ライフサイエンスコーパス: abnormal finding

1 pendix (>7 mm in diameter) was considered an abnormal finding.

2 year of a screening pelvic examination with abnormal findings.

3 stratified indications based on the yield of abnormal findings.

4 d brain CT (not shown) showed the absence of abnormal findings.

5 Ninety-six percent of the scans had abnormal findings.

6 Only 1 of 69 positive FCL did not accompany abnormal findings.

7 pecific pathologic parameters for women with abnormal findings.

8 chest radiography performed, 12 (70.6%) had abnormal findings.

9 low-up is necessary in cases with borderline abnormal findings.

10 prior neurologic involvement was related to abnormal findings.

11 ry test and complete blood count revealed no abnormal findings.

12 Of the 18% demonstrating incidental abnormal findings, 15.1% required no referral; 1.8%, rou

13 Pathologic murmur had the highest yield of abnormal findings (40%).

14 Age was a significant predictor of an abnormal finding after adjusting for indication and site

15 ent malapposition has been reported to be an abnormal finding after vascular brachytherapy and, possi

16 In MS, DTI abnormal findings along tracts correlated with quantitat

17 c health record repository for patients with abnormal findings and lack of associated follow-up actio

18 to communicate important, but not emergent, abnormal findings and recommended follow-up to two commu

19 Patients with possible abnormal findings are scheduled for a face-to-face exami

20 0-8) by assigning the following weights for abnormal findings: arterio-alveolar gradient, 3 points;

21 by using available technology in women with abnormal findings at conventional breast imaging who und

22 performed in 13 patients with hematuria and abnormal findings at conventional cystoscopy.

23 represented false-positive findings, with no abnormal findings at endoscopy.

24 -six of 27 patients with clinical stroke had abnormal findings at imaging, but even if patients with

25 ut clinical stroke), and 49% (78 of 158) had abnormal findings at MR angiography.

26 Ten (8.0%) patients were judged to have abnormal findings by using the duplex Doppler US and STO

27 ant on both PET and conventional imaging for abnormal findings compatible with metastatic disease.

28 The criteria for abnormal findings compatible with the diagnosis of APN w

29 1030 (86%) of 1192 subjects had at least one abnormal finding described in the whole-body CT screenin

30 s, 34.0% (95% CI, 24.7%-43.3%) had 1 or more abnormal findings during the vision screening, and 8% (9

31 out disease, the high specificity of certain abnormal findings greatly increases the probability of b

32 or early infarction (group B, n = 35), or no abnormal findings (group C, n = 13).

33 metabolic monitoring, and quick response to abnormal findings has resulted in remarkably low recipie

34 Odds of an abnormal finding in an A or M TTE were 6 times that of R

35 ment was accessed in 76 instances (75%) with abnormal findings in 23.

36 Abnormal findings in individual patients, suggestive of

37 definite for DSD on CT (grades 3-4), 11 had abnormal findings in the cervical spine, 16 in the thora

38 Of the 150 patients, 63 (42.0%) had no abnormal findings in the spine on PET (grade 0), 27 (18.

39 however, was not spatially specific because abnormal findings in WM tracts also related to cortical

40 These abnormal findings included an FVC < 80% of predicted in

41 The abnormal findings included focal lesions in the basal ga

42 ed motor assessments that indicate congruent abnormal findings indicative of cerebral palsy.

43 Because not every abnormal finding may require treatment, the terms abnorm

44 of an ANN with radiologists' descriptions of abnormal findings may improve interpretation of mammogra

45 t recommendation for chest CT to evaluate an abnormal finding on an outpatient chest radiographic exa

46 es at base line that were associated with an abnormal finding on CT of the head were an age of at lea

47 evere and extensive CAD had neither of these abnormal findings on adenosine MPS.

48 Eight of 10 cancer survivors had abnormal findings on brain, heart, and bone images, incl

49 Both patients had abnormal findings on chest radiographs.

50 Abnormal findings on CMR (hazard ratio, 2.77 [95% CI, 1.

51 d to identify those who are unlikely to have abnormal findings on CT of the head.

52 The prevalence of abnormal findings on cytopathological examination of vag

53 cts who underwent prostate biopsy because of abnormal findings on digital rectal examination or eleva

54 While being studied, patients with abnormal findings on dilated ophthalmoscopy and OCT comp

55 servational study, the clinical relevance of abnormal findings on early brain imaging after MTBI is d

56 servational study, the clinical relevance of abnormal findings on early brain imaging after MTBI is d

57 Specific abnormal findings on electronic monitoring of the fetal

58 LCO or FVC on the second set of PFTs and had abnormal findings on followup BAL fluid analysis.

59 independent clinical predictors of important abnormal findings on head CT were identified: age (adjus

60 and hybrid imaging, diagnostically relevant abnormal findings on higher-quality CT studies have been

61 he incidence of neoplasia in persons with no abnormal findings on initial examination are limited.

62 ported gastrointestinal side effects and had abnormal findings on LFTs.

63 establish the frequency and significance of abnormal findings on low-amperage-CT cardiac SPECT/CT sc

64 rubinemia (17 percent) had "questionable" or abnormal findings on neurologic examination, as compared

65 luation; 60 percent (15 of 25) of those with abnormal findings on physical examination that were cons

66 y 4 of 30 patients (13%) with metastasis had abnormal findings on simultaneous liver function tests.

67 Prevalence of abnormal findings on systemic testing.

68 The most common abnormal findings on the chest CT scan were pulmonary no

69 cal correlates and diagnostic specificity of abnormal findings on the neurological examination in fir

70 ndings provide neurobiological validation of abnormal findings on the neurological examination.

71 Potentially significant abnormal findings on the nondiagnostic-CT portion of the

72 tion control personnel for identification of abnormal findings prior to distribution.

73 Positive findings included abnormal findings related to malignant lesions (suspecte

74 region, and small bronchi and bronchioles), abnormal findings (reticulation, tiny nodules, altered a

75 All abnormal findings revealed by these neuroimaging techniq

76 at VLST in DES and BMS had a wide variety of abnormal findings, such as neoatherosclerosis, uncovered

77 le aspiration, suspected enlarging mass, and abnormal findings suggesting metastasis on a diagnostic

78 ical adaptations in athletes from distinctly abnormal findings suggestive of underlying pathology.

79 fy prospectively marked benign-appearing and abnormal findings that were seen on only one standard pr

80 ases were identified as those with normal or abnormal findings, the latter being a case that required

81 Of 10,673 patients with abnormal findings, the trigger flagged 1,256 patients (1

82 er per number of screening examinations with abnormal findings was 3% (three of 88) for mammography a

83 At least 1 of the 3 abnormal findings was identified by pulmonary tests in 3

84 Abnormal findings were appendicitis (n=13), urinary trac

85 Abnormal findings were cholelithiasis (n=3), obstructive

86 Abnormal findings were corroborated by a fellowship-trai

87 Abnormal findings were more common in patients <1 year o

88 Abnormal findings were noted in 36.8% of patients and th

89 Abnormal findings were observed in 5 of 72 patients (7%)

90 nt video capsule endoscopy (VCE) and typical abnormal findings were observed in all patients.

91 The detected abnormal findings were recorded as being in the region a

92 Patients with abnormal findings were reexamined at intervals ranging f

93 Overall, Cirrus significantly displayed abnormal findings while both Stratus and Spectralis disp

94 is OCT showed a significantly higher rate of abnormal findings while Cirrus displayed normal results

95 Colposcopy showed no abnormal findings with either tampon and no changes in v