戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。

今後説明を表示しない

[OK]

コーパス検索結果 (left1)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1                                                             A significance level of 0.05 was applied for 95% confidence i
2                                                             A significance level of 5% was used.
3  in the STATISTICAL PARAMETRIC MAPPING software package and a significance level of P < or = 0.001, uncorrected for multi
4                                                          At a significance level of P < 0.05, CGM Cho, CGM and NAWM tNAA,
5 n between the ACC cohort and both the NC and ACA cohorts at a significance level of P < 0.01.
6 n coefficients of 0.075 for liver enzyme concentrations, at a significance level of P < .05.
7  (D16S403), and 17 (D17S1301), with evidence for linkage at a significance level of P<.005.
8  analyzed in a linear and generalized linear mixed model at a significance level of 0.05 (P value).
9 set, covariates associated with 1-year overall mortality at a significance level of P < .10 constructed a multivariate Co
10 ide polymorphisms (SNPs) that were associated with NAFLD at a significance level of P < 10(-5) was examined in adults wit
11 ssary to obtain a power of 80% with concordant sib pairs at a significance level of .0001 are given, stratified by parent
12 ically estimated the sample sizes required for 80% power at a significance level of.001 and also used simulation methods
13 mputerized histomorphometry were statistically processed at a significance level of 5%.
14  using a prespecified one-sided stratified log rank test at a significance level of 0.02.
15  points, including major molecular response, were tested at a significance level of 0.0001 to adjust for multiple compari
16 tion of gamma-ray emissions above 200 megaelectron volts at a significance level of 17sigma from the globular cluster 47
17                         To adjust for multiple comparisons, a significance level of P < .01 was chosen.
18                                           Analyses included a significance level of alpha = .10 with no adjustments for m
19  of the experimental arms) with 81% power while maintaining a significance level of 2.5% in a two-sided test for each of
20  regions) match 114 of 443 experimentally determined sites (a significance level of 18 standard deviations).
21 dhood-onset SLE patients and controls were generated, using a significance level of P < 0.05 in a general linear model.
22 and Student t test were used for statistical analyses, with a significance level of .05.
23             Cox proportional hazards regression models with a significance level of 0.1 were used to build up univariate
24  endpoint was annualised relapse rate after 24 months, with a significance level of p=0.10.
25                                      A 2-tailed t test with a significance level of .05 was used for all comparisons.
26 al, the a priori power calculation used a 1-sided test with a significance level of P < .10.
27 using linear regression analysis and two-sided t tests with a significance level of .05.
28 g the split-plot analysis of variance and chi(2) tests with a significance level of 5%.
29 0.65, specificity 0.73) using one-sided binomial tests with a significance level of alpha=0.025.
30 factor was intervention type and occasion factor time, with a significance level of 0.01.

WebLSDに未収録の専門用語(用法)は "新規対訳" から投稿できます。