ライフサイエンスコーパス: SRS

1 SRS also automatically identified 14 of the image stacks

2 SRS followed by EGFR-TKI resulted in the longest OS and

3 SRS is a nonlinear technique that probes the same vibrat

4 SRS is typically administered in a single session but ca

5 SRS microscopy has a major advantage over previous coher

6 SRS microscopy offers an imaging speed that is faster th

7 SRS microscopy was used to image D2O, PG-d8/DMSO-d6, and

8 SRS relies on the precisely guided delivery of high-dose

9 SRS-XRF represents a major advancement in the study of t

10 C-H frequency (2850 cm(-1)) SRS imaging revealed a substantial difference in lipogen

11 randomized participants (SRS alone, n = 111; SRS plus WBRT, n = 102) with a mean age of 60.6 years (S

12 ) and the Social Responsiveness Scale(TM)-2 (SRS-2).

13 6 years (adjusted B=0.23, 95% CI=0.03-0.37); SRS results were similar.

14 pattern of more than 450 000 CpG sites in 44 SRS patients.

15 Single mutations in SRS 5, SRS 6 and near SRS 2 also introduced 3MI oxygenase activ

16 In addition, SRS results demonstrated a significant increase in autis

17 ce of cognitive deterioration was less after SRS alone at 3 months (5/11 [45.5%] vs 16/17 [94.1%]; di

18 ss cognitive deterioration at 3 months after SRS alone (40/63 patients [63.5%]) than when combined wi

19 -up, performed between 4 and 15 months after SRS, all 3 patients demonstrated a reduction in uveal tu

20 ration and detection strategies have allowed SRS to probe increasingly smaller volumes and shorter ti

21 disease progression (of which 47% were also SRS-positive) were deceased, and 87% of patients with a

22 the SRSs on the promoter region, forming an SRS-H-NS complex that prevents RNA polymerase-mediated t

23 On multivariable analysis, SRS versus EGFR-TKI, WBRT versus EGFR-TKI, age, performa

24 ibility that the precursor of the s48/45 and SRS domains emerged from an ancient transfer to Apicompl

25 However, double mutations in SRS 5 and SRS 6 successfully introduced oxygenase activity to CYP2

26 Initial scores for ABC and SRS were closely matched for participants assigned to pl

27 We further show that in BWS and SRS cells, there is opposing chromatin looping conformat

28 rmations are differently favoured in BWS and SRS likely predisposing the locus to the activation of I

29 CTCF--cohesin binding at the ICR in BWS and SRS together with DNA methylation correlate with the hig

30 hyll fluorescence and absorption in CARS and SRS microscopy.

31 er-adjusted associations between 52 EDCs and SRS scores using a two-stage hierarchical analysis to ac

32 tability observed during epileptogenesis and SRS.

33 tic child by a PDP score>98th percentile and SRS score in the top 5% of the sample (n=81, 2.0%).

34 aphy (for nonmetastatic or adrenal PHEO) and SRS (for metastatic PHEO) should be the first alternativ

35 t applications of both spontaneous Raman and SRS as novel imaging platforms to facilitate the drug di

36 romised in the Drosophila nervous system and SRS patient cells.

37 nce supports the use of SRS alone, WBRT, and SRS with WBRT.

38 Any SRS should be tested for effect on intrinsic report qual

39 the unique legacy of plutonium production at SRS.

40 f collected foot borne debris, were taken at SRS over an eleven year period, from 2003 to 2014.

41 a significant negative relationship between SRS-A scores and the functional connectivity of the preg

42 owed by EGFR-TKI versus EGFR-TKI followed by SRS at intracranial progression is urgently needed.

43 ollowed by EGFR-TKI, or EGFR-TKI followed by SRS or WBRT at intracranial progression.

44 sm resulting in a non-functional SMS causing SRS.

