ライフサイエンスコーパス: abdominal wall

1 ical examination revealed laxity of the left abdominal wall.

2 s exteriorized as a stoma in the lower right abdominal wall.

3 ension that were not affixed to the chest or abdominal wall.

4 rmine the safe zone of entry of the anterior abdominal wall.

5 arrier was laid in between the cecum and the abdominal wall.

6 host, and then placed subcutaneously in the abdominal wall.

7 r 5-mm trocars inserted through the anterior abdominal wall.

8 ion and prominent vascular markings over his abdominal wall.

9 ing smooth muscle of adjacent viscera or the abdominal wall.

10 ments that displaced the colon away from the abdominal wall.

11 ntreated cultures or in fibroblasts from the abdominal wall.

12 ot deformity, and congenital weakness of the abdominal wall.

13 r and seems as a safe option to preserve the abdominal wall.

14 the diaphragm and protrusion of the anterior abdominal wall.

15 at a lower force compared with nonherniated abdominal walls.

16 (17%), mesentery (14%), adrenal gland (8%), abdominal wall (8%), colon (6%), stomach (3%), and gallb

17 We report on a patient with an abdominal wall abscess that developed after an inguinal

18 or pediatric transplantation, closure of the abdominal wall after liver transplantation is occasional

19 analysis from abdominal tissue including the abdominal wall after removal of the major organs, of wil

20 Immediate revascularization of the abdominal wall allograft substantially reduces cold isch

21 We describe our initial experience with abdominal wall allotransplantation to facilitate abdomin

22 them from skin fibroblasts derived from the abdominal wall and from the pretibium.

23 schisis, a severe disruption of the anterior abdominal wall and herniation of the abdominal organs.

24 architecture of a patent airway conduit and abdominal wall and internal intercostal muscles providin

25 Infection within the abdominal wall and peritonitis are still important cause

26 l differential diagnosis of abnormalities of abdominal wall and urinary system, consideration of urac

27 of analgesia to the parietal peritoneum and abdominal wall, and are best used combined with oral or

28 rome type 1 that includes dental, ocular and abdominal wall anomalies as cardinal features.

29 g repair of large or recurrent hernia of the abdominal wall are at risk for early postoperative hyper

30 f the open abdomen and reconstruction of the abdominal wall are being developed from negative pressur

31 to M. smegmatis, was isolated both from the abdominal wall aspirate and from surgically drained mate

32 ted that hernia formation is associated with abdominal wall atrophy and fibrosis after 5 weeks in an

33 More important, the skin of the transplanted abdominal wall (AW) may serve as an immunological tool f

34 of labeled terminal profiles per area of the abdominal wall, axial, and pelvic floor motoneuron pool

35 motoneuron pools that supply muscles of the abdominal wall, axial, and pelvic floor.

36 patients (1.3%) with flank lesions (lateral abdominal wall below the rib cage, above the iliac crest

37 Trauma to abdominal wall blood vessels occurs in 0.2% to 2% of lap

38 niorrhaphy more completely reverses atrophic abdominal wall changes than primary herniorrhaphy, despi

39 modeling of conduit vessels arising from the abdominal wall circulation.

40 nt, EphB2/EphB3 are shown to mediate ventral abdominal wall closure by acting principally as ligands

41 ions for intestinal transplant patients with abdominal wall closure either primarily or with foreign

42 Primary abdominal wall closure following small bowel transplanta

43 Primary abdominal wall closure was achieved in all.

44 ominal compartment syndrome during attempted abdominal wall closure, and need to reassess extent of b

45 ion leads to visceral edema often precluding abdominal wall closure.

46 Incisional hernias complicate 11% of abdominal wall closures, resulting in 200,000 incisional

47 Overall, abdominal wall complaints decreased from 82% to 13% of t

48 tion, and fatigue), and questions addressing abdominal wall complaints.

49 become fibrotic during herniation, reducing abdominal wall compliance and increasing the transfer of

50 e length and tension relationships and total abdominal wall compliance.

51 ions, whereas BMI was a risk factor only for abdominal wall complications; BSA did not reach signific

52 Transplantation of an abdominal wall composite allograft can facilitate recons

53 We undertook nine cadaveric abdominal wall composite allograft transplants in eight

54 ake of the 99mTc bone tracer in the anterior abdominal wall confined to the sites of subcutaneous hep

55 Analyses of abdominal wall connective tissue thickness and peritonea

56 Restoring abdominal wall cover and contour in children undergoing

57 There was a membrane covered, midline, abdominal wall defect at the base of the umbilical cord

58 Absorbable mesh provides effective temporary abdominal wall defect coverage with a low fistula rate.

59 ular pedicle to reconstruct a full-thickness abdominal wall defect in the same mouse.

