ライフサイエンスコーパス: T2-weighted image

1 ts (rho > 0.90 and P < .001 for both T1- and T2-weighted images).

2 ones (r > 0.90 and P < .001 for both T1- and T2-weighted images).

3 pointense core was identified on T1, PD, and T2 weighted images.

4 fitted pixel-wise to the series of T1rho and T2 weighted images.

5 provide image contrast distinct from T1- and T2-weighted images.

6 from apparent diffusion coefficient maps and T2-weighted images.

7 ly scored likelihood of tumor per sextant on T2-weighted images.

8 area of homogeneous low signal intensity on T2-weighted images.

9 se on T1-weighted images and hyperintense on T2-weighted images.

10 was quantified from high intensity areas on T2-weighted images.

11 l intensity in the marrow on fat-suppressed, T2-weighted images.

12 r T1-weighted images read alone or read with T2-weighted images.

13 hree MR findings of degeneration on sagittal T2-weighted images.

14 white matter showed mild signal intensity on T2-weighted images.

15 ith a region of high signal intensity on the T2-weighted images.

16 peripheral enhancement and hyperintensity on T2-weighted images.

17 l-difference-to-noise ratios than comparable T2-weighted images.

18 hted MR images and lower signal intensity on T2-weighted images.

19 T1-weighted images and were hyperintense on T2-weighted images.

20 f the latter showed marked hyperintensity on T2-weighted images.

21 weighted images and high signal intensity on T2-weighted images.

22 red between each time point for both T1- and T2-weighted images.

23 d images or with those of skeletal muscle on T2-weighted images.

24 weighted images and slightly hyperintense on T2-weighted images.

25 logical specificity of abnormalities seen on T2-weighted images.

26 veal information and not apparent on T1- and T2-weighted images.

27 nd had increased signal intensity on T1- and T2-weighted images.

28 reased from 14.73 +/- 7.4 to 0.64 +/- 5.1 on T2-weighted images.

29 None was hypointense on proton-density- or T2-weighted images.

30 slightly hyperintense on proton-density- and T2-weighted images.

31 r the combined use of moderately and heavily T2-weighted images.

32 All perforations also were depicted on T2-weighted images.

33 re of predominantly high signal intensity on T2-weighted images.

34 ons were depicted more clearly on DW than on T2-weighted images.

35 ces and lesions with low signal intensity on T2-weighted images.

36 alized in three of the five animals (60%) on T2-weighted images.

37 tter than the current standard of reference, T2-weighted images.

38 ypointense foci within the adnexal lesion on T2-weighted images.

39 and coronal images and high-resolution axial T2-weighted images.

40 turation efficiency using fast spin-echo and T2-weighted images.

41 border toward the white matter (18 of 18) on T2-weighted images.

42 is a known pitfall in the interpretation of T2-weighted images.

43 at 3.0 T and who had cerebral microbleeds on T2*-weighted images.

44 were assessed from T1-, proton density-, and T2- weighted images.

45 ardial involvement in these disorders versus T2-weighted imaging.

46 odular region of reduced signal intensity at T2-weighted imaging.

47 tion and localization accuracy compared with T2-weighted imaging.

48 th 7 and 8 T high-resolution T2-weighted and T2*-weighted imaging.

49 quently show central low signal intensity at T2*-weighted imaging.

50 er for MRCP images interpreted with T1 - and T2-weighted images (0.9547 for reader 1, 0.8404 for read

51 intra-substance signal intensity on T1- and T2-weighted images (11 tendons), in linear or rounded ar

52 d signal intensity on T1-weighted images; on T2-weighted images, 13 collections demonstrated homogene

53 one sequence, eight (35%) were detected with T2-weighted imaging, 15 (65%) were detected on nephrogra

54 se ratio (postcontrast images, 36.6 +/- 3.6; T2-weighted images, 17.5 +/- 2.1; P <.001).

55 able to the size of the hyperintense zone on T2-weighted images 2 days later (43.4+/-3.3% versus 43.0

56 On T2-weighted images, 57 of 82 (70%) ovaries showed a zona

57 hted images read alone (65.7%) and read with T2-weighted images (62.9%).

58 y were higher for DW EP images than for STIR T2-weighted images (92% vs 54%, and 95% vs 70%, respecti

59 On T2-weighted images, a higher (P < .01) percentage of hem

60 Axial T2-weighted images acquired at both standard and high sp

61 ltages (1000, 1500, or 2500 V), with T1- and T2-weighted images acquired before and immediately after

62 rmined by magnetic resonance imaging T1- and T2-weighted images after eccentric challenge, as well as

63 , 0.99 for each reader) than with moderately T2-weighted images alone (area, 0.88-0.90; P < .05).