45 f the animal and a 3D atlas of target cells, SRS is effectively an atlas-guided voxel classification

46 his study exemplifies the merit of combining SRS and SHG microscopy for an enhanced label-free chemic

47 In the following decades, SRS emerged as a unique discipline involving a collegial

48 A different SRS-stabilizing bias was observed in the crystal structu

49 tegration within (local efficiency) the DMS, SRS, and FPS, and between (participation coefficient) th

50 Social Responsiveness Scale, second edition [SRS-2], with T scores of >/=75 associated with a categor

51 ed (1:1) with a block size of four to either SRS of the resection cavity (within 30 days of surgery)

52 dren whose parents had concordantly elevated SRS scores (odds ratio [OR], 1.85; 95% CI, 1.08-3.16) an

53 This has enabled SRS research to move from its original domain, of probin

54 In this early experience, SRS was found to be an effective management option for u

55 nchrotron rapid scanning X-ray fluorescence (SRS-XRF) of the Thermopolis Archaeopteryx, which shows t

56 l-focusing stimulated Raman scattering (FMSF-SRS) microscopy: a technical improvement over traditiona

57 for (123)I-MIBG scintigraphy, and 22.0% for SRS.

58 for (123)I-MIBG scintigraphy, and 64.0% for SRS.

59 P < 0.001, comparing treatments) and 17% for SRS scores (P = 0.017).

60 the SRS plus WBRT group and 20 to 24 Gy for SRS alone.

61 Median overall survival was 10.4 months for SRS alone and 7.4 months for SRS plus WBRT (hazard ratio

62 10.4 months for SRS alone and 7.4 months for SRS plus WBRT (hazard ratio, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.75-1.38; P

63 of a 5-week continuous monitoring period for SRS, quantitative immunohistochemistry using neuronal (n

64 (mean change from baseline, -1.5 points for SRS alone vs -4.2 points for SRS plus WBRT; mean differe

65 -1.5 points for SRS alone vs -4.2 points for SRS plus WBRT; mean difference, 2.7 points; 95% CI, -2.0

66 ndings from our study may have relevance for SRS and highlight a potentially underreported aspect of

67 ranial failure was significantly shorter for SRS alone compared with SRS plus WBRT (hazard ratio, 3.6

68 Moreover, coupled with label-free SRS imaging of the total proteome, our method can readil

69 However, SRS imaging in living animals and humans has not been fe

70 However, combined hyperspectral SRS and SHG imaging reveals that not all SHG-active stru

71 Current hyperspectral SRS data analysis methods are based on either linear unm

72 ated with negligible absolute differences in SRS scores (</= 1.5).

73 an inactive enzyme, while double mutants in SRS 4 did not alter 3MI metabolism.

74 However, double mutations in SRS 5 and SRS 6 successfully introduced oxygenase activi

75 Single mutations in SRS 5, SRS 6 and near SRS 2 also introduced 3MI oxygenas

76 hat radiocesium will likewise be retained in SRS soils.

77 omponent explaining 30.9% of the variance in SRS-2 scores, and a strong association with ADHD symptom

78 for patients with MBM from melanoma includes SRS, WBRT, or a combination of both.

79 ing any optical imaging technique, including SRS, there is an additional problem of optical aberratio

80 INTERPRETATION: SRS of the surgical cavity in patients who have had comp

81 f patients likely to benefit from first-line SRS, close CNS observation, and treatment of emergent CN

82 After resection of a brain metastasis, SRS radiosurgery should be considered one of the standar

83 ements were made on stations 7.1 and 9.2 MF (SRS Daresbury, UK) using the mobile luminescence end sta

84 oelectronic replacement of CO by NO(+), {(mu-SRS)[Fe(CO)2PMe3] [Fe(CO)(NO)PMe3](+)}, are also rotated

85 involved in the two structural forms of (mu-SRS)[Fe(CO)2PMe3]2(0,+) complexes.

86 We believe that quantitative multiplex SRS uniquely combines the advantage of fast label-free i

87 Single mutations in SRS 5, SRS 6 and near SRS 2 also introduced 3MI oxygenase activity.

88 positive SRS than the group with a negative SRS (P = 0.0002).

89 providing an ablative effect noninvasively, SRS has altered the treatment paradigms for benign and m

90 This previously unreported application of SRS has permitted, therefore, direct visualization and s

91 Initial treatment with a combination of SRS and close clinical monitoring is recommended as the

92 oteins and lipids by linear decomposition of SRS images at three optimally selected Raman shifts.

93 We aimed to establish the effect of SRS on survival and cognitive outcomes compared with WBR

94 sible for the patients having a mild form of SRS and reveal yet another molecular mechanism resulting

95 ates the pathological polyamine imbalance of SRS and causes survival defects and synaptic degeneratio

96 The label-free nature of SRS imaging combined with its chemical specificity allow

97 ts were surveyed regarding their opinions of SRS.

