戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。

今後説明を表示しない

[OK]

コーパス検索結果 (left1)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1                                              TIPS after LT can be clinically effective in patients wi
2                                              TIPS provides a possible first step toward HTLV-1 leukem
3                                              TIPS succeeds in lowering the hepatic sinusoidal pressur
4                                              TIPS volume of </= 20 TIPS/year, variceal bleeding, and
5                                              TIPS was associated with higher rates of early hepatic e
6                                              TIPS was technically successful in all 91 patients (12 i
7                                              TIPS was used more frequently in the tamponade group (4
8                                              TIPS were placed in all 5529 patients (mean age, 57 year
9                                              TIPS-acetylene-substituted benzene-1,2-diol and naphthal
10                                              TIPS-ethynyl groups are not bulky enough to allow stabil
11 orms the geminate radical ion pair state (1)(TIPS-Pn(+*)-PDI(-*)) that undergoes radical pair intersy
12 ition between ultrafast singlet fission ((1*)TIPS-Pn + TIPS-Pn --> 2 (3*)TIPS-Pn) and charge transfer
13  2 (3*)TIPS-Pn) and charge transfer from (1*)TIPS-Pn to PDIs 1-3.
14 ality is lower in hospitals performing >/=20 TIPS per year.
15                        TIPS volume of </= 20 TIPS/year, variceal bleeding, and nosocomial infections
16 adical pair intersystem crossing to form (3)(TIPS-Pn(+*)-PDI(-*)), which then undergoes charge recomb
17 let fission ((1*)TIPS-Pn + TIPS-Pn --> 2 (3*)TIPS-Pn) and charge transfer from (1*)TIPS-Pn to PDIs 1-
18 recombination to yield either (3*)PDI or (3*)TIPS-Pn.
19  show that multiple pathways produce the (3*)TIPS-Pn state, so that OPV design strategies based on th
20 sfer from (3*)PDI to TIPS-Pn also yields (3*)TIPS-Pn.
21 on (22 patients angioplasty/thrombolysis, 62 TIPS, and 20 OLT) and 36 (22.9%) died.
22 zinc chlorins, the series of substituents (7-TIPS-ethynyl, 7-acetyl, 7-formyl) progressively causes (
23  unique signature of a hidden interface in a TIPS-pentacene thin film, exposing its exciton dynamics
24                        The introduction of a TIPS-ethynyl, acetyl, or formyl group at the 7-position
25                                        After TIPS, central venous pressure (median, 11 vs 15 cm H(2)O
26 nd PV (0.88 L/min; 95% CI: 0.06, 1.70) after TIPS placement (all P < .05), with no significant differ
27  were performed 1 to 7 days before and after TIPS at months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 or until liver transpl
28 t to PV flow, were compared before and after TIPS placement by using analysis of variance.
29 oring of hepatic blood flow before and after TIPS placement.
30 sociated with a decrease in creatinine after TIPS (R = 0.816, P < .001).
31     ICG-PDR significantly deteriorated after TIPS (P = .006).
32 t the concept that PPG value <12 mm Hg after TIPS placement is associated with reduced risk of bleedi
33 ally stable patients at least 24 hours after TIPS to be the best maintained values.
34 V and incomplete patent PV immediately after TIPS was 57.05 +/- 0.75 vs. 39.12 +/- 2.64 months, respe
35 vival and vascular patency immediately after TIPS.
36 edation (early PPG); and again 1 month after TIPS placement (late PPG).
37 term (>3 months) need for paracentesis after TIPS placement were evaluated and calculated by using th
38 lues measured at different time points after TIPS placement, we found measurements of PPG in awake, h
39 nts collected at different time points after TIPS, aiming to identify a time point after which PPG va
40               Median change in the PSG after TIPS was 11 mm Hg (1-27 mm Hg).
41 vered stent-graft was superior to that after TIPS with the nitinol stent-graft.
42 tory ascites before and 2 and 12 weeks after TIPS placement by using a time-resolved three-dimensiona
43       ICT lures significantly worsened after TIPS (n = 10; 5 vs 9, respectively; P = .02) and improve
44 ollowing EPCS compared with 1.99 years after TIPS.