64 server agreement was fair (kappa = 0.37) for T2-weighted images alone and good (kappa = 0.80) with AD

65 differentiation was possible with moderately T2-weighted images alone.

66 lue in SVI detection compared with reviewing T2-weighted images alone.

67 dinal scale in three image-viewing settings: T2-weighted images alone; T2-weighted and DW MR images;

68 r for combinations of MP MR imaging than for T2-weighted imaging alone (kappa = 0.34-0.63 vs kappa =

69 ader 1, 0.79-0.86; reader 2, 0.75-0.81) than T2-weighted imaging alone (reader 1, 0.63-0.67; reader 2

70 ce of transition zone tumors on the basis of T2-weighted imaging alone and then, 4 weeks later, diffu

71 ikelihood of PCa with a five-point scale for T2-weighted imaging alone, T2-weighted imaging with DW i

72 the detection of recurrent PCa after RT than T2-weighted imaging alone, with no additional benefit if

73 significantly higher (P = .006) than that of T2-weighted imaging alone.

74 The addition of T2-weighted images altered the diagnosis in one of 90 (1

75 On T2-weighted images, an experienced radiologist outlined

76 orresponding tissue outlined on a transverse T2-weighted image and the MR spectra from all voxels at

77 Nonenhanced T1-weighted and fat-saturated T2-weighted images and contrast material-enhanced dynami

78 sseminated lesions that were hyperintense on T2-weighted images and did not enhance after contrast ad

79 lation was demonstrated for lesion volume on T2-weighted images and enhancing lesion volume in the re

80 s were generated from the proton density and T2-weighted images and evaluated by voxel-based-relaxome

81 he ovarian cortex and the ovarian medulla on T2-weighted images and in histopathologic sections.

82 h spatial scaling factor (SSF) of 2 and 4 on T2-weighted images and kurtosis on contrast-enhanced T1-

83 tive correlation was noted between volume on T2-weighted images and magnetization transfer ratio hist

84 se on T1-weighted images and hyperintense on T2-weighted images and significant restriction in diffus

85 f normal fallopian tubes was intermediate on T2-weighted images and that of muscularis was low.

86 The final infarct lesions obtained from tp3 T2-weighted images and the "penumbra" obtained from the

87 nding high- or low-signal-intensity areas on T2-weighted images and the metabolic ratio (choline + cr

88 xternal cyst morphology on axial and coronal T2-weighted images and three-dimensional gradient-echo T

89 alence and distribution of signal changes on T2-weighted images and to investigate the pathological s

90 ointense and had a surrounding bright rim on T2-weighted images and were predominantly hyperintense o

91 ss, hyperintense region on spin-density- and T2-weighted images and, in cerebral white matter and bra

92 was to evaluate a CMR protocol that includes T2-weighted imaging and assessment of left ventricular w

93 ith no additional benefit if DCE is added to T2-weighted imaging and DW imaging.

94 ay MR imaging (ie, unenhanced fast spin-echo T2-weighted imaging and gradient-echo T1-weighted imagin

95 ed with halothane and scanned at 4.7 T using T2-weighted imaging and in vivo MRS of frontal cortex.

96 ighted imaging) and detection sensitivities (T2-weighted imaging and MR spectroscopic imaging) for le

97 values did not differ significantly between T2-weighted imaging and T2-weighted imaging plus ADC map

98 atients underwent breast MR imaging (T1- and T2-weighted imaging and three-dimensional T1-weighted im

99 ed, fluid-attenuated inversion recovery, and T2-weighted images) and dynamic susceptibility contrast-

100 entral fibrous core (low signal intensity on T2-weighted images) and intratumoral cysts (high signal

101 Diagnostic performance at sextant level (T2-weighted imaging) and detection sensitivities (T2-wei

102 (d) fluid extending into the linear area on T2-weighted images, and (e) cartilage defects.

103 r length and 28.8% for width measurements on T2-weighted images, and 26.1% for length and 33.3% for w

104 regions, areas of lowest signal intensity on T2-weighted images, and areas of restricted diffusivity;

105 on, MR demonstrated high signal intensity on T2-weighted images, and both demonstrated hemorrhage, wh

106 ial fast fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery/T2-weighted images, and diffusion-weighted images of the

107 images, fluid-equivalent signal intensity on T2-weighted images, and peripheral rim enhancement.

