ライフサイエンスコーパス: TURP

コーパス検索結果 (left1)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します

1 TURP explained much of the observed increase in overall

2 TURP has declined due to medical therapy, but transcends

3 TURP is still rightly the dominant, most widely performe

4 TURP-detected cases prior to 1986 were calculated using

5 between 1986 and 1993 to determine whether a TURP occurred sufficiently close to the time of a prosta

6 e considered as a treatment option alongside TURP and medical management.

7 ally detected significant prostate cancer at TURP may have declined, whereas TURP for prostate cancer

8 ng inpatient hospitalization (range: 61% for TURP to 88% for total hip arthroplasty), and are thus mi

9 The authors identified the effect of TURP-detected prostate cancer on the observed incidence

10 The declining influence of TURP on prostate cancer incidence is likely to have cont

11 The changing role of TURP in detecting prostate cancer is attributed to chang

12 Residents are disturbingly short of TURP exposure, consequently experiencing more complicati

13 ge Survey) by estimates of the proportion of TURPs resulting in a prostate cancer diagnosis (from Med

14 f a transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) as implant candidates, may reduce urethral toxicit

15 ansurethral resection (TUR) of the prostate (TURP) has dominated symptomatic benign prostatic hyperpl

16 Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) has long been held as the gold standard for treatm

17 of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) in recent decades has had a large effect on prosta

18 f a transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) in the UK who were managed conservatively.

19 t a transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) within 2 years of implantation.

20 or transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP; trial 2) to compare four sessions with a therapist

21 We analysed recent TURP publications, with emphasis on durability, morbidit

22 ve office-based alternative to both standard TURP and medical therapy in the treatment of bladder out

23 d time to death from prostate cancer for the TURP cohort.

24 In the TURP cohort, the CCP score was the most important variab

25 ndirect method that involved multiplying the TURP procedure rate in the general population (from the

26 tices as a suitable treatment alternative to TURP and medical therapy.

27 ound its place as one of the alternatives to TURP.

28 med transurethral resection of bladder tumor-TURP seems oncologically acceptable (in selected cases);

29 te cancer at TURP may have declined, whereas TURP for prostate cancer may indicate the need for earli

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語（用法）は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。