45 entafluorophenyl 4-maleimidobenzoate (1) and TIPS-protected N-propargyl maleimide (2).
46 to 7 times greater in the EEST ($168100) and TIPS ($264800) groups than in the EPCS ($39000) group (P
47 y greater following EPCS than after EEST and TIPS (P<.001).
48 10-diphenylanthracene, perylene, rubrene and TIPS-pentacene, are reported.
49 ation-electrophilic fluorination of TMS- and TIPS-protected 1,3-benzothiazol-2-yl (BT) propargyl sulf
50  more common in hospitals with higher annual TIPS volume (20.3% for very low to 30.8% for very high;
51 s categorized into quintiles based on annual TIPS volume (very low, 1-4/year; low, 5-9/year; medium,
52       Mortality decreased with rising annual TIPS volume (13% for very low to 6% for very high volume
53                                  Appropriate TIPS procedures were performed based on our more specifi
54                 We conclude that appropriate TIPS procedures and lower grade of PVT are essential for
55 ile the use of bulkier silyl groups, such as TIPS, resulted unproductive.
56                                Moreover, BCS-TIPS prognostic index (PI) score (based on international
57 cting intervention-free survival and the BCS-TIPS PI score for predicting survival.
58                                       Before TIPS, MHE was detected by PHES and CFF in 33% and 39% of
59 (triisopropylsilyl)ethynylmagnesium bromide (TIPS-CC-MgBr) leads to a distribution of mono-, bis-, an
60 ere extensively controlled by a remote bulky TIPS group.
61 d by EEST in only 20% of the patients and by TIPS in only 22%.
62 n-2 is recruited to growing microtubules by +TIPS and that the motor protein steers growing microtubu
63 e use of bare stents and most patients chose TIPS 2-3 years after traditional treatment, thus making
64                                Collectively, TIPS is an effective and safe approach in treating BCS w
65                                Collectively, TIPS is safe and effective in treating liver cirrhosis-r
66                                   Conclusion TIPS placement in patients with chronic primary BCS was
67  do not have severe extrahepatic conditions, TIPS is an excellent option to treat severe complication
68                   Although the corresponding TIPS procedures have already performed on the patients t
69 ic hemostasis for variceal bleeding, covered TIPS was superior to EVL + beta-blocker for reduction of
70       Placement of a small-diameter, covered TIPS was straightforward and prevented variceal rebleedi
71 mly assigned to groups that received covered TIPS (n = 29) or large-volume paracenteses and albumin a
72  decrease in the density/size of crystalline TIPS-Pn domains.
73 ly strained, aligned, and single-crystalline TIPS-pentacene regions with mobility as high as 2.7 cm(2
74  Viatorrs were accidentally dislodged during TIPS procedure.
75 ks up when the two triplets separate to each TIPS-pentacene molecule.
76          In E. indica, the naturally evolved TIPS mutants are highly (more than 180-fold) resistant t
77 scopy 26%; P = 0.418) and treatment failure (TIPS 38% vs. endoscopy 34%; P = 0.685) did not differ be
78         Among MESA participants eligible for TIPS, Poly-Iran, Wald, and the PILL Collaboration, CAC =
79 inine (P = 0.005), ascites as indication for TIPS (P = 0.04), and the presence of significant comorbi
80  often inpatients for whom an indication for TIPS had been refractory ascites, with a history of OHE
81             The most frequent indication for TIPS was refractory ascites (50 of 54; 93%).
82          Twenty patients with indication for TIPS were enrolled.
83                              Indications for TIPS were recurrent variceal bleeding (n = 25) and refra
84 1 (3.3%) patients with other indications for TIPS.
85 use of CFF could help selecting patients for TIPS.
86 , all patients with primary BCS referred for TIPS placement were included in the study.
87 andomized trial, we found covered stents for TIPS to increase the proportion of patients with cirrhos
88 r-like structures, novel configurations for +TIPS.
89 reased cardiac performance benefit most from TIPS.