108 with highest and lowest signal intensity on T2-weighted images, and regions of most restricted diffu

109 ogic tumor volume measurements were 0.36 for T2-weighted imaging, and 0.46 and 0.60 for combined T2-w

110 All patients underwent transverse T1- and T2-weighted imaging, and chemical shift imaging was perf

111 ography biomarkers: signal intensity (SI) on T2-weighted images, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC)

112 th the combination of moderately and heavily T2-weighted images (area under the receiver operating ch

113 For T2-weighted imaging, areas under the receiver operating

114 nfarction and hypointensities on post-mortem T2-weighted images as a possible method for visualizing

115 gle-shot turbo spin-echo sequence, cine, and T2-weighted images as well as T1-weighted images before

116 s included conventional T1- and less heavily T2-weighted images, as well as gadolinium-enhanced dynam

117 and compared with lesion volumes measured on T2-weighted images at 7 days or later.

118 nerve lesions cause a hyperintense signal on T2-weighted images at and distal to the lesion site, whi

119 rrow edema presents with increased signal in T2-weighted images, being most visible in fat saturation

120 ulated by using whole-volume segmentation on T2-weighted images, both before and after ejaculation.

121 y adjacent to the enhancing (hyperintense on T2-weighted images, but not enhancing on postcontrast T1

122 DW EP images that were not detected on STIR T2-weighted images, but were colocalized with lesions de

123 of invasive cervical carcinoma was used with T2-weighted imaging by two independent observers to iden

124 Adding DW MR to T2-weighted imaging can significantly improve the accura

125 y-four patients also had volumes measured by T2-weighted imaging chronically (median time, 7.5 weeks;

126 imaging were graded for signal intensity on T2-weighted images, contrast material enhancement, shape

127 The thickness of regions shown on T1- and T2-weighted images correlated with that of histologic zo

128 Surgical navigation software provided T2-weighted images critical to targeting the peripheral

129 t on in-phase images), SI on T1-weighted and T2-weighted images, cystic degeneration, necrosis, hemor

130 T2-weighted images demonstrated the highest CNR and the

131 old of >33) demonstrated good agreement with T2-weighted imaging-derived AAR (bias, 0.18; 95% confide

132 Myocardial edema quantified from T2-weighted images did not change significantly after 3

133 ages to MRCP images with nonenhanced T1- and T2-weighted images did not significantly increase accura

134 g outperforms T2-weighted imaging in the PZ; T2-weighted imaging did not show a significant differenc

135 and 3-T endorectal presurgery MP MR imaging (T2-weighted imaging, diffusion-weighted [DW] imaging app

136 o underwent 3-T pelvic MR imaging, including T2-weighted imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging, and dyn

137 Use of 3-T MP MR imaging, consisting of T2-weighted imaging, DW imaging ADC maps (b values, 50,

138 t preoperative MR imaging, including T1- and T2-weighted imaging, DW MR imaging (b=0 and 800 sec/mm2)

139 assessment of myometrial invasion at T1- and T2-weighted imaging, DW MR imaging, and DCE MR imaging.

140 their predominantly low signal intensity on T2-weighted images, fibromas and fibrothecomas display a

141 pretations significantly more often than did T2-weighted image findings (in 107 [99%] vs 88 [82%] of

142 The CMR protocol consisted of T2-weighted imaging, first-pass perfusion, cine function

143 hy in TOF technique and brain MRI in T1- and T2-weighted images, FLAIR and DWI sequences are the meth

144 results for conventional and fast spin echo T2-weighted imaging, fluid-attenuated inversion recovery

145 Nonacute ischemic white matter changes on T2-weighted imaging, focal tissue loss, and ventriculome

146 tion in signal intensity within the tumor on T2*-weighted images for up to 5 days after treatment and

147 4 age-matched healthy controls underwent 7 T T2*-weighted imaging for cortical lesion segmentation an

148 MS subjects underwent 7T T2*-weighted imaging for cortical lesion segmentation, a

149 Krabbe disease, (b) are more sensitive than T2-weighted images for detecting white matter abnormalit

150 W (b values of 0, 50, and 500 sec/mm(2)) and T2-weighted images for FLL detection and characterizatio

151 o short inversion time inversion-recovery or T2-weighted images for low-signal-intensity nodules.