60 Patients with enteric fistulas and an abdominal wall defect present an extreme challenge to su

61 years, a mean BMI of 24.4 kg/m2, and a mean abdominal wall defect size of 247.9 cm2.

62 ed neonates with gastroschisis, a congenital abdominal wall defect that leads to exposure of the feta

63 Full-thickness abdominal wall defect was reconstructed using this engin

64 Survival for newborns with congenital abdominal wall defects (primarily omphalocele and gastro

65 Abdominal wall defects comprising both gastroschisis and

66 Our management scheme for giant abdominal wall defects consists of 3 stages: stage I, ab

67 Outcomes of abdominal wall defects have been discussed more often in

68 re intestinal atresia in 28 (54.9%) studies, abdominal wall defects in 27 (52.9%), anorectal malforma

69 Complex or recurrent abdominal wall defects may be the result of a failed pri

70 tion with anterior diaphragmatic and ventral abdominal wall defects suggestive of thoraco-abdominal v

71 ient selection, NPWT may leave patients with abdominal wall defects that require further treatment.

72 The staged management of patients with giant abdominal wall defects without the use of permanent mesh

73 valence of neural tube defects, oral clefts, abdominal wall defects, and chromosomal anomalies in Haw

74 ), which causes prenatal overgrowth, midline abdominal wall defects, macroglossia, and embryonal tumo

75 terized by somatic overgrowth, macroglossia, abdominal wall defects, visceromegaly, and an increased

76 ngs regarding outcomes and interventions for abdominal wall defects.

77 ntestinal transplant recipients with complex abdominal wall defects.

78 ment of patients with open abdomen and giant abdominal wall defects.

79 s including overgrowth, enlarged tongue, and abdominal wall defects.

80 repair in contaminated fields and for large abdominal wall defects; however, more studies need to be

81 methylation of LIT1 in patients with midline abdominal-wall defects and macrosomia was significantly

82 osomia, ear pits or ear creases, and midline abdominal-wall defects.

83 Patients with unilateral abdominal wall deficiency, unilateral undescended testis

84 Mesh-repaired abdominal walls demonstrated a trend toward an intermedi

85 The formation of the abdominal wall depends on a flawless merge of several de

86 at an angle of 20 degrees from the anterior abdominal wall, directed at the substernal space.

87 te bladder irritation, dramatic increases in abdominal wall EMG activity in response to CRD were obse

88 to 40 cm H2O produced no notable changes in abdominal wall EMG activity.

89 genital anomaly (aOR 5.17, 95% CI 1.9-14.1), abdominal wall erythema or discolouration at presentatio

90 me surrounding the needle; 3) imaging of rat abdominal wall explants, with and without needle rotatio

91 The internal oblique muscles of the abdominal wall express a pattern of changes consistent w

92 Common locations of the abscess are in the abdominal wall followed by the intra-abdominal cavity, u

93 nsertion of a Bardport subcutaneously in the abdominal wall for intraperitoneal therapy.

94 art from an increased mean time to close the abdominal wall for mesh-augmented reinforcement compared

95 The aim of the study was to examine abdominal wall function in patients undergoing abdominal

96 The literature on abdominal wall function in patients with incisional hern

97 e survived, five of whom have intact, viable abdominal wall grafts.

98 arynx, vascularized knee, trachea, face, and abdominal wall has been performed.

99 Abdominal wall hernia is one of the most common conditio

100 inguinal hernia repair (PFS, 15.5-22.1), and abdominal wall hernia repair (PFS, 21.6-26.1).

101 Rising rates of abdominal wall hernia repair have been described; howeve

102 esh-related complications following elective abdominal wall hernia repair in a population with comple

103 and risk-adjusted adverse event rates after abdominal wall hernia repair was determined.

104 2005-2009), 71,054 patients who underwent an abdominal wall hernia repair were identified (17% laparo

105 biological mesh materials used to reinforce abdominal wall hernia repair.

106 materials are increasingly used to reinforce abdominal wall hernia repairs.