98 eased tendency to burst during the period of SRS.

99 thalamus during SE or subsequent periods of SRS.

100 Finally, we demonstrate the potential of SRS for a range of in planta applications by presenting

101 We defined gene sets predictive of SRS group, and serial sampling demonstrated that subgrou

102 ive, multi-institutional randomized trial of SRS followed by EGFR-TKI versus EGFR-TKI followed by SRS

103 Thus, the use of SRS after brain metastasis resection could be an alterna

104 nts with 1 to 3 brain metastases, the use of SRS alone, compared with SRS combined with WBRT, resulte

105 Level 1 evidence supports the use of SRS alone, WBRT, and SRS with WBRT.

106 le length scales to underline the utility of SRS to the molecular sciences.

107 s were scored on CT and bone lesions also on SRS before and after treatment.

108 The intensity or number of bone lesions on SRS decreased after treatment in 19 of 23 patients (83%)

109 for the detection of primary NETs occult on SRS, especially tumors with a well-differentiated patter

110 assigned to the observation group (n=68) or SRS group (n=64), with 128 patients available for analys

111 tion was observed due to vector injection or SRS.

112 e sensitive than (123)I-MIBG scintigraphy or SRS.

113 : (18)F-DA PET, (123)I-MIBG scintigraphy, or SRS.

114 metastases were randomized to receive SRS or SRS plus WBRT between February 2002 and December 2013.

115 with random block sizes to SRS plus WBRT or SRS alone from Jan 2, 2001, to Sept 14, 2007.

116 There were 213 randomized participants (SRS alone, n = 111; SRS plus WBRT, n = 102) with a mean

117 BPA concentration was associated with poorer SRS-2 scores [beta=0.3 ( 95% CI: 0, 0.7)]; this associat

118 A positive SRS does not eliminate the need for performing (18)F-FDG

119 er for the patient group that had a positive SRS than the group with a negative SRS (P = 0.0002).

120 group with a low-grade GEPNET and a positive SRS, PFS and OS were also significantly lower for patien

121 For patients with a positive SRS, PFS and OS were significantly shorter when the (18)

122 raphy (SRS) era, and 23 patients in the post-SRS era.

123 maging studies are not rare even in the post-SRS period.

124 domly assigned (1:1) to either postoperative SRS (12-20 Gy single fraction with dose determined by su

125 roduct and remove three of the six potential SRS, negatively impacting delphinidin synthesis.

126 All participants provided SRS-A ratings completed by an informant who had observed

127 therapy (WBRT) or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) delivered only to the radiographically visible tumo

128 therapy (WBRT) to stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for the control of brain-tumours outweighs the pote

129 se of Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for this common problem.

130 y to determine if stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) to the surgical cavity improved time to local recur

131 However, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) to the surgical cavity is widely used in an attempt

132 The concept of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) was first described by Lars Leksell in 1951.

133 rgical resection, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), and whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT).

134 Purpose Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT), and epidermal gro

135 n the brain after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), yet because of its association with cognitive decl

136 apy to the brain (stereotactic radiosurgery [SRS] or whole-brain radiotherapy [WBRT]), and 86 of 90 r

137 3 brain metastases amenable to radiosurgery, SRS alone may be a preferred strategy.

138 -rearranged NSCLC treated with radiotherapy (SRS and/or WBRT) and TKIs have prolonged survival, sugge

139 Some rare SRS patients carry maternally inherited microduplication

140 t 4 months than patients assigned to receive SRS alone (mean posterior probability of decline 24%).

141 brain metastases were randomized to receive SRS or SRS plus WBRT between February 2002 and December

142 ) that patients randomly assigned to receive SRS plus WBRT were significantly more likely to show a d

143 grade 4 toxicity in the group that received SRS alone were diagnosed as radiation necrosis.

144 four deaths (13%) in the group that received SRS alone, and eight deaths (29%) in the group that rece

145 months compared with the group that received SRS alone.

146 ight deaths (29%) in the group that received SRS plus WBRT.

147 In the group that received SRS, one case of grade 3 toxicity (aphasia) was attribut

148 , compared with 27% of patients who received SRS alone (p=0.0003).

