1 A comparison with 20 type-matched isolates showed all re
2 rt the structural analysis of CCTTTAAAGG and
a comparison with 25 other representative crystal struct
3 A comparison with 30 restriction-site polymorphisms (RSP
4 A comparison with 60 autoantibody-negative relatives sug
5 dical devices in UCTD cases were explored in
a comparison with 660 scleroderma patients who were asce
6 A comparison with a data set for phosphate-deficient pla
7 A comparison with a HECT family E3-E2 complex indicates
8 ifferent input feature selection schemes and
a comparison with a hierarchical STDP based ensemble arc
9 he thermostability of htADH are suggested by
a comparison with a homologous mesophilic enzyme (55% id
10 A comparison with a human brain microarray study reveals
11 using various statistical methods, including
a comparison with a multiple regression approach.
12 ntains a putative tRNA in the exit site, and
a comparison with a non-programmed, yeast ribosome sugge
13 A comparison with a population-based approach shows that
14 A comparison with a previous analysis of these genotypes
15 A comparison with a previous study of the yeast mitochon
16 85 typically developing children, permitting
a comparison with a previously published template of nor
17 A comparison with a pure PDMS membrane and DVB/PDMS fibe
18 A comparison with a recently determined complex containi
19 ated conformations was carried out, based on
a comparison with a set of ten native-like structures de
20 A comparison with a similar data set from the distantly
21 A comparison with a six-base-pair T tract, a bending sta
22 erformed with human serum samples, including
a comparison with a standard LC-MS/MS method using 120 s
23 A comparison with age-matched control groups revealed th
24 The NOACs were pooled to perform
a comparison with all comparators and among themselves i
25 analytical performance of the new technique,
a comparison with an atmospheric pressure chemical ioniz
26 A comparison with analogous experiments on the C[UUCG]G
27 beta3-alpha3 loop of CKI1RD was supported by
a comparison with another A. thaliana histidine kinase,
28 A comparison with another ABA-deficient mutant, aba1, re
29 A comparison with another affinity clamp structure showe
30 scribes the value of a good independently of
a comparison with another good.
31 A comparison with antibody and alphabeta TCR V domains r
32 A comparison with aptamer beacon systems indicated that
33 A comparison with Arabidopsis microarray studies on subm
34 A comparison with arXiv shows that quantitative biology
35 A comparison with assembled VP1 in the virus capsid reve
36 The simulations and
a comparison with atmospheric observations show that nea
37 approach less biologically informative than
a comparison with CA or IA.
38 one in aqueous solution, not inferable from
a comparison with calculated CCS.
39 A comparison with cAMP-dependent protein kinase suggests
40 nsplant recipients in the United States, but
a comparison with Canadian kidney transplant recipients
41 A comparison with CD161 and CCR6 indicated that analysis
42 A comparison with chromosomal DHFR indicates a number of
43 A comparison with classical "cell culture" techniques in
44 A ranking of donor abilities and
a comparison with classical bidentate ligands is as foll
45 A comparison with closed-channel data leads us to propos
46 A comparison with closely related alpha/beta hydrolase f
47 A comparison with commercial SnO2 nanoparticles confirms
48 s domain structure in solution, and provided
a comparison with controversial folded-back crystal stru
49 We evaluated the LCx assay in
a comparison with conventional culture employing modifie
50 A comparison with conventional cylindrical capillary und
51 Through
a comparison with corresponding histology and OCT images
52 A comparison with crystal structures of HiPIPs from othe
53 A comparison with current national water and sanitation
54 The discussion includes
a comparison with cyclic adducts of GSH and furan metabo
55 ing resonance Raman spectroscopy and drawing
a comparison with CYP17A1, we have found no significant
56 A comparison with cytochrome P450 indicates that the str
57 A comparison with d-amino acid oxidase (DAAO) demonstrat
58 ility of the protein-bound cluster precluded
a comparison with data from pH and temperature dependenc
59 These conclusions were usually based on
a comparison with data obtained in low-viscous organic s
60 A comparison with databases of gene orthology, conservat
61 A comparison with dynamic light scattering measurements
62 This was designed to provide
a comparison with earlier behavioural studies, in which
63 A comparison with earlier reported results for trivaline
64 alpha-synuclein and validate the results by
a comparison with electron transfer measurements.
65 A comparison with established methods indicates the new
66 In
a comparison with excitation by green (519-nm) pulses, s
67 A comparison with existing structures of the LXRbeta hom
68 A comparison with existing tools that use GO terms sugge
69 s between DNase I from different species and
a comparison with exonuclease III.
70 The last step in our validation was
a comparison with experimental values for 22 complex, mu
71 A comparison with experimentally observed base-pairs rev
72 The accuracy of our approach is examined by
a comparison with extensive experiments using thick foil
73 A comparison with findings in 243 age- and sex-matched p
74 In
a comparison with five other methods performed in four d
75 of the soybean gene expression atlas allowed
a comparison with gene expression documented in the two
76 espective biosynthetic pathway steps allowed
a comparison with glycan structural data and provides su
77 In
a comparison with healthy controls, we found striking gr
78 ines, HepG2, Hep3B, and HuH-7, and performed
a comparison with herpes simplex thymidine kinase (TK).