152 arterial spin labeling for CBF, and T1- and T2-weighted imaging for atrophy, white matter hyperinten

153 r FLL detection and was equal to breath-hold T2-weighted imaging for FLL characterization.

154 imaging was better than standard breath-hold T2-weighted imaging for FLL detection and was equal to b

155 are best evaluated with nonenhanced FLAIR or T2-weighted imaging for low-grade tumors, vascular malfo

156 /- 6.1 to -1.79 +/- 5.7) and hyperintense on T2-weighted images (from 10.12 +/- 7.9 to 8.7 +/- 6.4).

157 +/- 5.9 to -7.8 +/- 6.8) and hyperintense on T2-weighted images (from 8.73 +/- 5.4 to 12.61 +/- 6.1).

158 regions with the lowest signal intensity on T2-weighted images (>2.07, 49%, 88%, 0.685, and P = .000

159 .0001), areas of lowest signal intensity on T2-weighted images (>2.45, 57%, 97%, 0.852, and P = .000

160 Qualitative assessment of FA maps and T2-weighted images helped identify subjects with conduct

161 A prominent ring of T2-weighted image hyperintensity, characteristic of edem

162 of diffusion-weighted imaging in addition to T2-weighted imaging improved detection of prostate cance

163 n, addition of diffusion-weighted imaging to T2-weighted imaging improved the areas under the receive

164 heral zone and seminal vesicles decreased on T2-weighted images in 42 (75%) and 25 (45%) patients, re

165 all six patients and iso- to hyperintense on T2-weighted images in five patients.

166 ssed using high resolution, motion-corrected T2-weighted images in natural sleep, analysed using an a

167 We advocate obtaining coronal oblique T2-weighted images in patients with either posterolatera

168 rate lower signal intensity of the cortex on T2-weighted images in the first HG and surrounding STG c

169 ue finding was increased signal intensity on T2-weighted images in the levator ani muscle (n = 34) an

170 c resonance images of the orbits and heavily T2-weighted images in the plane of the cranial nerves we

171 homogeneous low signal intensity was seen on T2-weighted images in the same location as the hemorrhag

172 gest pelvic fluid pocket was measured on the T2-weighted images in three orthogonal dimensions.

173 More lesions were found at T2-weighted imaging in fatigued patients.

174 DW imaging outperformed T2-weighted imaging in the PZ (OR, 3.49 vs 2.45; P = .00

175 Conclusion DW imaging outperforms T2-weighted imaging in the PZ; T2-weighted imaging did n

176 cted the biliary anatomy more often than did T2-weighted imaging (in 47 [92%] vs 43 [84%] donor candi

177 monstrated markedly high signal intensity on T2-weighted images) in all cases because of the high wat

178 , whereas leiomyomas initially high in SI on T2-weighted images indicate a likely greater volume redu

179 cancer, detection of lesions of <1 cm3 with T2-weighted imaging is significantly dependent on lesion

180 area of homogeneous low signal intensity at T2-weighted imaging, is highly accurate for cancer ident

181 air for definite extraprostatic extension on T2-weighted images (kappa = 0.289).

182 er the ROC curve, 0.70-0.77) did not improve T2-weighted imaging localization accuracy (AUC = 0.72) (

183 ipir trisodium-enhanced images than with the T2-weighted images (mean confidence score, 4.5 vs 3.4; P

184 high signal intensity of the endometrium on T2-weighted images (mean, 0.5 cm) and enhancement of the

185 eterogeneous endometrial signal intensity on T2-weighted images (mean, 1.8 cm) with enhancement of th

186 images (n = 11) and hyperintense to liver on T2-weighted images (n = 10).

187 een January 2004 and April 2008 and included T2-weighted imaging (n = 104), diffusion-weighted imagin

188 magnetic resonance protocol included cines, T2-weighted imaging, native T1 maps, 15-minute post-cont

189 axial and coronal single-shot fast spin-echo T2-weighted images obtained at 1.5 T.

190 s ratio = 0.92, P = .015) and homogeneity on T2-weighted images (odds ratio = 4.47, P = .037) as inde

191 thin 3.2 minutes to image renal tubules, and T2*-weighted images of the same resolution were obtained

192 T1rho- and T2-weighted images of calf muscle were acquired using a

193 DT images and T1- and T2-weighted images of the spinal cord were acquired in 2

194 31 controls (61%) underwent high-resolution T2-weighted imaging of the orbits.