149 s was less frequent in patients who received SRS than those who received WBRT (28 [52%] of 54 evaluab

150 aracteristics, attempting to directly relate SRS-A scores to patterns of functional connectivity obse

151 arch for a molecular cause for the remaining SRS cases, and to find a possible common epigenetic chan

152 e participants, 2144 nurses (67.8%) returned SRS forms for a child and at least 1 parent and were inc

153 to the default mode (DMS), salience/reward (SRS), and frontoparietal (FPS) subnetworks in rMDD patie

154 lysis using the Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS) revealed that the relationship between EQ-C and mat

155 s completed the Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS), a measure of autistic behaviors.

156 measured by the Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS), a quantitative measure of autism traits.

157 sessed with the Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS), an instrument established as a quantitative measur

158 hecklist (ABC), Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS), and Clinical Global Impression Improvement Scale (

159 list and/or the Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS).

160 me measure, the Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS)].

161 02, measured by Social Responsiveness Scale [SRS] score), which contrasts with families where the phe

162 rospectroscopy, stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) and laser scanning confocal imaging, and microtome

163 Stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) describes a family of techniques first discovered a

164 Hyperspectral stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) imaging has rapidly become an emerging tool for hig

165 al of employing stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) imaging to probe for metabolic differences between

166 (PhDY-Chol) and stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) microscope.

167 Stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) microscopy allows highly sensitive optical imaging

168 this method to stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) microscopy and systematically identify 57 Caenorhab

169 f hyperspectral stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) microscopy combined with second-harmonic generation

170 emonstrate that stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) microscopy could be used to sensitively monitor per

171 ng the emerging stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) microscopy coupled with metabolic incorporation of

172 ing method with stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) microscopy for visualization of the cell nuclei in

173 Stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) microscopy is a newly developed label-free chemical

174 Stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) microscopy is a powerful label-free chemical imagin

175 tical technique stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) microscopy promises a solution, as it can rapidly m

176 ring (CARS) and stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) microscopy provide label-free chemically specific i

177 roliferation or stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) microscopy to assess lipid quality.

178 ombination with stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) microscopy, define a role for BMP signaling in lipi

179 with label-free stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) microscopy, which overcomes major limitations of co

180 ticles based on stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) microscopy.

181 acterized using stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) microscopy.

182 ring (CARS) and stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) spectroscopies.

183 development of stimulated Raman scattering (SRS), and covers the use of bioorthogonal tags to enhanc

184 CT scan, (111)In-pentetreotide scintigraphy (SRS), and (18)F-FDG PET.

185 treotide somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (SRS) before treatment, and who had soft-tissue lesions,

186 the pre-somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (SRS) era, and 23 patients in the post-SRS era.

187 onal and somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (SRS) results were studied.

188 IBG) and somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (SRS) with (111)In-pentetreotide in nonmetastatic and met

189 with the somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (SRS), in each clinically suspicious case.

190 t-SE (seizure-free period) and 31 d post-SE (SRS-period).

191 d simultaneous recognition and segmentation (SRS) of cells, and applied it to 3D image stacks of the

192 the onset of spontaneous recurrent seizures (SRS) in the animals.

193 that promote spontaneous recurrent seizures (SRS), and studies have suggested that hippocampal T-type

194 d surface antigen 1 (SAG1)-related-sequence (SRS) fold observed in the SAG family of surface antigens

195 We also show SRS is generally applicable to other cell types, e.g. in

196 atients with spontaneous splenorenal shunts (SRS) is a matter of concern especially in case of large

197 We identified two sepsis response signature (SRS) subgroups in fecal peritonitis associated with earl

198 ubstitution in a substrate recognition site (SRS).

199 plutonium (Pu) study at Savannah River Site (SRS) conducted between 2003 and 2013.

200 al basin located on the Savannah River Site (SRS) has concentrated in a wetland 600 m downstream.

201 The F-Area of the Savannah River Site (SRS) in South Carolina (USA) is an example.

202 for high U retention by Savannah River Site (SRS) wetland sediments under varying redox and acidic (p

203 cility in F-Area of the Savannah River Site (SRS), USA, were approximately 2.5 times greater than tho

204 in upland soils of the Savannah River Site (SRS).

