ライフサイエンスコーパス: Teac

1 ctivity of the oils reached up to 3.00 mM/kg TEAC.

2 t was observed in both assays, PCL and alpha-TEAC.

3 xidant capacity (AOC) by using PCL and alpha-TEAC.

4 (FRAP: 10 +/- 2 and 19 +/- 3 muM FeSO4/gFW; TEAC: 10 +/- 2 and 17 +/- 3).

5 (FRAP: 24 +/- 2 and 28 +/- 3 muM FeSO4/gFW; TEAC: 18 +/- 2 and 20 +/- 1 Eq.

6 termined by UPLC and antioxidant capacity by TEAC ABTS and FRAP methods) properties of plum powders.

7 ta-carotene were the primary contributors to TEAC activity, while lutein, beta-cryptoxanthin and beta

8 o antioxidant capacities were established by TEAC and FRAP methods.

9 a stronger antioxidant activity than acai in TEAC and FRAP tests.

10 The AC was measured by TEAC and FRAP.

11 ise free radicals in different test systems (TEAC and ORAC assays), to form complexes with Fe(2+) and

12 olic content (TPC) and antioxidant capacity (TEAC and ORAC) were studied from the food quality point

13 g POD and also increasing the levels of TPC, TEAC and ORAC.

14 tion of PF and a direct relationship between TEAC and the total phenolic compounds (r(2)=0.9998) and

15 ounds, the antioxidant capacity, measured by TEAC and TOSC, also decreased.

16 th the radical scavenging capacity (DPPH and TEAC) and the ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP).

17 ing, Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity (TEAC), and the total oxidation (TOTOX) of encapsulated S

18 Highest TPC, TEAC- and FRAP values were observed in systems containin

19 Using the HPLC-UV/Vis-online-TEAC approach, distinct changes in composition and antio

20 the Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity (TEAC), as assessed by the anionic DPPH and cationic ABTS

21 nt (TPC) and the total antioxidant activity (TEAC assay and EPR spectrometry) of each cultivar were d

22 idant activity than its racemate form in the TEAC assay at all pHs, with similar values in the FRAP a

23 HF) and its racemate [6R,S] form was made by TEAC assay at different pHs, FRAP assay, and ORAC assay.

24 and DPPH assays were more suitable than the TEAC assay for predicting meat oxidation and any resulti

25 The TEAC assay of extracts ranged from 6.2 to 15.5 mmol/g ex

26 assay) and antioxidant capacities (FRAP and TEAC assay) of strawberry phenolics over time.

27 l phenolic content and antioxidant activity (TEAC assay).

28 ore sensitive to measure this parameter than TEAC assay.

29 FRAP and TEAC assays showed high correlations with total polyphen

30 t, antioxidant capacity using DPPH, FRAP and TEAC assays, and specific anthocyanins were determined u

31 ctivity than R. idaeus in the DPPH, FRAP and TEAC assays.

32 high antioxidant activity, the best value of TEAC being 2223+/-10.10muM, which means 91.1+/-0.43% oxi

33 ure through the use of different parameters (TEAC, EC50).

34 TEAC equivalence is as high as 44.1 and 47.4mmol Trolox/

35 ed to determine total phenolic compounds and TEAC, FRAP, and ORAC were applied to determine the antio

36 rolox-equivalent antioxidant capacity assay (TEAC) in the second growing season, while the growing co

37 ng to the standard chosen, by analogy to the TEAC indice (Trolox Equivalent Antioxidant Capacity) alr

38 ion for converting EC50 into TEAC values and TEAC into EC50 is presented in this paper.

39 del for converting EC50 into TEAC values and TEAC into EC50 values works properly.

40 and trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity (TEAC) levels, and catalase (CAT) and glutathione peroxid

41 +) scavenging activity ( approximately 232.3 TEAC, muM Trolox/g), whereas the ex vivo hydrolysate of

42 EC50 values of up to 0.08 mg/L or values of TEAC of 0.67 mmol Trolox/g of extract.

43 acity (DPPH) and trolox equivalent capacity (TEAC) of grape and acai pulps, with savings of time and

44 The antioxidant capacity (TEAC) of the PcF films was significantly increased by th

45 tioxidant capacity (35.8%, 29.1%, 31.9%, for TEAC, ORAC and DPPH assay, respectively) compared to unt

46 anthocyanins, and antioxidant capacity using TEAC, ORAC and DPPH method, respectively).

47 mely Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity (TEAC), reducing power (RP) and metal chelation activity

48 ield, total phenols, total phlorotannins and TEAC, respectively.

49 d antioxidant activity was assayed using the TEAC system based on the 2,2'-azinobis(3-ethylbenzothiaz

50 40min with UV-Vis spectrometry, DAD-HPLC and TEAC test.

51 rolox equivalent antioxidant capacity assay (TEAC), the 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical

52 dless of antioxidant assays (DPPH, FRAP, and TEAC) used.

53 The smallest TEAC value (1896+/-17muM), which means 75.9+/-0.7% oxida

54 system from protein isolate had the highest TEAC value and was shown to undergo single-electron tran

55 A new equation for converting EC50 into TEAC values and TEAC into EC50 is presented in this pape

56 the proposed model for converting EC50 into TEAC values and TEAC into EC50 values works properly.

57 n than recommended furthermore increased the TEAC values by 30%.

58 ] blends exhibited higher browning rates and TEAC values than corresponding [GE-GA] blends.

59 ing did however not systemically impact more TEAC values than cryo-milling.

60 ample weight at constant ABTS volume reduced TEAC values up to 50%.

61 Consequent size reduction increased TEAC values up to 90%.

62 A subsequent dehydration increased TEAC values, resistant starch content and decreased star

63 ween Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity (TEAC) values and total anthocyanins, suggesting that the

64 The trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity (TEAC) values of various (hydrophilic and lipophilic) ant

65 med the degradation of phenols; however, its TEAC was significantly (p<0.01) increased following irra

66 and Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity (TEAC) was 95.25 mM.