195 T2-weighted imaging of the ovary revealed cyst walls, co

196 ents with 2,602 morphologic images (axial 2D T2-weighted imaging) of the prostate were obtained.

197 : normal-appearing white matter; abnormal on T2-weighted image only (T2-only); and abnormal on T2-wei

198 hic and excretory phase images compared with T2-weighted images (P < .05).

199 ared with the size of the original plaque on T2-weighted images (P = .03).

200 r growth among masses showing homogeneity on T2-weighted images (P = .036) and a nearly significant s

201 trast images (P = .065) and hypointensity on T2-weighted images (P = .074).

202 ore; P = .046, corrected) and lesion load at T2-weighted imaging (P = .003, corrected) but not with d

203 T2-weighted imaging performed better but did not clearly

204 ignificantly between T2-weighted imaging and T2-weighted imaging plus ADC maps.

205 24.32; post-IRE, 97.80 +/- 18.03; P = .004; T2-weighted images, pre-IRE, 47.37 +/- 18.31; post-IRE,

206 High-SAR 2D T2-weighted imaging produced slightly higher SNR, while

207 On T2-weighted images, prostatic findings consisted of diff

208 0.61) and chronic lesion volume measured by T2-weighted imaging (r = 0.90) to the chronic stroke sca

209 2, 0.441, 0.596, 0.548; all P </= .001), and T2-weighted imaging (R(2) = 0.463, 0.582, 0.650, and 0.5

210 Endometrial width on T2-weighted images ranged from 0.1 to 7.5 cm (mean thick

211 res related to lesion texture and margins on T2-weighted images ranged from 0.136 (moderately hypoint

212 Volume of edema and intensity of signal on T2-weighted images relate to functional recovery after r

213 In this cohort, low SI on T2-weighted images relative to renal parenchyma and smal

214 Edema, as detected by a hyperintense zone on T2-weighted images, resolved, and regional radial systol

215 uated inversion recovery and T1-weighted and T2*-weighted images, respectively, compared between the

216 ratio of tumor to renal cortex SI on T1- and T2-weighted images, respectively), SI index (SII) ([SI(i

217 sity characteristics on thin-section T1- and T2-weighted images, respectively: HCC, hyperintense, hyp

218 d imaging for peripheral zone lesions and to T2-weighted imaging scores for transitional zone lesions

219 T1-weighted and T2-weighted image sets with a volume resolution of 1 mm(

220 Kurtosis (SSF, 2) on T2-weighted images showed a significant difference betwe

221 T2-weighted images showed greater contrast than proton d

222 Leiomyomas initially high in SI on T2-weighted images showed significantly greater volume r

223 low SI (relative to renal parenchyma SI) on T2-weighted images, smaller size, and female sex correla

224 ured by two neuroradiologists on QSM images, T2*-weighted images, susceptibility-weighted (SW) images

225 CV thresholds for AAR is 33% and IS is 46%), T2-weighted imaging, T1 maps, and acute LGE.

226 Region of interest (ROI)-based measures on T2-weighted images (T2wi) were quantitatively evaluated

227 MRI scans, including T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) and diffusion tensor imaging

228 sing proton spectroscopic imaging (1H-MRSI), T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) and diffusion-weighted imagin

229 sed apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) changes over time.

230 ing (DWI), perfusion weighted imaging (PWI), T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), and functional magnetic reso

231 perfusion, late gadolinium enhancement, and T2-weighted imaging techniques were used.

232 Cyst walls had lower signal intensity on T2-weighted images than ovarian stroma in 49 of 74 cases

233 s demonstrated increased signal intensity on T2-weighted images that involved multiple muscle compart

234 On T2-weighted images, the percentage of low signal intensi

235 On T2-weighted images, the signal intensity was more hetero

236 On T2-weighted images, the two smallest lesions showed homo

237 normal prostate, and hypointense features on T2-weighted imaging; these findings were highly suspicio

238 On the dual-transmission T2-weighted images, they detected 11 and five additional

239 in-section, high-spatial-resolution, coronal T2-weighted images; they should not be mistaken for path

240 weeks later, diffusion-weighted imaging and T2-weighted imaging together.

241 ignal intensity; of two lesions studied with T2-weighted imaging, two had high signal intensity; and

242 atterns of USPIO uptake were demonstrated at T2*-weighted imaging: uniform low signal intensity, cent

243 titis, and healthy tissue were delineated on T2-weighted images, using histology as a reference.