90 uent oxidation afford several functionalized TIPS-tetraazapentacene derivatives with energetically st
91                                     However, TIPS did not increase survival time or quality of life a
92                              In addition, HZ-TIPS and OZ-TIPS show a closely stacked 1D polymer chain
93 strated that the heptazethrene derivative HZ-TIPS has a closed-shell ground state while its octazethr
94 sections (sigma((2))) were determined for HZ-TIPS (sigma((2))(max) = 920 GM at 1250 nm) and OZ-TIPS (
95 ze two kinetically blocked heptazethrene (HZ-TIPS) and octazethrene (OZ-TIPS) compounds with good sta
96 e positive charge carrier (hole) mobility in TIPS-pentacene transistors increased from 0.8 cm(2) V(-1
97 erage of crystalline and amorphous phases in TIPS-Pn films comprising a mixture of phases.
98                           We propose that in TIPS, Tax recruits HDAC1 to the SHP-1 P2 promoter and fo
99 r charge transfer properties versus those in TIPS pentacene films, and EtTP-5 pentacene films have ve
100                                The E. indica TIPS EPSPS showed very high-level (2,647-fold) in vitro
101     Silylethynyl-substituted pentacenes like TIPS-pentacene possess small HOMO-LUMO gaps but are not
102 ars after traditional treatment, thus making TIPS appear to be not superior to endoscopy in survival
103 the mechanism behind formation of metastable TIPS-pentacene polymorphs.
104                                    One-month TIPS venography demonstrated complete resolution of MPV
105                                   Mortality (TIPS 32% vs. endoscopy 26%; P = 0.418) and treatment fai
106              As the IPR never enters the MS, TIPS addresses two major drawbacks of IPC for ESI-MS: it
107 borylation/Chan-Lam procedure guided by an N-TIPS group enabled the conversion of a tryptophan deriva
108 ing singlet fission in these nanocrystalline TIPS-Pn films.
109               Fifty-eight percent (15/26) of TIPS were considered clinically successful.
110 tion (median delay between administration of TIPS and first episode of dysfunction, 10.8 months).
111 uncovered stents counteracts the benefits of TIPS.
112 hos (SL-J009-1) catalyze the C-C coupling of TIPS-protected propargyl ether 1a with primary alcohols
113                      The clinical effects of TIPS have been confirmed, however, no large-scale studie
114 controlled trial to determine the effects of TIPS with stents covered with polytetrafluoroethylene in
115 ts (42%) experienced at least one episode of TIPS dysfunction (median delay between administration of
116 s for nanocrystalline and amorphous films of TIPS-Pn were estimated to be approximately 75 and approx
117 ents (9.2%) developed ELF within 3 months of TIPS (10 patients died, one required liver transplantati
118                                 Occlusion of TIPS was demonstrated in 84% of the patients, 63% of who
119  critical techniques and clinical outcome of TIPS on liver cirrhosis-related thrombotic total occlusi
120 t conditions: immediately after placement of TIPS (immediate PPG); at least 24 hours after placement
121 ortal hypertension who received placement of TIPS from January 2008 through October 2015; patients we
122 t types of PVT and technical success rate of TIPS is unclear.
123                       The successful rate of TIPS was 90.7%, without any procedure-related deaths or
124                  The overall success rate of TIPS was 95.8% (183/191).
125 sential for better technical success rate of TIPS.
126 ts for the observed much higher stability of TIPS-BT than TIPS-PT when mixed with PCBM.
127                         Little data exist on TIPS safety, efficacy, and survival after liver transpla
128              Most of the previous studies on TIPS procedure were based on the use of bare stents and
129  5 times the long-term survival than EEST or TIPS, and was much less costly than EEST or TIPS.
130  TIPS, and was much less costly than EEST or TIPS.
131  contain a 7-substituent (acetyl, formyl, or TIPS-ethynyl), a 10-mesityl group, and the 18,18-dimethy
132 salvage for failure of endoscopic therapy or TIPS is not supported by the definitive results of these
133 und state while its octazethrene analogue OZ-TIPS with a smaller energy gap exists as an open-shell s
134 (sigma((2))(max) = 920 GM at 1250 nm) and OZ-TIPS (sigma((2))(max) = 1200 GM at 1250 nm).
135                  In addition, HZ-TIPS and OZ-TIPS show a closely stacked 1D polymer chain in single c
136 heptazethrene (HZ-TIPS) and octazethrene (OZ-TIPS) compounds with good stability.
