1 his clinical criterion was confirmed with an abdominal radiograph.

2  time was assessed by radiopaque markers and abdominal radiographs.

3 ight chest radiograph and upright and supine abdominal radiographs.

4  period (803 portable chest radiographs, 103 abdominal radiographs, 303 extremity radiographs, 223 sp

5            The report interpretations of the abdominal radiographs and CT scans were divided into nor

6                    Ultrasonography and plain abdominal radiographs are also useful, especially for pa

7                                              Abdominal radiographs are not sensitive in the evaluatio

8                                              Abdominal radiographs have high sensitivity and interobs

9 of this single test may obviate confirmatory abdominal radiographs in carefully selected patients and

10  such objects and the true accuracy of plain abdominal radiographs in the detection of retained needl

11 y lower sensitivity and the utility of plain abdominal radiographs in this setting is more debatable.

12                                           An abdominal radiograph revealed a ground glass appearance

13 l radiographic workup for urolithiasis, from abdominal radiograph to three-dimensional computed tomog

14                            Interpretation of abdominal radiographs was nonspecific in 588 (68%) of 87

15 es (E/E(0)) for the acquisition of chest and abdominal radiographs were calculated by using Monte Car