244 a focal lesion with high signal intensity on T2-weighted images, variable signal intensity on T1-weig

245 es between lesions that are abnormal only on T2-weighted images versus lesions that are abnormal on T

246 of MR true-positive lesions were measured on T2-weighted images (VT2), on ADC maps (VADC), and on DCE

247 Median largest lesion size on T2-weighted images was 4 cm (range 0.5-12), with a disce

248 The mean plaque size on T2-weighted images was 72 mm2 +/- 21 (standard deviation

249 area of homogeneous low signal intensity on T2-weighted images was also recorded.

250 At multiple logistic regression, kurtosis on T2-weighted images was independently associated with pCR

251 nse (P = .008), and high signal intensity on T2-weighted images was predictive of a good response (P

252 Marked hyperintensity on T2-weighted images was seen in 12 of 14 (86%) inflammato

253 tio in areas with lowest signal intensity on T2-weighted images was used to classify 95% of patients

254 rded, and intrasubstance signal intensity at T2-weighted imaging was graded.

255 Diffusion-, perfusion-, and T2-weighted imaging was performed during MCAO and every

256 tion fluid-attenuated inversion recovery and T2*-weighted images were acquired in 14 AD patients and

257 d signal intensity of lymph nodes at T2- and T2*-weighted imaging were recorded before and after USPI

258 o help detect invasive cervical carcinoma on T2-weighted images were 55.6% and 75% for observer 1 and

259 imaging (MRI), T1 maps, proton density, and T2-weighted images were acquired before and after EAE in

260 CP-BOLD, standard cine, and T2-weighted images were acquired in canines (n=11) at ba

261 gh-spatial-resolution transverse and coronal T2-weighted images were acquired.

262 nfiltrative lesions that were hypointense on T2-weighted images were better characterized with DW ima

263 Lesion sizes measured on T2-weighted images were closest to those measured at gro

264 signal hyperintensity) computed from T1- and T2-weighted images were combined with magnetization-tran

265 DW and T2-weighted images were compared for FLL detection and c

266 The hypointense (dark) areas in T2-weighted images were not coextensive with the SN but

267 Signal intensity values on T2-weighted images were not useful for differentiating t

268 -weighted MR images and axial fast spin-echo T2-weighted images were obtained.

269 dentified by matching pathologic slides with T2-weighted images were overlaid on MET and ADC maps.

270 Size measurements obtained on T2-weighted images were significantly closer to gross pa

271 ghted images and of signal intensity drop on T2-weighted images were significantly lower in malignant

272 Additional axial and coronal T2-weighted images were used to visualize the anatomy in

273 Anisotropy maps and T2-weighted images were visually inspected.

274 Diffusion-, perfusion-, and T2-weighted imaging were acquired before and during occl

275 intratumoral cysts (high signal intensity on T2-weighted images) were seen more frequently in endomet

276 nal intensity from contrast-enhanced T1- and T2-weighted images, were measured from the enhancing reg

277 f the ovary had low-signal-intensity rims on T2-weighted images, which corresponded to the theca and

278 ol consisted of sagittal and coronal T1- and T2-weighted images with and without fat saturation.

279 TLD appeared as hypointense masses on T1-and T2-weighted images with minimal enhancement.

280 Use of nonenhanced T1- and less heavily T2-weighted images with MRCP images significantly improv

281 alone, T2-weighted imaging with DW imaging, T2-weighted imaging with DCE imaging, and T2-weighted im

282 g, T2-weighted imaging with DCE imaging, and T2-weighted imaging with DW and DCE imaging, with at lea

283 contribute significant incremental value to T2-weighted imaging with DW imaging (reader 1, P > .99;

284 In detection of recurrent PCa, T2-weighted imaging with DW imaging yielded higher AUCs

285 e-point scale for T2-weighted imaging alone, T2-weighted imaging with DW imaging, T2-weighted imaging

286 y using multiplanar half-Fourier single-shot T2-weighted imaging without and with spectral adiabatic

287 rwent high-spatial-resolution axillary 3.0-T T2-weighted imaging without fat suppression and DW imagi

288 um standardized uptake value (SUVmax), SI on T2-weighted images x SUVmax, and ADC x SUVmax values at

289 ET/MR enterography biomarkers, SUVmax, SI on T2-weighted images x SUVmax, and ADC x SUVmax, showed si

290 te images threshold and overlaid in color on T2-weighted images yielded an estimate of the spatial ex