137 double amino acid substitution (T102I+P106S [TIPS]) in the 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthas
138 bis(2-(tri-isopropylsilyl)ethynyl)pentacene (TIPS-pentacene).
139 ,13-bis(triisopropylsilylethynyl) pentacene (TIPS-pentacene) from 3.33 A to 3.08 A.
140 ,13-bis(triisopropylsilylethynyl) pentacene (TIPS-Pn), without the need for chemical modifications.
141 6,13-bis(triisopropylsilylethynyl)pentacene (TIPS pentacene), 6,14-bis-(triisopropylsilylethynyl)-1,3
142 6,13(bis-triisopropylsilylethynyl)pentacene (TIPS-pentacene), a small-molecule organic semiconductor,
143 6,13-bis(triisopropylsilylethynyl)pentacene (TIPS-pentacene), including a new polymorph discovered vi
144 6,13-bis(triisopropylsilylethynyl)pentacene (TIPS-pentacene).
145 6,13-bis(triisopropylsilylethynyl)pentacene (TIPS-Pn) were studied for their potential use as photoac
146 een ultrafast singlet fission ((1*)TIPS-Pn + TIPS-Pn --> 2 (3*)TIPS-Pn) and charge transfer from (1*)
147                                         Post-TIPS OHE was more accurately predicted by CFF than by PH
148                                         Post-TIPS overt hepatic encephalopathy was present in 14 pati
149 as improving the long-term survival for post-TIPS patients.
150 ad a 100% negative predictive value for post-TIPS recurrent OHE.
151                                  Median post-TIPS patient survival was 15 months (1-109 months).
152          Aiming to decrease the rate of post-TIPS HE, the use of CFF could help selecting patients fo
153 epatic encephalopathy was predictive of post-TIPS OHE and to compare Psychometric Hepatic Encephalopa
154  predictive value (91%) for the risk of post-TIPS recurrent OHE, defined as the occurrence of three o
155            The high rate of MPV patency post-TIPS placement suggests flow reestablishment as the domi
156 difference between the first and second post-TIPS placement acquisitions (all P > .11).
157  0.8 +/- 0.2 and 0.9 +/- 0.2 at the two post-TIPS time points, respectively, while the observed ratio
158 ient with refractory ascites at the two post-TIPS time points, respectively.
159                       Cumulative 1-year post-TIPS patient survival was 50%.
160 ality and graft loss for patients with a pre-TIPS MELD of more than or equal to 15 were significantly
161 e significantly higher than those with a pre-TIPS MELD score of less than 15 (P<0.01).
162 rall median survival for patients with a pre-TIPS MELD score of more than or equal to 15 was 3 months
163                On multivariate analysis, pre-TIPS MELD was a significant and independent predictor of
164                                   Median pre-TIPS model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score was
165                               The median pre-TIPS PSG was 18 mm Hg (7-38 mm Hg).
166                           The absence of pre-TIPS history of OHE and a CFF value equal to or greater
167                                  Results Pre-TIPS demographics and clinical characteristics of the tw
168 ospective study was to determine whether pre-TIPS minimal hepatic encephalopathy was predictive of po
169  months (2-109 months) for patients with pre-TIPS MELD score of less than 15.
170  was performed on ~100 nm solution-processed TIPS-Pn:PDI blend films to characterize the charge separ
171       By tracking MT +end-binding proteins (+TIPS) in Aspergillus nidulans, we find that MTs are regu
172                                       At PVR-TIPS completion, persistence of MPV thrombus was noted i
173               We evaluated the impact of PVR-TIPS on liver function, transplant eligibility, and long
174                                      The PVR-TIPS may be considered for patients with obliterative PV
175 gery/radiology, these patients underwent PVR-TIPS to potentiate transplant eligibility.
176 e hypervalent iodine alkyne transfer reagent TIPS-ethynyl-benziodoxolone has been developed.
177 reas 88.89% of 9 patients who didn't receive TIPS procedure (2 in acute group).
178 underwent EEST and 61% of those who received TIPS.
179 102I mutation to create the highly resistant TIPS EPSPS.