79 ly determined peptoid structures and provide
a comparison with high-level quantum mechanics calculati
80 A comparison with homologous lectin-like domains from th
81 A comparison with human and other ape genomes shows that
82 A comparison with human keratin 9 showed an overall nucl
83 ted scream variation, and Experiment 3 added
a comparison with human vowel sounds.
84 Additionally,
a comparison with hydrogen bond-based analogues is provi
85 In
a comparison with IFNgammaR-deficient mice, TRPM2(-/-) m
86 A comparison with immotile trypanosomes demonstrates tha
87 A comparison with independent records suggests that the
88 ition of the new human gene, HuAZ2, and make
a comparison with its antizyme 1 homologue.
89 4 regulatory elements and as discussed here,
a comparison with known basolateral sorting sequences id
90 A comparison with laboratory measurements indicates that
91 ow better environmental performance, whereas
a comparison with LCD technology indicates the environme
92 A comparison with legacy data shows the method to be acc
93 A comparison with loop positions in substrate complexes
94 A comparison with matched patients with low-grade diseas
95 When
a comparison with MMSE scores was made, (18)F-FDG signif
96 xD cluster based on cluster organization and
a comparison with noncoding and Hox gene-coding sequence
97 The intact hemifield also allows
a comparison with normal vision.
98 A comparison with Notch1 and Pax5 and Pax8 expression in
99 ate relative to the oxidized state, based on
a comparison with order parameters reported for the bovi
100 A comparison with oseltamivir alone and combination of M
101 A comparison with other algorithms and a different data
102 A comparison with other C(12)H(6) and C(12)H(8) isomers
103 method for uterine leiomyomas and to present
a comparison with other currently used methods.
104 A comparison with other domain prediction methods used i
105 A comparison with other JmjC enzymes illustrates that JM
106 A comparison with other known structures reveals that EC
107 A comparison with other known structures reveals that rh
108 A comparison with other methods in terms of coverage and
109 A comparison with other peripheral membrane proteins elu
110 include pathogen risk in LCA and facilitate
a comparison with other potential impacts on human healt
111 In
a comparison with other published estimators of pairwise
112 A comparison with other reference materials in use for t
113 A comparison with other species of TS shows that the vol
114 the effects of optical distortions and (iv)
a comparison with other standard tests.
115 A comparison with our previously determined NMR structur
116 A comparison with our radio survey of type Ibc supernova
117 A comparison with P450 EryF (CYP107A1) reveals a remarka
118 In
a comparison with patients without late diagnosis, hospi
119 A comparison with polarization-resolved SHG highlights t
120 It also provides
a comparison with previous studies using hydrodynamic st
121 On the basis of
a comparison with previously determined structures, we i
122 A comparison with previously sequenced Chlamydophila gen
123 Through
a comparison with prior complexes of intermediate struct
124 A comparison with PROBE DESIGN within the ARB software p
125 A comparison with published data revealed that three of
126 ition of hypoxanthine are revealed, allowing
a comparison with published data that describe uracil bi
127 A comparison with published in-gel staining methods show
128 A comparison with published mtDNA lineages from European
129 A comparison with recent data on the beta-amyloid fragme
130 A comparison with recent molecular dynamics simulations
131 on their properties was investigated to make
a comparison with recently published results focused on
132 The total daily intake was estimated and
a comparison with reference values was indicated.
133 into the metal activation of AntR and allow
a comparison with related DtxR proteins.
134 The assay was specific for M. leprae in
a comparison with results obtained from 14 species of my
135 In
a comparison with ritonavir-boosted atazanavir, efficacy
136 retation of mutant activities and allows for
a comparison with similar structures from the related to
137 d Xe atom is found to be quite unfavorable.)
A comparison with simulation results for the binding of
138 A comparison with SKIE for the wild-type enzyme provides
139 onfirmation of our hypothesis was sought via
a comparison with SNP data from the Maasai, an East Afri
140 A comparison with solid phase micro extraction coupled t
141 tributed oxygen sensor (DOS) was assessed by
a comparison with spot optodes.
142 A comparison with step times for elongation shows that R
143 sis of ligand PET data should always include
a comparison with structural MRI; such comparisons are g
144 A comparison with studies of dimer formation by other ph
145 A comparison with summer temperature reconstructions fro
146 A comparison with telomere uncapping caused by the absen
147 rn Ocean, Fragilariopsis cylindrus, based on
a comparison with temperate diatoms.
148 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.04, 1.41) in
a comparison with that of non-supplement users.
149 ictive value for hospital mortality and made
a comparison with the Acute Physiology and Chronic Healt
150 graminis f.sp. hordei (Blumeria), as well as
a comparison with the analysis of two powdery mildews pa
151 A comparison with the Arabidopsis genes regulating bract
152 In
a comparison with the bare planar electrode, the modifie
153 A comparison with the behavior of encapsulated derivativ
154 A comparison with the cheminformatics plug-in RDKit show
155 data between ancestral-derivative pairs and
a comparison with the chimpanzee and macaque genome supp
156 A comparison with the closely related Marburg virus show
157 s of the Anopheles gambiae receptors permits
a comparison with the corresponding Drosophila melanogas
158 A comparison with the couplings seen in related, structu
159 A comparison with the crystal structure of higher plant
160 A comparison with the crystal structure of the barnase:b
161 A comparison with the crystal structure of the receptor
162 These results and
a comparison with the dental phenotype of Ank loss-of-fu
163 lculations were carried out in order to have
a comparison with the DFT results.