107 erative CT and who had surgically proved non-abdominal wall hernia small-bowel obstruction (n=68) or

108 biological mesh materials for the repair of abdominal wall hernia.

109 ons frequently complicate surgical repair of abdominal wall hernia.

110 ion without surgery for bowel obstruction or abdominal-wall hernia (14.2% vs. 8.1%, P<0.001).

111 ntaining tissues or organs (i.e., diaphragm, abdominal wall, ileum, and rectum).

112 olon cancer may result in the development of abdominal wall implants because of disseminated disease

113 transplant recipients--one to buttress a lax abdominal wall in a 22-month-old child with megacystis m

114 The absence of Pitx2 leads to an open abdominal wall in mice, while mutations in humans result

115 cted biopsies from human limb allografts and abdominal walls in various stages of rejection for histo

116 cted biopsies from human limb allografts and abdominal walls in various stages of rejection for histo

117 We sought to reduce the high incidence of abdominal wall incisional hernias using sustained releas

118 eported to improve outcomes in the repair of abdominal wall incisional hernias.

119 s frequently used to reinforce the repair of abdominal wall incisional hernias.

120 As well as postoperative changes in the abdominal wall, increased vigilance for groin hernia see

121 omplications in 25 patients (18.5%) included abdominal wall infection (n = 9), fascial dehiscence (n

122 an be significant but are usually limited to abdominal wall infection and hernia.

123 ulature related to birth defects and loss of abdominal wall integrity from multiple surgeries.

124 ntercostal nerve endings at the level of the abdominal wall is an effective surgical procedure for pa

125 y mesh augmentation is a method in which the abdominal wall is strengthened to reduce incisional hern

126 h a Mediport implanted subcutaneously in the abdominal wall is used currently for treatment of perito

127 undescended testis and female neonates with abdominal wall laxity are classified as Pseudo Prune Bel

128 a whirl of blood vessels seen along anterior abdominal wall leading to these lesions suggesting torsi

129 oids, but surgery alone is curative for most abdominal wall lesions.

130 Recurrences appear as a new or enlarging abdominal wall mass, often involving subjacent omental f

131 nt of the viscera within an unyielding stiff abdominal wall may compromise the perfusion of the intes

132 surgical solution to the problem of infected abdominal wall mesh.

133 simultaneously measured (i) chest and upper abdominal wall motion using opto-electronic plethysmogra

134 result of hemorrhagic shock were seen in the abdominal wall muscle and the stomach as assessed by gas

135 air and mesh design should take into account abdominal wall muscle length and tension relationships a

136 e slowly than the bowel, but faster than the abdominal wall muscle pH, gastric PCO2 gap, or pHi.

137 ude and rapidity compared with stomach pH or abdominal wall muscle pH.

138 A 1 x 1 cm of abdominal wall muscle was excised directly over the ceca

139 h, the submucosa of the small bowel, and the abdominal wall muscle.

140 l undescended testis and absence of anterior abdominal wall muscles.

141 ional hernia specifically improved long-term abdominal wall muscular function and quality of life.

142 ly syndrome (PBS) and whether the absence of abdominal wall musculature impairs exercise performance

143 scles of the body wall (intercostal muscles, abdominal wall musculature).

144 chronic incisional hernias or acute anterior abdominal wall myofascial defects.

145 The purpose of this study is to measure abdominal wall myopathic histologic and mechanical chang

146 = 34), breast (n = 3), chest wall (n = 18), abdominal wall (n = 1), and perineal (n = 7).

147 One placement was unsuccessful (abdominal wall not breached), two patients were ultimate

148 A ventral hernia, surgically created in the abdominal wall of female swine, was repaired using silic

149 A silicone patch was secured to the lateral abdominal wall of groups of C57BL/6 mice, followed by ce

150 affixed to the serosal side of the anterior abdominal wall of rats, and solutions containing radiola

151 as minimized by remotely revascularizing the abdominal wall on the forearm vessels, synchronous to th

152 t is unknown whether this is specific to the abdominal wall or due to an improvement in overall physi

153 ith Gardner's syndrome, usually occur in the abdominal wall or intra-abdominally.

154 es does not limit solute transfer across the abdominal wall peritoneum during dialysis.

155 antrum connected to a neurostimulator in an abdominal wall pocket.