180  we call this transient ion-pair separation (TIPS).
181 ms become more homogeneous across the series TIPS-Pn:PDI 1 --> 2 --> 3, charge separation becomes com
182      Required several revisions of the shunt TIPS can be performed in case of different conditions su
183 ansjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) as a treatment for BCS with diffuse occlusion of h
184 ansjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) as second-line therapeutic options.
185 ansjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) correlates with the absence of further bleeding or
186 ansjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) creation in patients with cirrhosis with Model for
187 ansjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) creation performed by using a 10-mm or an 8-mm-dia
188 ansjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) for cirrhotic portal hypertension.
189 ansjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) has been worldwide considered as a noninvasive tec
190 ansjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) in a series of patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome
191 ansjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) in patients with portal hypertension may be consid
192 ansjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) in this population are unknown.
193 ansjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is used in the management of refractory ascites (R
194 ansjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) placement.
195 ansjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) to potentiate LT.
196 ansjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) was created to facilitate the outflow from the tre
197 ansjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) with covered stents in patients receiving standard
198 ansjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS).
199 ansjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS).
200 ansjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS).
201 ular intrahepatic portosystemic stent shunt (TIPS).
202 ular intrahepatic portosystemic stent-shunt (TIPS) (8 mm; n = 90), or medical reduction of portal pre
203 sjugular intrahepatic portal-systemic shunt (TIPS) performed when bleeding is not controlled.
204 svenous intrahepatic portosystemic shunting (TIPS), and before/after yogurt treatment.
205 jugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunting (TIPS), and orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT).
206 nsjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) is a second-line treatment because of an increased
207 nsjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) to increase survival times of patients with cirrho
208 nsjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) to increase survival times of patients with cirrho
209 mportant for Tax-induced promoter silencing (TIPS).
210                                     Standard TIPS procedure was not feasible due to altered anatomy o
211 ion of one photoexcited and one ground-state TIPS-pentacene molecule.
212 ent of solution-sheared and lattice-strained TIPS-pentacene crystals.
213 ed using the criteria of 4 polypill studies (TIPS [The Indian Polycap Study], Poly-Iran, Wald, and th
214                       These findings support TIPS as the first-line intervention in such patients.
215 te, the "thermal inkjet picofluidic system" (TIPS), for analytical purposes.
216 served much higher stability of TIPS-BT than TIPS-PT when mixed with PCBM.
217 s in the 6,13 positions is longer lived than TIPS-pentacene.
218                           This suggests that TIPS could be used as a means to extend posttransplant s
219                                          The TIPS venography and serial ultrasound/MRI were used subs
220                                    After the TIPS procedure, 19 patients (35%) experienced a total of
221 splenic vein (SV), portal vein (PV), and the TIPS.
222 any days of hospitalization (35 days) as the TIPS group (17 days) (P = .04).
223          In those with resolved ascites, the TIPS-to-PV flow ratio was 0.8 +/- 0.2 and 0.9 +/- 0.2 at
224 sensitivity, and precision and evaluated the TIPS deposits as reference materials for MXRF using sing
225  by comparing multielement deposits from the TIPS with the NIST SRMs 1833 and 1832 thin film standard
226 ) was also successfully synthesized from the TIPS-protected ( S)-2-amino-2-pyridylethanol in 97% ee.
227 year) was significantly more frequent in the TIPS group (35% vs. 14%; P = 0.035), but during long-ter
228       A higher proportion of patients in the TIPS group (93%) met the primary end point than in the L
229 lightly higher proportion of patients in the TIPS group experienced adverse events, including encepha
230 cantly smaller proportion of patients in the TIPS group had rebleeding within 2 years (7%) than in th
231 e total number of paracenteses was 32 in the TIPS group vs 320 in the LVP+A group.
232  as compared to 0 of 37 (0%) patients in the TIPS group, developed variceal rebleeding (P = 0.001).
233 mplications (18% vs 0%; P = .01) than in the TIPS group.
234 raction (<10%) of the amorphous phase in the TIPS-Pn films greatly decreased the ultimate triplet dif
235 rtal-venous shunting, with draining into the TIPS.