205 le mutations in substrate recognition sites (SRS) 1 produced an inactive enzyme, while double mutants

206 (TG-MS) and statistical Raman spectroscopy (SRS) and microscopy (SRM).

207 scopy (CARS), stimulated Raman spectroscopy (SRS) and surface enhanced Raman scattering (SERS).

208 ave employed statistical Raman spectroscopy (SRS), and a forefront characterization tool using thermo

209 t scores, and summed difference scores (SSS, SRS, and SDS [respectively] = SSS-SRS) were evaluated us

210 ores (SSS, SRS, and SDS [respectively] = SSS-SRS) were evaluated using 17-segment visual interpretati

211 esis enzyme, cause Snyder-Robinson syndrome (SRS), an X-linked intellectual disability syndrome; howe

212 Snyder-Robinson syndrome (SRS, OMIM: 309583) is an X-linked intellectual disabilit

213 Silver-Russell syndrome (SRS) is a growth retardation syndrome in which loss of m

214 Silver Russell Syndrome (SRS) syndrome is an imprinting disorder involving low bi

215 syndrome (BWS) and Silver-Russell syndrome (SRS).

216 syndrome (BWS) and Silver-Russell syndrome (SRS).

217 ing the ACC domain of seryl tRNA synthetase (SRS-ACC) as a scaffold for protein grafting experiments,

218 strengthening the specimen-referral system (SRS).

219 Raman scattering is an incoherent technique, SRS is a coherent process, and this fact provides severa

220 showed more metastatic anatomic regions than SRS in 17 patients.

221 ur approach exhibits higher sensitivity than SRS imaging of DNA in the fingerprint spectral region.

222 Our study demonstrates that SRS imaging is a sensitive and quantitative means of mea

223 We found that SRS is the major predictor of transcriptomic variation;

224 Given that SRS children also have very low body mass index, underst

225 erging data exist to support the notion that SRS in combination with targeted therapies or immune the

226 d the favorable benefit-to-risk profile that SRS affords for appropriately selected patients.

227 The SRS endoscopic stapling system creates a partial fundopl

228 The SRS scores of the children were examined in association

229 The SRS scores, as reported by nurse mothers and their spous

230 Although the SRS and EGFR-TKI cohorts shared similar prognostic featu

231 d surface complexation modeling (SCM) at the SRS F-Area and other similar aquifers.

232 irritated, had less connections between the SRS and other subnetworks and higher local efficiency co

233 erences in autism traits, as measured by the SRS.

234 T-type current density increased during the SRS period, and the steady-state inactivation shifted fr

235 re depolarized membrane potential during the SRS period.

236 Results The median OS for the SRS (n = 100), WBRT (n = 120), and EGFR-TKI (n = 131) co

237 dose schedule was 30 Gy in 12 fractions; the SRS dose was 18 to 22 Gy in the SRS plus WBRT group and

238 our patients were ineligible (three from the SRS group and one from the observation group).

239 ant roots can highly immobilize U(VI) in the SRS acidic sediments, which has significant implication

240 fter 58 patients were recruited (n=30 in the SRS alone group, n=28 in the SRS plus WBRT group), the t

241 assessment committee identified gaps in the SRS for prioritization and intervention and piloted the

242 the observation group and 72% (60-87) in the SRS group (hazard ratio 0.46 [95% CI 0.24-0.88]; p=0.015

243 impairment (three [3%] of 93 patients in the SRS group vs eight [9%] of 92 patients in the WBRT group

244 actions; the SRS dose was 18 to 22 Gy in the SRS plus WBRT group and 20 to 24 Gy for SRS alone.

245 73% of patients in the SRS plus WBRT group were free from CNS recurrence at 1 y

246 ed (n=30 in the SRS alone group, n=28 in the SRS plus WBRT group), the trial was stopped by the data

247 In the SRS plus WBRT group, one case of grade 3 toxicity (seizu

248 c characteristics still persist today in the SRS terrestrial environment.

249 Uranium in the SRS wetland sediments existed primarily as U(VI) bonded

250 genes unique to probands, especially in the SRS-discordant group (p = 0.0035).

251 with CTCF-cohesin becoming biallelic in the SRS.

