in mean PD reduction of 21.6%,

218 %, 39.4%, and 61.39% CAL loss, respectively; SRP, MWF, and OS resulted in increased mean PD of 2.5%,

219 d for the signal recognition particle (SRP), SRP receptors, the translocon, the signal peptidase comp

220 SRP proteins and a single, highly structured SRP RNA.

221 sed site-specific photocrosslinking to study SRP-signal sequence interactions.

222 tory and requiring antibiotics to supplement SRP were associated with low biofilm lysine contents.

223 (SRP), and were assigned randomly to a test (SRP + probiotic, n = 14) or control (SRP + placebo, n =

224 MWF had significantly more PD reduction than SRP, and there was significantly less CAL gain with surg

225 S had significantly higher PD reduction than SRP.

226 Moreover, we show that SRP binds RNCs in multiple and interconverting conformat

227 The SRP is a central component of the co-translational prote

228 The SRP precedes critical words if a previous sentence conte

229 The SRP RNA is a universally conserved component of SRP that

230 The SRP-FtsY GTPases are detached from the RNA tetraloop and

231 The SRP-independent pathway requires the Sec translocase-ass

232 ndent binding of the SRP-FtsY GTPases at the SRP RNA tetraloop.

233 cant differences were identified between the SRP and FMD groups in regard to OHQoL and OIDP scores wh

234 etically compensate for the loss of both the SRP and GET pathways, and act as a backup targeting syst

235 nce of GTP, a closed state is adopted by the SRP-FtsY complex.

236 In Escherichia coli, the SRP and its receptor FtsY bind to ribosome-nascent chain

237 r plant chloroplasts from cyanobacteria, the SRP pathway underwent striking adaptations that enable t

238 SRP and sample rotation, we demonstrate the SRP tomography that can reconstruct the 3D distribution

239 chanism of signal sequence transfer from the SRP to the translocon.

240 Compared with the other groups, the SRP/SA group showed less local inflammation and better t

241 mug/kg) were administered for 10 days in the SRP + vitamin D3, SRP + vitamin K2, and SRP + vitamins K

242 aborate conformational rearrangements in the SRP and SRP receptor GTPases; these rearrangements provi

243 e-controlled conformational switching in the SRP provides a mechanism for discriminating between diff

244 er RANKL immunolabeling were observed in the SRP/SA group at 15 and 30 days.

245 There were fewer TRAP-positive cells in the SRP/SA group than in the NT group at all of the time poi

246 There was more PBF in the SRP/SA group than in the other groups at days 7 and 15.

247 ries reveal the intrinsic flexibility of the SRP conformational landscape and provide insight into re

248 beyond its hydrophobic binding groove of the SRP M domain towards the translocon.

249 polypeptide selection by SecA instead of the SRP machinery.

250 Initial recruitment of the SRP receptor FtsY to the SRP-RNC complex results in GTP-

251 e, membrane targeting via recruitment of the SRP receptor, and rejection of ribosome-bound nascent po

252 ing machinery permits the permutation of the SRP RNA and creates highly stable and functional circula

253 in relative conformational stability of the SRP upon substrate binding to quantify allosteric coupli

254 tidomain chloroplast-specific subunit of the SRP, cpSRP43, is proposed to take on the role of coordin

255 ex results in GTP-independent binding of the SRP-FtsY GTPases at the SRP RNA tetraloop.

256 ecture of these two states, show many of the SRP-ribosome interactions at atomic resolution, and sugg

257 ature protein have only a mild effect on the SRP-signal sequence association.

258 e translating Escherichia coli ribosome, the SRP-SR in the 'activated' state and the translocon.

259 Depletion of SRP, the SRP receptor or the Sec61 translocon in cells leads to r

260 ions in the RNA-binding domain of Srp54, the SRP protein subunit that directly interacts with helix 8

261 by biochemical experiments, reveals that the SRP RNA adopts a kinked and untwisted conformation to al

262 ing the signal sequence to deliver it to the SRP receptor (SR) on the membrane, where the signal pept

263 gets ribosome-nascent chain complexes to the SRP receptor in the endoplasmic reticulum membrane, init

264 ribosome-nascent-chain complex (RNC) to the SRP receptor, termed FtsY in bacteria.

265 recruitment of the SRP receptor FtsY to the SRP-RNC complex results in GTP-independent binding of th

266 by SRP, while positive charges fine-tune the SRP-signal sequence affinity and targeting to the transl

267 e reactions with chemical accuracy using the SRP-DFT approach, as has been shown for H2 + Cu(111) and

268 rated that S. mutans YlxM interacts with the SRP components Ffh and small cytoplasmic RNA (scRNA) but

269 all cytoplasmic RNA (scRNA) but not with the SRP receptor FtsY.

270 teract efficiently by themselves without the SRP RNA.

271 eated with SRP and adjunctive laser therapy (SRP + L).

272 Strikingly, these SRP RNA features in Basidiomycota are accompanied by phy

273 The 5'- and 3'-termini of this SRP RNA are located close to a functionally important lo

274 use of local antimicrobials as an adjunct to SRP may result in additional benefits compared with SRP

275 nce daily is a potentially viable adjunct to SRP that significantly reduces levels of HbA1c, FPG, and

276 cts of local antimicrobials as an adjunct to SRP, compared with SRP alone, on periodontal clinical pa

277 Class II furcation defects as an adjunct to SRP.

278 tion of four sessions of aPDT, adjunctive to SRP, promotes additional clinical, microbiologic, and im

279 ded that topical use of SA as an adjuvant to SRP is effective in the treatment of experimental period

280 e) did not provide any additional benefit to SRP in terms of clinical parameters or inflammatory mark

281 id not enhance clinical outcomes compared to SRP alone in the treatment of inflamed sites with >/= 5

282 ts without obesity with CP were submitted to SRP.

283 the adjunctive use of diode laser therapy to SRP alone on changes in the clinical parameters of disea

284 Here we show that SR switches translocons to SRP-dependent translocation by displacing Sec62.

285 All patients underwent SRP.

286 ns and a slowly releasable pool of vesicles (SRP) at farther distance from them.

287 One in 4 patients was SRP-IgG positive, and 1 in 3 was HMGCR-IgG positive.

288 tivated systems like H2 + Pd(111), for which SRP DFs are not yet available.

289 However, chemical accuracy with SRP-DFT has yet to be demonstrated for weakly activated

290 result in additional benefits compared with SRP alone in PD reduction and CAL gain, especially in we

291 crobials as an adjunct to SRP, compared with SRP alone, on periodontal clinical parameters of patient

292 similar clinical improvements compared with SRP alone.

293 onstrate that they function in parallel with SRP and GET to target a broad range of substrates to the

294 d analysis, patients in group 2 treated with SRP + 0.5% AZM showed enhanced reductions in PI, GI, mSB

295 Sites treated with SRP + L and SRP alone resulted in statistically signific

296 Fifty-eight sites were treated with SRP alone.

297 Fifty-six sites were treated with SRP and adjunctive laser therapy (SRP + L).

298 nt IBD depth reduction at sites treated with SRP plus locally delivered MF in patients with CP in bot

299 BDs was randomly allocated to treatment with SRP followed by LDD of 1.2% RSV, 1.2% ATV, or placebo ge

300 processing and quality control of the yeast SRP RNA (scR1).