236              The sequential evolution of the TIPS mutation endowing high-level glyphosate resistance
237                         The evolution of the TIPS mutation in crop fields under glyphosate selection
238  measured immediately after placement of the TIPS, when different circumstances can affect PPG values
239 ults showed that selective excitation of the TIPS-Pn results in competition between ultrafast singlet
240 rom the early PPG, regardless of whether the TIPS was placed using general anesthesia (8.5 +/- 3.5 mm
241 approaches, we show that kinesin-2, and the +TIPS EB1 and APC, are required for uniform dendrite micr
242                                        These TIPS-TAPs are either crystalline or amorphous, depending
243                                         This TIPS mutation recreates the biotechnology-engineered com
244                       Median time from LT to TIPS was 17 months (1-89 months).
245              Energy transfer from (3*)PDI to TIPS-Pn also yields (3*)TIPS-Pn.
246 e PPG); at least 24 hours after placement to TIPS into hemodynamically stable patients, without sedat
247 h cirrhosis and acute BEV were randomized to TIPS (n=78) or EPCS (n=76).
248 rotonation of [U(Tren(TIPS))(NH2)] (1) [Tren(TIPS) = N(CH2CH2NSiPr(i)3)3] with organoalkali metal rea
249  Reaction of [U(Tren(TIPS) )(PH2 )] (1, Tren(TIPS) =N(CH2 CH2 NSiPr(i)3 )3 ) with C6 H5 CH2 K and [U(
250         Reaction of [U(Tren(TIPS))] [1, Tren(TIPS)=N(CH2CH2NSiiPr3)3] with 0.25 equivalents of P4 rep
251 ion of [U(Tren(TIPS) )(THF)][BPh4 ] (1; Tren(TIPS) =N{CH2 CH2 NSi(iPr)3 }3 ) with NaPH2 afforded the
252 nium(VI) nitride [U(Tren(TIPS))(N)] (2, Tren(TIPS)=N(CH2CH2NSiiPr3)3) with CO gave the uranium(IV) cy
253 ) )}2 (mu-eta(2) :eta(2) -As2 H2 )] (3, Tren(TIPS) =N(CH2 CH2 NSiPr(i) 3 )3 ; Pr(i) =CH(CH3 )2 ).
254 [An(Tren(DMBS) ){Pn(SiMe3 )2 }] and [An(Tren(TIPS) ){Pn(SiMe3 )2 }] [Tren(DMBS) =N(CH2 CH2 NSiMe2 Bu(
255 n=U, Pn=P, As, Sb, Bi; An=Th, Pn=P, As; Tren(TIPS) =N(CH2 CH2 NSiPr(i)3 )3 , An=U, Pn=P, As, Sb; An=T
256 erminal parent phosphinidene complex [U(Tren(TIPS) )(PH)][K(B15C5)2 ] (4; UP=2.613(2) A).
257           Alternatively, reaction of [U(Tren(TIPS) )(PH)][Na(12C4)2 ] (5, 12C4=12-crown-4 ether) with
258                          Reaction of [U(Tren(TIPS) )(PH2 )] (1, Tren(TIPS) =N(CH2 CH2 NSiPr(i)3 )3 )
259 ck terminal parent phosphide complex [U(Tren(TIPS) )(PH2 )] (2; U-P=2.883(2) A).
260                          Reaction of [U(Tren(TIPS) )(THF)][BPh4 ] (1; Tren(TIPS) =N{CH2 CH2 NSi(iPr)3
261  NSiPr(i)3 )3 ) with C6 H5 CH2 K and [U(Tren(TIPS) )(THF)][BPh4 ] (2) afforded a rare diuranium paren
262  the diuranium mu-phosphido complex [{U(Tren(TIPS) )}(mu-P){U(Tren(DMBS) )}][Na(12C4)2 ] [7, Tren(DMB
263 HAsAsH in the diuranium(IV) complex [{U(Tren(TIPS) )}2 (mu-eta(2) :eta(2) -As2 H2 )] (3, Tren(TIPS) =
264  the diuranium mu-phosphido complex [{U(Tren(TIPS) )}2 (mu-P)][K(B15C5)2 ] (4).
265 anium parent phosphinidiide complex [{U(Tren(TIPS) )}2 (mu-PH)] (3).