252 strategy enables detailed monitoring of the SRS environment, revealing plutonium isotopic compositio

253 This innovative use of the SRS spectroscopy may find applications in agrochemical r

254 This result highlights the potential of the SRS-ACC scaffold for protein engineering applications an

255 eated participants showed improvement on the SRS.

256 In microcosms simulating the SRS wetland processes, U immobilization on roots was 2 o

257 Surprisingly, the SRS scores were found to only be significant when the ag

258 We demonstrate that the SRS virtually eliminates the background interference com

259 The most common complaints were that the SRS was overly constraining with regard to report conten

260 ne of more of these genes contributes to the SRS phenotype.

261 traits in neurotypical individuals using the SRS-A and established a novel approach to assessing the

262 e distal domains and clear homology with the SRS-domain containing proteins of Toxoplasma gondii.

263 on (127)I and (129)I are similar within the SRS aquifer/wetland system.

264 Common to all three SRS subgroups, we found a hypomethylated region at the p

265 ients were enrolled and randomly assigned to SRS (98 patients) or WBRT (96 patients).

266 survival was longer in patients assigned to SRS (median 3.7 months [95% CI 3.45-5.06], 93 events) th

267 8 [52%] of 54 evaluable patients assigned to SRS vs 41 [85%] of 48 evaluable patients assigned to WBR

268 Pu/(239+240)Pu activity ratios attributed to SRS are substantially different than fallout due to past

269 mited cerebral metastasis were randomised to SRS versus SRS+WBRT.

270 d block algorithm with random block sizes to SRS plus WBRT or SRS alone from Jan 2, 2001, to Sept 14,

271 nse to sepsis, including effects specific to SRS group.

272 Although the addition of WBRT to SRS improves the overall brain relapse rate, WBRT has no

273 py: a technical improvement over traditional SRS microscopy that effectively removes imaging backgrou

274 e potential therapeutic targets for treating SRS and other polyamine-associated neurological disorder

275 are worse than those of patients who undergo SRS alone.

276 and memory functions of patients who undergo SRS plus WBRT are worse than those of patients who under

277 e the molecular mechanisms that may underlie SRS.

278 Two patients also underwent SRS for additional intracranial metastases.

279 at operated at the Savannah River Site, USA (SRS) decades ago, trace quantities of plutonium with hig

280 We then use SRS to image the mixing of aqueous glucose and salt solu

281 As a proof of principle, we used SRS microscopy to analyze the cuticles from a variety of

282 Using SRS-based isotope tracing assay to quantitatively track

283 up reread the same MR imaging cases by using SRS to create reports.

284 nectivity analyses were then conducted using SRS-A scores as a covariate of interest.

285 e Social Responsiveness Scale-Adult Version (SRS-A) measures autistic traits that are continuously di

286 ral metastasis were randomised to SRS versus SRS+WBRT.

287 solve the controversy of upfront WBRT versus SRS in the management of patients with limited cerebral

288 show that single cell metabolic imaging via SRS microscopy can be used for rapid detection of antimi

289 In this work, we enable in vivo SRS imaging by substantially enhancing the collection of

290 tion, failure to receive EGFR-TKI after WBRT/SRS, or insufficient follow-up.

291 ment in the central beta-amino acid, whereas SRS diastereomers preferred an extended delta-turn (C9)

292 inimally perturbative to live cells, whereas SRS imaging of exogenous carbon-deuterium bonds (C-D) in

293 treatment in 19 of 23 patients (83%) in whom SRS after treatment was available.

294 e children were examined in association with SRS scores of the parents using crude and adjusted linea

295 astases, the use of SRS alone, compared with SRS combined with WBRT, resulted in less cognitive deter

296 ficantly shorter for SRS alone compared with SRS plus WBRT (hazard ratio, 3.6; 95% CI, 2.2-5.9; P < .

297 tumors has not yet been fully evaluated with SRS imaging.

298 Quality of life was higher at 3 months with SRS alone, including overall quality of life (mean chang

299 nction was more frequent with WBRT than with SRS and there was no difference in overall survival betw

300 Patients were treated with SRS followed by EGFR-TKI, WBRT followed by EGFR-TKI, or

301 Patients treated with SRS plus WBRT were at a greater risk of a significant de

302 e brain metastasis or initial treatment with SRS versus WBRT were not (P = .633 and .666, respectivel