156 stinal, foregut, hepatopancreaticobiliary vs abdominal wall procedure), and complexity (eg, adhesions

157 93 mL; P < .001 vs basal value) and anterior abdominal wall protrusion (32 +/- 3 mm increase in girth

158 osterior component separation via TAR during abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR) continues to gain po

159 dominal wall function in patients undergoing abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR) for incisional herni

160 Patients undergoing abdominal wall reconstruction for 106 recurrent or compl

161 rithm based on defect analysis and location, abdominal wall reconstruction has been achieved in 92% o

162 Complex abdominal wall reconstruction has witnessed tremendous s

163 esh and scarred fascia followed by immediate abdominal wall reconstruction using bilateral sliding re

164 , to date, 73 of the 120 have had definitive abdominal wall reconstruction using the modified compone

165 Abdominal wall reconstruction with ADA biologic mesh pro

166 One-stage abdominal wall reconstruction with enteric fistula taked

167 he patient ultimately survived and underwent abdominal wall reconstruction with mesh.

168 old poly-4-hydroxybutyrate (P4HB) in complex abdominal wall reconstruction.

169 ue is the procedure of choice for definitive abdominal wall reconstruction.

170 mpassing acute management through definitive abdominal wall reconstruction.

171 nt, broad-spectrum antibiotics, and eventual abdominal wall reconstruction.

172 al options are available perioperatively for abdominal wall reconstruction.

173 ated with porcine cadaveric mesh for complex abdominal wall reconstructions.

174 Three patients had proven abdominal wall rejection, all treated successfully.

175 One in 8 patients undergoing abdominal wall repair suffer inadvertent enterotomy foll

176 ive data of all patients undergoing elective abdominal wall repair were included in a prospective coh

177 nterotomies and long-lasting adhesiolysis in abdominal wall repair.

178 A cohort of 133 abdominal wall repairs was analyzed.

179 The hernia group developed lateral abdominal wall shortening and oblique muscle atrophy.

180 Unrepaired abdominal walls significantly demonstrated greater stiff

181 tion, and the myosin/actin ratio in limb and abdominal wall skeletal muscle of prolonged critically i

182 Both limb and abdominal wall skeletal muscles of prolonged critically

183 Intact abdominal wall strips were cut perpendicular to the woun

184 o which the developmental network leading to abdominal wall syndromes can be built.

185 basic scientific underpinning to understand abdominal wall syndromes.

186 pisode of acute rejection of the skin of the abdominal wall that resolved with corticosteroid therapy

187 nce interval [CI]: 1.03, 1.21; P = .006) and abdominal wall thickness (odds ratio, 2.50; 95% CI: 1.32

188 Northern blot analysis of abdominal wall tissue showed that five of six talc-treat

189 rt experiments with a chamber affixed to the abdominal wall to determine mass transfer coefficients o

190 surface of the rat cecum, liver, stomach, or abdominal wall to measure the in vivo bidirectional mass

191 Abdominal wall transplantation (AWTX) has revolutionized

192 Although abdominal wall transplantation was reported 10 years ago

193 report six cases of combined small bowel and abdominal wall transplantation where the ischemic time w

194 r outcomes following combined intestinal and abdominal wall transplantation, focusing on the presenta

195 have performed five combined intestinal and abdominal wall transplants to date.

196 The presence of an abdominal wall tumor recurrence affected patient care in

197 Demonstration of abdominal wall tumor recurrence affects patient care.

198 t the effects of laparoscopic procedures and abdominal wall tumor recurrence.

199 Abdominal wall tumors had the best outcome (5-year local

200 h a control group of patients with an intact abdominal wall undergoing colorectal resection (n = 18).

201 tion and treatment of acute rejection of the abdominal wall vascularized composite allograft (VCA).

202 ction, and propose that while the skin of an abdominal wall VCA may reject independently of the intes

203 Both superficial and deep abdominal wall vessels are at risk.

204 en the visceral transplant was complete, the abdominal wall was removed from the forearm and revascul

205 Fourteen patients (11.6%) had abdominal wall weakness or hernias.

206 Augmentation of the abdominal wall with a retro-muscular lightweight polypro

207 Prophylactic augmentation of the abdominal wall with a retromuscular lightweight polyprop

208 al pancreatic tissue subcutaneously into the abdominal wall without immunosuppression.

209 al pancreatic tissue subcutaneously into the abdominal wall without immunosuppression.

210 clustered small-bowel loops adjacent to the abdominal wall without overlying omental fat and central

211 s (median >10 units), inability to close the abdominal wall without tension, development of abdominal