266 ) afforded the imido-bridged dimers [{U(Tren(TIPS))(mu-N[H]M)}2] [M = Li-Cs (2a-e)].
267 onylation of the uranium(VI) nitride [U(Tren(TIPS))(N)] (2, Tren(TIPS)=N(CH2CH2NSiiPr3)3) with CO gav
268 ve 1 and the uranium-nitride complex [U(Tren(TIPS))(N)] (5); this reaction is a new way to prepare th
269 can be prepared directly from CO and [U(Tren(TIPS))(N)][K(B15C5)2] (7).
270  from CO and the uranium(V) nitride [{U(Tren(TIPS))(N)K}2] (6), with or without B15C5, respectively.
271 with CO gave the uranium(IV) cyanate [U(Tren(TIPS))(NCO)] (3).
272 4) and KNCO, or cyanate retention in [U(Tren(TIPS))(NCO)][K(B15C5)2] (5, B15C5=benzo-15-crown-5 ether
273 ranium terminal parent imido complex [U(Tren(TIPS))(NH)] (4) resulted in spontaneous disproportionati
274 ranium terminal parent imido complex [U(Tren(TIPS))(NH)][K(15C5)2] (3c), which can also be viewed as
275                     Deprotonation of [U(Tren(TIPS))(NH2)] (1) [Tren(TIPS) = N(CH2CH2NSiPr(i)3)3] with
276 lted in cyanate dissociation to give [U(Tren(TIPS))] (4) and KNCO, or cyanate retention in [U(Tren(TI
277                          Reaction of [U(Tren(TIPS))] [1, Tren(TIPS)=N(CH2CH2NSiiPr3)3] with 0.25 equi
278 reaction of the uranium(III) complex [U(Tren(TIPS))] with sodium azide followed by abstraction and en
279  inverted sandwich cyclo-P5 complex [{U(Tren(TIPS))}2(mu-eta(5):eta(5)-cyclo-P5)] (2).
280 terminal uranium(V) nitride complex [UN(Tren(TIPS))][Na(12-crown-4)(2)] {in which Tren(TIPS) = [N(CH(
281 en(TIPS))][Na(12-crown-4)(2)] {in which Tren(TIPS) = [N(CH(2)CH(2)NSiPr(i)(3))(3)](3-) and Pr(i) = CH
282 ethylformamide, Tf=trifluoromethanesulfonyl, TIPS=triisopropylsilyl.
283 n solutions of bis(triisopropylsilylethynyl (TIPS)) pentacene.
284 d solutions of bis(triisopropylsilylethynyl)[TIPS]--tetracene we find rapid (<100 ps) formation of ex
285  with a MELD score of 12 or less who undergo TIPS placement for refractory ascites (especially in pat
286  noncirrhotic portal hypertension undergoing TIPS in seven centers between 2000 and 2014 were retrosp
287     All patients >/= 18 years old undergoing TIPS during a hospital admission (n = 5529) without conc
288  [CI]: 57.2 years, 60.3 years) had undergone TIPS placement by using 10-mm (60 patients) or 8-mm (111
289 ients from the medical group (16%) underwent TIPS placement during follow-up evaluation, mainly for r
290                Twenty-six patients underwent TIPS.
291 ospective analysis of patients who underwent TIPS placement after LT for RA.
292 eline MELD score of 12 or less who underwent TIPS placement between September 1999 and July 2012 were
293  mortality rate of 91 patients who underwent TIPS was 6.59% (6/91), whereas 88.89% of 9 patients who
294 n 84% of the patients, 63% of whom underwent TIPS revision, which failed in 80% of the cases.
295 st per QALY, proportions of persons with VB, TIPS, and all-cause mortality.
296 y to numerous endoscopic treatments in which TIPS was considered in an attempt to decrease the risk o
297 n + beta-blocker treatment was compared with TIPS placement in 72 patients with a first or second epi
298 otic total occlusion of MPV and treated with TIPS from January 2000 to January 2010 were retrospectiv
299 y 2011, 54 consecutive patients treated with TIPS were included.
300 this study and 91 patients were treated with TIPS.

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。
 
Page Top