164 Through
a comparison with the distribution of lipids around a si
165 diated human brain tumor cells; to allow for
a comparison with the effects of radiation on transcript
166 also tested by serum neutralization (SN) as
a comparison with the EIA test results; one serum (negat
167 A comparison with the Galanthus nivalis agglutinin/manno
168 A comparison with the genome sequence of recently isolat
169 rasterstereographic device was evaluated in
a comparison with the gold standard in motion analysis,
170 itrate reduction regulatory protein, through
a comparison with the Haemophilus influenzae genome.
171 imodal pattern of tumor development, forcing
a comparison with the human disease.
172 f the mouse FKBP65 gene (Fkbp10) and provide
a comparison with the human ortholog.
173 A comparison with the human topoisomerase I-DNA cocrysta
174 A comparison with the mechanisms documented for vertebra
175 A comparison with the membrane peroxisomal targeting sig
176 A comparison with the metastable hexagonal baseplate of
177 A comparison with the model superbase, which lacks a cav
178 A comparison with the NOESY maps evidence an excellent c
179 vian reproductive behavior is discussed, and
a comparison with the organization of VMH afferents in l
180 clonal anti-insulin antibody, thus providing
a comparison with the performance of surface plasmon res
181 A comparison with the PIG-L deacetylases led to a propos
182 A comparison with the plant vascular networks shows that
183 A comparison with the plexin B1 RBD/Rnd1 complex structu
184 morphology of the circumstellar material and
a comparison with the predictions of kinematic modelling
185 A comparison with the previously determined structure of
186 A comparison with the previously determined structures o
187 A comparison with the previously reported archaeal and e
188 The main focus is on
a comparison with the previously reported systems CH(3)Y
189 A comparison with the previously well characterized type
190 s on DNA basepairs are required to establish
a comparison with the proton-exchange data.
191 ructural, spectroscopic, and DFT studies and
a comparison with the protonated analogue [Ar'Bi(C(6)H(2
192 de an in-depth discussion of FPRP, including
a comparison with the q value, and examine the empirical
193 widely studied collagen model and to provide
a comparison with the recent high-resolution crystal str
194 A comparison with the recently determined cryo-electron
195 A comparison with the recently solved X-ray structure of
196 e, square-planar Co (2+) complexes, based on
a comparison with the results obtained in our previous s
197 A comparison with the results of other investigators ind
198 Through
a comparison with the rich body of literature regarding
199 pylacrylamide in water was also conducted as
a comparison with the SET-LRP system.
200 By
a comparison with the shock field-induced Joule heating
201 A comparison with the solution structure of the related
202 A comparison with the state-of-the-art shows reduced mem
203 A comparison with the structural and functional conseque
204 A comparison with the structurally unrelated E. coli per
205 A comparison with the structure of its mature serine pro
206 sen on the basis of previous studies or from
a comparison with the structure of P450(eryF) containing
207 A comparison with the structure of the endogenously liga
208 A comparison with the structure of the mammalian annexin
209 A comparison with the structure of the T7 RNAP initiatio
210 A comparison with the structures of other tyrosine kinas
211 A comparison with the structures of the PDZ2 and PDZ3 do
212 A comparison with the substrate-free structure reveals s
213 fficacy was mediated by glycemia regulation,
a comparison with the sulfonylurea glimepiride was done.
214 llography, and ab initio computations enable
a comparison with the ubiquitous benzoenediynes.
215 A comparison with the widely used line source approximat
216 alysis of the improved NAAAR variant allowed
a comparison with the wild-type enzyme.
217 In
a comparison with the Xenopus TR beta A promoter, we fou
218 A comparison with their classroom peers indicates a leve
219 s ab initio studies on azPro derivatives and
a comparison with their cognate Pro derivatives: 1-acety
220 impanzee-specific L1 subfamily diversity and
a comparison with their human-specific counterparts.
221 ion pattern of Arabidopsis thaliana CRTs for
a comparison with these proposed roles.
222 treated by chemotherapy and/or radiation as
a comparison with this group.
223 at gene and function levels are revealed by
a comparison with those for type 2 diabetes and inflamma
224 e in lactose-free milk was investigated, and
a comparison with two alternative chromatographic method
225 The study also includes
a comparison with two established recombination detectio
226 three-electrode configuration was tested by
a comparison with two purely transvenous two-electrode c
227 A comparison with two recently described ecotin-like gen
228 Moreover,
a comparison with two-dimensional fluorescence spectra o
229 A comparison with UniGene Mouse and Rat databases reveal
230 NOACs were pooled to perform
a comparison with vitamin K antagonists, calculating poo
231 A comparison with zebra finch Taeniopygia guttata, chick